Re: Reply: [rti4empowerment] Re: Poll results for rti4empowerment

Dear Mr WEDS

1) On what basis did you apply directly in RTI to Mr Veerappa Moily ?.
2) On what basis did you file a FA to PM ?

It is people like you who don't even possess a copy of RTI Act
(5.4/5.5) or have the brains to understand it to apply it who are
screwing up the scene for genuine citizen applicants.

Contaminants like you should be removed from responsible RTI groups as
soon as possible. List owner kindly take action under RUP.

Sarbajit

DSouza Wilberious Evanglist wrote:
> Dear Dr Sharma,
>
> About the dilution of RTI, you will soon come to know.
>
> If you have specific information do let me know. If it was about former CJI KG
> Balakrishnan's recommendations to include judges in section 8 of RTI, I obtained
> copies of those letters & wrote to PM that KGB' s decision is repugnant to the
> Constitution of india & Judges cannot be preferentially treated as they are
> Public Servants. Independence of Judiciary does not connote immunity to judges.
> It only connotes that the process of adjudication does not become influenced.
>
> However, my RTI application addressed to Veerappa Moily (Section 5(4&5)) did not
> elicit any reply. Appealed PM as FAA - no disposal. PM did not reply in another
> issue- appealed to Prez- no reply.
>
> I did not have time to pursue further as approach to Central Information
> Commission or any other Information Commission is futile.
>
> Regards,
> WEDS