Re: [HumJanenge] UNITY and Unification in RTI movement

Dear Dr Sharma

 

Wajahat would not have delivered the judgement that he delivered in agarwal's case without the blessing of his godmother. With the kind of orders he had been delivering even in very very minor case (for example in my case against the national consumer disputes redressal commission!), one just cannot attibute any sense of logic or fairness to him. Even coming to the agarwal case, do you think that it is such a great case as far as the RTI Act is itself is concerned. At the cost fo reptition, even a fifith standard student after reading the RTI act would have said the same thing but much more fairly than wajahat. And now that the letter of KGB to the PM is out we know that what KGB did is outright treason for which he should have been impeached instead of being given another luxurious office!

 

regards n bw

 

ravi 

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Dr. Jagnarain Sharma <dr.jagnarainsharma@gmail.com> wrote:

DEAR RAVI TO COMMENT
           My comment for Mr. Wazahat  are that he can not be a
traitor , though he never did any help to me personally, but he took
up the case of Subhash Agarwal against  SC / HC Judges.
         As regards appointment  as CCIC OR CIC from amongst the
bureaucrats & Judges, I agree with Ravi, that  majority of them will
never deliver the goods in favour of common man using RTI.
          Dr JN Sharma

On 12/15/10, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Ravi
>
> I think you are badly misinformed. Mr. Tiwari should be placed very
> high on the list of heroes of RTI. It is Mr. Wajahat Habibullah who
> should head the list of RTI "traitors" with Mr. Shailesh Gandhi coming
> a very close second.
>
> For your information I am attaching an article of Mr Tiwari published
> in 2004. Please read it.
>
> I concede that Mr Tiwari was not very popular among RTI activists.
> This is because honest, forthright and upright people are not very
> well like by the weaklings, fools and corrupt. There was a systematic
> campaign against Mr Tiwari organised by NGOs like the NCPRI who had
> the free run of Mr Habibullah's office for their misuse.
>
> After Mr Tiwari's brief innings as CIC, I am happy top observe that
> the perception of him has changed. He has played a crucial role as
> night watchman, and it is hoped that IC-SM carries on in setting RTI's
> houses in order.
>
> Sarbajit
>
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Ravindran P M <pmravindran@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> A N Tiwariji? He is the first on the list of the traitors! The rti act has
>> been put on ventilator by the info commissioners and judges.
>>
>> regards n bw
>>
>> ravi
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 6:43 PM, sroy 1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> To all members
>>>
>>> I am grateful to this group's owner "PMK" for taking swift action
>>> against disruptive members. I hope he continues without need for
>>> further reminders / complaints.
>>>
>>> The need of the hour is unity among active concerned citizens.
>>> Constantly focusing on personality based issues cannot lead to
>>> anything meaningful or constructive. At the same time it is also
>>> necessary to send a powerful message that people of India are not
>>> fools and wont tolerate inefficiency, corruption and deceit by public
>>> servants.
>>>
>>> We must strictly focus on the root causes of the problems that ail RTI
>>> movement..Let me list  the one I see as the biggest problem, (members
>>> are urged to contribute their own to this list).
>>>
>>> 1) The prime problem is that RTI movement is riddled with Mir Jafars
>>> (or traitors to RTI cause). These quislings who masquerade as
>>> saints/leaders of RTI are exclusively former govt servants with dodgy
>>> records/facing corruption charges who resigned or were forced out of
>>> service. The list of these people is so long, and their command of
>>> English language and misuse of RTI groups and media so good, that CIC
>>> A.N.Tiwariji identified this group of 'haramis' as the biggest threat
>>> to the RTI movement.
>>>
>>> Sarbajit
>>
>>
>