Re: [HumJanenge] UNITY and Unification in RTI movement

After raking a sensitive issue, Mr Rajeshwar goes into hibernation for many days. This is being dealt with insensitivity and casually by Mr. Rao.  He should either disclose the list or admit that no such list is in his possession.

---

From: RTI AP <rtiap2005@gmail.com>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tue, 14 December, 2010 8:45:08 PM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] UNITY and Unification in RTI movement

Dear all,

Its good to see you all giving your reactions on implementation of RTI. As a convener of a active Civil society organisation Social audit council on information Right (SACIR)  from Hyderabad, A.P at the national level I would be happy to share my view .After conducting independent RTI implementation review meetings for the past five years  with several organisations from the village level up to the city level and with all stake holders of RTI act, particularly by organizing two mass awareness campaigns at the state level in all districts of A.P, I feel every activist should concentrate on up dating the records under section 41(b) of RTI act in every public authority. 

                           Section 41b is the heart of the RTI act2005 which will up date the information with insides of every public authority and readily kept open to all.If it is achieved, the reason for our agony being non accountability and corruption in governance at different levels can be addressed. Let us prepare our selves to strengthen the systems so as to get good governance.Let us start at some point to make success stories by filing applications questioning whether public authorities are maintaining the 17 manual columns under  the section 41b.With out putting first step we can not travel a long way to achieve our goals.So let us all start the campaign from individual level by filing applications asking about section 41b.

                            AP information commission have successfully produced four annual reports so far which is possible with the efforts from civil society activists working for the last five years constantly.Unless you ask nothing is available.   

V.V.RAO

Convener SACIR

09849064309

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 7:08 PM, bimal khemani <bimal.khemani@yahoo.co.in> wrote:

Dear Rajeswar I requested to share the list with me. If it is true that why you do not want to share it Bimal Khemani RTI activist ALIGARH-202001 INDIA Mob:935-972-4625 --- On Sun, 12/12/10, Ravindran P M <pmravindran@gmail.com> wrote: From: Ravindran P M <pmravindran@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] UNITY and Unification in RTI movement To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com Date: Sunday, 12 December, 2010, 10:06 PM Many on this or other forums have sought this info. Please post it to these groups or to me on my personal id.   regards n bw   ravi On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:48 PM, young cyber indians <cyberyouth@tightmail.com> wrote: Dear Friends Many of National RTI Forum working committee members are on list of suspected maoist / terrorist affiliated RTI activists whose phone and internet were tapped which was obtained by AID under RTI. If any member wants the list of such persons they can send me email. K Rajeshwar Rao. On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Mr. Varkey > > Your answer is quite evidently contained within your question. So who > am I to disagree with the view of any Hon'ble Court? > > On a larger note, there are many unanswered questions about the bonafides > of these 2 Thakurs and the self-serving NGOs they have set up. for instance > the so-called nationl RTI forum is set up as a trust with only themselves as > Trustees. The office-bearers are packed with persons belonging to certain > communities etc etc.. There are many unanswered questions about > Dr Nutan Thakur circulated on other RTI groups which she had failed to > answer comprehensively. > > Sarbajit > > On 12/9/10, Baby Varkey <babyjohn.varkey@gmail.com> wrote: >> Dear Mr Sarbajit Roy >> >> On another RTI group an IPS officer (Amitav Thakur) and his wife from >> National RTI forum have  written that Lucknow High Court has dismissed their >> writ petition seeking an enquiry into corrupt judges of UP which Hon'ble >> Supreme Court had commented adversely upon. It appears that >> Hon'ble Lucknow bench characterised the petitioner Nutan Thakur as cheap >> publicity seekers. >> >> Your valued comments please >> >> B. Varkey (Adv.) >> > ------------------------------------------------- This message sent via VFEmail.net http://www.vfemail.net $14.95 Lifetime accounts!  15GB disk!  No bandwidth quotas!