To
India Against Corruption
CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA NEED TO SHOW RESTRAINT IN HIS OBSERVATIONS
In open court, Chief Justice of India has accused central government of bringing the entire judiciary to a "grinding halt" by sitting on the recommendations of the collegium for appointment and transfer of judges to high courts across the country. It is disturbing that he went to the extent of saying that the court would not shy away from a confrontation with the government, if driven to a corner. He made such remarks even when the Attorney General assured that the issue would be taken up at the highest level.
Even while the Chief Justice made such sharp remarks, the law minister has said that appointment of number of judges would be finalized very soon. Is Chief Justice not aware of this?
The collegium issue has been under discussions for quite sometime now and many have questioned the judges themselves appointing the judges , when several judges at various levels have been caught in corruption scandals with one former Chief Justice of India himself being one of the accused.
Government stand appears to be that there must be proper procedure and transparency in selection of judges. There is nothing wrong with this view.
Chief Justice rejects the government's view and insists that he should have the final say. This stand of the Chief Justice is the origin of the confrontation.
It would have been appropriate if Chief Justice has read the mood of the people, who are increasingly not sure about the caliber of some of the judges.
Reflecting such public mood , he should accept the need for a level of transparency in the appointment of judges. Threat of confrontation by Chief Justice is not in tune with the functioning of the judiciary.
N.S.Venkataraman
Nandini Voice for The Deprived
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net "
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists "
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Friday, August 26, 2016
Re: [IAC#RG] CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA NEED TO SHOW RESTRAINT IN HIS OBSERVATIONS
Dear Shri NS Venkatraman
In a democracy if everyone takes the law in their hands it would be chaos. We have trust in the SC much more than what we have for the politicians and the legislatures. Even though the functioning of the courts are like too many procedures and too many fees not conducive to speedy justice. The Nirbhaya case convicts are a case in point why is the convict not given the sentences they were awarded. The essence of justice is lost some where in these delays.
Someone somewhere has to trust the pillars of the constitution somewhere. Among those pillars the judiciary is the most trusted.. Once that happens MNS and Shivsena would not have defied the SC directive in Maharashtra to exceed the 20 ft level in the Dahi Handi pyramids..
The message is that let us respect the Judiciary in their decisions. No one (R) should come in between. Then only the people's trust in the system would be restored to its maximum. The legislatures have their shackles in adverse public opinion though the Judiciary has no shackle as they follow the constitution in its letter and spirit. It is our pliable system that allowed the SC diktat to be defied the way it was done in Maharashtra thus lowering the dignity of the Judiciary otherwise those who defied or incited would have been in jail.
So in my opinion let us leave the judiciary alone in their decisions. Their allegiance to the constitution by the Judiciary is maximum or the fullest..
If the law minister has said that the appointment of 150 HC judges is approved then why is the delay?
Vijoy Ambasta
On 13 August 2016 at 19:38, Venkatraman Ns <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com> wrote:
[IAC#RG] Fwd: Blocked site WWW.BIGFILE.TO
To:
M/s TATA COMMUNICATIONS 2) That the court's order is categorical that only those specific / individual URLs from which the film Sultan is actually being downloaded are to be blocked. In fact the order is very clear at para 2 that whole websites are not to be blocked.
3) The sites I have mentioned as blocked for me are the general purpose file upload sites which are very popular and free of cost to use. Because of your contemptuous and/or incompetent and/or malafide action in blocking the entire site, instead of the specific URLs which Yash Raj have complained against, I was unable to access these sites and I and my anti-corruption group have suffered massive and irreparable losses for being unable to access certain highly confidential files we had uploaded to these websites, and our computers, computer servers and computer networks have stopped functioning properly and our anti-corruption activities are severely hampered. Because we are unable to access these valuable files, they are also likely to have been deleted by now and lost to us. The matter is also with CERT-IN and duly registered at ticket no 70860716 dt. 30.07.2016 on our complaint.
4) Accordingly, I am calling upon you to IMMEDIATELY, and within 48 hours in any case, provide me the specific list of the 102 URLs which are mentioned in the Hon'ble Court's order. If any other specific URLs were subsequently verified by Cyber Cell for blockage please also provide those to me equally expeditiously.
5) Finally, I am also calling upon you to ensure that all my access to these websites like BIGFILE.TO, NITROFLARE.COM, DATAFILE.COM etc are restored IMMEDIATELY, because we have nothing to do with the film SULTAN or its distribution.
Herein fail not,
sincerely
Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor
India Against Corruption
New Delhi 110024
Tel; 08010205897
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 8:46 PM, urlblock <urlblock@tatacommunications.com > wrote:
Hi
The URL WWW.BIGFILE.TO has been blocked under the order(s) dated 4 July 2016 passed by Hon'ble High Court of Bombay, in case titled as Yash Raj Films Pvt. Ltd. v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (Suit (L) No. 692 of 2016 in Notice of Motion (L) No. 1933 of 2016). You may approach the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay for redressal of your grievance.
Regards
-----Original Message-----
From: Sarbajit Roy [mailto:sroy.mb@gmail.com]
Sent: 25 August 2016 09:01
To: urlblock <urlblock@tatacommunications.com >
Subject: Blocked site WWW.BIGFILE.TO
To:
urlblock@tatacommunications.com
Please inform me the complete reasons why WWW.BIGFILE.TO is blocked for access to me since 30 July 2016.
I am unable to access certain important files.
Sarbajit Roy
New Delhi
M: 8010205897
On 8/25/16, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> To:
> urlblock@tatacommunications.com
>
> Please inform me the complete reasons why WWW.DATAFILE.COM is blocked
> for access to me since 30 July 2016.
>
> I am unable to access certain important files.
>
> Sarbajit Roy
> New Delhi
> M: 8010205897
>
> On 8/25/16, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> To:
>> urlblock@tatacommunications.com
>>
>> Please inform me the complete reasons why WWW.NITROFLARE.COM is
>> blocked for access to me since 30 July 2016.
>>
>> I have complained to CERT-IN on 30.07.2016 and the CERT-IN ticket is
>> CERTIn-70860716.
>> I am unable to access certain important files.
>>
>> Sarbajit Roy
>> New Delhi
>> M: 8010205897
>>
>
Re: [IAC#RG] CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA NEED TO SHOW RESTRAINT IN HIS OBSERVATIONS
Evidently, there are ills in our judicial system. No use blaming only judiciary for the same. It is a combination of so many factors - some of which that come to mind are as follows -
1. Outdated laws that the executive has failed to update.
2. Very large number of vacancies in Judiciaries for which political bosses and executives are equally responsible as the judiciary itself. Bureaucratic delays in approvals are galore.
3. Government the biggest litigant - responsible the bureaucratic approach - some times Govt goes for litigation for small sums up to supreme court against poor employees / residents.
4. Advocates - who by unscrupulous means keep on extending the proceedings by forcing adjournments for their personnel gains
5. Corruption amongst advocates as well as judiciary
R.N.Malhotra
--------------------------------------------
On Fri, 8/19/16, Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA NEED TO SHOW RESTRAINT IN HIS OBSERVATIONS
To: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Date: Friday, August 19, 2016, 1:31 PM
19/8/16
This holier than thou attitude of the Chief justice is
not helpful. It clearly negates any suggestion for
improvement in the working of the judiciary. Corruption is
not an issue for him. Suggestion that there should be court
of Appeals in metropolitan cities
like Chennai ,Calcutta and Mumbai is not acceptable to him.
Commercial courts for Govt. litigation is not being
implemented.Gram Panchayats and alternative fora to ease the
pendency is not being implemented.Regds
From:
indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net
<indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net> on behalf of
Venkatraman Ns <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2016 7:38 PM
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: [IAC#RG] CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA NEED TO SHOW
RESTRAINT IN HIS OBSERVATIONS
To
India Against Corruption
CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA
NEED TO SHOW RESTRAINT IN HIS
OBSERVATIONS
In open court, Chief Justice of
India has accused central government of bringing the entire
judiciary to a "grinding halt" by sitting on the
recommendations of the collegium for appointment and
transfer
of judges to high courts across the country. It is
disturbing that he went to the extent of saying that the
court would not shy away from a confrontation with the
government, if driven to a corner. He made such
remarks even when the Attorney General assured
that the issue would be taken up at the highest
level.
Even while the Chief Justice made
such sharp remarks, the law minister has said that
appointment of number of judges would be finalized very
soon. Is Chief Justice not aware of this?
The collegium issue has been under
discussions for quite sometime now and many have questioned
the judges themselves appointing the judges , when several
judges at various levels have been caught in corruption
scandals with one former Chief Justice of India
himself being one of the accused.
Government stand appears to
be that there must be proper procedure and transparency in
selection of judges. There is nothing wrong with this view.
Chief Justice rejects the
government's view and insists that he should have the
final say. This stand of the Chief Justice is the origin of
the confrontation.
It would have been appropriate if
Chief Justice has read the mood of the people, who are
increasingly not sure about the caliber of some of the
judges.
Reflecting such public mood , he
should accept the need for a level of transparency in the
appointment of judges. Threat of confrontation by Chief
Justice is not in tune with the functioning of the
judiciary.
N.S.Venkataraman
Nandini Voice for The
Deprived
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
1. Outdated laws that the executive has failed to update.
2. Very large number of vacancies in Judiciaries for which political bosses and executives are equally responsible as the judiciary itself. Bureaucratic delays in approvals are galore.
3. Government the biggest litigant - responsible the bureaucratic approach - some times Govt goes for litigation for small sums up to supreme court against poor employees / residents.
4. Advocates - who by unscrupulous means keep on extending the proceedings by forcing adjournments for their personnel gains
5. Corruption amongst advocates as well as judiciary
R.N.Malhotra
--------------------------------------------
On Fri, 8/19/16, Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA NEED TO SHOW RESTRAINT IN HIS OBSERVATIONS
To: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Date: Friday, August 19, 2016, 1:31 PM
19/8/16
This holier than thou attitude of the Chief justice is
not helpful. It clearly negates any suggestion for
improvement in the working of the judiciary. Corruption is
not an issue for him. Suggestion that there should be court
of Appeals in metropolitan cities
like Chennai ,Calcutta and Mumbai is not acceptable to him.
Commercial courts for Govt. litigation is not being
implemented.Gram Panchayats and alternative fora to ease the
pendency is not being implemented.Regds
From:
indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net
<indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net> on behalf of
Venkatraman Ns <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2016 7:38 PM
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: [IAC#RG] CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA NEED TO SHOW
RESTRAINT IN HIS OBSERVATIONS
To
India Against Corruption
CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA
NEED TO SHOW RESTRAINT IN HIS
OBSERVATIONS
In open court, Chief Justice of
India has accused central government of bringing the entire
judiciary to a "grinding halt" by sitting on the
recommendations of the collegium for appointment and
transfer
of judges to high courts across the country. It is
disturbing that he went to the extent of saying that the
court would not shy away from a confrontation with the
government, if driven to a corner. He made such
remarks even when the Attorney General assured
that the issue would be taken up at the highest
level.
Even while the Chief Justice made
such sharp remarks, the law minister has said that
appointment of number of judges would be finalized very
soon. Is Chief Justice not aware of this?
The collegium issue has been under
discussions for quite sometime now and many have questioned
the judges themselves appointing the judges , when several
judges at various levels have been caught in corruption
scandals with one former Chief Justice of India
himself being one of the accused.
Government stand appears to
be that there must be proper procedure and transparency in
selection of judges. There is nothing wrong with this view.
Chief Justice rejects the
government's view and insists that he should have the
final say. This stand of the Chief Justice is the origin of
the confrontation.
It would have been appropriate if
Chief Justice has read the mood of the people, who are
increasingly not sure about the caliber of some of the
judges.
Reflecting such public mood , he
should accept the need for a level of transparency in the
appointment of judges. Threat of confrontation by Chief
Justice is not in tune with the functioning of the
judiciary.
N.S.Venkataraman
Nandini Voice for The
Deprived
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Thursday, August 25, 2016
Re: [IAC#RG] How Kejriwal is FAST UNDOING a phenomenon called AAP
Dear Dr. Raizada
With reference to your webarticle in DNA, there is a legal maxim 'falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus' (false in one means false in all)
So let me remind you again,1) Anna Hazare was not 'the' leader of India Against Corruption,
brgds
Sarbajit Roy
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Dr. Munish Raizada <pedia333@gmail.com> wrote:
Kindly see my article published in DNA yesterday (Aug 19):Munish K Raizada, MD, FAAPHow Kejriwal is FAST undoing a phenomenon called AAP:Thank you!Board Certified Neonatologist
Chicago, USA
Phone: USA: +1- 217 720 9331 ; India: +91 98737- 03054Skype: munish.raizadaFollow me at:
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net "
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists "
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
[IAC#RG] FINALLY, THAT BEACH CLEANING CONTRACT CANCELLED
With the Goa Lokayukta Justice P.K. Misra who is hearing complaints on the alleged multi-crore beach cleaning scam having issued notice to Tourism Minister Dilip Parulekar, the Government yesterday cancelled the current very fishy beach cleaning contract.
Dilip Parulekar, the beach cleaning contractor Manish Mohata and Avdhoot Parrikar the brother of Manohar Parrikar amongst others have been accused of emptying the state coffers under the guise of so called scientific beach cleaning.
In September 2014 while Manohar Parrikar was the Chief Minister and Nikhil Desai the Director of Tourism, the Goa Government awarded the contract of Comprehensive Management of cleanliness of North Goa Beaches to Bhumika Cleantech Services Pvt Ltd at an annual cost of Rs 7, 51, 40,999 and the cleaning of South Goa beaches to Ram Cleansers & Developers Pvt Ltd at a cost of Rs 7, 04, 87,999. Both the companies are owned by Manish Mohata. Earlier the cleaning of Goa beaches was costing the State Government an average of a mere two crores annually.
The former Director of Tourism Mr. Ameya Abhyankar on 11th December last year had proposed that the current beach cleaning contract be terminated for not fulfilling major conditions of the tender. In his four page note Ameya Abhyankar while giving detailed reasons had further proposed that the department go in for a fresh tender. The government the very next day transferred Ameya Abhyankar.
Aires Rodrigues
Advocate High Court
C/G-2, Shopping Complex
Ribandar Retreat,
Ribandar – Goa – 403006
Mobile No: 9822684372
Office Tel No: (0832) 2444012
Email: airesrodrigues1@gmail.com
Or
You can also reach me on
Facebook.com/ AiresRodrigues
Twitter@rodrigues_aires
Wednesday, August 24, 2016
Re: [IAC#RG] CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA NEED TO SHOW RESTRAINT IN HIS OBSERVATIONS
DEAR ALL,
Below is very just and logical.
:-
*"DOCTORS VS JUDGES"*
*Judiciary should also come under CPA (Consumer Protection Act)*
*"Every Body Must READ and SHARE this Article.*
*In the Salman Khan hit and run case the LOWER court judge and the HIGH court judge had the SAME pieces of EVIDENCE to deal with.*
*They also had the SAME Indian LAW to abide by and most probably they had similar education qualifications too.*
*Yet they INTERPRETED the situation in absolutely CONTRASTING manner and gave verdicts which are poles apart.*
*Just imagine what would have happened if a YOUNG doctor sitting in a GOVERNMENT hospital doctor catering to hundreds of patients in a day had diagnosed a celebrity patient presenting with gastric discomfort as GASTRITIS and another hospital had LATER on diagnosed that patient to be having a MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION. I am sure that doctor would have been screwed and jailed.*
*A JUDGE gets YEARS to decide on a case unlike a DOCTOR who is expected to diagnose and treat everything in the BLINK of an eye.*
*If a doctor making a wrong diagnosis can be prosecuted shouldn't a judge giving wrong verdicts meet the same fate?*
*If hospitals can be sued for not admitting poor patients shouldn't the courts be prosecuted for having lacs of impending cases?*
*Is it not appalling that a judge taking 12 years to give a wrong verdict gets away unhurt and a doctor making one mistake is screwed by our legal system?*
*Doctors practice medicine which is more of an art than an exact science whereas law is absolutely 100% manmade, yet doctors are expected to be right on all occasions.*
*If doctors and hospitals have a duty towards the society then does the judiciary not have a responsibility towards the socitey.*
*If there is so much of hue and cry in media about doctors and hospitals charging huge sums from patients then why do we not ever hear a word on the fee that lawyers like Manu singhvi and Jethmalani charge for their court appearances.*
*Government often talks about putting a capping on the fees doctors charge for various procedures but their is no talk of putting a capping on the fee that these lawyers charge to get justice for their clients.*
*If health is a citizen's right then so is justice. Shall we take our minds off worshipping false heroes & think?*
*#JUDICIARY SHOULD ALSO COME UNDER CPA (CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT)#*
Regards, PB.
Sent from my iPhone
On 13-Aug-2016, at 7:38 PM, Venkatraman Ns <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com> wrote:
To
India Against Corruption
CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA NEED TO SHOW RESTRAINT IN HIS OBSERVATIONS
In open court, Chief Justice of India has accused central government of bringing the entire judiciary to a "grinding halt" by sitting on the recommendations of the collegium for appointment and transfer of judges to high courts across the country. It is disturbing that he went to the extent of saying that the court would not shy away from a confrontation with the government, if driven to a corner. He made such remarks even when the Attorney General assured that the issue would be taken up at the highest level.
Even while the Chief Justice made such sharp remarks, the law minister has said that appointment of number of judges would be finalized very soon. Is Chief Justice not aware of this?
The collegium issue has been under discussions for quite sometime now and many have questioned the judges themselves appointing the judges , when several judges at various levels have been caught in corruption scandals with one former Chief Justice of India himself being one of the accused.
Government stand appears to be that there must be proper procedure and transparency in selection of judges. There is nothing wrong with this view.
Chief Justice rejects the government's view and insists that he should have the final say. This stand of the Chief Justice is the origin of the confrontation.
It would have been appropriate if Chief Justice has read the mood of the people, who are increasingly not sure about the caliber of some of the judges.
Reflecting such public mood , he should accept the need for a level of transparency in the appointment of judges. Threat of confrontation by Chief Justice is not in tune with the functioning of the judiciary.
N.S.Venkataraman
Nandini Voice for The Deprived
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"Sent from my iPhone
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
19/8/16
This holier than thou attitude of the Chief justice is not helpful. It clearly negates any suggestion for improvement in the working of the judiciary. Corruption is not an issue for him. Suggestion that there should be court of Appeals in metropolitan cities like Chennai ,Calcutta and Mumbai is not acceptable to him. Commercial courts for Govt. litigation is not being implemented.Gram Panchayats and alternative fora to ease the pendency is not being implemented.Regds
From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net <indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net> on behalf of Venkatraman Ns <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2016 7:38 PM
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: [IAC#RG] CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA NEED TO SHOW RESTRAINT IN HIS OBSERVATIONS
To
India Against Corruption
CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA NEED TO SHOW RESTRAINT IN HIS OBSERVATIONS
In open court, Chief Justice of India has accused central government of bringing the entire judiciary to a "grinding halt" by sitting on the recommendations of the collegium for appointment and transfer of judges to high courts across the country. It is disturbing that he went to the extent of saying that the court would not shy away from a confrontation with the government, if driven to a corner. He made such remarks even when the Attorney General assured that the issue would be taken up at the highest level.
Even while the Chief Justice made such sharp remarks, the law minister has said that appointment of number of judges would be finalized very soon. Is Chief Justice not aware of this?
The collegium issue has been under discussions for quite sometime now and many have questioned the judges themselves appointing the judges , when several judges at various levels have been caught in corruption scandals with one former Chief Justice of India himself being one of the accused.
Government stand appears to be that there must be proper procedure and transparency in selection of judges. There is nothing wrong with this view.
Chief Justice rejects the government's view and insists that he should have the final say. This stand of the Chief Justice is the origin of the confrontation.
It would have been appropriate if Chief Justice has read the mood of the people, who are increasingly not sure about the caliber of some of the judges.
Reflecting such public mood , he should accept the need for a level of transparency in the appointment of judges. Threat of confrontation by Chief Justice is not in tune with the functioning of the judiciary.
N.S.Venkataraman
Nandini Voice for The Deprived
[IAC#RG] Nepotism : न्यायाधीश बना खानदानी पेशा :Business of Justice in India.
Dear All,
न्यायाधीश बना खानदानी पेशा, भाई-भतीजावाद की भेंट चढ़ा इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट!
Business of Justice to Protect Culprit Big-Wigs and Hit Helpless Poor Indians.
India needs simpler judicial system. Not even 1 % get justice in present system - Prashant Bhushan.
Regards,
Babubhai Vaghela,
Ahmedabad - 9427608632.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: AK Bhattacharyya <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Date: Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:54 AM
Subject: [IAC#RG] Court work load
To: Indiaresists <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
The courts are overloaded with outstanding long duration cases.IF CJI puts a survey team to review the details of such ones many of them are created by greedy professionals .and could be settled by discussion outside the court by reconciliation and discussion.and need not involve such heavy long duration costly ones with one common factor of taking a new date through adjournement and creating one more case..
CJI /Register Supreme court need to review the functioning of legal professionals who indulge/ contribute to delays and censure them from Bar Council.Some determined effort is called for to control such new rich professionals.
With kind regards A.K.BHATTACHARYYA F.I.StructE (UK), FIE (India), FIBE, FIRT H-2A, Hauzkhas, New Delhi -16, Ph:011-26854127
Re: [IAC#RG] CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa vehicles
Excellent;
This warning must be last else lessons should be taught to them.
Best Wishes
RK Atri
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
Original Message
From: Sarbajit Roy
Sent: Thursday 25 August 2016 03:36
To: commtpt@nic.in; Dinkar Adeeb; cmdelhi
Reply To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Cc: indiaresists
Subject: [IAC#RG] CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa vehicles
To:
Shri Sandip Kumar, IAS, Commr Tpt / GNCTD
cc: o/o Minister of Transport/GNCTD
cc: o/o CM Delhi
Sir,
I refer to the string of complaints I have made to your office and o/o
Minister Transport (GNCTD) concerning thousands of E-rickshaws
illegally plying on Pankha Road, New Delhi in violation your Dept
notification dated 11.Dec.2014, and thereby endangering the public
safety.
Since I have reason to believe you (as Commissioner of Police for
Traffic in Delhi u/rule 123) DMVR are deliberately not impounding
these vehicles for reasons of gross corruption, I am giving you one
final opportunity to personally ensure that no e-rickshaw plies or
parks on Pankha Road, New Delhi within 7 days of today or thereafter.
Accordingly, I specifically draw your attention to Section 39 of Motor
Vehicles Act r/w rule 123 Delhi Motor Vehicle Rules (DMVR 1993)
concerning these illegal motor vehicles which are also mostly
operating without the mandatory registration.
Herein fail not.
sincerely
Sarbajit Roy
B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024
Tel : 8010205897
Relevant sections of law set out for your ready reference
Section 39 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
39. Necessity for registration.—No person shall drive any motor
vehicle and no owner of a motor vehicle shall cause or permit the
vehicle to be driven in any public place or in any other place unless
the vehicle is registered in accordance with this Chapter and the
certificate of registration of the vehicle has not been suspended or
cancelled and the vehicle carries a registration mark displayed in the
prescribed manner: Provided that nothing in this section shall apply
to a motor vehicle in possession of a dealer subject to such
conditions as may be prescribed by the Central Government.
Rule 123 , Delhi Motor Vehicle Rules
123.Functions and Powers of officers of Motor vehicles Department.-
(1)The State Government may delegate any power under the Act and the
rules made thereunder to any person for the proper implementation of
the Act and the rules made thereunder and such persons shall
discharge all function and perform all duties as assigned to them most
diligently.
(2)All the authorities prescribed under the Act and the rules made
thereunder and all such
persons so empowered, shall be under the over-all control of the
Commissioner. The
Commissioner shall be under the control of the State Government and
shall exercise all the
powers of the police officer of the rank of Commissioner of Police
under the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988.
(3)The Joint Director(s) (Transport) and the Deputy Director (s)
(Transport) shall be under the control of the Commissioner and shall
exercise the powers of Deputy Commissioner of Police under the Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988.
(4)All other Gazetted officers of the Transport Department shall be
under the control of the Commissioner and shall exercise the powers of
Assistant Commissioner of Police under the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988.
All the Inspectors shall be under the control of the Commissioner and
shall exercise powers of the rank of the Inspector of Police under the
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
(5)All other checking staff shall be under the control of Commissioner
and shall exercise the powers of the corresponding rank of the Delhi
Police under the Motor Vehicles Act,1988.
(6)In addition to the powers that may be conferred on any officer of
the Transport Department under sub-section (3) of Section 213 of the
Act, such officer shall also be empowered by the State Government
under sub-section(5) of Section 213 of the Act.
(7)Any police officer(s) or the person(s) appointed as officer(s)
under Section 213 of the
Act and specified as such in rule 123, not below the rank of
(Assistant Sub-Inspector),
shall have power, if they have reasons to believe that a motor vehicle
has been or is being
used in contravention of the provisions of Section 3 or Section 4 or
Section 39 or without
the permit required by sub-section (1) of section 66 or in
contravention of any condition of such permit relating to the route
on which or the area in which or the purpose for which the vehicle may
be used to seize and detain the vehicle, and shall keep the same in
safe custody of the nearest police station or police post or traffic
police circle officer or any other designated place declared by the
Delhi Police or in the designated impounding pits of the Transport
Department against a proper receipt to be given by him in Form
O.S.S. to the owner or in charge of the vehicle from whose custody the
vehicle was seized and detained.
(8)The officer in charge of the Police Station or police Post or
Traffic Inspector of the circle or the officer in charge of the
impounding pit shall ensure that the vehicle is kept in safe custody
along with the goods contained therein, if any, at the time of keeping
the same in his custody.
(9)The concerned person may get the vehicle released within a period
of ten days from the
date of seizure or detention of the vehicle, as the case may be, after
complying with the
requirements of law and on approval of the competent authority.
(10)In case the vehicle is not got released within the period
specified in Sub-rule (9), then, rental charges at the rate of one
hundred rupees per day, subject to a maximum of one thousand rupees,
shall be charged after the expiry of the said period of ten days from
the date of seizure of detention of the vehicle.]
-------- Original Message --------
From: "Dinkar Adeeb" <minhome.delhi@gov.in>
Date: Aug 5, 2016 4:11:29 PM
Subject: Fwd: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa vehicles
To: commtpt@nic.in, <commtpt@nic.in>
For attention Shri Sandip Kumar, Commr Tpt
-------- Original Message --------
From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
Date: Aug 4, 2016 11:55:06 PM
Subject: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa vehicles
To: Dinkar Adeeb <minhome.delhi@gov.in>, indiaresists
<indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Cc: commtpt@nic.in
Kind Attn: Brig (Retd) Dinkar Adeeb
Dear Brig. Adeeb
It has been over a week and there is no revert / update on my
complaint which you kindly re-forwarded.
This is quite unlike the exceedingly prompt action which your office
took when a certain transport sector operator from Mumbai (who
incidentally has somehow become quite important in the Aam Aadmi
Party) contacted your office's Mr. Sunil Chandrakar for "sleuthing"
from the same GNCTD Transport Dept. office and was given information
in a few hours. In fact Moneylife.In magazine has quoted the AAP
office bearer as saying
"With an AAP government in Delhi, it has had the access to do some
more sleuthing as well."
http://www.moneylife.in/article/pankaja-munde-using-delhi-registered-range-rover-in-maharashtra-without-paying-taxes-aap/47627.html
If anything this proves my point that corruption is rampant and runs
rife in the Transport Dept and also evidently in your Minister's
office.
PS: If your Minister is incapable of doing his job for the benefit of
the ordinary Delhi-ites who elected AAP, then perhaps he should resign
and let the L-G run Delhi ?
sincerely
Sarbajit Roy
New Delhi
On 7/28/16, Dinkar Adeeb <minhome.delhi@gov.in> wrote:
> For a feed back for Hon'ble Minister pl...... From .OSD Tpt
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> From: "O/o of Minister (Health, Home, PWD, Power, Industries)"
> <moh.delhi@gov.in>
> Date: Jul 27, 2016 12:44:14 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa
> vehicles
> To: HOME <minhome.delhi@gov.in>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> Date: Jul 27, 2016 12:33:00 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa
> vehicles
> To: MIN H & FW DELHI <moh.delhi@gov.in>
>
>
>
>
> KIND ATTN: MR. Sunil Chandrakar
>
> As discussed with yourself today on telecon, and your assurance, I would
> appreciate your immediate reply on the following emails (trail appended)
> concerning transport dept..
>
>
>
>
> Sincerely
>
> Sarbajit Roy
> National Convenor
> India Against Corruption, jan andolan
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
> Tel: 8010205897 (Mob)
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Operation Branch <dcops05@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:59 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa
> vehicles
> To: "V.D. Sharma" <vdayal61@gmail.com>
> Cc: sroy.mb@gmail.com, commtpt <commtpt@nic.in>
>
>
>
> for immediate necessary action please.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: commtpt <commtpt@nic.in>
> Date: Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:20 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa
> vehicles
> To: DC OPS <dcops05@gmail.com>
>
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> From: GopalRai Minister <gopalrai.delhi@gov.in>
> Date: May 12, 2016 3:58:43 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa
> vehicles
> To: commtpt <commtpt@nic.in>
>
>
> Sir,
>
> Forwarded for your kind perusal andnecessary action.
>
> With regards,
>
> O.S.D. to Minister of Transport, Labour
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> From: CM DELHI <cmdelhi@nic.in>
> Date: 28 Apr 2016 13:24:34
> Subject: Fwd: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa
> vehicles
> To: MIN TPT DELHI <gopalrai.delhi@gov.in>
> Cc: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
>
>
> Sir,
>
> This email has been received at CM's official emailID. It is being forwarded
> for your kind perusal and appropriate necessaryaction at your end.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajeev Gupta
>
> O.S.D. - Chief Minister's Office
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> Date: Apr 26, 2016 12:45:41 PM
> Subject: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa vehicles
> To: cmdelhi <cmdelhi@nic.in>, commtpt <commtpt@nic.in>, osdlg
> <osdlg@nic.in>
>
> To:
> 1) Shri Arvind Kejriwal,CM GoNCTD
> 2) Comm. Transport GoNCTD
> 3) OSD to LG/GoNCTD
>
> Dear Sirs
>
> No action has been taken on my attached complaint below. It seems
> GoNCT of Delhi is not interested in acting upon complaints of
> corruption against its officers and departments.
>
> Despite notification of Transport Dept dated 11.Dec.2014 the
> E-rickshaws continuity to ply with impunity all over Delhi and
> especially on the notified streets where they are prohibited,
> such as Pankha Road and in notified roads of Dwarka.
>
> My private enquiries with Delhi Traffic Police indicate that
> prosecution under Section 115 MV Act for these vehicles is not being
> carried out properly because of gross corruption in Transport Dept
> GNCTD who have not even erected the traffic signs prescribed under the
> Motor Vehicle Act for the Police to prosecute them under s.115 r/w
> s.194 MV Act.
>
> It is further learned that E-rickshaw unions are bribing Transport
> Dept enforcement officers to refrain from taking action against them,
> especially for the unregistered e-rickshaws, and that the stupendous
> bribes involved are reaching high levels of government.
>
> Kindly inform me within 72 hours what action is being taken by you to
> immediately resolve this menace of e-rickshaws operating in Delhi
> which is a hazard to the other traffic on the roads as well as to the
> citizens.
>
> Sincerely
>
> Sarbajit Roy
> National Convenor
> India Against Corruption, jan andolan
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
> Tel: 8010205897 (Mob)
>
> On 2/8/16, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> To:
>> 1) Shri Arvind Kejriwal,CM GoNCTD
>> 2) Shri Parimal Rai, Comm. Transport GoNCTD
>> 3) OSD to LG/GoNCTD
>>
>> Dear Sirs
>>
>> VERY URGENT
>>
>> I am constrained to complain that there is GROSS CORRUPTION in
>> Transport department of GoNCTD concerning the plying of E-rickshaws
>> and permits to Grameen Sewa vehicles.which is causing menace to
>> commuters of DTC Bus services.
>>
>> In this connection,you may kindly review some videos taken at Sagarpur
>> DTC Bus Stop which is directly opposite Police Station Hari Nagar on
>> the Pankha Road on 6 Feb 2016.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yki1IQ_zGQ4
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDU0LoLfegw
>>
>> It is self evident that these poorly maintained Grameen Sewa tempos
>> and E-rickshaws (mostly unregistered) are stopping for long periods
>> directly in the "bus box" of the DTC stands and collecting passengers.
>> As a result the DTC buses cannot enter the bus lane and stop within 1
>> meter of the bus stop as they are required (in law) to do because of
>> these tempos. The bus passengers therefore come onto the road and
>> occupy the lanes and the buses stop in the 3rd lane. Thereby the
>> traffic capacity on the Pankha Road is reduced by a factor of 300%
>> merely because a few Grameen Sewa and E-rickshaws are parked at the
>> DTC bus stop. The air pollution in Delhi also spikes because of
>> traffic jams caused by these small capacity vehicles.
>>
>> There is also a major safety issue since bus passengers are forced to
>> go into heavy traffic to board buses stopping very far from the bus
>> stop. Since the E-rickshaws are mostly unregistered the Delhi Police
>> is unable to prosecute them. The responsibility of prosecuting these
>> unregistered E-rickshaws is that of Transport Dept/GoNCTD and not of
>> Delhi Traffic Police. It is very strange that these vehicles are still
>> plying on the Master Plan roads, and it reeks of huge corruption in
>> Transport Department.
>>
>> Accordingly, I am calling upon the GoNCTD Transport Department to
>> immediately impound all unregistered E-rickshaws everywhere in Delhi.
>> I am also calling upon Transport Department to cancel, by
>> notification, all permits of Grameen Sewa vehicles plying on Master
>> Plan roads (ie.roads which are 18 m.or more in width as per Master
>> Plan) and not sanction such routes.
>>
>> Kindly do so immediately and within 7 days in any case.
>>
>> Sincerely
>>
>> Sarbajit Roy
>> National Convenor
>> India Against Corruption, jan andolan
>> B-59 Defence Colony
>> New Delhi 110024
>> Tel: 8010205897 (Mob)
>>
> --
> OSD to Commr.
> Govt. of Delhi
>
This warning must be last else lessons should be taught to them.
Best Wishes
RK Atri
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
Original Message
From: Sarbajit Roy
Sent: Thursday 25 August 2016 03:36
To: commtpt@nic.in; Dinkar Adeeb; cmdelhi
Reply To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Cc: indiaresists
Subject: [IAC#RG] CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa vehicles
To:
Shri Sandip Kumar, IAS, Commr Tpt / GNCTD
cc: o/o Minister of Transport/GNCTD
cc: o/o CM Delhi
Sir,
I refer to the string of complaints I have made to your office and o/o
Minister Transport (GNCTD) concerning thousands of E-rickshaws
illegally plying on Pankha Road, New Delhi in violation your Dept
notification dated 11.Dec.2014, and thereby endangering the public
safety.
Since I have reason to believe you (as Commissioner of Police for
Traffic in Delhi u/rule 123) DMVR are deliberately not impounding
these vehicles for reasons of gross corruption, I am giving you one
final opportunity to personally ensure that no e-rickshaw plies or
parks on Pankha Road, New Delhi within 7 days of today or thereafter.
Accordingly, I specifically draw your attention to Section 39 of Motor
Vehicles Act r/w rule 123 Delhi Motor Vehicle Rules (DMVR 1993)
concerning these illegal motor vehicles which are also mostly
operating without the mandatory registration.
Herein fail not.
sincerely
Sarbajit Roy
B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024
Tel : 8010205897
Relevant sections of law set out for your ready reference
Section 39 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
39. Necessity for registration.—No person shall drive any motor
vehicle and no owner of a motor vehicle shall cause or permit the
vehicle to be driven in any public place or in any other place unless
the vehicle is registered in accordance with this Chapter and the
certificate of registration of the vehicle has not been suspended or
cancelled and the vehicle carries a registration mark displayed in the
prescribed manner: Provided that nothing in this section shall apply
to a motor vehicle in possession of a dealer subject to such
conditions as may be prescribed by the Central Government.
Rule 123 , Delhi Motor Vehicle Rules
123.Functions and Powers of officers of Motor vehicles Department.-
(1)The State Government may delegate any power under the Act and the
rules made thereunder to any person for the proper implementation of
the Act and the rules made thereunder and such persons shall
discharge all function and perform all duties as assigned to them most
diligently.
(2)All the authorities prescribed under the Act and the rules made
thereunder and all such
persons so empowered, shall be under the over-all control of the
Commissioner. The
Commissioner shall be under the control of the State Government and
shall exercise all the
powers of the police officer of the rank of Commissioner of Police
under the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988.
(3)The Joint Director(s) (Transport) and the Deputy Director (s)
(Transport) shall be under the control of the Commissioner and shall
exercise the powers of Deputy Commissioner of Police under the Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988.
(4)All other Gazetted officers of the Transport Department shall be
under the control of the Commissioner and shall exercise the powers of
Assistant Commissioner of Police under the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988.
All the Inspectors shall be under the control of the Commissioner and
shall exercise powers of the rank of the Inspector of Police under the
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
(5)All other checking staff shall be under the control of Commissioner
and shall exercise the powers of the corresponding rank of the Delhi
Police under the Motor Vehicles Act,1988.
(6)In addition to the powers that may be conferred on any officer of
the Transport Department under sub-section (3) of Section 213 of the
Act, such officer shall also be empowered by the State Government
under sub-section(5) of Section 213 of the Act.
(7)Any police officer(s) or the person(s) appointed as officer(s)
under Section 213 of the
Act and specified as such in rule 123, not below the rank of
(Assistant Sub-Inspector),
shall have power, if they have reasons to believe that a motor vehicle
has been or is being
used in contravention of the provisions of Section 3 or Section 4 or
Section 39 or without
the permit required by sub-section (1) of section 66 or in
contravention of any condition of such permit relating to the route
on which or the area in which or the purpose for which the vehicle may
be used to seize and detain the vehicle, and shall keep the same in
safe custody of the nearest police station or police post or traffic
police circle officer or any other designated place declared by the
Delhi Police or in the designated impounding pits of the Transport
Department against a proper receipt to be given by him in Form
O.S.S. to the owner or in charge of the vehicle from whose custody the
vehicle was seized and detained.
(8)The officer in charge of the Police Station or police Post or
Traffic Inspector of the circle or the officer in charge of the
impounding pit shall ensure that the vehicle is kept in safe custody
along with the goods contained therein, if any, at the time of keeping
the same in his custody.
(9)The concerned person may get the vehicle released within a period
of ten days from the
date of seizure or detention of the vehicle, as the case may be, after
complying with the
requirements of law and on approval of the competent authority.
(10)In case the vehicle is not got released within the period
specified in Sub-rule (9), then, rental charges at the rate of one
hundred rupees per day, subject to a maximum of one thousand rupees,
shall be charged after the expiry of the said period of ten days from
the date of seizure of detention of the vehicle.]
-------- Original Message --------
From: "Dinkar Adeeb" <minhome.delhi@gov.in>
Date: Aug 5, 2016 4:11:29 PM
Subject: Fwd: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa vehicles
To: commtpt@nic.in, <commtpt@nic.in>
For attention Shri Sandip Kumar, Commr Tpt
-------- Original Message --------
From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
Date: Aug 4, 2016 11:55:06 PM
Subject: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa vehicles
To: Dinkar Adeeb <minhome.delhi@gov.in>, indiaresists
<indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Cc: commtpt@nic.in
Kind Attn: Brig (Retd) Dinkar Adeeb
Dear Brig. Adeeb
It has been over a week and there is no revert / update on my
complaint which you kindly re-forwarded.
This is quite unlike the exceedingly prompt action which your office
took when a certain transport sector operator from Mumbai (who
incidentally has somehow become quite important in the Aam Aadmi
Party) contacted your office's Mr. Sunil Chandrakar for "sleuthing"
from the same GNCTD Transport Dept. office and was given information
in a few hours. In fact Moneylife.In magazine has quoted the AAP
office bearer as saying
"With an AAP government in Delhi, it has had the access to do some
more sleuthing as well."
http://www.moneylife.in/article/pankaja-munde-using-delhi-registered-range-rover-in-maharashtra-without-paying-taxes-aap/47627.html
If anything this proves my point that corruption is rampant and runs
rife in the Transport Dept and also evidently in your Minister's
office.
PS: If your Minister is incapable of doing his job for the benefit of
the ordinary Delhi-ites who elected AAP, then perhaps he should resign
and let the L-G run Delhi ?
sincerely
Sarbajit Roy
New Delhi
On 7/28/16, Dinkar Adeeb <minhome.delhi@gov.in> wrote:
> For a feed back for Hon'ble Minister pl...... From .OSD Tpt
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> From: "O/o of Minister (Health, Home, PWD, Power, Industries)"
> <moh.delhi@gov.in>
> Date: Jul 27, 2016 12:44:14 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa
> vehicles
> To: HOME <minhome.delhi@gov.in>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> Date: Jul 27, 2016 12:33:00 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa
> vehicles
> To: MIN H & FW DELHI <moh.delhi@gov.in>
>
>
>
>
> KIND ATTN: MR. Sunil Chandrakar
>
> As discussed with yourself today on telecon, and your assurance, I would
> appreciate your immediate reply on the following emails (trail appended)
> concerning transport dept..
>
>
>
>
> Sincerely
>
> Sarbajit Roy
> National Convenor
> India Against Corruption, jan andolan
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
> Tel: 8010205897 (Mob)
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Operation Branch <dcops05@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:59 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa
> vehicles
> To: "V.D. Sharma" <vdayal61@gmail.com>
> Cc: sroy.mb@gmail.com, commtpt <commtpt@nic.in>
>
>
>
> for immediate necessary action please.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: commtpt <commtpt@nic.in>
> Date: Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:20 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa
> vehicles
> To: DC OPS <dcops05@gmail.com>
>
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> From: GopalRai Minister <gopalrai.delhi@gov.in>
> Date: May 12, 2016 3:58:43 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa
> vehicles
> To: commtpt <commtpt@nic.in>
>
>
> Sir,
>
> Forwarded for your kind perusal andnecessary action.
>
> With regards,
>
> O.S.D. to Minister of Transport, Labour
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> From: CM DELHI <cmdelhi@nic.in>
> Date: 28 Apr 2016 13:24:34
> Subject: Fwd: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa
> vehicles
> To: MIN TPT DELHI <gopalrai.delhi@gov.in>
> Cc: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
>
>
> Sir,
>
> This email has been received at CM's official emailID. It is being forwarded
> for your kind perusal and appropriate necessaryaction at your end.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajeev Gupta
>
> O.S.D. - Chief Minister's Office
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> Date: Apr 26, 2016 12:45:41 PM
> Subject: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa vehicles
> To: cmdelhi <cmdelhi@nic.in>, commtpt <commtpt@nic.in>, osdlg
> <osdlg@nic.in>
>
> To:
> 1) Shri Arvind Kejriwal,CM GoNCTD
> 2) Comm. Transport GoNCTD
> 3) OSD to LG/GoNCTD
>
> Dear Sirs
>
> No action has been taken on my attached complaint below. It seems
> GoNCT of Delhi is not interested in acting upon complaints of
> corruption against its officers and departments.
>
> Despite notification of Transport Dept dated 11.Dec.2014 the
> E-rickshaws continuity to ply with impunity all over Delhi and
> especially on the notified streets where they are prohibited,
> such as Pankha Road and in notified roads of Dwarka.
>
> My private enquiries with Delhi Traffic Police indicate that
> prosecution under Section 115 MV Act for these vehicles is not being
> carried out properly because of gross corruption in Transport Dept
> GNCTD who have not even erected the traffic signs prescribed under the
> Motor Vehicle Act for the Police to prosecute them under s.115 r/w
> s.194 MV Act.
>
> It is further learned that E-rickshaw unions are bribing Transport
> Dept enforcement officers to refrain from taking action against them,
> especially for the unregistered e-rickshaws, and that the stupendous
> bribes involved are reaching high levels of government.
>
> Kindly inform me within 72 hours what action is being taken by you to
> immediately resolve this menace of e-rickshaws operating in Delhi
> which is a hazard to the other traffic on the roads as well as to the
> citizens.
>
> Sincerely
>
> Sarbajit Roy
> National Convenor
> India Against Corruption, jan andolan
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
> Tel: 8010205897 (Mob)
>
> On 2/8/16, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> To:
>> 1) Shri Arvind Kejriwal,CM GoNCTD
>> 2) Shri Parimal Rai, Comm. Transport GoNCTD
>> 3) OSD to LG/GoNCTD
>>
>> Dear Sirs
>>
>> VERY URGENT
>>
>> I am constrained to complain that there is GROSS CORRUPTION in
>> Transport department of GoNCTD concerning the plying of E-rickshaws
>> and permits to Grameen Sewa vehicles.which is causing menace to
>> commuters of DTC Bus services.
>>
>> In this connection,you may kindly review some videos taken at Sagarpur
>> DTC Bus Stop which is directly opposite Police Station Hari Nagar on
>> the Pankha Road on 6 Feb 2016.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yki1IQ_zGQ4
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDU0LoLfegw
>>
>> It is self evident that these poorly maintained Grameen Sewa tempos
>> and E-rickshaws (mostly unregistered) are stopping for long periods
>> directly in the "bus box" of the DTC stands and collecting passengers.
>> As a result the DTC buses cannot enter the bus lane and stop within 1
>> meter of the bus stop as they are required (in law) to do because of
>> these tempos. The bus passengers therefore come onto the road and
>> occupy the lanes and the buses stop in the 3rd lane. Thereby the
>> traffic capacity on the Pankha Road is reduced by a factor of 300%
>> merely because a few Grameen Sewa and E-rickshaws are parked at the
>> DTC bus stop. The air pollution in Delhi also spikes because of
>> traffic jams caused by these small capacity vehicles.
>>
>> There is also a major safety issue since bus passengers are forced to
>> go into heavy traffic to board buses stopping very far from the bus
>> stop. Since the E-rickshaws are mostly unregistered the Delhi Police
>> is unable to prosecute them. The responsibility of prosecuting these
>> unregistered E-rickshaws is that of Transport Dept/GoNCTD and not of
>> Delhi Traffic Police. It is very strange that these vehicles are still
>> plying on the Master Plan roads, and it reeks of huge corruption in
>> Transport Department.
>>
>> Accordingly, I am calling upon the GoNCTD Transport Department to
>> immediately impound all unregistered E-rickshaws everywhere in Delhi.
>> I am also calling upon Transport Department to cancel, by
>> notification, all permits of Grameen Sewa vehicles plying on Master
>> Plan roads (ie.roads which are 18 m.or more in width as per Master
>> Plan) and not sanction such routes.
>>
>> Kindly do so immediately and within 7 days in any case.
>>
>> Sincerely
>>
>> Sarbajit Roy
>> National Convenor
>> India Against Corruption, jan andolan
>> B-59 Defence Colony
>> New Delhi 110024
>> Tel: 8010205897 (Mob)
>>
> --
> OSD to Commr.
> Govt. of Delhi
>
Tuesday, August 23, 2016
[IAC#RG] Court work load
The courts are overloaded with outstanding long duration cases.IF CJI puts a survey team to review the details of such ones many of them are created by greedy professionals .and could be settled by discussion outside the court by reconciliation and discussion.and need not involve such heavy long duration costly ones with one common factor of taking a new date through adjournement and creating one more case..
CJI /Register Supreme court need to review the functioning of legal professionals who indulge/ contribute to delays and censure them from Bar Council.Some determined effort is called for to control such new rich professionals.
With kind regards A.K.BHATTACHARYYA F.I.StructE (UK), FIE (India), FIBE, FIRT H-2A, Hauzkhas, New Delhi -16, Ph:011-26854127
Monday, August 22, 2016
[IAC#RG] CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa vehicles
To:
Shri Sandip Kumar, IAS, Commr Tpt / GNCTD
cc: o/o Minister of Transport/GNCTD
cc: o/o CM Delhi
Sir,
I refer to the string of complaints I have made to your office and o/o
Minister Transport (GNCTD) concerning thousands of E-rickshaws
illegally plying on Pankha Road, New Delhi in violation your Dept
notification dated 11.Dec.2014, and thereby endangering the public
safety.
Since I have reason to believe you (as Commissioner of Police for
Traffic in Delhi u/rule 123) DMVR are deliberately not impounding
these vehicles for reasons of gross corruption, I am giving you one
final opportunity to personally ensure that no e-rickshaw plies or
parks on Pankha Road, New Delhi within 7 days of today or thereafter.
Accordingly, I specifically draw your attention to Section 39 of Motor
Vehicles Act r/w rule 123 Delhi Motor Vehicle Rules (DMVR 1993)
concerning these illegal motor vehicles which are also mostly
operating without the mandatory registration.
Herein fail not.
sincerely
Sarbajit Roy
B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024
Tel : 8010205897
Relevant sections of law set out for your ready reference
Section 39 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
39. Necessity for registration.—No person shall drive any motor
vehicle and no owner of a motor vehicle shall cause or permit the
vehicle to be driven in any public place or in any other place unless
the vehicle is registered in accordance with this Chapter and the
certificate of registration of the vehicle has not been suspended or
cancelled and the vehicle carries a registration mark displayed in the
prescribed manner: Provided that nothing in this section shall apply
to a motor vehicle in possession of a dealer subject to such
conditions as may be prescribed by the Central Government.
Rule 123 , Delhi Motor Vehicle Rules
123.Functions and Powers of officers of Motor vehicles Department.-
(1)The State Government may delegate any power under the Act and the
rules made thereunder to any person for the proper implementation of
the Act and the rules made thereunder and such persons shall
discharge all function and perform all duties as assigned to them most
diligently.
(2)All the authorities prescribed under the Act and the rules made
thereunder and all such
persons so empowered, shall be under the over-all control of the
Commissioner. The
Commissioner shall be under the control of the State Government and
shall exercise all the
powers of the police officer of the rank of Commissioner of Police
under the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988.
(3)The Joint Director(s) (Transport) and the Deputy Director (s)
(Transport) shall be under the control of the Commissioner and shall
exercise the powers of Deputy Commissioner of Police under the Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988.
(4)All other Gazetted officers of the Transport Department shall be
under the control of the Commissioner and shall exercise the powers of
Assistant Commissioner of Police under the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988.
All the Inspectors shall be under the control of the Commissioner and
shall exercise powers of the rank of the Inspector of Police under the
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
(5)All other checking staff shall be under the control of Commissioner
and shall exercise the powers of the corresponding rank of the Delhi
Police under the Motor Vehicles Act,1988.
(6)In addition to the powers that may be conferred on any officer of
the Transport Department under sub-section (3) of Section 213 of the
Act, such officer shall also be empowered by the State Government
under sub-section(5) of Section 213 of the Act.
(7)Any police officer(s) or the person(s) appointed as officer(s)
under Section 213 of the
Act and specified as such in rule 123, not below the rank of
(Assistant Sub-Inspector),
shall have power, if they have reasons to believe that a motor vehicle
has been or is being
used in contravention of the provisions of Section 3 or Section 4 or
Section 39 or without
the permit required by sub-section (1) of section 66 or in
contravention of any condition of such permit relating to the route
on which or the area in which or the purpose for which the vehicle may
be used to seize and detain the vehicle, and shall keep the same in
safe custody of the nearest police station or police post or traffic
police circle officer or any other designated place declared by the
Delhi Police or in the designated impounding pits of the Transport
Department against a proper receipt to be given by him in Form
O.S.S. to the owner or in charge of the vehicle from whose custody the
vehicle was seized and detained.
(8)The officer in charge of the Police Station or police Post or
Traffic Inspector of the circle or the officer in charge of the
impounding pit shall ensure that the vehicle is kept in safe custody
along with the goods contained therein, if any, at the time of keeping
the same in his custody.
(9)The concerned person may get the vehicle released within a period
of ten days from the
date of seizure or detention of the vehicle, as the case may be, after
complying with the
requirements of law and on approval of the competent authority.
(10)In case the vehicle is not got released within the period
specified in Sub-rule (9), then, rental charges at the rate of one
hundred rupees per day, subject to a maximum of one thousand rupees,
shall be charged after the expiry of the said period of ten days from
the date of seizure of detention of the vehicle.]
-------- Original Message --------
From: "Dinkar Adeeb" <minhome.delhi@gov.in>
Date: Aug 5, 2016 4:11:29 PM
Subject: Fwd: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa vehicles
To: commtpt@nic.in, <commtpt@nic.in>
For attention Shri Sandip Kumar, Commr Tpt
-------- Original Message --------
From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
Date: Aug 4, 2016 11:55:06 PM
Subject: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa vehicles
To: Dinkar Adeeb <minhome.delhi@gov.in>, indiaresists
<indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Cc: commtpt@nic.in
Kind Attn: Brig (Retd) Dinkar Adeeb
Dear Brig. Adeeb
It has been over a week and there is no revert / update on my
complaint which you kindly re-forwarded.
This is quite unlike the exceedingly prompt action which your office
took when a certain transport sector operator from Mumbai (who
incidentally has somehow become quite important in the Aam Aadmi
Party) contacted your office's Mr. Sunil Chandrakar for "sleuthing"
from the same GNCTD Transport Dept. office and was given information
in a few hours. In fact Moneylife.In magazine has quoted the AAP
office bearer as saying
"With an AAP government in Delhi, it has had the access to do some
more sleuthing as well."
http://www.moneylife.in/article/pankaja-munde-using-delhi-registered-range-rover-in-maharashtra-without-paying-taxes-aap/47627.html
If anything this proves my point that corruption is rampant and runs
rife in the Transport Dept and also evidently in your Minister's
office.
PS: If your Minister is incapable of doing his job for the benefit of
the ordinary Delhi-ites who elected AAP, then perhaps he should resign
and let the L-G run Delhi ?
sincerely
Sarbajit Roy
New Delhi
On 7/28/16, Dinkar Adeeb <minhome.delhi@gov.in> wrote:
> For a feed back for Hon'ble Minister pl...... From .OSD Tpt
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> From: "O/o of Minister (Health, Home, PWD, Power, Industries)"
> <moh.delhi@gov.in>
> Date: Jul 27, 2016 12:44:14 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa
> vehicles
> To: HOME <minhome.delhi@gov.in>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> Date: Jul 27, 2016 12:33:00 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa
> vehicles
> To: MIN H & FW DELHI <moh.delhi@gov.in>
>
>
>
>
> KIND ATTN: MR. Sunil Chandrakar
>
> As discussed with yourself today on telecon, and your assurance, I would
> appreciate your immediate reply on the following emails (trail appended)
> concerning transport dept..
>
>
>
>
> Sincerely
>
> Sarbajit Roy
> National Convenor
> India Against Corruption, jan andolan
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
> Tel: 8010205897 (Mob)
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Operation Branch <dcops05@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:59 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa
> vehicles
> To: "V.D. Sharma" <vdayal61@gmail.com>
> Cc: sroy.mb@gmail.com, commtpt <commtpt@nic.in>
>
>
>
> for immediate necessary action please.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: commtpt <commtpt@nic.in>
> Date: Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:20 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa
> vehicles
> To: DC OPS <dcops05@gmail.com>
>
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> From: GopalRai Minister <gopalrai.delhi@gov.in>
> Date: May 12, 2016 3:58:43 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa
> vehicles
> To: commtpt <commtpt@nic.in>
>
>
> Sir,
>
> Forwarded for your kind perusal andnecessary action.
>
> With regards,
>
> O.S.D. to Minister of Transport, Labour
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> From: CM DELHI <cmdelhi@nic.in>
> Date: 28 Apr 2016 13:24:34
> Subject: Fwd: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa
> vehicles
> To: MIN TPT DELHI <gopalrai.delhi@gov.in>
> Cc: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
>
>
> Sir,
>
> This email has been received at CM's official emailID. It is being forwarded
> for your kind perusal and appropriate necessaryaction at your end.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajeev Gupta
>
> O.S.D. - Chief Minister's Office
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> Date: Apr 26, 2016 12:45:41 PM
> Subject: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa vehicles
> To: cmdelhi <cmdelhi@nic.in>, commtpt <commtpt@nic.in>, osdlg
> <osdlg@nic.in>
>
> To:
> 1) Shri Arvind Kejriwal,CM GoNCTD
> 2) Comm. Transport GoNCTD
> 3) OSD to LG/GoNCTD
>
> Dear Sirs
>
> No action has been taken on my attached complaint below. It seems
> GoNCT of Delhi is not interested in acting upon complaints of
> corruption against its officers and departments.
>
> Despite notification of Transport Dept dated 11.Dec.2014 the
> E-rickshaws continuity to ply with impunity all over Delhi and
> especially on the notified streets where they are prohibited,
> such as Pankha Road and in notified roads of Dwarka.
>
> My private enquiries with Delhi Traffic Police indicate that
> prosecution under Section 115 MV Act for these vehicles is not being
> carried out properly because of gross corruption in Transport Dept
> GNCTD who have not even erected the traffic signs prescribed under the
> Motor Vehicle Act for the Police to prosecute them under s.115 r/w
> s.194 MV Act.
>
> It is further learned that E-rickshaw unions are bribing Transport
> Dept enforcement officers to refrain from taking action against them,
> especially for the unregistered e-rickshaws, and that the stupendous
> bribes involved are reaching high levels of government.
>
> Kindly inform me within 72 hours what action is being taken by you to
> immediately resolve this menace of e-rickshaws operating in Delhi
> which is a hazard to the other traffic on the roads as well as to the
> citizens.
>
> Sincerely
>
> Sarbajit Roy
> National Convenor
> India Against Corruption, jan andolan
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
> Tel: 8010205897 (Mob)
>
> On 2/8/16, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> To:
>> 1) Shri Arvind Kejriwal,CM GoNCTD
>> 2) Shri Parimal Rai, Comm. Transport GoNCTD
>> 3) OSD to LG/GoNCTD
>>
>> Dear Sirs
>>
>> VERY URGENT
>>
>> I am constrained to complain that there is GROSS CORRUPTION in
>> Transport department of GoNCTD concerning the plying of E-rickshaws
>> and permits to Grameen Sewa vehicles.which is causing menace to
>> commuters of DTC Bus services.
>>
>> In this connection,you may kindly review some videos taken at Sagarpur
>> DTC Bus Stop which is directly opposite Police Station Hari Nagar on
>> the Pankha Road on 6 Feb 2016.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yki1IQ_zGQ4
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDU0LoLfegw
>>
>> It is self evident that these poorly maintained Grameen Sewa tempos
>> and E-rickshaws (mostly unregistered) are stopping for long periods
>> directly in the "bus box" of the DTC stands and collecting passengers.
>> As a result the DTC buses cannot enter the bus lane and stop within 1
>> meter of the bus stop as they are required (in law) to do because of
>> these tempos. The bus passengers therefore come onto the road and
>> occupy the lanes and the buses stop in the 3rd lane. Thereby the
>> traffic capacity on the Pankha Road is reduced by a factor of 300%
>> merely because a few Grameen Sewa and E-rickshaws are parked at the
>> DTC bus stop. The air pollution in Delhi also spikes because of
>> traffic jams caused by these small capacity vehicles.
>>
>> There is also a major safety issue since bus passengers are forced to
>> go into heavy traffic to board buses stopping very far from the bus
>> stop. Since the E-rickshaws are mostly unregistered the Delhi Police
>> is unable to prosecute them. The responsibility of prosecuting these
>> unregistered E-rickshaws is that of Transport Dept/GoNCTD and not of
>> Delhi Traffic Police. It is very strange that these vehicles are still
>> plying on the Master Plan roads, and it reeks of huge corruption in
>> Transport Department.
>>
>> Accordingly, I am calling upon the GoNCTD Transport Department to
>> immediately impound all unregistered E-rickshaws everywhere in Delhi.
>> I am also calling upon Transport Department to cancel, by
>> notification, all permits of Grameen Sewa vehicles plying on Master
>> Plan roads (ie.roads which are 18 m.or more in width as per Master
>> Plan) and not sanction such routes.
>>
>> Kindly do so immediately and within 7 days in any case.
>>
>> Sincerely
>>
>> Sarbajit Roy
>> National Convenor
>> India Against Corruption, jan andolan
>> B-59 Defence Colony
>> New Delhi 110024
>> Tel: 8010205897 (Mob)
>>
> --
> OSD to Commr.
> Govt. of Delhi
>
Shri Sandip Kumar, IAS, Commr Tpt / GNCTD
cc: o/o Minister of Transport/GNCTD
cc: o/o CM Delhi
Sir,
I refer to the string of complaints I have made to your office and o/o
Minister Transport (GNCTD) concerning thousands of E-rickshaws
illegally plying on Pankha Road, New Delhi in violation your Dept
notification dated 11.Dec.2014, and thereby endangering the public
safety.
Since I have reason to believe you (as Commissioner of Police for
Traffic in Delhi u/rule 123) DMVR are deliberately not impounding
these vehicles for reasons of gross corruption, I am giving you one
final opportunity to personally ensure that no e-rickshaw plies or
parks on Pankha Road, New Delhi within 7 days of today or thereafter.
Accordingly, I specifically draw your attention to Section 39 of Motor
Vehicles Act r/w rule 123 Delhi Motor Vehicle Rules (DMVR 1993)
concerning these illegal motor vehicles which are also mostly
operating without the mandatory registration.
Herein fail not.
sincerely
Sarbajit Roy
B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024
Tel : 8010205897
Relevant sections of law set out for your ready reference
Section 39 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
39. Necessity for registration.—No person shall drive any motor
vehicle and no owner of a motor vehicle shall cause or permit the
vehicle to be driven in any public place or in any other place unless
the vehicle is registered in accordance with this Chapter and the
certificate of registration of the vehicle has not been suspended or
cancelled and the vehicle carries a registration mark displayed in the
prescribed manner: Provided that nothing in this section shall apply
to a motor vehicle in possession of a dealer subject to such
conditions as may be prescribed by the Central Government.
Rule 123 , Delhi Motor Vehicle Rules
123.Functions and Powers of officers of Motor vehicles Department.-
(1)The State Government may delegate any power under the Act and the
rules made thereunder to any person for the proper implementation of
the Act and the rules made thereunder and such persons shall
discharge all function and perform all duties as assigned to them most
diligently.
(2)All the authorities prescribed under the Act and the rules made
thereunder and all such
persons so empowered, shall be under the over-all control of the
Commissioner. The
Commissioner shall be under the control of the State Government and
shall exercise all the
powers of the police officer of the rank of Commissioner of Police
under the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988.
(3)The Joint Director(s) (Transport) and the Deputy Director (s)
(Transport) shall be under the control of the Commissioner and shall
exercise the powers of Deputy Commissioner of Police under the Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988.
(4)All other Gazetted officers of the Transport Department shall be
under the control of the Commissioner and shall exercise the powers of
Assistant Commissioner of Police under the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988.
All the Inspectors shall be under the control of the Commissioner and
shall exercise powers of the rank of the Inspector of Police under the
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
(5)All other checking staff shall be under the control of Commissioner
and shall exercise the powers of the corresponding rank of the Delhi
Police under the Motor Vehicles Act,1988.
(6)In addition to the powers that may be conferred on any officer of
the Transport Department under sub-section (3) of Section 213 of the
Act, such officer shall also be empowered by the State Government
under sub-section(5) of Section 213 of the Act.
(7)Any police officer(s) or the person(s) appointed as officer(s)
under Section 213 of the
Act and specified as such in rule 123, not below the rank of
(Assistant Sub-Inspector),
shall have power, if they have reasons to believe that a motor vehicle
has been or is being
used in contravention of the provisions of Section 3 or Section 4 or
Section 39 or without
the permit required by sub-section (1) of section 66 or in
contravention of any condition of such permit relating to the route
on which or the area in which or the purpose for which the vehicle may
be used to seize and detain the vehicle, and shall keep the same in
safe custody of the nearest police station or police post or traffic
police circle officer or any other designated place declared by the
Delhi Police or in the designated impounding pits of the Transport
Department against a proper receipt to be given by him in Form
O.S.S. to the owner or in charge of the vehicle from whose custody the
vehicle was seized and detained.
(8)The officer in charge of the Police Station or police Post or
Traffic Inspector of the circle or the officer in charge of the
impounding pit shall ensure that the vehicle is kept in safe custody
along with the goods contained therein, if any, at the time of keeping
the same in his custody.
(9)The concerned person may get the vehicle released within a period
of ten days from the
date of seizure or detention of the vehicle, as the case may be, after
complying with the
requirements of law and on approval of the competent authority.
(10)In case the vehicle is not got released within the period
specified in Sub-rule (9), then, rental charges at the rate of one
hundred rupees per day, subject to a maximum of one thousand rupees,
shall be charged after the expiry of the said period of ten days from
the date of seizure of detention of the vehicle.]
-------- Original Message --------
From: "Dinkar Adeeb" <minhome.delhi@gov.in>
Date: Aug 5, 2016 4:11:29 PM
Subject: Fwd: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa vehicles
To: commtpt@nic.in, <commtpt@nic.in>
For attention Shri Sandip Kumar, Commr Tpt
-------- Original Message --------
From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
Date: Aug 4, 2016 11:55:06 PM
Subject: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa vehicles
To: Dinkar Adeeb <minhome.delhi@gov.in>, indiaresists
<indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Cc: commtpt@nic.in
Kind Attn: Brig (Retd) Dinkar Adeeb
Dear Brig. Adeeb
It has been over a week and there is no revert / update on my
complaint which you kindly re-forwarded.
This is quite unlike the exceedingly prompt action which your office
took when a certain transport sector operator from Mumbai (who
incidentally has somehow become quite important in the Aam Aadmi
Party) contacted your office's Mr. Sunil Chandrakar for "sleuthing"
from the same GNCTD Transport Dept. office and was given information
in a few hours. In fact Moneylife.In magazine has quoted the AAP
office bearer as saying
"With an AAP government in Delhi, it has had the access to do some
more sleuthing as well."
http://www.moneylife.in/article/pankaja-munde-using-delhi-registered-range-rover-in-maharashtra-without-paying-taxes-aap/47627.html
If anything this proves my point that corruption is rampant and runs
rife in the Transport Dept and also evidently in your Minister's
office.
PS: If your Minister is incapable of doing his job for the benefit of
the ordinary Delhi-ites who elected AAP, then perhaps he should resign
and let the L-G run Delhi ?
sincerely
Sarbajit Roy
New Delhi
On 7/28/16, Dinkar Adeeb <minhome.delhi@gov.in> wrote:
> For a feed back for Hon'ble Minister pl...... From .OSD Tpt
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> From: "O/o of Minister (Health, Home, PWD, Power, Industries)"
> <moh.delhi@gov.in>
> Date: Jul 27, 2016 12:44:14 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa
> vehicles
> To: HOME <minhome.delhi@gov.in>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> Date: Jul 27, 2016 12:33:00 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa
> vehicles
> To: MIN H & FW DELHI <moh.delhi@gov.in>
>
>
>
>
> KIND ATTN: MR. Sunil Chandrakar
>
> As discussed with yourself today on telecon, and your assurance, I would
> appreciate your immediate reply on the following emails (trail appended)
> concerning transport dept..
>
>
>
>
> Sincerely
>
> Sarbajit Roy
> National Convenor
> India Against Corruption, jan andolan
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
> Tel: 8010205897 (Mob)
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Operation Branch <dcops05@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:59 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa
> vehicles
> To: "V.D. Sharma" <vdayal61@gmail.com>
> Cc: sroy.mb@gmail.com, commtpt <commtpt@nic.in>
>
>
>
> for immediate necessary action please.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: commtpt <commtpt@nic.in>
> Date: Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:20 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa
> vehicles
> To: DC OPS <dcops05@gmail.com>
>
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> From: GopalRai Minister <gopalrai.delhi@gov.in>
> Date: May 12, 2016 3:58:43 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa
> vehicles
> To: commtpt <commtpt@nic.in>
>
>
> Sir,
>
> Forwarded for your kind perusal andnecessary action.
>
> With regards,
>
> O.S.D. to Minister of Transport, Labour
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> From: CM DELHI <cmdelhi@nic.in>
> Date: 28 Apr 2016 13:24:34
> Subject: Fwd: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa
> vehicles
> To: MIN TPT DELHI <gopalrai.delhi@gov.in>
> Cc: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
>
>
> Sir,
>
> This email has been received at CM's official emailID. It is being forwarded
> for your kind perusal and appropriate necessaryaction at your end.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajeev Gupta
>
> O.S.D. - Chief Minister's Office
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> Date: Apr 26, 2016 12:45:41 PM
> Subject: Re: CORRUPTION: Menace of E-rickshaws and Grameen Sewa vehicles
> To: cmdelhi <cmdelhi@nic.in>, commtpt <commtpt@nic.in>, osdlg
> <osdlg@nic.in>
>
> To:
> 1) Shri Arvind Kejriwal,CM GoNCTD
> 2) Comm. Transport GoNCTD
> 3) OSD to LG/GoNCTD
>
> Dear Sirs
>
> No action has been taken on my attached complaint below. It seems
> GoNCT of Delhi is not interested in acting upon complaints of
> corruption against its officers and departments.
>
> Despite notification of Transport Dept dated 11.Dec.2014 the
> E-rickshaws continuity to ply with impunity all over Delhi and
> especially on the notified streets where they are prohibited,
> such as Pankha Road and in notified roads of Dwarka.
>
> My private enquiries with Delhi Traffic Police indicate that
> prosecution under Section 115 MV Act for these vehicles is not being
> carried out properly because of gross corruption in Transport Dept
> GNCTD who have not even erected the traffic signs prescribed under the
> Motor Vehicle Act for the Police to prosecute them under s.115 r/w
> s.194 MV Act.
>
> It is further learned that E-rickshaw unions are bribing Transport
> Dept enforcement officers to refrain from taking action against them,
> especially for the unregistered e-rickshaws, and that the stupendous
> bribes involved are reaching high levels of government.
>
> Kindly inform me within 72 hours what action is being taken by you to
> immediately resolve this menace of e-rickshaws operating in Delhi
> which is a hazard to the other traffic on the roads as well as to the
> citizens.
>
> Sincerely
>
> Sarbajit Roy
> National Convenor
> India Against Corruption, jan andolan
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
> Tel: 8010205897 (Mob)
>
> On 2/8/16, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> To:
>> 1) Shri Arvind Kejriwal,CM GoNCTD
>> 2) Shri Parimal Rai, Comm. Transport GoNCTD
>> 3) OSD to LG/GoNCTD
>>
>> Dear Sirs
>>
>> VERY URGENT
>>
>> I am constrained to complain that there is GROSS CORRUPTION in
>> Transport department of GoNCTD concerning the plying of E-rickshaws
>> and permits to Grameen Sewa vehicles.which is causing menace to
>> commuters of DTC Bus services.
>>
>> In this connection,you may kindly review some videos taken at Sagarpur
>> DTC Bus Stop which is directly opposite Police Station Hari Nagar on
>> the Pankha Road on 6 Feb 2016.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yki1IQ_zGQ4
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDU0LoLfegw
>>
>> It is self evident that these poorly maintained Grameen Sewa tempos
>> and E-rickshaws (mostly unregistered) are stopping for long periods
>> directly in the "bus box" of the DTC stands and collecting passengers.
>> As a result the DTC buses cannot enter the bus lane and stop within 1
>> meter of the bus stop as they are required (in law) to do because of
>> these tempos. The bus passengers therefore come onto the road and
>> occupy the lanes and the buses stop in the 3rd lane. Thereby the
>> traffic capacity on the Pankha Road is reduced by a factor of 300%
>> merely because a few Grameen Sewa and E-rickshaws are parked at the
>> DTC bus stop. The air pollution in Delhi also spikes because of
>> traffic jams caused by these small capacity vehicles.
>>
>> There is also a major safety issue since bus passengers are forced to
>> go into heavy traffic to board buses stopping very far from the bus
>> stop. Since the E-rickshaws are mostly unregistered the Delhi Police
>> is unable to prosecute them. The responsibility of prosecuting these
>> unregistered E-rickshaws is that of Transport Dept/GoNCTD and not of
>> Delhi Traffic Police. It is very strange that these vehicles are still
>> plying on the Master Plan roads, and it reeks of huge corruption in
>> Transport Department.
>>
>> Accordingly, I am calling upon the GoNCTD Transport Department to
>> immediately impound all unregistered E-rickshaws everywhere in Delhi.
>> I am also calling upon Transport Department to cancel, by
>> notification, all permits of Grameen Sewa vehicles plying on Master
>> Plan roads (ie.roads which are 18 m.or more in width as per Master
>> Plan) and not sanction such routes.
>>
>> Kindly do so immediately and within 7 days in any case.
>>
>> Sincerely
>>
>> Sarbajit Roy
>> National Convenor
>> India Against Corruption, jan andolan
>> B-59 Defence Colony
>> New Delhi 110024
>> Tel: 8010205897 (Mob)
>>
> --
> OSD to Commr.
> Govt. of Delhi
>
Sunday, August 21, 2016
[IAC#RG] How Kejriwal is FAST UNDOING a phenomenon called AAP
Kindly see my article published in DNA yesterday (Aug 19):
Munish K Raizada, MD, FAAPHow Kejriwal is FAST undoing a phenomenon called AAP:
Thank you!
Board Certified Neonatologist
Chicago, USA
Phone: USA: +1- 217 720 9331 ; India: +91 98737- 03054
Chicago, USA
Phone: USA: +1- 217 720 9331 ; India: +91 98737- 03054
Skype: munish.raizada
Follow me at:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)