Hum Janenge: 10/9/16

Saturday, October 15, 2016

[IAC#RG] Complaint of CORRUPTION in tax exemption to "Anna" Hazare film

DELHI DIALOGUE COMMISSION (www.delhidialoguecommission.in)

an initiative of "India Against Corruption"

To:

Shri Arvind Kejriwal,

Chief Minister of NCT Delhi

cc: OSD to Hon'ble LG of Delhi (for information)

BY EMAIL

Dear Chief Minister,

Sub: CORRUPTION in tax exemption to "Anna" Hazare film

India Against Corruption is constrained to inform you of CORRUPTION by the Commissioner Entertainment Tax / Excise Commissioner of Delhi for recommending to the Cabinet the motion picture "Anna Kisan Baburao Hazare" or suchlike for tax exemption in clear violation of The Delhi Entertainments and Betting Tax Act, 1996.

You may kindly see the relevant website page of the said Dept of your Govt. of NCT Delhi.

http://excise.delhigovt.nic.in/ex4.asp

It is very strange that this exemption is announced since by all accounts the film is very badly made, is just released, is a fully commercial film and is yet to receive any National or International awards as required by Act and Rules.

Accordingly India Against Corruption infers that your government has only given this tax exemption because Shri Anna Hazare is well known to one of your Cabinet Ministers and to your Guruji Sri Sri Ravi Shankar and to your party financier Shri Jindal, and there is thus considerable CORRUPTION in your cabinet for granting this tax exemption in violation of prescriptions.

Kindly examine our complaint and take suitable action so that there is no hanky panky and revenue loss caused to exchequer.

Looking forward to your prompt reply concerning this matter of tremendous public interest to citizens of Delhi.

Sarbajit Roy

National Convenor
for Delhi Dialogue Commission

(an initiative of "India Against Corruption")

B-59 Defence Colony,
New Delhi 110024

M: +91-8010205897

Friday, October 14, 2016

Re: [IAC#RG] AAP donation scam exposed

This is hand in gloves with yogendr yadav to take revange with kejriwal and aap

On Oct 14, 2016 17:53, "Swaraj Abhiyan" <theswarajabhiyan@gmail.com> wrote:

For many months now SWARAJ ABHIYAN has been complaining that the Aam Aadmi Party has stopped publishing list of donors on its website.

eg: http://www.aamaadmiparty.us/2016/09/why-the-aap-indias-donor-list-page-is-not-working

The reason is now in public domain - Tax Payers have paid for AAP's expansion plans.

SWARAJ ABHIYAN (2009)

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC#RG] STRICTLY PRIVATE: CONFIDENTIAL

Your IAC members may be interested to know that last week LG appointed Ms.Alka Diwan IAS (AGMUT) as Member Secretary Delhi Commission of Women. Ms. Diwan is presently RCS and will hold additional charge.

Manish Sisodia was quizzed today for 3 hours by Anti-Corruption Bureau to firmly record his clarifications of March 2016 that all powers of DCW vest in and are to be exercised by Member-Secretary DCW as per 1994 Act and 2000 Rules.

At one stroke Swati Maliwal Jaihind has been neutered.

SWARAJ ABHIYAN (2009)

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

DELHI DIALOGUE COMMISSION (www.delhidialoguecommission.in)

an initiative of "India Against Corruption"

To:

Shri Arvind Kejriwal,

Chief Minister of NCT Delhi

cc: OSD to Hon'ble LG of Delhi (for information)

BY EMAIL

Dear Chief Minister,

Sub: Appointment of Ms. Swati Maliwal as Chairperson of the Delhi Women's Commission

We have noted that you have not replied to our earlier email dt. Oct.9 2016 and also that the misogynist abuser Mr. Ashutosh continues as National Spoksperson for the Aam Aadmi party. Now, since you have not denied the contents of Mr. Kapil Bajaj's piece (which we reported to you) alleging your own past liason/s and/or "bedroom farce" with Ms. Maliwal (@Shilpa), and since NEWSGRAM.COM (a news website in USA) has published some rather disturbing facts about Ms. Swati Maliwal and her keen interest in prostitution rackets in Delhi, the India Against Corruption ("IAC") is caused to publicly question you and/or your Government as follows:-

1) Is it correct that Ms.Swati Maliwal is appointed as Chairperson of the Delhi Commission for Women, and if so the date and the citations of notifications / orders for Ms/ Maliwal's appointment ? The reaons we are caused to seek such basic information is as follows:-

a) That the RTI disclosure of Delhi Govt. (17 manuals) for The Delhi Commission for Women, downloaded by us today and attached, states that Ms. Barkha Singh, MLA is the Chairperson. URL : http://delhigovt.nic.in/upload/rti_manual/233-9.doc

b) IAC is unable to locate the gazette / order / circular, if any, appointing Ms. Maliwal as Chairperson DCW - either via the DCW's sub-website or via the main GNCTD website.

2) Is it correct that Ms. Swati Maliwal was employed, as she claims, with your PCRF trust since 2006, because as far as we know PCRF was only constituted by you on or around 20th Dec 2006 and all our information is that Ms. Maliwal had never even met you till then ? I seem to recall that in the financial year 2006-07 the only employee of PCRF was the late Santosh Koli who was paid about Rs. 13,175/- as salary for the Jan '07 to March '07 period.

3) Is it ethical to directly employ your own PCRF corporate employees in lucrative government positions under you once you come to power, and that too without advertising for the position ? IAC observes that this is completely against the principled stand you took for appointments for the posts of Chief and other Central Information Commissioners.

4) The reasons whereby Ms. Maliwal was nominated for the position of Chairperson DCW by your ministerial colleague (and also co-Trustee in PCRF) Mr. Manish Sisodia, and the reasons why no public advertisement for the post of Chairperson DCW was issued so that persons actually "committed to the cause of women" could be identified.

5) Because Ms. Swati Maliwal had publicly announced at a press conference called by her that she would shortly disclose the names of 2 prominent politicians behind prostitution rackets in GB Road, The India Against Corruption would like to know the entire facts behind Ms. Maliwal's allegations publicly made.

Looking forwrd to your prompt reply concerning this matter of tremendous public interest to citizens of Delhi.

Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor
for Delhi Dialogue Commission
(an initiative of "India Against Corruption")

B-59 Defence Colony,
New Delhi 110024
M: +91-8010205897

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

[IAC#RG] AAP donation scam exposed

For many months now SWARAJ ABHIYAN has been complaining that the Aam Aadmi Party has stopped publishing list of donors on its website.

eg: http://www.aamaadmiparty.us/2016/09/why-the-aap-indias-donor-list-page-is-not-working

The reason is now in public domain - Tax Payers have paid for AAP's expansion plans.

SWARAJ ABHIYAN (2009)

Re: [IAC#RG] STRICTLY PRIVATE: CONFIDENTIAL

DELHI DIALOGUE COMMISSION (www.delhidialoguecommission.in)

an initiative of "India Against Corruption"

To:

Shri Arvind Kejriwal,

Chief Minister of NCT Delhi

cc: OSD to Hon'ble LG of Delhi (for information)

BY EMAIL

Dear Chief Minister,

Sub: Appointment of Ms. Swati Maliwal as Chairperson of the Delhi Women's Commission

We have noted that you have not replied to our earlier email dt. Oct.9 2016 and also that the misogynist abuser Mr. Ashutosh continues as National Spoksperson for the Aam Aadmi party. Now, since you have not denied the contents of Mr. Kapil Bajaj's piece (which we reported to you) alleging your own past liason/s and/or "bedroom farce" with Ms. Maliwal (@Shilpa), and since NEWSGRAM.COM (a news website in USA) has published some rather disturbing facts about Ms. Swati Maliwal and her keen interest in prostitution rackets in Delhi, the India Against Corruption ("IAC") is caused to publicly question you and/or your Government as follows:-

1) Is it correct that Ms.Swati Maliwal is appointed as Chairperson of the Delhi Commission for Women, and if so the date and the citations of notifications / orders for Ms/ Maliwal's appointment ? The reaons we are caused to seek such basic information is as follows:-

a) That the RTI disclosure of Delhi Govt. (17 manuals) for The Delhi Commission for Women, downloaded by us today and attached, states that Ms. Barkha Singh, MLA is the Chairperson. URL : http://delhigovt.nic.in/upload/rti_manual/233-9.doc

b) IAC is unable to locate the gazette / order / circular, if any, appointing Ms. Maliwal as Chairperson DCW - either via the DCW's sub-website or via the main GNCTD website.

2) Is it correct that Ms. Swati Maliwal was employed, as she claims, with your PCRF trust since 2006, because as far as we know PCRF was only constituted by you on or around 20th Dec 2006 and all our information is that Ms. Maliwal had never even met you till then ? I seem to recall that in the financial year 2006-07 the only employee of PCRF was the late Santosh Koli who was paid about Rs. 13,175/- as salary for the Jan '07 to March '07 period.

3) Is it ethical to directly employ your own PCRF corporate employees in lucrative government positions under you once you come to power, and that too without advertising for the position ? IAC observes that this is completely against the principled stand you took for appointments for the posts of Chief and other Central Information Commissioners.

4) The reasons whereby Ms. Maliwal was nominated for the position of Chairperson DCW by your ministerial colleague (and also co-Trustee in PCRF) Mr. Manish Sisodia, and the reasons why no public advertisement for the post of Chairperson DCW was issued so that persons actually "committed to the cause of women" could be identified.

5) Because Ms. Swati Maliwal had publicly announced at a press conference called by her that she would shortly disclose the names of 2 prominent politicians behind prostitution rackets in GB Road, The India Against Corruption would like to know the entire facts behind Ms. Maliwal's allegations publicly made.

Looking forwrd to your prompt reply concerning this matter of tremendous public interest to citizens of Delhi.

Sarbajit Roy

National Convenor
for Delhi Dialogue Commission

(an initiative of "India Against Corruption")

B-59 Defence Colony,
New Delhi 110024

M: +91-8010205897

Re:[IAC#RG]

Another question to consider is if this is the right time. The country is vulnerable from external attack and their claim of Kashmir is because the valley is Muslim majority. It surely will create internal disturbances. So is the govt. Capable of fighting fire on two fronts. I am only questioning the time not the motive or need of a common code.regds jkgaur

On 14 Oct 2016 12:20, manak nahata <manaknahata@hotmail.com> wrote:

Dear Mr.Roy

I have seen the two communications carefully and find that people are putting a word of caution as I did.One would like to see other communications, if and when they follow, and later make an opinion for the better.You may consider to wait for a while and see the opinion of other well meaning persons also and arrive at a decision after a good face to face discussion

Regards

Dr.M.C.Nahata

Thursday, October 13, 2016

Re: [IAC#RG] Law Commission seeks inputs on UCC

Dear All,

We must support UCC and give reasons in absolute terms.

This country will go to dogs, ungovernable in future and the very existence will be at stake.

May we may antagonize a sizable section of the population, never mind, even amongst them there are a great silent majority, who wish to express their mind and raise their voice but just because of the same fear of the fundamentalist, they are forced to be quite.

Let us rise above politics and all other issues for the sake of the nation; we should submit an unanimous view of approval to establish UCC.

Dr K S Elangbam

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Amitava Sanyal <saamit1@hotmail.com> wrote:

5. Not optional

6. Regulated

Sent from my Samsung device

-------- Original message --------
From: Dharmesh Dutta <duttadharmesh@gmail.com>
Date: 10-13-2016 12:11 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Law Commission seeks inputs on UCC

5. No

6. Regulated

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

To get a sense of the mood of our subscribers, we are seeking inputs on 2 queries which the Law Commission has posed

http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/questionnaire.pdf

5. Should the Uniform Civil Code be optional ?

a) Yes

b) No

6. Should the following practices be banned / regulated ?

a) Polygamy

b) Polyandry
c) Maitri-karar (friendship deed) and similar customary practices

Subscribers may post their views

Sarbajit

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

If our members wish we can discuss the Law Commission's UCC questionnaire which is accessible here
http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/questionnaire.pdf

Sarbajit

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

[IAC#RG]

Dear Mr.Roy

Regards

Dr.M.C.Nahata

Re: [IAC#RG] IMPORTANT NOTICE: IAC in LS-2019 elections

BHUSHAN HAS HURT AND MASSACRED HIS NEW-BORN PARTY BY HIS STUPID STATEMENT ABOUT KASHMIR.

WHAT CAN U EXPECT FROM SUCH CONFUSED AND IRRELEVANT PEOPLE ASPIRING TO LEAD INDIA ?

From: Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com>
To: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 6:05 AM
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] IMPORTANT NOTICE: IAC in LS-2019 elections

I have a word of caution seeing the history of political parties. Although the constitution is silent on political parties their functioning finances accountability etc. Congress got a he'd start as a ruling outfit. Other parties tried to follow in their footsteps justifying not on clearly defined political ideology but the egos of community leaders. Today's there are more than 1000 political parties and they are increasing by the day.
When app was formed there were high expectations and people from all walks of life joined and gave them unprecedented mandate in date. But people today are completely disillusioned and yadav and prsant bhusan a breakaway from aap are forming a separate political outfit.
S.Roy and others have to ensure these pitfalls. They have to declare their ideology on all issues relating to governance and stick to them. If it means delaying formation of party so be it.
S.Roy has clarified about funds which is good because no political party can run without finances. And I hope there is no tainted money either from- India or from abroad - east or west north or south. There is saying' no army can march on empty stomach'
Regds jkgaur

On 13 Oct 2016 10:52, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Dr Nahata

I can assure you that this list has a high percentage of persons with a keen sense of history.

The party which IAC proposes shall be operationally separate from IAC but shall have a core of workers grounded in IAC's revolutionary philosophy and with an entirely different membership profile from the usual rag-tag political parties (mostly composed of opportunists and carpet-baggers) and our party shall adopt some unconventional positions on public issues.

IAC has more than enough resources and dedicated cadres across India to launch a party in a month if required and to sustain it for decades if required. However, being a low profile movement we deem it prudent to initially utilise the momentum of IAC's volunteer base instead of using / revealing our own resources.

We expect Aam Aadmi Party to get progressively larger (and therefore more corrupt) and Bhushan-Yadav party to be a niche player fizzling out within 2 years. This will transfer enough of their dissatisfied workers into the clean, honest and revolutionary party IAC will form and we are taking certain steps to ensure that name of Swaraj India Party is retained by us for that eventuality.

Lastly, the members of the new party shall not be big names, or professional politicians. We have no use for such people who come begging to HRA for votes at every elections.

Sarbajit Roy

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 7:56 PM, manak nahata <manaknahata@hotmail.com> wrote:

You may be aware that late Rajaji had formed Swatantra party and Maharani Gayatridevi of Jaipur was an important member of that party besides many others but it did not last long.

The idea of forming a new party sounds good but to run it is not an easy affair-- of course this must have been thought of by the concerned people We wish you best of luck.

Dr.M.C.Nahata

From: indiaresists-request@lists. riseup.net <indiaresists-request@lists. riseup.net> on behalf of mathangi krishnamurthy <mathangi.krishnamurthy@ rediffmail.com>
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 5:32:43 AM
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] IMPORTANT NOTICE: IAC in LS-2019 elections

The IAC decision to explore its options of forming a national political party - "SWARAJ INDIA PARTY" is very welcome and actually long overdue. It is great the IAC is finally coming out in the open, and the presence of even a few of IAC's freedom soldiers in public life will show India who the true patriots really are.

Please count me in.

MK

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net "
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@ lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/ signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/ list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption. net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC#RG] Law Commission seeks inputs on UCC

5. Not optional

6. Regulated

Sent from my Samsung device

-------- Original message --------
From: Dharmesh Dutta <duttadharmesh@gmail.com>
Date: 10-13-2016 12:11 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Law Commission seeks inputs on UCC

5. No

6. Regulated

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

To get a sense of the mood of our subscribers, we are seeking inputs on 2 queries which the Law Commission has posed

http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/questionnaire.pdf

5. Should the Uniform Civil Code be optional ?

a) Yes

b) No

6. Should the following practices be banned / regulated ?

a) Polygamy

b) Polyandry
c) Maitri-karar (friendship deed) and similar customary practices

Subscribers may post their views

Sarbajit

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

If our members wish we can discuss the Law Commission's UCC questionnaire which is accessible here
http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/questionnaire.pdf

Sarbajit

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC#RG] Law Commission seeks inputs on UCC

Dear Mr. S.Roy.
You must participate whole heartily. But in my view we have to be first clear what are the civil rights you want to codify. Civil rights like liberty equality are all covered by the fundamental rights. Here it is basically concerned with religious rights including marriage divorce property rights and all. They have played havoc with Hindu laws in a hurried manner. They recognise spindas and customary laws yet they they refuse it on the ground that they do not form a core of the religion. The same problem will happen whether it is Islam or christiniaty. And the politicians do it without proper consultation with religious and social institutions. It should be much large and long process of consultations. Nehru did it for Hindus because they can be managed and left Muslim fearing backlash. In the name of progess and modernity which are basically western thoughts let us not sacrifice basic core values of our future traditions and way of life and hand over all our civil rights to the govt. And courts from birth to death and thereafter.Regds JK gaur

On 10 Oct 2016 23:51, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

If our members wish we can discuss the Law Commission's UCC questionnaire which is accessible here
http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/questionnaire.pdf

Sarbajit

Re: [IAC#RG] IMPORTANT NOTICE: IAC in LS-2019 elections

On 13 Oct 2016 10:52, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Dr Nahata

I can assure you that this list has a high percentage of persons with a keen sense of history.

Lastly, the members of the new party shall not be big names, or professional politicians. We have no use for such people who come begging to HRA for votes at every elections.

Sarbajit Roy

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 7:56 PM, manak nahata <manaknahata@hotmail.com> wrote:

You may be aware that late Rajaji had formed Swatantra party and Maharani Gayatridevi of Jaipur was an important member of that party besides many others but it did not last long.

The idea of forming a new party sounds good but to run it is not an easy affair-- of course this must have been thought of by the concerned people We wish you best of luck.

Dr.M.C.Nahata

From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net <indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net> on behalf of mathangi krishnamurthy <mathangi.krishnamurthy@rediffmail.com>
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 5:32:43 AM
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] IMPORTANT NOTICE: IAC in LS-2019 elections

The IAC decision to explore its options of forming a national political party - "SWARAJ INDIA PARTY" is very welcome and actually long overdue. It is great the IAC is finally coming out in the open, and the presence of even a few of IAC's freedom soldiers in public life will show India who the true patriots really are.

Please count me in.

MK

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Wednesday, October 12, 2016

Re: [IAC#RG] IMPORTANT NOTICE: IAC in LS-2019 elections

Dear Mr. Roy

I am a professional--a medical person with 61 years of professional experience in various capacities. I am in my eighties--85 and seen happenings in the country which has certainly been disturbing--and as such I ventilated my ideas and feelings through articles published or even unpublished--which I compiled in three published books.

Recently I read the autobiography of late Maharani Gayatridevi and having read the news of you people considering to form a new political party, I wrote giving you a sort of caution and no other idea .However, if you and your associates feel confident to achieve the intended objectives, it will be in the larger interest of the country--pl go ahead--my good wishes.

Yours Sincerely

Dr.M.C.Nahata

From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net <indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net> on behalf of Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 4:46:36 AM
To: indiaresists
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] IMPORTANT NOTICE: IAC in LS-2019 elections

Dear Dr Nahata

I can assure you that this list has a high percentage of persons with a keen sense of history.

Lastly, the members of the new party shall not be big names, or professional politicians. We have no use for such people who come begging to HRA for votes at every elections.

Sarbajit Roy

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 7:56 PM, manak nahata <manaknahata@hotmail.com> wrote:

You may be aware that late Rajaji had formed Swatantra party and Maharani Gayatridevi of Jaipur was an important member of that party besides many others but it did not last long.

The idea of forming a new party sounds good but to run it is not an easy affair-- of course this must have been thought of by the concerned people We wish you best of luck.

Dr.M.C.Nahata

From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net <indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net> on behalf of mathangi krishnamurthy <mathangi.krishnamurthy@rediffmail.com>
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 5:32:43 AM
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] IMPORTANT NOTICE: IAC in LS-2019 elections

The IAC decision to explore its options of forming a national political party - "SWARAJ INDIA PARTY" is very welcome and actually long overdue. It is great the IAC is finally coming out in the open, and the presence of even a few of IAC's freedom soldiers in public life will show India who the true patriots really are.

Please count me in.

MK

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC#RG] IMPORTANT NOTICE: IAC in LS-2019 elections

Dear Dr Nahata

I can assure you that this list has a high percentage of persons with a keen sense of history.

Lastly, the members of the new party shall not be big names, or professional politicians. We have no use for such people who come begging to HRA for votes at every elections.

Sarbajit Roy

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 7:56 PM, manak nahata <manaknahata@hotmail.com> wrote:

You may be aware that late Rajaji had formed Swatantra party and Maharani Gayatridevi of Jaipur was an important member of that party besides many others but it did not last long.

The idea of forming a new party sounds good but to run it is not an easy affair-- of course this must have been thought of by the concerned people We wish you best of luck.

Dr.M.C.Nahata

From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net <indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net> on behalf of mathangi krishnamurthy <mathangi.krishnamurthy@rediffmail.com>
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 5:32:43 AM
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] IMPORTANT NOTICE: IAC in LS-2019 elections

The IAC decision to explore its options of forming a national political party - "SWARAJ INDIA PARTY" is very welcome and actually long overdue. It is great the IAC is finally coming out in the open, and the presence of even a few of IAC's freedom soldiers in public life will show India who the true patriots really are.

Please count me in.

MK

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC#RG] Formation of 'Swaraj India' party

This is a welcome news from IAC HQ.

Carrying forward from IAC HQ comment that Yogesh Yadav has packed Swaraj Party with useless corrupts it would be better to focus on each of the 17 members of the Swaraj Party Presidium

Take case of Christian Samy formerly AAP Tamil Nadu state convenor and Bhushan-Yadav loyalist

She is well known for running 2 or 3 trusts like AREDS and SWATE with properties in hundreds of crores accreted over the years from mainly foreign sources ostensibly to promote education in Dalits but actually from Christian churches abroad through late Vatican liberation theologian Dr. Desmond D'Abreo's network which has now been fully taken over by Naxals.

See these photos glorifying Naxalite activities organised by Christina Swamy's trust ARED in Karur Distt TN in 2007. Samy's AREDS openly boast of organising such Dalit sangams to practice violence.

The Swaraj Abhiyan (2009)

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

To: IAC subscribers in reply to a querist.

India Against Corruption has been carefully observing attempts by the various A-teams of Congress party to reorganise themselves.

These regroupings are clearly to maximise their incomes and provide reasons to exist for all the useless part-time (now mostly unemployed) foreign financed parasites who have been sucking off the Congress Party / WORLD BANK / USAID / ISI etc. for decades.

Swaraj Abhiyan is filled to the brim with foreign influenced parasites like Yogendra Yadav, Wajahat Habibullah, Aruna Roy, E.A.S Sarma, Shekhar Singh, Amrita Bhardwaj, Venkatesh Nayak, Admiral Ramdas etc. who are included in their so-called "anti-corruption team". These included NAC linked rascals are mostly 'paidayishi' Congressi's, always busy singing for their supper; and the people of India should know their real faces and inter-relationships (for eg. EAS Sarma's US-based son Sanjay is married to Subramaniam Swamy's daughter).

Accordingly, IAC believes such people have no place in our world ie. in the ideal democracy titled 'Poorna Swaraj' which India Against Corruption represents.

Furthermore, if today it is the eunuchs, 'yadavs' and 'banias' dominating Indian politics and treating it as their fiefdom because of their "Gandhi (black money) power", then it is nature's law there shall be a natural volcanic reaction (super-Tsunami) following which will take out all the garbage which the tide brought in and which is as inevitable as day being followed by night or that violence shall follow ahimsa.

Sarbajit

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Raminder Singh <ramisingh.bbc@gmail.com> wrote:
Sarabjit

Yogender Yadav has applied yesterday to Election Commission for recognition of 'Swaraj India'. What is IAC's take on this ? line of action ?

http://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/politics/101016/swaraj-india-files-application-for-registration-with-ec.html

RS Pabbi

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
To:
Shri Yogendra Yadav

cc: for information to:
a) Shri Shanti Bhushan, Sr. Advocate (Patron Swaraj Abhiyan)
b) Shri (Prof) Anand Kumar, National Convenor (Swaraj Abhiyan)

Dear Shri Yadav,

BY EMAIL

We are constrained to bring to your attention that a Facebook page which appears to be under your association's control is making false references to "INDIA AGAINST CORRUPTION" - when there was no need for it - except to confuse and for "passing off" so as to divert IAC subscribers to your association and incidentally get monies from them by misusing goodwill of India Against Corruption's name.

The link is at URL : https://www.facebook.com/swarajindiaofficial/photos/a.313692558999971.1073741828.313353792367181/314535298915697/

The impugned image included in the URL above is at URL : https://fbcdn-photos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xfp1/v/t1.0-0/s480x480/14469557_314535298915697_166972179087520045_n.jpg?oh=a8abdbcb00960a100763a636a4429b5a&oe=586B9F1C&__gda__=1483420270_237658a0adf710c4bbaf4a558fd6a7fb

We are also concerned that your movement, which mostly comprises of person expelled from Aam Aadmi Party, was first named as 'Swaraj Sankalp', then was renamed as 'Swaraj Abhiyan' and has now floated yet another name "SWARAJ INDIA" for a prospective political party. We are also informed that you had intended to title your party as "Democratic Swaraj Party" but another wing of your movement has laid claim to it.

From the said Facebook pages, it seems that you are about to finalise a Constitution / Memorandum for this prospective party without considering that the name of "SWARAJ INDIA PARTY" is already being used by another body of persons, committed to the secular ideals of unquestioned patriots of yore like Chittaranjan Das and Tattyasaheb Kelkar of the iconic 'Swaraj Party' who both unequivocally stood for territorial integrity of India, and which body of persons have also reserved / expressed their Constitutional right/s to participate in political process at time of their choosing under the said party name by registering in advance their prospective party names for future political use and also by using it thereafter.

We are also concerned that your association's President has repeatedly expressed his personal opinion on the territorial integrity of India. We are likewise concerned that in the past (and perhaps even now) several of your association's senior members and/or officer bearers have been closely associated with certain foreign organisations / sponsors. In particular the role of Admiral (Retd.) Ramdas in your association disquietens us.

We would, therefore, appreciate if you would consider some other name for your proposed political party, and so that there is no "passing off" and the people of India are not confused between ourselves, or respective ideologies and our respective names, and so that the iconic SWARAJ PARTY (which played a pivotal role in India's freedom struggle) name is not disrespected and misused and confused by foreign-sponsored persons or those who publicly doubt and question the territorial integrity of India.

NB: I am cc'ing a copy of this email to Shri Shanti Bhushan ji and Prof Anand Kumar, both senior and eminent patrons of your association.

sincerely

Sarbajit Roy
for
INDIA AGAINST CORRUPTION
SWARAJ INDIA PARTY

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC#RG] IMPORTANT NOTICE: IAC in LS-2019 elections

You may be aware that late Rajaji had formed Swatantra party and Maharani Gayatridevi of Jaipur was an important member of that party besides many others but it did not last long.

The idea of forming a new party sounds good but to run it is not an easy affair-- of course this must have been thought of by the concerned people We wish you best of luck.

Dr.M.C.Nahata

From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net <indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net> on behalf of mathangi krishnamurthy <mathangi.krishnamurthy@rediffmail.com>
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 5:32:43 AM
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] IMPORTANT NOTICE: IAC in LS-2019 elections

The IAC decision to explore its options of forming a national political party - "SWARAJ INDIA PARTY" is very welcome and actually long overdue. It is great the IAC is finally coming out in the open, and the presence of even a few of IAC's freedom soldiers in public life will show India who the true patriots really are.

Please count me in.

MK

Tuesday, October 11, 2016

Re: [IAC#RG] Law Commission seeks inputs on UCC

5. No

6. Regulated

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

To get a sense of the mood of our subscribers, we are seeking inputs on 2 queries which the Law Commission has posed

http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/questionnaire.pdf

5. Should the Uniform Civil Code be optional ?
a) Yes
b) No

6. Should the following practices be banned / regulated ?
a) Polygamy
b) Polyandry
c) Maitri-karar (friendship deed) and similar customary practices

Subscribers may post their views

Sarbajit

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
If our members wish we can discuss the Law Commission's UCC questionnaire which is accessible here
http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/questionnaire.pdf

Sarbajit

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Re: [IAC#RG] Law Commission seeks inputs on UCC

To get a sense of the mood of our subscribers, we are seeking inputs on 2 queries which the Law Commission has posed

http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/questionnaire.pdf

5. Should the Uniform Civil Code be optional ?

a) Yes

b) No

6. Should the following practices be banned / regulated ?

a) Polygamy

b) Polyandry
c) Maitri-karar (friendship deed) and similar customary practices

Subscribers may post their views

Sarbajit

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

If our members wish we can discuss the Law Commission's UCC questionnaire which is accessible here
http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/questionnaire.pdf

Sarbajit

Re: [IAC#RG] Suicide is the only option for Middle class person to prove that he is innocent and escape from being harassed by political/money power ?

Thanks for all the respected inputs and I got pouring replies from individuals which made me feel that still I need to fight and see and control my oscillation human mind. I have included my wife email in this thread.
In case any thing in future if she requires any inputs, she will ask whether she is doing right or wrong . Because I came to know those guys are talking with rowdies and gundas to do something illegal when I am defending them for last 8 months legally. They wanted me / my parents to give our assets by threatening. I am in sure motive what ever happens those gundas should not get single paise from innocent by using money power and I want to set my case as example and if when anythign they do with me or my family my assets should go to PM funds and orphanage and I have done the back ground work with my Advocate already.

Their only mechanism is threatening me by harassing my dad and threatening my family by harassing me.

Thanks,
Saravanan.M

On 11-Oct-2016 2:09 PM, "Sarbajit Roy" <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

Respected Ranga Rao ji is 100% correct

You and your family are not liable for any acts done by your brother without your knowledge or participation

Police are notorious for misusing their uniform / office for extracting money by threats. Do not get fooled by them, ultimately they have to work within CrPC norms and police manuals.

Do NOT pay bribes, it is a very slippery slope once you go down it. The working rule is that police are equally under time pressure to deliver bribes upwards regularly. Nobody from them wants to provoke a motivated citizen who will waste their time with RTI, public grievances, complaints, and prevent them from 'earning' UNLESS you challenge their ego and make it a prestige issue.

Lastly, always remember the fate of DSP Saunders - "Citizens should not be scared of police, the police should be scared of citizens". Thankfully, India is still not yet a nation of Gandhis (eunuchs) as our enemies would want us to be.

Sarbajit

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Ranga Rao <dsrangarao@gmail.com> wrote:
With corrections, please.

Regards,
D.S.Ranga Rao
8379813275
9969 069 144

Dear Mr. Saravanan,

You need not fear anybody. As your brother is out of touch with you or your parents, and you or your parents are not involved in any of his money transactions, there is no reason for you or your parents to be afraid of your brother's lenders or any of his associates. More over, as you say, you have already court protection. Show it to the police, include it in your statements to police that you or your parents are either directly or indirectly
NOT
involved in your brother's dealings or his business matters and therefore you all are not liable to bear the burden of omissions and commissions of your brother. If still the harassment persists from the goons or police, you may engage a good lawyer and get a fresh and strong directive from the court not to harass you or your parents in any way. Police cannot detain you or your parents with a view to harass you. May be they detain you in order to save you from the goons. If you feel that police are harassing you, you can tell them that you have nothing to do with your brother's wrongs and you be spared of further questioning.

You need think of suicide or any other drastic step for this much nuisance. Face the situation boldly and wisely. After all, there are many more people with more severe problems living and trying to overcome their difficulties by making sustainable efforts within their own means. You are an educated and skilled professional. You should not think of dying is the ultimate solution to one's problems. Be practical and realistic in life. When you are clean by your conscience, you need not be afraid of anybody.

Next time, when police call you or if any fellow threatens you or your parents, go to police and complain in writing, giving out the name of that fellow who threatens you and write that the same fellow has to be held responsible if any thing untoward happens to you or your family or your parents. Take an acknowledgement of that complaint from police and give it to the press and file a private complaint in the court for directions to police to take action. No fellow will dare come near you nor your parents. Best.

Regards,
D.S.Ranga Rao
8379813275
9969 069 144

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

[IAC#RG] "Fake" / "planted" govt denials re: disability pensions

http://ajaishukla.blogspot.in/2016/10/the-so-called-government-denial-is-not.html

The so-called "government denial" is not a denial at all...

Ajai Shukla

For Broadsword readers, a clarification.

The so-called government "denial", which PTI first carried, and was picked up by newspapers like the Times of India, is not an official denial at all. It is a plant that does not name any government office or official --- only "sources".

When the government denies a story, it puts out an official denial... and posts it on the Press Information Bureau (PIB) website. This so-called denial is from anonymous sources. Nobody in government wants to put their name to a patently false denial.

All of Monday, the government has been getting hammered on social media after Broadsword reported the reduction of disability pensions for soldiers invalided out of service as a result of battle injuries. The government simply had no defence.

So the government did what governments tend to do. Call up a few pliable reporters, plant an anonymous denial and then wait for the hordes of Modi supporters on social media --- who, mind you, are not interested in disabled soldiers' welfare, but in exonerating the government that has treated them so shabbily --- to pick up the "non-denial" and hold it aloft as a sign of victory.

It's sad that this is how we treat our soldiers --- all of whom know the truth. And its even sadder that a trusted agency like PTI, and a widely-read newspaper like The Times of India, cannot differentiate between a "source-based story" that is obviously a plant, and an official denial.