Your objection is very well taken.
Since 1875, the legal principle from Taylor versus Taylor "that where
a thing is required to be done in a particular manner, it must be done
in that manner or not at all and that other methods of performance are
necessarily forbidden." is now firmly established, by the Privy
Council in Nazir Ahmad Vs. Emperor AIR 1936 PC 253. and also AIR 1975
SC 915 Ram Chandra Keshav Adke (dead) Vs. Govind Joti Chavare and Ors.
If even about 10 persons from this list make the proper
representations (even by email considering the short time available),
the Govt can be prevailed upon in my view to either withdraw their
Office Memorandum or publish a public notice or clarify that it is a
departmental memo soliciting comments only from other departments /
ministries / organizations.
Baby Varkey, Adv.
On 12/17/10, sroy 1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2 threads have been started on the website
>
> "Amendment to RTI Rules"
> http://humjanenge.org.in/forum/index.php/topic,15.0.html
> ( I have set the ball rolling on this, members can add their own
> comments/objs/suggns)
>
> "IPC 498A public notice for comments to Rajya Sabha "
> http://humjanenge.org.in/forum/index.php/topic,14.0.html
>
> Sarbajit
>
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.