Friday, April 18, 2014

RE: [IAC#RG] Why people beat Arvind Kejriwal?

18/4/14
 
This is a case of crony journalism. One Senior journalist is contesting Lok Sabha election from Chandni Chowk constituency. Then there are quite  a few other journilsts who have joined the AAP bandwagon. Any one of them could spread such false accusation that  the TV Channels have blocked AAP news.
2. AAP is fighting lok sabha elections to spread confusion and anachy in the country. They swear by the Constittion to avoid sedition charge but want to change it and promote revolution through AAM ADMI-educated but unemplyed youth,marginalised  and poor sections in Urban areas.
3. For BJP-Hinduism or Brahminism as you call it-is not a question to be asked. The main question is SECULARISM as practiced in India. You can fight for the rights of religous minorities and still be secular. But the moment you utter the word Hindu, you are branded as COMMUNAL. Worse if you are a Hindu Nationalist leader, you are still communal without uttering the word .
JKGaur 
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 10:08:40 +0530
From: pranabkumar.chakravarty@gmail.com
To: ankkhe2002@yahoo.co.in
CC: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Why people beat Arvind Kejriwal?

I  everyday see news related to AAP or AK on all channels.You should produce some documents to back up your allegation that AAP is ignored by TV channels instead of quoting some unnamed senior journalist to say that print and electronic media ignore you.
Journalists are not part of any media house and hence, they are not privy to what their managements decide.Do not rely upon on what so-called senior journalists say to please you to spread canard against media houses.They might be disgruntled due to various reasons  .


On 15 April 2014 10:47, Ankit Khetan <ankkhe2002@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
I have a great expectation with AAP but after their withdrawal from Delhi seat the fight of their supporter against corruption gets a question mark, when their petition become pending in AAP delhi office. The effect of AAP where clearly visible in those 49 days. But after their withdrawal a question mark arises on those 49 days?
My question to AAP is that they left Delhi seat because they didn't get majority there. Then why they are fighting Lok Sabha Election when they are targetting for just 100 seats.

I think BJP may be a 2nd best party but its one sided remark on Hinduism create a question.
My question to BJP is that if BJP is true supporter of Hinduism then why we cant see any development on Varanasi, where the MLA and MP both belongs to BJP?
It creates a question that whether BJP is a real supporter of Hinduism or Brahamanism. Its Ram Mandir Nirmaan promises only developed Brahamanism rather than Hinduism.

Congress has developed the bribe system not only in govt department but also in common man mind.
So I dont have any question to Congress Party because it is self a great question.


Ankit Khetan
India
From: Bina Goel <drbinagoel@gmail.com>
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Sent: Sunday, 13 April 2014 9:14 AM

Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Why people beat Arvind Kejriwal?

We indians are exporting our ideas to USA, see SHOE was thrown at Ms.HILARY CLINTON in USA. So Arvind should not get afraid by "GHOOSA" And "THAPPAD"offered to him in road show at Lok Sabha Election rally in India-dr.govind goel


On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Veerendra Jaitly <jaitly.iit@gmail.com> wrote:
And AAP accepts supports from even from a hard core criminal like Mukhtaar Ansari to defeat Modi who is the hope of the millions and millions.
AK 49 को अब देश की जनता की आवाज़ सुनाई नहीं देती।  (AK 49 can't listen to the message from the Aam Janata now)

With Warm Regards,

Veerendra K Jaitly
09811777904
C_cube Consultants
101/2 Beverly Park, Plot-2
Sector 22, Dwarka, New Delhi-110077 




On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com> wrote:
Arnab,s is not the only channel. Other channels continue to cover AK and AAP. So the charge of blocking AAP news is not correct.
Regarding Azam Khan.s remarks, it shows a muslim leader can say anything, appeal for votes on communal lines and can get away with it and still considered a secular leader. Sonia Gandh can meet the Imam for favour in return for favours and still be secular. But a Hindu leader becomes communal without saying anything communal.
JKGaur
 
From: k_ramani44@hotmail.com
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 05:30:31 +0530

To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Why people beat Arvind Kejriwal?

I fully endorse views of Manoj Joshi. I think it was Arnab's channel , it talked about congress , BJP and got only their leaders to talk. YES paid indeed. it is very intriguing that no news channel castigated Azam Khan for his muslim soldiers remark. I would like to know where these so called pundits like Pronoy Roy who manage to hire Rashtarpati Bhawan , are when it comes to anti nationals like Azam Khan. Where is this Sampath fellow who issues notices on flimsy ground to Ashutosh , keeps mum on Azam Khan.. Sampath in any case is an apology and stooge of politicians of any hue .


On 09-Apr-2014, at 3:49 pm, Manoj Joshi <mjoshiyhai@gmail.com> wrote:

I met a very senior journalist the other day who told me that the entire media specially news channels have been paid and are instructed to block the good news of AAP but to show all the negative aspects regarding AAP to tarnish their image. I strongly believe in this theory as exactly the same thing is seen on all the leading  news channels barring none. The so called Fourth pillar of DEMOCRACY seems to be  sold out few crores...... God save India.


On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Sureshan <sureshandelhi@gmail.com> wrote:
This question I am also in mind.yesterday was the last day of campaigning in delhi.apart from this incident showing again and again by media they did not have anything about AAP.when major parties spend crores for ad AAP did not spent much but still every day they grabed media attention

Joshi NM <naishadhjoshi@gmail.com> wrote:

AK gets beaten up by people time and again.
I think in Indian election history, He is a campaigner who got inked+beaten; highest number of times.

Every time ordinary attacker is thrashed severely. Normally, police would arrest people from both sides in a public fight for beating each others.

AK claims, without naming, attackers are sent by political parties like congress or BJP. But police is silent on this issue after recording statement of attackers.
Even media is also silent, apart from loud noise.

Do people not have right to know the truth?

--
Best Regards,
-Joshi NM

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in





Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Posted by at No comments:

Wednesday, April 16, 2014

Re: [IAC#RG] Why people beat Arvind Kejriwal?

I  everyday see news related to AAP or AK on all channels.You should produce some documents to back up your allegation that AAP is ignored by TV channels instead of quoting some unnamed senior journalist to say that print and electronic media ignore you.
Journalists are not part of any media house and hence, they are not privy to what their managements decide.Do not rely upon on what so-called senior journalists say to please you to spread canard against media houses.They might be disgruntled due to various reasons  .


On 15 April 2014 10:47, Ankit Khetan <ankkhe2002@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
I have a great expectation with AAP but after their withdrawal from Delhi seat the fight of their supporter against corruption gets a question mark, when their petition become pending in AAP delhi office. The effect of AAP where clearly visible in those 49 days. But after their withdrawal a question mark arises on those 49 days?
My question to AAP is that they left Delhi seat because they didn't get majority there. Then why they are fighting Lok Sabha Election when they are targetting for just 100 seats.

I think BJP may be a 2nd best party but its one sided remark on Hinduism create a question.
My question to BJP is that if BJP is true supporter of Hinduism then why we cant see any development on Varanasi, where the MLA and MP both belongs to BJP?
It creates a question that whether BJP is a real supporter of Hinduism or Brahamanism. Its Ram Mandir Nirmaan promises only developed Brahamanism rather than Hinduism.

Congress has developed the bribe system not only in govt department but also in common man mind.
So I dont have any question to Congress Party because it is self a great question.


Ankit Khetan
India
 From: Bina Goel <drbinagoel@gmail.com>
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Sent: Sunday, 13 April 2014 9:14 AM

Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Why people beat Arvind Kejriwal?

We indians are exporting our ideas to USA, see SHOE was thrown at Ms.HILARY CLINTON in USA. So Arvind should not get afraid by "GHOOSA" And "THAPPAD"offered to him in road show at Lok Sabha Election rally in India-dr.govind goel


On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Veerendra Jaitly <jaitly.iit@gmail.com> wrote:
And AAP accepts supports from even from a hard core criminal like Mukhtaar Ansari to defeat Modi who is the hope of the millions and millions.
AK 49 को अब देश की जनता की आवाज़ सुनाई नहीं देती।  (AK 49 can't listen to the message from the Aam Janata now)

With Warm Regards,

Veerendra K Jaitly
09811777904
C_cube Consultants
101/2 Beverly Park, Plot-2
Sector 22, Dwarka, New Delhi-110077 




On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com> wrote:
Arnab,s is not the only channel. Other channels continue to cover AK and AAP. So the charge of blocking AAP news is not correct.
Regarding Azam Khan.s remarks, it shows a muslim leader can say anything, appeal for votes on communal lines and can get away with it and still considered a secular leader. Sonia Gandh can meet the Imam for favour in return for favours and still be secular. But a Hindu leader becomes communal without saying anything communal.
JKGaur
 
From: k_ramani44@hotmail.com
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 05:30:31 +0530

To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Why people beat Arvind Kejriwal?

I fully endorse views of Manoj Joshi. I think it was Arnab's channel , it talked about congress , BJP and got only their leaders to talk. YES paid indeed. it is very intriguing that no news channel castigated Azam Khan for his muslim soldiers remark. I would like to know where these so called pundits like Pronoy Roy who manage to hire Rashtarpati Bhawan , are when it comes to anti nationals like Azam Khan. Where is this Sampath fellow who issues notices on flimsy ground to Ashutosh , keeps mum on Azam Khan.. Sampath in any case is an apology and stooge of politicians of any hue .


On 09-Apr-2014, at 3:49 pm, Manoj Joshi <mjoshiyhai@gmail.com> wrote:

I met a very senior journalist the other day who told me that the entire media specially news channels have been paid and are instructed to block the good news of AAP but to show all the negative aspects regarding AAP to tarnish their image. I strongly believe in this theory as exactly the same thing is seen on all the leading  news channels barring none. The so called Fourth pillar of DEMOCRACY seems to be  sold out few crores...... God save India.


On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Sureshan <sureshandelhi@gmail.com> wrote:
This question I am also in mind.yesterday was the last day of campaigning in delhi.apart from this incident showing again and again by media they did not have anything about AAP.when major parties spend crores for ad AAP did not spent much but still every day they grabed media attention

Joshi NM <naishadhjoshi@gmail.com> wrote:

AK gets beaten up by people time and again.
I think in Indian election history, He is a campaigner who got inked+beaten; highest number of times.

Every time ordinary attacker is thrashed severely. Normally, police would arrest people from both sides in a public fight for beating each others.

AK claims, without naming, attackers are sent by political parties like congress or BJP. But police is silent on this issue after recording statement of attackers.
Even media is also silent, apart from loud noise.

Do people not have right to know the truth?

--
Best Regards,
-Joshi NM

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in





Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Posted by at No comments:

Re: [IAC#RG] VIGILANCE PETITION : Concerning Shri Amarjit Singh (Under Secretary) & CPIO

Dear Sir,

                 Great and most relevant communication you sent this morning to   
Shri Shyamal Kumar Sarkar, Secretary/DoPT.
A query: does the officer assume that he himself is "Sarkar" ?

One will look forward to see what response you are likely to get from Shri Sarkar by the 24 th April, 2014.

Best regards and Peace. 

devinder das chopra
un retiree
9810338049


On 17 April 2014 07:53, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
To:
Shri Shyamal Kumar Sarkar
Secretary/DoPT
Sir,

Sub:  Bribery of your Dept officers, including yourself,  by Shri K.B. "Anna" Hazare / his associates such as a) Mr. Arvind Kejriwal IRS, b) Mr. Shanti Bhushan, Sr. Adv. c) Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv. d) Justice (Retd). Santosh Hegde.

Please refer to the recent automated email received from the DARPG's CPGRAM system informing me that my complaint no. DOPAT/E/2012/00654 dated 11 Aug 2012 was disposed off on 05 Feb 2014 with the casual remark "submitted in file No.104/49/2014-AVD.I on 05.02.2014"

It is very strange that a duly registered Public Grievance which is meant to be disposed off in 2 (or at the most 3) months is closed and consigned to file after almost 2 years in such a highly sensitive matter.

As it is an open secret that you are a highly pliable (ie. one who lacks spine) officer, I would request you to kindly ensure personally that the true copy of the entire file as mentioned (which presumably contains the information I requested) be conveyed to me immediately (and not later than 7 days from today) and free of cost so that I may know (in terms of section 4 RTI Act 2005) the reasons for this corrupt administrative action of your Dept. and take such further action as I deem fit.

with best wishes

Er. Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor,
India Against Corruption, jan andolan
B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
To:
Shri Shyamal Kumar Sarkar
Secretary/DoPT

Sir,

Kindly advise me of the outcome of the below appended vigilance
complaint dt. 19/04/2011I sent to your department's CVO. It is
pertinent to mention that such complaints are to be disposed off
within 3 months as per the CVC notification dated 23.05.2000 but the same appears to be pending for over 2 years now.

with best wishes

Er. Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor, India Against Corruption, jan andolan

B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024

On 4/19/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> To:
> Shri Alok Kumar
> Chief Vigilance Officer/Ministry of Personnel
>
> BY EMAIL
>
> 19-April-2011
>
> Sir
>
> I am caused to complain that the following officers of your Ministry
> have corruptly accepted illegal gratification on behalf of one Mr.
> "Anna" Hazare and his associates to not discharge their official
> duties to provide me information I demanded from them under the
> statutory process of Right To Information Act 2005 (section 4). It is
> pertinent that I sought to know why Mr Anna Hazare and his associates
> were favoured over me for appointment to a Committee for drafting
> Central Lok Pal Bill falling under your Ministry's subject allocation.
>
> 1) Mr  Amarjit Singh (Under Secretary AVD-IV)/CPIO
> 2) Mr K.G.Verma / Director RTI
> 3) Mr. Rajiv Kapur / Joint Secretary AT&A
>
> I am appending inline the messages I sent to all of the above on
> 11-April-2011 and earlier which is self explanatory.
>
> I request you to kindly take all necessary measures to ensure that the
> above officers carry out their duties in a honest manner. I am ready,
> able and willing to provide any further assistance and clarifications
> you may require. I would be obliged if you would kindly acknowledge
> receipt of this email.
>
> Yours faithfully
>
> Sarbajit Roy
>
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
>
> Tel: 09311448069


On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
To:
Shri Shyamal Kumar Sarkar
Secretary/DoPT

Sir,

Kindly advise me of the outcome of the below appended vigilance
complaint dt. 19/04/2011I sent to your department's CVO. It is
pertinent to mention that such complaints are to be disposed off
within 3 months as per the CVC notification dated 23.05.2000 but the
same appears to be pending for over 2 years now.

with best wishes

Er. Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor, India Against Corruption, jan andolan
B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024

On 4/19/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> To:
> Shri Alok Kumar
> Chief Vigilance Officer/Ministry of Personnel
>
> BY EMAIL
>
> 19-April-2011
>
> Sir
>
> I am caused to complain that the following officers of your Ministry
> have corruptly accepted illegal gratification on behalf of one Mr.
> "Anna" Hazare and his associates to not discharge their official
> duties to provide me information I demanded from them under the
> statutory process of Right To Information Act 2005 (section 4). It is
> pertinent that I sought to know why Mr Anna Hazare and his associates
> were favoured over me for appointment to a Committee for drafting
> Central Lok Pal Bill falling under your Ministry's subject allocation.
>
> 1) Mr  Amarjit Singh (Under Secretary AVD-IV)/CPIO
> 2) Mr K.G.Verma / Director RTI
> 3) Mr. Rajiv Kapur / Joint Secretary AT&A
>
> I am appending inline the messages I sent to all of the above on
> 11-April-2011 and earlier which is self explanatory.
>
> I request you to kindly take all necessary measures to ensure that the
> above officers carry out their duties in a honest manner. I am ready,
> able and willing to provide any further assistance and clarifications
> you may require. I would be obliged if you would kindly acknowledge
> receipt of this email.
>
> Yours faithfully
>
> Sarbajit Roy
>
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
>
> Tel: 09311448069
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:23 AM
> Subject: Re: DEMAND for Information u/s 4(4) of RTI Act 2005
> To: dirrti-dopt@nic.in, diradmn@nic.in, jsata@nic.in
>
>
> To:
> Joint-Secretary / ATA/ DoPT (and public grievance officer) for necessary
> action
>
> Sir,
>
> I refer to the rejection (truncated) email below.
>
> I am now aggrieved that the duly designated/notified CPIO under you is
> refusing to accept / rejecting my RTI related email as below. I have
> obtained (by faithfully copy-pasting) the email ID of the CPIO from
> the persmin website today.
>
> Please ensure that I receive the demanded information immediately so
> as to resolve my grievance as I am concerned that this is a systemic
> failure and not individual one.
>
> NB: Apparently cc's of the said bounced email have been received by
> Dir/RTI and Dir/Admin of DoPT without bouncing back..
>
> Yours faithfully
>
> Sarbajit Roy
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
> TeL ; 09311448069
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
> Date: Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:09 AM
> Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
> To: sroy.mb@gmail.com
>
> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>
>     usavd4@nic.in
>
> Technical details of permanent failure:
> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the
> recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for
> further information about the cause of this error. The error that the
> other server returned was: 550 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected
> usavd4@nic.in (state 17).
>
> ----- Original message -----
>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Received: by 10.204.127.29 with SMTP id e29mr3887919bks.52.1302460741212;
> Sun,
>  10 Apr 2011 11:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: by 10.204.37.195 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 11:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 00:09:01 +0530
> Message-ID: <BANLkTinpqMsPCRenZeMDFzoti0zwkT1DpA@mail.gmail.com>
> Subject: DEMAND for Information u/s 4(4) of RTI Act 2005
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> To: usavd4@nic.in, dirrti-dopt@nic.in, diradmn@nic.in
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dab507d05afd04a094c583
>
> To:
> Shri Amarjit Singh (AVD-4)/DoPT,
> Central Public Information Officer/RTI Act
>
> 10-April-2010
>
> BY EMAIL
>
> Sir
>
> I refer to recent media reports concerning the purported setting up of
> Committee(s) for Central Lok Pal legislation referring *inter-alia* to the
> unprecedented step of including various members of public / civil society
> in
> it. I also refer to questions answered in Lok Sabha during the past 1 year
> by the Hon'ble MoS/DoPT on the status of Central Lok Pal legislation. In
> the
> interest of brevity I am not specifying these reports/questions since these
> are matters of record.
>
> Accordingly, I am caused to *DEMAND* the following information be *
> DISSEMINATED* suitably to me free of cost in the electronic form *
> IMMEDIATELY* to safeguard my Fundamental Rights listed in the Constitution
> of India. I am given to understand from the Persmin website today that you
> are the dealing CPIO for "Central Lok Pal legislation".
>
> NB: As this is a DEMAND for information dissemination u/s 4(4) r/w
> sub-sections 4(1)(b), 4(1)(c), 4(1)(d) and 4(3) of RTI Act 2005, I am not
> required to pay the Rs.10 application fee prescribed for "requests" for
> information made u/s 6(1) of RTI Act.
>
> Information required
>
> 1) Copy of all notifications or orders or circulars or any other official
> communication constituting committee(s) / council(s) / board(s) by whatever
> noun or description etc in connection with
> a) the formulation (incl. drafting) of Central  Lok Pal legislation, or
> b) advising on the formulation of Central Lok Pal legislation,
> as the case may be.
>
> 2)  All relevant facts concerning the formulation of the Central Lok Pal
> legislation.
>
> 3)  Provide reasons why I was not appointed / nominated to the said
> committee(s) / council(s) /  boards(s) etc.. I say that I am an affected
> person for this limited purpose. In the alternative the reasons why a few
> other members of the public / civil society (if any) were appointed /
> nominated may be disseminated to me.
>


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Posted by at No comments:

Re: [IAC#RG] VIGILANCE PETITION : Concerning Shri Amarjit Singh (Under Secretary) & CPIO

To:
Shri Shyamal Kumar Sarkar
Secretary/DoPT
Sir,

Sub:  Bribery of your Dept officers, including yourself,  by Shri K.B. "Anna" Hazare / his associates such as a) Mr. Arvind Kejriwal IRS, b) Mr. Shanti Bhushan, Sr. Adv. c) Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv. d) Justice (Retd). Santosh Hegde.

Please refer to the recent automated email received from the DARPG's CPGRAM system informing me that my complaint no. DOPAT/E/2012/00654 dated 11 Aug 2012 was disposed off on 05 Feb 2014 with the casual remark "submitted in file No.104/49/2014-AVD.I on 05.02.2014"

It is very strange that a duly registered Public Grievance which is meant to be disposed off in 2 (or at the most 3) months is closed and consigned to file after almost 2 years in such a highly sensitive matter.

As it is an open secret that you are a highly pliable (ie. one who lacks spine) officer, I would request you to kindly ensure personally that the true copy of the entire file as mentioned (which presumably contains the information I requested) be conveyed to me immediately (and not later than 7 days from today) and free of cost so that I may know (in terms of section 4 RTI Act 2005) the reasons for this corrupt administrative action of your Dept. and take such further action as I deem fit.

with best wishes

Er. Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor,
India Against Corruption, jan andolan
B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
To:
Shri Shyamal Kumar Sarkar
Secretary/DoPT

Sir,

Kindly advise me of the outcome of the below appended vigilance
complaint dt. 19/04/2011I sent to your department's CVO. It is
pertinent to mention that such complaints are to be disposed off
within 3 months as per the CVC notification dated 23.05.2000 but the same appears to be pending for over 2 years now.

with best wishes

Er. Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor, India Against Corruption, jan andolan

B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024

On 4/19/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> To:
> Shri Alok Kumar
> Chief Vigilance Officer/Ministry of Personnel
>
> BY EMAIL
>
> 19-April-2011
>
> Sir
>
> I am caused to complain that the following officers of your Ministry
> have corruptly accepted illegal gratification on behalf of one Mr.
> "Anna" Hazare and his associates to not discharge their official
> duties to provide me information I demanded from them under the
> statutory process of Right To Information Act 2005 (section 4). It is
> pertinent that I sought to know why Mr Anna Hazare and his associates
> were favoured over me for appointment to a Committee for drafting
> Central Lok Pal Bill falling under your Ministry's subject allocation.
>
> 1) Mr  Amarjit Singh (Under Secretary AVD-IV)/CPIO
> 2) Mr K.G.Verma / Director RTI
> 3) Mr. Rajiv Kapur / Joint Secretary AT&A
>
> I am appending inline the messages I sent to all of the above on
> 11-April-2011 and earlier which is self explanatory.
>
> I request you to kindly take all necessary measures to ensure that the
> above officers carry out their duties in a honest manner. I am ready,
> able and willing to provide any further assistance and clarifications
> you may require. I would be obliged if you would kindly acknowledge
> receipt of this email.
>
> Yours faithfully
>
> Sarbajit Roy
>
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
>
> Tel: 09311448069


On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
To:
Shri Shyamal Kumar Sarkar
Secretary/DoPT

Sir,

Kindly advise me of the outcome of the below appended vigilance
complaint dt. 19/04/2011I sent to your department's CVO. It is
pertinent to mention that such complaints are to be disposed off
within 3 months as per the CVC notification dated 23.05.2000 but the
same appears to be pending for over 2 years now.

with best wishes

Er. Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor, India Against Corruption, jan andolan
B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024

On 4/19/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> To:
> Shri Alok Kumar
> Chief Vigilance Officer/Ministry of Personnel
>
> BY EMAIL
>
> 19-April-2011
>
> Sir
>
> I am caused to complain that the following officers of your Ministry
> have corruptly accepted illegal gratification on behalf of one Mr.
> "Anna" Hazare and his associates to not discharge their official
> duties to provide me information I demanded from them under the
> statutory process of Right To Information Act 2005 (section 4). It is
> pertinent that I sought to know why Mr Anna Hazare and his associates
> were favoured over me for appointment to a Committee for drafting
> Central Lok Pal Bill falling under your Ministry's subject allocation.
>
> 1) Mr  Amarjit Singh (Under Secretary AVD-IV)/CPIO
> 2) Mr K.G.Verma / Director RTI
> 3) Mr. Rajiv Kapur / Joint Secretary AT&A
>
> I am appending inline the messages I sent to all of the above on
> 11-April-2011 and earlier which is self explanatory.
>
> I request you to kindly take all necessary measures to ensure that the
> above officers carry out their duties in a honest manner. I am ready,
> able and willing to provide any further assistance and clarifications
> you may require. I would be obliged if you would kindly acknowledge
> receipt of this email.
>
> Yours faithfully
>
> Sarbajit Roy
>
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
>
> Tel: 09311448069
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:23 AM
> Subject: Re: DEMAND for Information u/s 4(4) of RTI Act 2005
> To: dirrti-dopt@nic.in, diradmn@nic.in, jsata@nic.in
>
>
> To:
> Joint-Secretary / ATA/ DoPT (and public grievance officer) for necessary
> action
>
> Sir,
>
> I refer to the rejection (truncated) email below.
>
> I am now aggrieved that the duly designated/notified CPIO under you is
> refusing to accept / rejecting my RTI related email as below. I have
> obtained (by faithfully copy-pasting) the email ID of the CPIO from
> the persmin website today.
>
> Please ensure that I receive the demanded information immediately so
> as to resolve my grievance as I am concerned that this is a systemic
> failure and not individual one.
>
> NB: Apparently cc's of the said bounced email have been received by
> Dir/RTI and Dir/Admin of DoPT without bouncing back..
>
> Yours faithfully
>
> Sarbajit Roy
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
> TeL ; 09311448069
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
> Date: Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:09 AM
> Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
> To: sroy.mb@gmail.com
>
> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>
>     usavd4@nic.in
>
> Technical details of permanent failure:
> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the
> recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for
> further information about the cause of this error. The error that the
> other server returned was: 550 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected
> usavd4@nic.in (state 17).
>
> ----- Original message -----
>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Received: by 10.204.127.29 with SMTP id e29mr3887919bks.52.1302460741212;
> Sun,
>  10 Apr 2011 11:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: by 10.204.37.195 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 11:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 00:09:01 +0530
> Message-ID: <BANLkTinpqMsPCRenZeMDFzoti0zwkT1DpA@mail.gmail.com>
> Subject: DEMAND for Information u/s 4(4) of RTI Act 2005
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> To: usavd4@nic.in, dirrti-dopt@nic.in, diradmn@nic.in
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dab507d05afd04a094c583
>
> To:
> Shri Amarjit Singh (AVD-4)/DoPT,
> Central Public Information Officer/RTI Act
>
> 10-April-2010
>
> BY EMAIL
>
> Sir
>
> I refer to recent media reports concerning the purported setting up of
> Committee(s) for Central Lok Pal legislation referring *inter-alia* to the
> unprecedented step of including various members of public / civil society
> in
> it. I also refer to questions answered in Lok Sabha during the past 1 year
> by the Hon'ble MoS/DoPT on the status of Central Lok Pal legislation. In
> the
> interest of brevity I am not specifying these reports/questions since these
> are matters of record.
>
> Accordingly, I am caused to *DEMAND* the following information be *
> DISSEMINATED* suitably to me free of cost in the electronic form *
> IMMEDIATELY* to safeguard my Fundamental Rights listed in the Constitution
> of India. I am given to understand from the Persmin website today that you
> are the dealing CPIO for "Central Lok Pal legislation".
>
> NB: As this is a DEMAND for information dissemination u/s 4(4) r/w
> sub-sections 4(1)(b), 4(1)(c), 4(1)(d) and 4(3) of RTI Act 2005, I am not
> required to pay the Rs.10 application fee prescribed for "requests" for
> information made u/s 6(1) of RTI Act.
>
> Information required
>
> 1) Copy of all notifications or orders or circulars or any other official
> communication constituting committee(s) / council(s) / board(s) by whatever
> noun or description etc in connection with
> a) the formulation (incl. drafting) of Central  Lok Pal legislation, or
> b) advising on the formulation of Central Lok Pal legislation,
> as the case may be.
>
> 2)  All relevant facts concerning the formulation of the Central Lok Pal
> legislation.
>
> 3)  Provide reasons why I was not appointed / nominated to the said
> committee(s) / council(s) /  boards(s) etc.. I say that I am an affected
> person for this limited purpose. In the alternative the reasons why a few
> other members of the public / civil society (if any) were appointed /
> nominated may be disseminated to me.
>

Posted by at No comments:

Tuesday, April 15, 2014

Re: [IAC#RG] Why people beat Arvind Kejriwal?

Dear Sir
Yesterday Raj Thakre the North India Hater and the opponent of the
Indian Constitution has clearly stated that he supports Modi and not
the BJP. He has virtually snubbed Rajnath Singh. This was a fact
clearly known earlier though kept under the carpet. IN THE LIGHT OF
ABOVE there needs to zero vote for BJP. especially where the elections
are due to be held.. Let in varanasi and at other place Modi is set
to lose.
Vijoy Ambasta

On 4/13/14, Bina Goel <drbinagoel@gmail.com> wrote:
> We indians are exporting our ideas to USA, see SHOE was thrown at Ms.HILARY
> CLINTON in USA. So Arvind should not get afraid by "GHOOSA" And
> "THAPPAD"offered to him in road show at Lok Sabha Election rally in
> India-dr.govind goel
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Veerendra Jaitly
> <jaitly.iit@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> And AAP accepts supports from even from a hard core criminal like
>> Mukhtaar
>> Ansari to defeat Modi who is the hope of the millions and millions.
>> AK 49 को अब देश की जनता की आवाज़ सुनाई नहीं देती। (AK 49 can't listen to
>> the message from the Aam Janata now)
>>
>> With Warm Regards,
>>
>> Veerendra K Jaitly
>> 09811777904
>> C_cube Consultants
>> 101/2 Beverly Park, Plot-2
>> Sector 22, Dwarka, New Delhi-110077
>> Blog:
>> www.excellenceguru.blogspot.in<http://www.ccubeconsultants.blogspot.in>
>> Website:www.ccubeconsultants.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Arnab,s is not the only channel. Other channels continue to cover AK and
>>> AAP. So the charge of blocking AAP news is not correct.
>>> Regarding Azam Khan.s remarks, it shows a muslim leader can say
>>> anything,
>>> appeal for votes on communal lines and can get away with it and still
>>> considered a secular leader. Sonia Gandh can meet the Imam for favour in
>>> return for favours and still be secular. But a Hindu leader becomes
>>> communal without saying anything communal.
>>> JKGaur
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> From: k_ramani44@hotmail.com
>>> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 05:30:31 +0530
>>>
>>> To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
>>> Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Why people beat Arvind Kejriwal?
>>>
>>> I fully endorse views of Manoj Joshi. I think it was Arnab's channel ,
>>> it
>>> talked about congress , BJP and got only their leaders to talk. YES paid
>>> indeed. it is very intriguing that no news channel castigated Azam Khan
>>> for
>>> his muslim soldiers remark. I would like to know where these so called
>>> pundits like Pronoy Roy who manage to hire Rashtarpati Bhawan , are when
>>> it
>>> comes to anti nationals like Azam Khan. Where is this Sampath fellow who
>>> issues notices on flimsy ground to Ashutosh , keeps mum on Azam Khan..
>>> Sampath in any case is an apology and stooge of politicians of any hue .
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09-Apr-2014, at 3:49 pm, Manoj Joshi <mjoshiyhai@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I met a very senior journalist the other day who told me that the
>>> entire media specially news channels have been paid and are instructed
>>> to
>>> block the good news of AAP but to show all the negative aspects
>>> regarding
>>> AAP to tarnish their image. I strongly believe in this theory as exactly
>>> the same thing is seen on all the leading news channels barring none.
>>> The
>>> so called Fourth pillar of DEMOCRACY seems to be sold out few
>>> crores......
>>> God save India.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Sureshan <sureshandelhi@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> This question I am also in mind.yesterday was the last day of
>>> campaigning
>>> in delhi.apart from this incident showing again and again by media they
>>> did
>>> not have anything about AAP.when major parties spend crores for ad AAP
>>> did
>>> not spent much but still every day they grabed media attention
>>>
>>> Joshi NM <naishadhjoshi@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> AK gets beaten up by people time and again.
>>> I think in Indian election history, He is a campaigner who got
>>> inked+beaten; highest number of times.
>>>
>>> Every time ordinary attacker is thrashed severely. Normally, police
>>> would
>>> arrest people from both sides in a public fight for beating each others.
>>>
>>> AK claims, without naming, attackers are sent by political parties like
>>> congress or BJP. But police is silent on this issue after recording
>>> statement of attackers.
>>> Even media is also silent, apart from loud noise.
>>>
>>> Do people not have right to know the truth?
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Best Regards,*
>>> -Joshi NM
>>>
>>> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
>>> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
>>> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>>> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
>>> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>>>
>>>
>>> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
>>> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
>>> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>>> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
>>> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>>>
>>>
>>> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "
>>> indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "
>>> https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help:
>>> https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW :
>>> http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>>>
>>> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
>>> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
>>> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>>> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
>>> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>>>
>>
>>
>> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
>> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
>> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
>> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>>
>
Posted by at No comments:

Monday, April 14, 2014

RE: [IAC#RG] Why people beat Arvind Kejriwal?


 15/4/14
 
There have been quite a few instances of shoe throwing at the politicians. Many Indians and th Arabs consider beating with a shoe is the greatest insult one can inflict on an adversary. In Iraq a shoe was hurled at George Bush by an Arab journist to avenge the humiliation and the journalist became a hero.
A shoe was hurled at a senior minister of UPA and GeneralSecretary of Congress. Prashat Bhusan was thrashed in his office for his controversial comments on J&K.
With the kind of security thrown arouand a VIP, shoe is the only misile that can be hurled at, to show anger and frustration. In case of AK, the absence of security cordon is adding to frquency of these attacks. Sooner or later he has to opt for it.
JKGaur
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 20:44:29 -0700
From: drbinagoel@gmail.com
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Why people beat Arvind Kejriwal?

We indians are exporting our ideas to USA, see SHOE was thrown at Ms.HILARY CLINTON in USA. So Arvind should not get afraid by "GHOOSA" And "THAPPAD"offered to him in road show at Lok Sabha Election rally in India-dr.govind goel


On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Veerendra Jaitly <jaitly.iit@gmail.com> wrote:
And AAP accepts supports from even from a hard core criminal like Mukhtaar Ansari to defeat Modi who is the hope of the millions and millions.
AK 49 को अब देश की जनता की आवाज़ सुनाई नहीं देती।  (AK 49 can't listen to the message from the Aam Janata now)

With Warm Regards,

Veerendra K Jaitly
09811777904
C_cube Consultants
101/2 Beverly Park, Plot-2
Sector 22, Dwarka, New Delhi-110077 




On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com> wrote:
Arnab,s is not the only channel. Other channels continue to cover AK and AAP. So the charge of blocking AAP news is not correct.
Regarding Azam Khan.s remarks, it shows a muslim leader can say anything, appeal for votes on communal lines and can get away with it and still considered a secular leader. Sonia Gandh can meet the Imam for favour in return for favours and still be secular. But a Hindu leader becomes communal without saying anything communal.
JKGaur
 
From: k_ramani44@hotmail.com
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 05:30:31 +0530

To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Why people beat Arvind Kejriwal?

I fully endorse views of Manoj Joshi. I think it was Arnab's channel , it talked about congress , BJP and got only their leaders to talk. YES paid indeed. it is very intriguing that no news channel castigated Azam Khan for his muslim soldiers remark. I would like to know where these so called pundits like Pronoy Roy who manage to hire Rashtarpati Bhawan , are when it comes to anti nationals like Azam Khan. Where is this Sampath fellow who issues notices on flimsy ground to Ashutosh , keeps mum on Azam Khan.. Sampath in any case is an apology and stooge of politicians of any hue .


On 09-Apr-2014, at 3:49 pm, Manoj Joshi <mjoshiyhai@gmail.com> wrote:

I met a very senior journalist the other day who told me that the entire media specially news channels have been paid and are instructed to block the good news of AAP but to show all the negative aspects regarding AAP to tarnish their image. I strongly believe in this theory as exactly the same thing is seen on all the leading  news channels barring none. The so called Fourth pillar of DEMOCRACY seems to be  sold out few crores...... God save India.


On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Sureshan <sureshandelhi@gmail.com> wrote:
This question I am also in mind.yesterday was the last day of campaigning in delhi.apart from this incident showing again and again by media they did not have anything about AAP.when major parties spend crores for ad AAP did not spent much but still every day they grabed media attention

Joshi NM <naishadhjoshi@gmail.com> wrote:

AK gets beaten up by people time and again.
I think in Indian election history, He is a campaigner who got inked+beaten; highest number of times.

Every time ordinary attacker is thrashed severely. Normally, police would arrest people from both sides in a public fight for beating each others.

AK claims, without naming, attackers are sent by political parties like congress or BJP. But police is silent on this issue after recording statement of attackers.
Even media is also silent, apart from loud noise.

Do people not have right to know the truth?

--
Best Regards,
-Joshi NM

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Posted by at No comments:

Re: [IAC#RG] Why people beat Arvind Kejriwal?

Nothing good to the nation will happen if we stop discussion issues. 


On 11 April 2014 12:31, Bhasha Singh <bhasha.k@gmail.com> wrote:

Please stop this nonsense...have gutts to expose and talk about MODI...anti women..anti secular things

On Apr 11, 2014 11:24 AM, "arun joshi" <colarun.joshi@gmail.com> wrote:

Kejriwal ran away from the battlefield.if such people are st the helm of affairs god save us
Or has he also given up?

On 10 Apr 2014 21:53, "Manoj Joshi" <mjoshiyhai@gmail.com> wrote:
I met a very senior journalist the other day who told me that the entire media specially news channels have been paid and are instructed to block the good news of AAP but to show all the negative aspects regarding AAP to tarnish their image. I strongly believe in this theory as exactly the same thing is seen on all the leading  news channels barring none. The so called Fourth pillar of DEMOCRACY seems to be  sold out few crores...... God save India.


On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Sureshan <sureshandelhi@gmail.com> wrote:
This question I am also in mind.yesterday was the last day of campaigning in delhi.apart from this incident showing again and again by media they did not have anything about AAP.when major parties spend crores for ad AAP did not spent much but still every day they grabed media attention

Joshi NM <naishadhjoshi@gmail.com> wrote:

AK gets beaten up by people time and again.
I think in Indian election history, He is a campaigner who got inked+beaten; highest number of times.

Every time ordinary attacker is thrashed severely. Normally, police would arrest people from both sides in a public fight for beating each others.

AK claims, without naming, attackers are sent by political parties like congress or BJP. But police is silent on this issue after recording statement of attackers.
Even media is also silent, apart from loud noise.

Do people not have right to know the truth?

--
Best Regards,
-Joshi NM

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



--
Posted by at No comments:

Re: [IAC#RG] Why people beat Arvind Kejriwal?

I have a great expectation with AAP but after their withdrawal from Delhi seat the fight of their supporter against corruption gets a question mark, when their petition become pending in AAP delhi office. The effect of AAP where clearly visible in those 49 days. But after their withdrawal a question mark arises on those 49 days?
My question to AAP is that they left Delhi seat because they didn't get majority there. Then why they are fighting Lok Sabha Election when they are targetting for just 100 seats.

I think BJP may be a 2nd best party but its one sided remark on Hinduism create a question.
My question to BJP is that if BJP is true supporter of Hinduism then why we cant see any development on Varanasi, where the MLA and MP both belongs to BJP?
It creates a question that whether BJP is a real supporter of Hinduism or Brahamanism. Its Ram Mandir Nirmaan promises only developed Brahamanism rather than Hinduism.

Congress has developed the bribe system not only in govt department but also in common man mind.
So I dont have any question to Congress Party because it is self a great question.


Ankit Khetan
India
From: Bina Goel <drbinagoel@gmail.com>
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Sent: Sunday, 13 April 2014 9:14 AM
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Why people beat Arvind Kejriwal?

We indians are exporting our ideas to USA, see SHOE was thrown at Ms.HILARY CLINTON in USA. So Arvind should not get afraid by "GHOOSA" And "THAPPAD"offered to him in road show at Lok Sabha Election rally in India-dr.govind goel


On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Veerendra Jaitly <jaitly.iit@gmail.com> wrote:
And AAP accepts supports from even from a hard core criminal like Mukhtaar Ansari to defeat Modi who is the hope of the millions and millions.
AK 49 को अब देश की जनता की आवाज़ सुनाई नहीं देती।  (AK 49 can't listen to the message from the Aam Janata now)

With Warm Regards,

Veerendra K Jaitly
09811777904
C_cube Consultants
101/2 Beverly Park, Plot-2
Sector 22, Dwarka, New Delhi-110077 




On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Gaur J K <gaurjk@hotmail.com> wrote:
Arnab,s is not the only channel. Other channels continue to cover AK and AAP. So the charge of blocking AAP news is not correct.
Regarding Azam Khan.s remarks, it shows a muslim leader can say anything, appeal for votes on communal lines and can get away with it and still considered a secular leader. Sonia Gandh can meet the Imam for favour in return for favours and still be secular. But a Hindu leader becomes communal without saying anything communal.
JKGaur
 
From: k_ramani44@hotmail.com
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 05:30:31 +0530

To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Why people beat Arvind Kejriwal?

I fully endorse views of Manoj Joshi. I think it was Arnab's channel , it talked about congress , BJP and got only their leaders to talk. YES paid indeed. it is very intriguing that no news channel castigated Azam Khan for his muslim soldiers remark. I would like to know where these so called pundits like Pronoy Roy who manage to hire Rashtarpati Bhawan , are when it comes to anti nationals like Azam Khan. Where is this Sampath fellow who issues notices on flimsy ground to Ashutosh , keeps mum on Azam Khan.. Sampath in any case is an apology and stooge of politicians of any hue .


On 09-Apr-2014, at 3:49 pm, Manoj Joshi <mjoshiyhai@gmail.com> wrote:

I met a very senior journalist the other day who told me that the entire media specially news channels have been paid and are instructed to block the good news of AAP but to show all the negative aspects regarding AAP to tarnish their image. I strongly believe in this theory as exactly the same thing is seen on all the leading  news channels barring none. The so called Fourth pillar of DEMOCRACY seems to be  sold out few crores...... God save India.


On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Sureshan <sureshandelhi@gmail.com> wrote:
This question I am also in mind.yesterday was the last day of campaigning in delhi.apart from this incident showing again and again by media they did not have anything about AAP.when major parties spend crores for ad AAP did not spent much but still every day they grabed media attention

Joshi NM <naishadhjoshi@gmail.com> wrote:

AK gets beaten up by people time and again.
I think in Indian election history, He is a campaigner who got inked+beaten; highest number of times.

Every time ordinary attacker is thrashed severely. Normally, police would arrest people from both sides in a public fight for beating each others.

AK claims, without naming, attackers are sent by political parties like congress or BJP. But police is silent on this issue after recording statement of attackers.
Even media is also silent, apart from loud noise.

Do people not have right to know the truth?

--
Best Regards,
-Joshi NM

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in




Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)