N vikramsimha ,Trustee RTI study Center & KRIA Katte , #12 Sumeru Sir M N Krishna Rao Road , Basvangudi < Bangalore 560004.
--- On Fri, 17/12/10, Baby Varkey <babyjohn.varkey@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Baby Varkey <babyjohn.varkey@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: URGENT: Use the HJ website/forum
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Date: Friday, 17 December, 2010, 4:20 PM
> Dear Mr Sarbajit
>
> Your objection is very well taken.
>
> Since 1875, the legal principle from Taylor versus Taylor
> "that where
> a thing is required to be done in a particular manner, it
> must be done
> in that manner or not at all and that other methods of
> performance are
> necessarily forbidden." is now firmly established, by the
> Privy
> Council in Nazir Ahmad Vs. Emperor AIR 1936 PC 253. and
> also AIR 1975
> SC 915 Ram Chandra Keshav Adke (dead) Vs. Govind Joti
> Chavare and Ors.
>
> If even about 10 persons from this list make the proper
> representations (even by email considering the short time
> available),
> the Govt can be prevailed upon in my view to either
> withdraw their
> Office Memorandum or publish a public notice or clarify
> that it is a
> departmental memo soliciting comments only from other
> departments /
> ministries / organizations.
>
> Baby Varkey, Adv.
>
> On 12/17/10, sroy 1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > 2 threads have been started on the website
> >
> > "Amendment to RTI Rules"
> > http://humjanenge.org.in/forum/index.php/topic,15.0.html
> > ( I have set the ball rolling on this, members can add
> their own
> > comments/objs/suggns)
> >
> > "IPC 498A public notice for comments to Rajya Sabha "
> > http://humjanenge.org.in/forum/index.php/topic,14.0.html
> >
> > Sarbajit
> >
>
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.