From: Gopalarao ganugapati <gvgrao33@gmail.com>
To: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2013 8:35 PM
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] WILL MANMOHAN SINGH RESIGN NOW ?
Attitude of Mr Singh is DUNNAPOTHU MEEDA VARSHAM KURISINATLE!
telling in English he is like a buffalo which will not be affected by the down pour of rain
On Friday, September 27, 2013, Venkatraman Ns <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com> wrote:
> To
>
> India Against Corruption
>
> WILL MANMOHAN SINGH RESIGN NOW ?
>
> Rahul Gandhi has termed the ordinance to undo the Supreme court verdict on convicted persons from sitting in assemblies and parliament as nonsense and said it should be thrown away.
>
> While , by this statement Rahul Gandhi has tried to improve his public image , what about the public image of Manmohan Singh? When the Vice President of the leading party in the UPA makes such strong statement in public , Manmohan Singh has to react.
>
> The option for him is either to defend his decision to issue an ordinance or submit his resignation protesting against the outburst of Rahul Gandhi in public .
>
> At the fag end of UPA II facing all round criticism, Rahul Gandhi has given Manmohan Singh an opportunity to redeem his image by quitting on a matter of principle where the Prime Minister's decision is being questioned by the Vice President of his own party.
>
> N.S.Venkataraman
>
> Email:- nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com
>
>
--
G.V.Gopalarao,BA,BE,DIIT,MIE
Professional Engineer (IEI)26/378A,Buttaipeta.Machilipatnam,521001INDIA.Phone: Landline 91 8672 221315Cell:7893935473
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in/
Saturday, September 28, 2013
Re: [IAC#RG] WILL MANMOHAN SINGH RESIGN NOW ?
Re: [IAC#RG] WILL MANMOHAN SINGH RESIGN NOW ?
Not necessary to resign PM . Ragul gandhi statement also appreciated by indian citizen
On Sep 28, 2013 1:32 PM, "Venkatraman Ns" <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com> wrote:
To
India Against Corruption
WILL MANMOHAN SINGH RESIGN NOW ?
Rahul Gandhi has termed the ordinance to undo the Supreme court verdict on convicted persons from sitting in assemblies and parliament as nonsense and said it should be thrown away.
While , by this statement Rahul Gandhi has tried to improve his public image , what about the public image of Manmohan Singh? When the Vice President of the leading party in the UPA makes such strong statement in public , Manmohan Singh has to react.
The option for him is either to defend his decision to issue an ordinance or submit his resignation protesting against the outburst of Rahul Gandhi in public .
At the fag end of UPA II facing all round criticism, Rahul Gandhi has given Manmohan Singh an opportunity to redeem his image by quitting on a matter of principle where the Prime Minister's decision is being questioned by the Vice President of his own party.
N.S.Venkataraman
Email:- nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Regards
B.Rama Krishna Raju,UF-RTI
+91-9246563738
RE: [IAC#RG] WILL MANMOHAN SINGH RESIGN NOW ?
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 15:17:19 +0530
From: chaddask@gmail.com
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] WILL MANMOHAN SINGH RESIGN NOW ?
There are more than one reasons for Manmohan Singh NOT TO REACT.
To
India Against Corruption
WILL MANMOHAN SINGH RESIGN NOW ?
Rahul Gandhi has termed the ordinance to undo the Supreme court verdict on convicted persons from sitting in assemblies and parliament as nonsense and said it should be thrown away.
While , by this statement Rahul Gandhi has tried to improve his public image , what about the public image of Manmohan Singh? When the Vice President of the leading party in the UPA makes such strong statement in public , Manmohan Singh has to react.
The option for him is either to defend his decision to issue an ordinance or submit his resignation protesting against the outburst of Rahul Gandhi in public .
At the fag end of UPA II facing all round criticism, Rahul Gandhi has given Manmohan Singh an opportunity to redeem his image by quitting on a matter of principle where the Prime Minister's decision is being questioned by the Vice President of his own party.
N.S.Venkataraman
Email:- nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Re: [IAC#RG] WILL MANMOHAN SINGH RESIGN NOW ?
telling in English he is like a buffalo which will not be affected by the down pour of rain
On Friday, September 27, 2013, Venkatraman Ns <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com> wrote:
> To
>
> India Against Corruption
>
> WILL MANMOHAN SINGH RESIGN NOW ?
>
> Rahul Gandhi has termed the ordinance to undo the Supreme court verdict on convicted persons from sitting in assemblies and parliament as nonsense and said it should be thrown away.
>
> While , by this statement Rahul Gandhi has tried to improve his public image , what about the public image of Manmohan Singh? When the Vice President of the leading party in the UPA makes such strong statement in public , Manmohan Singh has to react.
>
> The option for him is either to defend his decision to issue an ordinance or submit his resignation protesting against the outburst of Rahul Gandhi in public .
>
> At the fag end of UPA II facing all round criticism, Rahul Gandhi has given Manmohan Singh an opportunity to redeem his image by quitting on a matter of principle where the Prime Minister's decision is being questioned by the Vice President of his own party.
>
> N.S.Venkataraman
>
> Email:- nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com
>
>
--
Professional Engineer (IEI)
Re:[IAC#RG]
And by the way who raked the issue?Wasn't it the Govt who went to press to say that the Ex Chief tried to use money to topple the Govt out there?So if the chief is clarifying his posn what wrong?Let "senior government functionary speaking on the condition of anonymity" have balls and come out in open to charge what is true and just.rgdsrahul
On Friday, 27 September 2013 4:45 PM, Ranjit <ranjitrai123@gmail.com> wrote:
Absolutely right ..Bhanotmadan. ...World wide Governments have to trust Intelligence Agencies and never go deep in to their funds once allocated as most trusted persons should be placed as Int Heads and they should be tasked for tasks and to GET inputs that the state and military needs. That needs oversight and as no tasking is done with no oversight political committee and now we have 8 Int Agencies the funds were used indiscriminately and will continue till some PM like Mrs G or Vajpayee come to use intelligence for national goals.Till I worked in Intelligence no tasking was done so spending is Lassez Faire , and the Subject should be closed......Army Chiefs inquiring and then talking about the Int Funds is anti nationalRR
Sent from my iPadMadan BhanotHi there,Very interesting. U must know that MI fund has always been spent at total discretion of the Chief. Meant for untold MI expenses that is not audit-able. Why bellyache after he has demitted the office."Dam tha to uswaqt pakadte", any rash action at this point may open the pandora's box as there may be many skeletons in the cupboard.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:33 PM, <javedmansari@gmail.com> wrote:
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
From: javedmansari@gmail.comSent: Wednesday 25 September 2013 13:35To: Assignment; Ajay Dixit; Rahul Headlines Today; itgd ed; vikram.kilpady@intoday.comSubject:Senior government functionaries voiced their angst against former Army chief V K Singh for his recent utterances. " his statements have caused us irreparable damage besides ofcourse undermining the democratic process in Jammu and Kashmir".The Government has taken a very serious view of Genl V K Singh's recent statements about the Army paying politicians in Kashmir and intends to order an inquiry. " There needs to be an inquiry into whether money was indeed distributed and if so where did it go". The government is yet to decide about who will conduct the inquiry but sources say it will not be the CBI .The general consensus in the upper echelons of the Government is that the generals "irresponsible statement" has come at an inopportune time for the government and put it in an embarrassing position ahead of the talks with Pakistan scheduled for Sunday.General V K Singh had an extremely prickly relationship with the UPA government even when he was the Army chief and the relationship has progressively detoriated after he demitted office. At one point of time during his standoff with the government, the political leadership toyed with the idea of dismissing him, but it was the intervention of Defence Minister A K Antony that disuaded the government from going ahead. The feeling amongst the governments senior functionaries now is that V K Singh's "reckless" statement has seriously compromised the nations interests in addition to providing Pakistan and the likes of the Hurriyat an issue to embarass the country.A senior government functionary speaking on the condition of anonynimity said that Singh's statement needed to be inquired into because " the Army has no business paying off civilians".It was evident from the tone and tenor of senior government officials that this time the government intends posing some uncomfortable questions to Genl V K Singh " we need to find out whether payments were made and if it's true who authorised these payments and who the real beneficiaries were".from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Re: [IAC#RG] WILL MANMOHAN SINGH RESIGN NOW ?
There are more than one reasons for Manmohan Singh NOT TO REACT.
To
India Against Corruption
WILL MANMOHAN SINGH RESIGN NOW ?
Rahul Gandhi has termed the ordinance to undo the Supreme court verdict on convicted persons from sitting in assemblies and parliament as nonsense and said it should be thrown away.
While , by this statement Rahul Gandhi has tried to improve his public image , what about the public image of Manmohan Singh? When the Vice President of the leading party in the UPA makes such strong statement in public , Manmohan Singh has to react.
The option for him is either to defend his decision to issue an ordinance or submit his resignation protesting against the outburst of Rahul Gandhi in public .
At the fag end of UPA II facing all round criticism, Rahul Gandhi has given Manmohan Singh an opportunity to redeem his image by quitting on a matter of principle where the Prime Minister's decision is being questioned by the Vice President of his own party.
N.S.Venkataraman
Email:- nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Re: [IAC#RG] WILL MANMOHAN SINGH RESIGN NOW ?
Not necessary to resign PM . Ragul gandhi statement also appreciated by indian citizen
To
India Against Corruption
WILL MANMOHAN SINGH RESIGN NOW ?
Rahul Gandhi has termed the ordinance to undo the Supreme court verdict on convicted persons from sitting in assemblies and parliament as nonsense and said it should be thrown away.
While , by this statement Rahul Gandhi has tried to improve his public image , what about the public image of Manmohan Singh? When the Vice President of the leading party in the UPA makes such strong statement in public , Manmohan Singh has to react.
The option for him is either to defend his decision to issue an ordinance or submit his resignation protesting against the outburst of Rahul Gandhi in public .
At the fag end of UPA II facing all round criticism, Rahul Gandhi has given Manmohan Singh an opportunity to redeem his image by quitting on a matter of principle where the Prime Minister's decision is being questioned by the Vice President of his own party.
N.S.Venkataraman
Email:- nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Re: [IAC#RG] WILL MANMOHAN SINGH RESIGN NOW ?
This message is eligible for Automatic Cleanup! (nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com) Add cleanup rule | More info
To
India Against Corruption
WILL MANMOHAN SINGH RESIGN NOW ?
Rahul Gandhi has termed the ordinance to undo the Supreme court verdict on convicted persons from sitting in assemblies and parliament as nonsense and said it should be thrown away.
While , by this statement Rahul Gandhi has tried to improve his public image , what about the public image of Manmohan Singh? When the Vice President of the leading party in the UPA makes such strong statement in public , Manmohan Singh has to react.
The option for him is either to defend his decision to issue an ordinance or submit his resignation protesting against the outburst of Rahul Gandhi in public .
At the fag end of UPA II facing all round criticism, Rahul Gandhi has given Manmohan Singh an opportunity to redeem his image by quitting on a matter of principle where the Prime Minister's decision is being questioned by the Vice President of his own party.
N.S.Venkataraman
Email:- nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Partner - ADS & Co., Chartered Accountants
Chairman - VIVEKANANDA INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FINANCE
unless they Pass Jan LokPal, Right to Reject & Right to Recall!
Friday, September 27, 2013
Re: [IAC#RG] PUBLIC GRIEVANCE: DMRC - 00001
Shri K. N. Shrivastava,
Secretary,
Ministry of Civil Aviation
Govt. Of India
Sir,
Please find below the trail emails concerning my Public Grievance (submitted in larger public interest) sent to a senior officers under / attached to your Ministry, which is being ignored.
It needs to be urgently explained / clarified to the public at large why the prescribed codes for providing essential passenger amenities such as free drinking water are being openly flouted and your Ministry's regulatory officers are colluding with the operators to permit it.
I am further constrained to bring to your notice the willful malfeasance in office of your Ministry's Joint Secretary & Public Grievance Officer who has failed to register (within 3 days as prescribed by "Manual of Office Procedure") my public grievance and provide me the CPGRAMS number to enable it to be tracked and monitored.
The said grievance was submitted in larger public interest of lakhs of affected passengers and the very least that was expected is that it would be acknowledged and duly diarised in the CPGRAMS system. Instead the operators are being allowed to carry on making outrageous profits by only forcefully selling their artificially bottled water at hugely inflated rates by denying passengers/citizens the right to potable water in drinking fountains as prescribed.
Accordingly, the India Against Corruption jan andolan, has reason to believe that the strange inaction of your Ministry is for corrupt reasons and that there is a syndicate of senior officers under/attached to your Ministry, who are part of this water mafia, and who even deny drinking water to juveniles in extreme distress.
Accordingly, India Against Corruption requests you to kindly ensure that the CPGRAMS ID evidencing registration of my public grievance is issued immediately as prescribed, and that my grievance is resolved forthwith so that passengers get free drinking water without any further delay.
With best wishes
Er. Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor
India Against Corruption, jan andolan
2nd floor, B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024
Tel : 09311448069
www.indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
On 9/22/13, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> To
> Shri G Asok Kumar
> Joint Sec & PGO
> Ministry of Civil Aviation
>
> Sir
>
> BY EMAIL
>
> Please find below the trail emails of Public Grievance sent to a
> senior safety officer under / attached your Ministry, which is being
> ignored.
>
> It needs to be urgently explained / clarified why the prescribed codes
> for essential passenger amenities such as drinking water are being
> openly flouted and your Ministry's regulatory officers are colluding
> with the operators to permit it.
>
> Kindly take all necessary steps on this Grievance as mentioned in
> Manual of Office Procedure and the applicable DARPG instructions.
>
> With best wishes
>
> Er. Sarbajit Roy
> National Convenor
> India Against Corruption, jan andolan
>
> 2nd floor, B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
> Tel : 09311448069
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 21:50:06 +0530
> Subject: Re: PUBLIC GRIEVANCE: DMRC - 00001
> To: crs@nr.railnet.gov.in, indiaresists
> <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>, Swati Chawla <swatiechawla@gmail.com>
>
> To:
> Shri Raj Kumar Kardam
> Commissioner of Metro Rail Safety(Northern Circle).
> CRIS COMPLEX, CHANAKYAPURI, NEW DELHI.
>
> Sir
>
> PUBLIC GRIEVANCE:
>
> I am constrained to observe that I have not had the basic courtesy of
> a reply / acknowledgment to my Public Grievance of 11/09/2013
> addressed to you by name.
>
> You are presumably very well aware of the technical planning for
> railway stations and the basic amenities required to be provided to
> railway passengers throughout India, including on the Metro Railways.
>
> To refresh your memory I am providing a relevant link to the Railway
> Board website.
>
> http://www.indianrailways.gov.in/railwayboard/uploads/codesmanual/IRWM/worksmanualCh4_data.htm
>
> and direct your attention to para 414 therein concerning providing
> potable drinking water for railway passengers which is being openly
> flouted by DMRC.
>
> Please note that I have reason to suspect that the juvenile pickpocket
> "Pappu Kumar" apprehended and in charge of Delhi Police who was denied
> drinking water at Rajiv Chowk Metro Station has gone missing after he
> was in custody of Delhi Police and taken to Rajouri Garden Metro
> Police Station for interrogation, and his life / safety was endangered
> by lack of drinking water / fountains within DMRC network without
> which essential passenger amenities the delhi metro railway operations
> could never have commenced.
>
> Kindly note that I expect to receive your acknowledgment to my
> email(s) within 72 hours clearly spelling out by when my grievance
> (issued in larger public interest) shall be resolved.
>
> With best wishes
>
> Er. Sarbajit Roy
> National Convenor
> India Against Corruption, jan andolan
>
> 2nd floor, B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
> Tel : 09311448069
>
> On 9/11/13, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> To:
>> Shri Raj Kumar Kardam
>> Commissioner of Metro Rail Safety(Northern Circle).
>> CRIS COMPLEX, CHANAKYAPURI, NEW DELHI.
>>
>> Ref: DMRC/2013/E/00001
>> Date: 11-Sep-2013
>>
>> Sir
>>
>> PUBLIC GRIEVANCE:
>>
>> On behalf of the citizens I am constrained to complain as follows:-
>>
>> 1) That there is apparently no provision to provide free drinking
>> water to citizens at well marked and easily accessible locations in
>> the controlled ares of DMRC network/stations.
>>
>> 2) I am constrained to say this on the complaint of some police
>> officers to me at Rajiv Chowk Metro station who were discussing the
>> situation whereby they are denied drinking water facility and have no
>> place to even sit / conduct interrogations because DMRC has let out
>> the area marked for their Police Post in Rajiv Chowk Metro Station to
>> a well known coffee chain where water is sold at about Rs. 45 per 1
>> litre bottle.
>>
>> 3) For example, I am given to understand that the juvenile
>> offender/accused pickpocket "Pappu Kumar" age about 10 years
>> apprehended at about 8:00 PM at Rajiv Chowk was without drinking water
>> till about 11:45 PM after he was booked at Raja Garden Metro Police
>> Station, because there is no free drinking water available in the
>> controlled areas of DMRC for the Police to provide to him. This is
>> surely a human rights violation of citizens, seeing as how the
>> interrogation of the offender was conducted in the main control room
>> of Rajiv Gandhi Metro Station (where there is no drinking water either
>> to provide the offender/accused or the police).
>>
>> 4) Being greatly surprised at the information from the Delhi Police, I
>> conducted my brief initial enquiry and could confirm the same.
>>
>> Kindly look into the matter, as I am given to understand that the
>> control/supervision of design and operation of DMRC stations also
>> falls under your mandate.
>>
>> Kindly acknowledge this email by return indicating a time-line to
>> resolution by your office.
>>
>> With best wishes
>>
>> Er. Sarbajit Roy
>> National Convenor
>> India Against Corruption, jan andolan
>>
>> 2nd floor, B-59 Defence Colony
>> New Delhi 110024
>> Tel : 09311448069
>
Re: [IAC#RG] Violation of "National Anti-Corruption Strategy" by DoPT officers.
प्रिये युवाओ,भाद्र्पुर्शो व मात्र्शक्ति ! आज हमारी संस्कृति छीन-भिन्न हो चुकी हैं हमारा खान-पान,रहन-सहन, वेश भूषा ,आचार-विचार सब कुछ बदल गया हैं!देश की युवा पीढ़ी नसे के कारण बर्बाद हो रही हैं घर के सदस्यों में आपसी प्रेम समाप्त हो चूका हैं,बेरोजगारी, गरीबी, आतंकवाद और आपसी फूट के कारण हमारा देश फिर से गुलाम होने के कगार पर हैं, अपने आपको देश का ठेकेदार मानने वाले लोग भी भ्रस्ताचार की दल-दल में बुरी तरह से फसे हुए हे,ऐसी परिस्तिथि में श्री राम और श्री कृषण की संस्कृति की रक्छा कौन करेगा? इन समसियाओं का समाधान केवल एक ही हैं -प्राचीन विधा! जिसके बल पर हमारा देश विश्व गुरु कहलाता था! उसी विधा के बल पर हमने दुनिया पर करोडो वर्ष तक राज किया! महाभारत की लड़ाई के बाद जब इस विधा का पड़ना-पढाना छुट गया तब हम हजारों वर्षो तक विदेशियों के गुलाम रहे और हमारे पूर्वजो ने लाखो अतियाचार सहें !आज भी यदि इस विधा को हमने नहीं पड़ा तो आने वाले भयंकर दुखो से हम बच नहीं पाएंगे! इसलिए युवाओ ,भद्र पुरषों से प्रार्थना हैं की राष्ट्रीय आर्य निर्मात्री सभा द्वारा निर्देशित दो दिवसीय लघु गुरु कुल आर्य प्रसिक्छन सत्र में आकर ऋषि-मुनियों की इस पवन विधा को जान कर अपना,बच्चो का,अपने समाज का और राष्ट्र का कल्याण करे !
"गुरु कुल के नियम"
1 .इस में पुरुष व महिला आ सकते हैं
2 .आयु कम से कम 18 वर्ष होनी चाहिए
3 .पूरा समय सत्र में रहना अनिवारिये हैं
4 .भोजन और आवास का प्रबंध निशुल्क होगा
5 .बैठने के लिए गदा व कुर्शी पर सुविधा अनुसार बैठ सकते हैं
6 .सत्रार्थी सत्य का जिज्ञासु,धार्मिक और राष्ट्रीय भावना वाला होना चाहिए
7 .गुरु कुल में वैज्ञानिक ढंग से रोचक प्रशन उतर होंगे कोई भी हठ-दुराग्रह न करे, एक दुसरे का सामान करे !
"सत्य को ग्रहण करने में और असत्य को छोड़ने में हमेशा तैयार रहना चाहिए यही सुख का उपाए हैं "
5-6 अक्टूबर 2013सुबह9:30 से शाम 6 बजे , आप से नम्र निवेदन हे समय पर पहुंचे , वेदोक्त ज्ञान द्वारा , वियाक्तिगत ,शारीरिक , मानसिक ,आर्थिक,शिक्छा ,सामाजिक,धार्मिक,राष्ट्रीय,उथान के लिए ज्ञान अर्जित कर स्वयं को परिवार को व समाज को प्रगति के लिए अग्रसर हो ?(आप इन विषयो पर तर्क कर सकते हे व अपनी जानकारी बाँट सकते हे )
गुरु कुल आयोजन स्थान :- 5-6 अक्टूबर 2013,रवा राजपूत धर्मशाला,नजीबाबाद,बिजनौर,उ० प्र०, सम्पर्क:- आर्य राजेन्द्र - 09837317062
5-6 अक्टूबर 2013,Evergreen Public School,गांव रणसूरा,सहारनपुर,उ० प्र०, सम्पर्क:- आर्य सुरेन्द्र - 07500319237
5-6 अक्टूबर 2013,आर्य समाज शिवाजी कालोनी रोहतक, सम्पर्क:- आर्य वेदप्रकाश - 09416147217
5-6 अक्टूबर 2013,आर्य समाज गांव माहरा,जिला सोनीपत,हरयाणा,सम्पर्क:- आर्य नरेन्द्र 08053562978
5-6 अक्टूबर 2013,S.S.N Public School,गांव गंगा टेहडी पोपडा,जिला करनाल,हरयाणा,सम्पर्क:- आर्य रामफल 08930512895,9068991350
5-6 अक्टूबर 2013,छोटूराम धरमसाला , बहादुरगढ़,हरयाणा, सम्पर्क:- आर्य रामबीर जी 09312523084
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:53 PM, M.N.Seshadri <manavasi.seshadri@gmail.com> wrote:
Hullo Pl quickly ask Rahul about RTI being made applicable for political
parties . I would like to ask a dozen questions . I am sure he would like to
take the lead in agreeing to this after he condemned in a hurry the
ordinance to protect the convicted guys !!! Seshadri
-----Original Message-----
From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net
[mailto:indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of Sarbajit Roy
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 12:46 PM
To: G.S. Beniwal; indiaresists
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Violation of "National Anti-Corruption Strategy" by
DoPT officers.
Dear Mr. Beniwal
It is of the CVC (Central Vigilance Commission) - which is administratively
under DoPT.
http://www.cvc.nic.in/nacs26082010.htm
BUT, the NACS is an extremely badly drafted document which has been drawn up
by some NGOs and corrupt ex-babus. It is still in "final draft" form since
2010 and it is a major embarrassment to DoPT and UPA.
So I am only using it to "poke" DoPT.
Hope this clarifies.
Sarbajit
On 9/27/13, G.S. Beniwal <beniwalg@ymail.com> wrote:
> Roy sir, may i know which authority issued this policy and does this
policy
> applies to MoD/departments ?. rgds. beniwal (66yrs)
>
> ________________________________
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> To: secy_mop <secy_mop@nic.in>; jsata <jsata@nic.in>; jsv-dopt
> <jsv-dopt@nic.in>; indiaresists <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
> Sent: Friday, 27 September 2013 6:58 AM
> Subject: [IAC#RG] Violation of "National Anti-Corruption Strategy" by
> DoPT officers.
>
>
RE: [IAC#RG] RTI Act (Amendment) Bill 2013
that the ordinance on convicted politicians was nonsense with the elections
facing him like a giant. Now we must ensure that we get the support of at
least one political party other than AAM ADMI PARTY we can surely break the
consensus now existing !! Let us get busy. Now or never . Ask Anna to give
statements . I wonder why he has become so quiet now.
-----Original Message-----
From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net
[mailto:indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of DR MC GEORGE
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 12:56 PM
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] RTI Act (Amendment) Bill 2013
Hello friends
Thanks and congratulations for your adament fight for public cause
of social relevance. In the instant case we - INFAM - has the firm opinion
that political parties are 'public institutions' eligible to be brought
under the scrutiny of the RTI Act. They choose legislatures from whom the
very executive makes its origin and the entire power structure is centred
around political parties. They issue directions to legislatures and have got
authority to give 'whip' which has to be obeyed strictly as otherwise they
will lose their status as legislatures. Having such super power status to
form, lead and run the executive authority under whose control and hegmony
everything related to administration happens they should not be left from
under the purview of RTI Act. If the president's/prime minister's office is
included with in the ambit of RTI how can anybody think of excluding the
'creator' of all these institutions and having such vast controlling powers
over them (impeachment in the case of president.) get exclusion.
Please be good enough to share the format of the
memmoranda/sugestions to us also for guidance and form part of the
initiatives. Thanks again and best wishes.
Dr.M.C.GEORGE,ADVOCATE,INFAM(IndianFarmersMovement)National Trustee.
N.B. INFAM is an organisation of farmers especially small and marginal ones
and strives for the empowerment and overall development of farm sector
village communities.
--------------------------------------------
On Fri, 27/9/13, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] RTI Act (Amendment) Bill 2013
To: sahoo.ak@sansad.nic.in, "Shantaram Naik" <shantaramgoa@gmail.com>,
rs-cpers@sansad.nic.in, "indiaresists" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>,
"ncpri" <ncpri@googlegroups.com>
Date: Friday, 27 September, 2013, 11:28 AM
To:
Joint Secretary (PPG)
Rajya Sabha
27-Sep-2013
BY
Dear Sir(s)
We thank you for the very prompt action taken on our email representation
dt. 26.09.2013 to upload the Press Release and Last Date for filing (Oct 6
2013) for the subject Bill to the Rajya Sabha's official website.
We are now circulating the uploaded attachment to our national membership
for their comments which we expect to file expeditiously.
With best
wishes.
( Er. Sarbajit Roy
)
National Convenor : India Against Corruption, jan andolan
National Convenor : National Campaign for Political Reform in India
www.indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
www.ncpri.org
Mailing address:
2nd
floor, B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024
Tel : 011-24334262
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013
at 2:02 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
wrote:
To:
Joint Secretary (PPG)
Rajya Sabha
26-Sep-2013
BY
Sir
This refers our telecon today.
I am given to understand that the subject Bill is referred to your
Departmental Committee for further consideration.
I am further given to understand that a public notice inviting comments
from affected persons was published on 21 Sept 2013 in some newspapers, but
I could not access the same as newspapers have become very expensive
nowadays for ordinary citizens, and also thanks to the UPA Govt.
(under directions of Hon'ble Chairperson UPA) the citizens like
undersigned since 2005 have been used to getting such relevant information
about Govt. free of cost under the Right to Information over the Internet
suo-moto.
It seems, however, that this important
Amendment Bill's public notice has not been uploaded to website and the
last date for responding is also not specified in Rajya Sabha website.
Ordinarily I would be the last person to attribute any ulterior motives for
this oversight where the aam aadmi is being excluded from Parliamentary
consultative processes by non-disclosure by the very same authority which
passed this beneficial legislation, but seeing as how this amendment is
directly for the benefit of members of the Houses, I am constrained to
formally protest this curious oversight.
Accordingly, I request you to kindly put it up to the Honble Committee to
extend the date for submitting comments for at least 15 days after it the
public notice is uploaded to the website.
In any case, in the interim, I wish to submit on behalf of the National
Campaign for Political Reform in India (NCPRI) and the India Against
Corruption andolan, both movements of which I happen to be the present
National Convenor of, as follows:-
1) That political parties are presently not public authorities as defined
in RTI Act 2005. That the operative judgment on which the CIC (Central
Information
Commission) order of 03-June-2013 is based ie.
"Veeresh Malik versus Indian Olympic
Association" was in the case of the co-convenor of the above 2 movements,
and has been comprehensively misinterpreted by the CIC.
2) That the CIC decision dt. 03-June-2013 is a mischievous and legally
unsound decision delivered, for extraneous considerations, by incompetent
persons on the verge of retirement, who were all appointed under an opaque
discretionary process best described as "horse trading".
3) That there is an urgent need to lay down proper qualifications and
transparent selection procedures for appointment of Information
Commissioners of proven merit and integrity, so that such kind of corrupt
decisions do not again emanate from the Information Commissions.
4) That the RTI Act 2005 requires to be urgently amended in a transparent
manner after wide public consultation to sort out many inherent obstacles
and grey areas which are obstructing the citizens from receiving
information. This may include specifically defining therein that political
parties shall be public authority, for purposes of the RTI Act, along with
all private and semi-public bodies performing public activities.
We may be submitting our detailed submissions once the public notice is
available to us for perusal and discussed by our nationwide membership.
Our movements would also like to personally appear before the Hon'ble
Committee and make our presentations in person. We woudl be obliged if you
would kindly place this communication on the record of the Hon'ble
Committee for this Bill.
With best regards
( Er. Sarbajit Roy )
National Convenor : India Against Corruption, jan andolan
National Convenor : National Campaign for Political Reform in India
www.indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
www.ncpri.org
Mailing address:
2nd
floor, B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024
Tel : 011-24334262
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Re: [IAC#RG] Violation of "National Anti-Corruption Strategy" by DoPT officers.
Corruption is one of the most sought after issue in our country. So, in coming days we might again bring our special edition on this topic. If so, your views will be important for that edition.
Hullo Pl quickly ask Rahul about RTI being made applicable for political
parties . I would like to ask a dozen questions . I am sure he would like to
take the lead in agreeing to this after he condemned in a hurry the
ordinance to protect the convicted guys !!! Seshadri
-----Original Message-----
From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net
[mailto:indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of Sarbajit Roy
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 12:46 PM
To: G.S. Beniwal; indiaresists
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Violation of "National Anti-Corruption Strategy" by
DoPT officers.
Dear Mr. Beniwal
It is of the CVC (Central Vigilance Commission) - which is administratively
under DoPT.
http://www.cvc.nic.in/nacs26082010.htm
BUT, the NACS is an extremely badly drafted document which has been drawn up
by some NGOs and corrupt ex-babus. It is still in "final draft" form since
2010 and it is a major embarrassment to DoPT and UPA.
So I am only using it to "poke" DoPT.
Hope this clarifies.
Sarbajit
On 9/27/13, G.S. Beniwal <beniwalg@ymail.com> wrote:
> Roy sir, may i know which authority issued this policy and does this
policy
> applies to MoD/departments ?. rgds. beniwal (66yrs)
>
> ________________________________
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> To: secy_mop <secy_mop@nic.in>; jsata <jsata@nic.in>; jsv-dopt
> <jsv-dopt@nic.in>; indiaresists <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
> Sent: Friday, 27 September 2013 6:58 AM
> Subject: [IAC#RG] Violation of "National Anti-Corruption Strategy" by
> DoPT officers.
>
>
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Re:[IAC#RG]
Absolutely right ..Bhanotmadan. ...World wide Governments have to trust Intelligence Agencies and never go deep in to their funds once allocated as most trusted persons should be placed as Int Heads and they should be tasked for tasks and to GET inputs that the state and military needs. That needs oversight and as no tasking is done with no oversight political committee and now we have 8 Int Agencies the funds were used indiscriminately and will continue till some PM like Mrs G or Vajpayee come to use intelligence for national goals.Till I worked in Intelligence no tasking was done so spending is Lassez Faire , and the Subject should be closed......Army Chiefs inquiring and then talking about the Int Funds is anti nationalRR
Sent from my iPadMadan BhanotHi there,Very interesting. U must know that MI fund has always been spent at total discretion of the Chief. Meant for untold MI expenses that is not audit-able. Why bellyache after he has demitted the office."Dam tha to uswaqt pakadte", any rash action at this point may open the pandora's box as there may be many skeletons in the cupboard.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:33 PM, <javedmansari@gmail.com> wrote:
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
From: javedmansari@gmail.comSent: Wednesday 25 September 2013 13:35To: Assignment; Ajay Dixit; Rahul Headlines Today; itgd ed; vikram.kilpady@intoday.comSubject:Senior government functionaries voiced their angst against former Army chief V K Singh for his recent utterances. " his statements have caused us irreparable damage besides ofcourse undermining the democratic process in Jammu and Kashmir".The Government has taken a very serious view of Genl V K Singh's recent statements about the Army paying politicians in Kashmir and intends to order an inquiry. " There needs to be an inquiry into whether money was indeed distributed and if so where did it go". The government is yet to decide about who will conduct the inquiry but sources say it will not be the CBI .The general consensus in the upper echelons of the Government is that the generals "irresponsible statement" has come at an inopportune time for the government and put it in an embarrassing position ahead of the talks with Pakistan scheduled for Sunday.General V K Singh had an extremely prickly relationship with the UPA government even when he was the Army chief and the relationship has progressively detoriated after he demitted office. At one point of time during his standoff with the government, the political leadership toyed with the idea of dismissing him, but it was the intervention of Defence Minister A K Antony that disuaded the government from going ahead. The feeling amongst the governments senior functionaries now is that V K Singh's "reckless" statement has seriously compromised the nations interests in addition to providing Pakistan and the likes of the Hurriyat an issue to embarass the country.A senior government functionary speaking on the condition of anonynimity said that Singh's statement needed to be inquired into because " the Army has no business paying off civilians".It was evident from the tone and tenor of senior government officials that this time the government intends posing some uncomfortable questions to Genl V K Singh " we need to find out whether payments were made and if it's true who authorised these payments and who the real beneficiaries were".from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
[IAC#RG] WILL MANMOHAN SINGH RESIGN NOW ?
To
India Against Corruption
WILL MANMOHAN SINGH RESIGN NOW ?
Rahul Gandhi has termed the ordinance to undo the Supreme court verdict on convicted persons from sitting in assemblies and parliament as nonsense and said it should be thrown away.
While , by this statement Rahul Gandhi has tried to improve his public image , what about the public image of Manmohan Singh? When the Vice President of the leading party in the UPA makes such strong statement in public , Manmohan Singh has to react.
The option for him is either to defend his decision to issue an ordinance or submit his resignation protesting against the outburst of Rahul Gandhi in public .
At the fag end of UPA II facing all round criticism, Rahul Gandhi has given Manmohan Singh an opportunity to redeem his image by quitting on a matter of principle where the Prime Minister's decision is being questioned by the Vice President of his own party.
N.S.Venkataraman
Email:- nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com