Saturday, November 6, 2010

[HumJanenge] Sonia routes her US$2 billion commission to Pakistan

Dear Friends

The nation is being raped by foreigners and their rubber stamps
Consider this

1) India signs US$ 10 billion commercial deals with United States
2) United States gives US$ 2 billion as military "aid" to Pakistan.
3) Pakistan will promptly return this "aid" back to India.

When Obama visits Mumbai for 26/11 victims, he does not refer
even once to Pakistan in his speech. Instead Obama insists that
Indian Army and Indian Airforce must buy US fighter planes in
a secret deal not even to be revealed in RTI till 2020. Manmohan
Singh welcomes that 50,000 jobs will be created in USA by these
orders.

Let us all condemn the foreigners who are running this country and
their anti-national policies.

S D Sharma

Re: [HumJanenge] Re: [rti_india] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy intoday's Pioneer

Mr. Moderator, please kick SD Sharma out of the group.

Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel


From: "S.D. Sharma" <anonsharma@yahoo.com>
Sender: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 22:42:04 -0700
To: <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
ReplyTo: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: [rti_india] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in today's Pioneer

You are talking like wazahat sahib. approach you are suggesting has not worked for over 60 yaers. India must pull out its troops to jammu, use neutron bomb and solve problem finally. Kashmiri youth are asking to be killed, why are they throwing stones and bombs. Rape is effective mean for army to control and dominate. Indian soldiers spend many months away from wive and family. since no local brothels and too many rti queries then raping local girls is best low cost solution Also it is scientific fact that 1 muslim man cannot satisfy 4 wives so where is harm if Indian army helps local poplation.

S D Sharma

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Abhimanyu <who.will.file.rti@gmail.com> wrote:
The easiest way to solve kashmir problem is to WIN OVER the hearts and minds of the kashmiris ..
 
this cannot be done through raping kashmiri gilrs and killing kashmiri youth.The history is evident that we failed to win kashmir through raping and killing .
 
now lets try to win over kashmir through attemps made to win over hearts and minds of kashmiris.
 
 
 


 
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 10:28 AM, S.D. Sharma <anonsharma@yahoo.com> wrote:
Dear Mr

You are 110% correct that there is diference of opinion.

ms Rundhati Roy is 110% correct that Kashmir is not integral part of India and this is historical fact. Kashmir enjoys special status under India's Constition under the accession of Maharaja to India. India is a federation of states, each state negotiates its union with India. kashmir negotiated its accession to India. Unilaterally the agreement cannot be changed by one side unless through the force of arms. If India has Imperialist ambistions then the proper thing to do is it use our neutron bomb and peacefully eliminate all Muslims in Kashmri since there are only about 4.000. pandits left in Kashmir who would gladly become martyrs to final solution of kashmir problem

S D Sharma


On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:46 AM, Amitabh Thakur <amitabhth@yahoo.com> wrote:
 

Friends,

My Article in today's Pioneer presenting my views on the case related with Ms Arundhati Roy, Mr Geelani etc.
There would certainly be difference on opinion on this but I personally stick to the opinion presented by me here.

http://epaper.dailypioneer.com/THEPIONEER/PIONEER/2010/11/04/ArticleHtmls/04_11_2010_009_030.shtml?Mode=1

As an alternative link-

http://epaper.dailypioneer.com/Thepioneer/Pioneer/2010/11/04/index.shtml

Amitabh Thakur
IPS,
Currently at IIM Lucknow
# 94155-34526



Re: [HumJanenge] Natgrid will kick in from May 2011. Is the big brother threat for real?

Hello Mr VijayBahadur

Please explain how you reached the conclusion that I am explaining on
behalf of group owners.

FYI, this is not a "fake" group, but is the result of a conscious
decision of owners of HumJanenge franchise to shift the group to
google groups. All this has been repeatedly explained to members of
this group by list owner PMK

http://groups.google.com/group/HumJanenge/browse_thread/thread/4553f94a9d51c569#
http://groups.google.com/group/HumJanenge/browse_thread/thread/db2d1cfca915ce42#
http://groups.google.com/group/HumJanenge/browse_thread/thread/4d20e56d24944133#
http://groups.google.com/group/HumJanenge/browse_thread/thread/5df7e200647d5e23#

So as your fellow group member (nothing to do with this group's
management) I request you to please use polite language and only post
to this list those allegations which you can prove. For example I am
alleging that "v4veeresh@yahoo.com" and "v_kudz@yahoo.com" are one and
the same online personality, and I can prove it.

Raminder

On 11/6/10, VijayBahadur Singh <vijaybahadur@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please don't confuse at least me. Why are you explaing on behalf of owner of
> the group? Let real owner of this *fake* group explain how he has added ids
> in the group without consent.
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Raminder Singh
> <ramisingh.bbc@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> You had posted that you would expose identities of Owners, moderators
>> of this group by using IP address. Now you say that owner / moderators
>> is not vishal Kudchadkar or PMK1504. I have also been trailing the
>> people behind this group, but my own study proves that "v4Veeresh
>> (humjanenge.owner")" who was posting to this group and "v_kudz AT
>> yahoo dot com" ("vishalkudchadkar") are one and same person, and same
>> can be verified by anyone.
>>
>> Raminder
>>
>

RE: [HumJanenge] Re: [rti_india] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in today's Pioneer

Kindly immediately remove my name from this group as well. I find many of the exchanges on it distasteful and disrespectful.

I have repeatedly asked for my name to be removed, but it does not happen. Please ensure.

Regards

Harsh Mander

 

From: humjanenge@googlegroups.com [mailto:humjanenge@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Raminder Singh
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 10:27 PM
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: [rti_india] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in today's Pioneer

 

Hello Mr Bhushan

Sorry to have to say this, but what is utterly absurd and ridiculous is when people like you who are expected to be speaking out for Arundhati Roy keep silent in public groups.

An IPS officer Mr Amitabh Thakur has published an article in the Daily Pioneer calling for charges of sedition to be framed against her. As an IPS officer Mr Thakur can be presumed to know something about the law - Indian Penal Code. Mr Thakur's article is the subject of this thread. Another IPS officer (Mr Sharma) has publicly supported your client's statement about the integrity of J+K to India. When persons like you keep silent, then you have no moral right to demand that this group be wound up. Incidentally how did you join this group?

Raminder

On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Prashant Bhushan <prashantbhush@gmail.com> wrote:

This is an utterly absurd and ridiculous group judging from this exchange of emails. It should be wound up immediately. At least immediately remove me from this group. 

Prashant Bhushan 

 

[HumJanenge]

happy diwali to you and your group.

--
Adv. Ajit M Deshmukh  ( M.A.,LL.B )
C/O Gajanan Kirana Store,
Karanja Road, Beed. 431122. ( Maharashtra )
Mo: 9422744640.

Re: [HumJanenge] Natgrid will kick in from May 2011. Is the big brother threat for real?

Please don't confuse at least me. Why are you explaing on behalf of owner of the group? Let real owner of this fake group explain how he has added ids in the group without consent.
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Raminder Singh <ramisingh.bbc@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello

You had posted that you would expose identities of Owners, moderators
of this group by using IP address. Now you say that owner / moderators
is not vishal Kudchadkar or PMK1504. I have also been trailing the
people behind this group, but my own study proves that "v4Veeresh
(humjanenge.owner")" who was posting to this group and "v_kudz AT
yahoo dot com" ("vishalkudchadkar") are one and same person, and same
can be verified by anyone.

Raminder

Re: [HumJanenge]

go ahead dear bimal
dr jn sharma

On 11/7/10, bimal khemani <bimal.khemani@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
>
>
>
> Bimal Khemani
> RTI activist
> ALIGARH-202001
> INDIA
> Mob:935-972-4625
>
>

Re: [HumJanenge] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in today's Pioneer

Dear moderator
 
I AM FED UP WITH ALL THE bakawas IN THIS FORUM
KINDLY DELETE MY NAME FROM THE MAILING LIST

Bimal Khemani
RTI activist
ALIGARH-202001
INDIA
Mob:935-972-4625


--- On Sun, 7/11/10, Dr. Jagnarain Sharma <dr.jagnarainsharma@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Dr. Jagnarain Sharma <dr.jagnarainsharma@gmail.com>
Subject: [HumJanenge] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in today's Pioneer
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Cc: prashantbhush@gmail.com, usukulsingh@hotmail.com
Date: Sunday, 7 November, 2010, 3:24 AM

DEAR PRASHANT, URVI
          Yes this group  platform should not be used for raising
issues which are touchy, like kashmiri pundit and Muslim. One must be
careful  while commenting and to  my mind it is absurd to discuss this
issue.
            Regards
            Dr JN Sharma
             ADVOCATE/HUMANRIGHTS ACTIVIST

On 11/6/10, Urvi Sukul Singh <usukulsingh@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Please take me off  this Group,too.
>
>
> From: Prashant Bhushan
> Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 10:09 PM
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: [rti_india] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in
> today's Pioneer
>
>
> This is an utterly absurd and ridiculous group judging from this exchange of
> emails. It should be wound up immediately. At least immediately remove me
> from this group.
> Prashant Bhushan
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 9:26 PM, S.D. Sharma <anonsharma@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>   muslims do not have 4 wives ? They have 100 wives by serial divorcing.
>   But Indian muslims cannot afford to have more than 1 wife because
> polticians
>   and their religious leaders keep them economically backward..
>   S D Sharma
>
>
>   On 11/6/10, Urvi Sukul Singh <usukulsingh@hotmail.com> wrote:
>   >  Dear Irfanji,
>   > I have read this person Sharma's comments which are rude and highly
>   > provocative. I am shocked. Muslims do not have 4 wives.You should not
> bother
>   > to react.
>   > Regards
>   > Urvi
>
>
>

[HumJanenge]



Bimal Khemani
RTI activist
ALIGARH-202001
INDIA
Mob:935-972-4625

[HumJanenge] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in today's Pioneer

DEAR PRASHANT, URVI
Yes this group platform should not be used for raising
issues which are touchy, like kashmiri pundit and Muslim. One must be
careful while commenting and to my mind it is absurd to discuss this
issue.
Regards
Dr JN Sharma
ADVOCATE/HUMANRIGHTS ACTIVIST

On 11/6/10, Urvi Sukul Singh <usukulsingh@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Please take me off this Group,too.
>
>
> From: Prashant Bhushan
> Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 10:09 PM
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: [rti_india] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in
> today's Pioneer
>
>
> This is an utterly absurd and ridiculous group judging from this exchange of
> emails. It should be wound up immediately. At least immediately remove me
> from this group.
> Prashant Bhushan
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 9:26 PM, S.D. Sharma <anonsharma@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> muslims do not have 4 wives ? They have 100 wives by serial divorcing.
> But Indian muslims cannot afford to have more than 1 wife because
> polticians
> and their religious leaders keep them economically backward..
> S D Sharma
>
>
> On 11/6/10, Urvi Sukul Singh <usukulsingh@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Dear Irfanji,
> > I have read this person Sharma's comments which are rude and highly
> > provocative. I am shocked. Muslims do not have 4 wives.You should not
> bother
> > to react.
> > Regards
> > Urvi
>
>
>

RE: Re: [HumJanenge] Bikaner district collector set new trend by penalising defaulting PIOs by 1000/- each

Pl unsubscribe me

jptaparia@gmail.com

 


From: humjanenge@googlegroups.com [mailto:humjanenge@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of leslie almeida
Sent: 04 November 2010 09:14
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Cc: manojkamra@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Re: [HumJanenge] Bikaner district collector set new trend by penalising defaulting PIOs by 1000/- each

 

This order is Divali bonus must welcome, pendancy of 2nd appeal will come down drastically

Leslie Almeida

On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 06:54:40 +0530 wrote
>GREAT. SUCH JUDGMENTS WIOLL HELP RTI.
JOHAR


On 3 November 2010 16:31, manoj wrote:

                Diwali Greetings-2010

First time in india, any appellate authority have penalised

defaulting
PIOs.Bikaner district collector Dr.Prithvi Raj have set new trend by
directing defaulting PIOs to deposit 1000/- each within two weeks and
appear with deposit receipt in the court of first appeal hearing.



        Such intiative can lighten the burden of information
commissions.We can hope for smooth RTI compliance now.

With best wishes
Manoj K.Kamra
Bikaner

Re: [HumJanenge] Re: [rti_india] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in today's Pioneer

Please take me off  this Group,too.

Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 10:09 PM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: [rti_india] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in today's Pioneer

This is an utterly absurd and ridiculous group judging from this exchange of emails. It should be wound up immediately. At least immediately remove me from this group. 
Prashant Bhushan 

On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 9:26 PM, S.D. Sharma <anonsharma@yahoo.com> wrote:
muslims do not have 4 wives ? They have 100 wives by serial divorcing.
But Indian muslims cannot afford to have more than 1 wife because polticians
and their religious leaders keep them economically backward..
S D Sharma

On 11/6/10, Urvi Sukul Singh <usukulsingh@hotmail.com> wrote:
>  Dear Irfanji,
> I have read this person Sharma's comments which are rude and highly
> provocative. I am shocked. Muslims do not have 4 wives.You should not bother
> to react.
> Regards
> Urvi

Re: [HumJanenge] Natgrid will kick in from May 2011. Is the big brother threat for real?

Hello

You had posted that you would expose identities of Owners, moderators
of this group by using IP address. Now you say that owner / moderators
is not vishal Kudchadkar or PMK1504. I have also been trailing the
people behind this group, but my own study proves that "v4Veeresh
(humjanenge.owner")" who was posting to this group and "v_kudz AT
yahoo dot com" ("vishalkudchadkar") are one and same person, and same
can be verified by anyone.

Raminder

On 11/6/10, VijayBahadur Singh <vijaybahadur@gmail.com> wrote:
> Imposter,
>
> By posting such clippings by copying from various websites avaiable on
> net you are trying to convince the members by using the names of Vishal
> Kudchadkar or PMK1504, you are trying to fool members that yours is real
> group. The fact is that you are you are one of the biggest fool and liar on
> the earth.
>
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 5:19 PM, vishalkudchadkar <humjanenge.owner@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>
>> http://www.tehelka.com/story_main47.asp?filename=Ne131110Natgrid_will.asp
>>
>> A terrorist has been arrested in Kashmir's Anantnag district. During
>> interrogation, he reveals that two of his fellow operatives are from
>> Coimbatore in Tamil Nadu. As of now, the procedure is that the
>> interrogator would write a report to be perused by his senior
>> officers. If and when they read it, the information will then be
>> forwarded to their counterparts in the relevant states, who will
>> forward it to the district superintendent of police. This winding
>> process often takes a month.
>>
>> But from May 2011, there will be major changes in the way such data is
>> handled across India. With the National Intelligence Grid (Natgrid) in
>> place, the interrogator will immediately feed the data into the
>> Natgrid and the Coimbatore Police will get instant updates. They can
>> not only mail back specific questions to the interrogators, but also,
>> if required, send someone to join the investigation right away. All
>> thanks to Natgrid.
>>
>> Natgrid, the brainchild of Home Minister P Chidambaram, is based on
>> the US model. It will integrate the existing 21 databases with Central
>> and state government agencies and other organisations in the public
>> and private sector such as banks, insurance companies, stock
>> exchanges, airlines, railways, telecom service providers, chemical
>> vendors, etc.
>>
>> Eleven government agencies (including RAW, Intelligence Bureau,
>> Revenue Intelligence, Income Tax, etc.) will be able to access
>> sensitive personal information of any individual — such as bank
>> accounts, insurance policies, property owned or rented, travel, income
>> tax returns, driving records, automobiles owned or leased, credit card
>> transactions, stock market trades, phone calls, emails and SMSes,
>> websites visited, etc. A national population registry will be
>> established by the 2011 Census, during which fingerprints and iris
>> scans would be taken along with GPS records of each household.
>>
>> Once the Natgrid is in place, security agencies will need to just feed
>> your name into the system and all information about you will be
>> available at the click of a button. Apart from this, important
>> information that every police or intelligence agency receives will
>> also be fed to the grid, thereby enabling the agencies to coordinate
>> their strategy.
>>
>> According to the home ministry, the Central intelligence agencies and
>> state police have plenty of information that is not shared or because
>> there is no umbrella organisation to collate all the information,
>> which any or all the agencies can share to generate real-time
>> intelligence. The Natgrid enables quick extraction of information,
>> data mining, pattern recognition and flagging 'tripwires' of
>> suspicious or unusual activities.
>>
>> With a budget of Rs. 2,800 crore and a staff of 300, the Natgrid is
>> headed by Raghu Raman, an ex-serviceman who previously headed the
>> Mahindra Special Service Groups, a leading player in risk and
>> governance consulting.
>> Natgrid will integrate existing 21 databases with Central and state
>> government agencies and other organisations
>>
>> BUT WILL the Natgrid really improve our national security? Or will it
>> merely duplicate the existing intelligence mechanism? "Natgrid is all
>> about instant communication," says former Intelligence Bureau director
>> Ajit Doval. "It will help in dissemination of data — everybody will be
>> in the loop. It will function like a power grid, where every state
>> shares power stored in it. A major hurdle in the fight against
>> terrorism is that many intelligence agencies are wary about sharing
>> information with each other. In the US, the CIA does not talk to the
>> FBI, which keeps the NSA at bay. In the UK, the MI5, MI6 and
>> Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) are known to have turf
>> battles. In India, the RAW regards the IB and MEA as more of an enemy
>> than it does the ISI."
>>
>> "The success of the GCHQ and MI5 in identifying militants in Pakistan
>> by matching voice samples from phone conversations intercepted between
>> Pakistan and UK, and comparing them with a database of voice prints of
>> suspects, underscores the need for Natgrid," says Ravi Visvesvaraya,
>> head of C4ISRT (Command, Control, Communications and Computers
>> Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance and Targeting), a defence
>> think tank. "India has had a Joint Intelligence Committee to
>> coordinate between intelligence agencies, but its functioning has been
>> stymied by the very agencies it was supposed to integrate."
>>
>> Training of end-users is also important. "If you want Natgrid to be
>> effective, you have to open it to the last operating level, that is
>> your sub-inspector," says Doval. "The problem will be that most of
>> them are semi-literate and not well versed with computers. So, the
>> chances are that they feed so many things that contaminated data will
>> finish off the good data. To save it, you will need to have trained
>> people all over the country so that they don't fill the grid with
>> trash."
>>
>> What also worries the home ministry is the security of the system and
>> its potential misuse. "A stringent system for verification should be
>> in place," says Doval. "If there is a mole, then terrorists or hackers
>> will be able to download data. Imagine the kind of catastrophic
>> scenario that will create. So, it will be a challenge to look after
>> the security of the system."
>> 'In conjunction with the UID scheme, Natgrid will result in invasion
>> of privacy,' says C4IRST head Ravi Visvesvaraya
>>
>> Some are worried about privacy issues. "In conjunction with the UID
>> scheme, Natgrid will result in invasion of privacy, and personal data
>> will be extremely vulnerable to exploitation by criminals," says
>> Visvesvaraya. "Due to the terror threat, there has been a trend in the
>> judiciary and legislature to make surveillance easier and curtail
>> privacy rights."
>>
>> Today, a citizen has absolutely no legal protection against government
>> surveillance. Though the Supreme Court had ruled against arbitrary
>> surveillance on a petition filed by the People's Union for Civil
>> Liberties in 1996, it was overturned by Parliament with the passage of
>> the Information Technology (Amendment) Act 2008. It is noteworthy that
>> no political party raised objections when the government passed this
>> Act, which removed certain safeguards regarding surveillance.
>>
>> "The assertions that the Natgrid will have mechanisms to prevent
>> leakage and that it will access only abstracted and approved subsets
>> of information cannot be relied upon," warns Visvesvaraya.
>>
>> Indeed, in a pending case about invasion of privacy, the Delhi High
>> Court observed: "We have no clear definition of what is meant by
>> 'invasion of privacy' within the RTI Act." Indeed, we have no
>> equivalent of the UK's Data Protection Act, 1998, Section 2 (Sensitive
>> Personal Data), which reads as follows:
>>
>> In this Act, "sensitive personal data" means information such as:
>> • The racial or ethnic origin of the subject
>> • His/her political opinions
>> • His/her religious beliefs or other beliefs of a similar nature
>> • Whether he/she is a member of a trade union
>> • His/her physical or mental health condition
>> • His/her sexual life
>> • The commission or alleged commission by him/her of any offence
>> • Any proceedings for any offence committed or alleged to have been
>> committed by him/her, the disposal of such proceedings or the court
>> sentencing.
>>
>> "Natgrid is an important step, but there are various handicaps," says
>> a home ministry official. "To ensure that the data does not fall into
>> the wrong hands or is not abused will be a Herculean task the
>> promoters will face."
>>
>

Re: [HumJanenge] Re: [rti_india] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in today's Pioneer

Hello Mr Bhushan

Sorry to have to say this, but what is utterly absurd and ridiculous is when people like you who are expected to be speaking out for Arundhati Roy keep silent in public groups.

An IPS officer Mr Amitabh Thakur has published an article in the Daily Pioneer calling for charges of sedition to be framed against her. As an IPS officer Mr Thakur can be presumed to know something about the law - Indian Penal Code. Mr Thakur's article is the subject of this thread. Another IPS officer (Mr Sharma) has publicly supported your client's statement about the integrity of J+K to India. When persons like you keep silent, then you have no moral right to demand that this group be wound up. Incidentally how did you join this group?

Raminder

On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Prashant Bhushan <prashantbhush@gmail.com> wrote:
This is an utterly absurd and ridiculous group judging from this exchange of emails. It should be wound up immediately. At least immediately remove me from this group. 
Prashant Bhushan 

Re: [HumJanenge] Re: [rti_india] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in today's Pioneer

This is an utterly absurd and ridiculous group judging from this exchange of emails. It should be wound up immediately. At least immediately remove me from this group. 
Prashant Bhushan 

On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 9:26 PM, S.D. Sharma <anonsharma@yahoo.com> wrote:
muslims do not have 4 wives ? They have 100 wives by serial divorcing.
But Indian muslims cannot afford to have more than 1 wife because polticians
and their religious leaders keep them economically backward..
S D Sharma

On 11/6/10, Urvi Sukul Singh <usukulsingh@hotmail.com> wrote:
>  Dear Irfanji,
> I have read this person Sharma's comments which are rude and highly
> provocative. I am shocked. Muslims do not have 4 wives.You should not bother
> to react.
> Regards
> Urvi

Re: [HumJanenge] Re: [rti_india] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in today's Pioneer

muslims do not have 4 wives ? They have 100 wives by serial divorcing.
But Indian muslims cannot afford to have more than 1 wife because polticians
and their religious leaders keep them economically backward..
S D Sharma

On 11/6/10, Urvi Sukul Singh <usukulsingh@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Irfanji,
> I have read this person Sharma's comments which are rude and highly
> provocative. I am shocked. Muslims do not have 4 wives.You should not bother
> to react.
> Regards
> Urvi

Re: [HumJanenge] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in today's Pioneer

Dear Guptaji

So many people are creating differences between communities and using RTI.

you reside in Delhi. have you heard of "eminent Delhi based RTI
activist Afroz Alam Sahil" who is now campaigning for political party
in his native place Bihar ? other award goes to another Bihar based
MUSLIM RTI network.

Read this story, the prize distribution is on 4.Dec.2010, Please go an
throw 2 chappals on my behalf.

http://twocircles.net/2010nov03/tcn_annual_awards_2010_winners_announced.html

S D Sharma

On 11/6/10, M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> No body should try to create difference between the followers of two
> religions
> for the sake of peace and development. I doubt the credentials of Mr. S D
> Sharma. His id runs anonsharma. Whether this anon stand for anonymous and
> in
> the past, no mail by him has ever been posted. I fully sympathise with
> Kashmiri
> Pandits and others but for it is wrong to blame all for this. There are
> good
> and bad persons in every society, caste and religion.
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Urvi Sukul Singh <usukulsingh@hotmail.com>
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Sat, 6 November, 2010 6:31:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: [rti_india] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in
> today's Pioneer
>
>
> Dear Irfanji,
> I have read this person Sharma's comments which are rude and highly
> provocative.
> I am shocked. Muslims do not have 4 wives.You should not bother to react.
> Regards
> Urvi
>
>
> From: irfan khan
> Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 3:58 PM
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: [rti_india] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in
> today's Pioneer
>
>
> Urvashi ji .
> supreme court is justifying live-in-relationships ( women living with men
> without marriage )and supreme court is justifying same sex marriage .
>
> if supreme court is justifying such illegal and criminal relationships then
> why
> supreme courts cant justify a duely married women as WIFE . ( Hema's case )
>
> urvashiji
>
> basically i was replying to Mr sharma who said raping kashmiri girls is
> justified. He went on to say muslims cant satisfy 4 wives so it is justified
> that army MUST rape kashmiri women .
>
> we all must condem sharma for his uncivilised comments on kashmiri girls.
>
> urvashi do u condem?????
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Urvi Sukul Singh <usukulsingh@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I agree with Khemani sahab.In fact,my mailbox is flooded with these mails.I
> am
> on the rti4empowerment@yahoogroups.com and am happy with
> that.Incidentally,Mr
> Khan,the law applicable in Dharmendra's case is the Hindu law and it is
> uneqivocal in its position.There is a Supreme Court judgement on this,as I
> understand it.
>>PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE ME FROM ALL GROUPS OTHER THAN
>>rti4empowerment@yahoogroups.com I fail to understand why there s no unity
>>though.It probably requires the cause being put above individual egos.
>>Regards,
>>Urvi
>>
>>
>>From: Bimal Khemani
>>Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 12:18 PM
>>To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
>>Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: [rti_india] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in
>>
>>today's Pioneer
>>
>>
>>
>>I WOULD REQUEST THE MODERATOR OF THIS GROUP TO STOP SUCH ABUSIVE ARTICLES
>> AND
>>LETTERS
>>
>>BIMAL KUMAR KHEMANI,
>>TRAP group of RTI activists
>> ALIGARH (U.P.)
>> Mob:09359724625
>>******************************************
>>Officially Certified A Grade by DoPT
>>*****************************************
>>
>>
>>
>>On 6 November 2010 12:09, irfan khan <rtirti.khan@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>Dear sharma .
>>>
>>>this shows how uneducated and un civilised you are .
>>>
>>>I pray to Allah that he may send indian army to your area and let the army
>>> rape
>>>your wife and daughters . I am praying this because you do not have any
>>>objection to this .
>>>
>>>
>>>as far as 4 wifes of muslims is concerned .Just read following.
>>>
>>>
>>>Hema malini is second wife of Dharmendra . If you follow Hindu marriage
>>> act Hema
>>>cannot be "Wife " since Hindu marriage act do not allow second wife .
>>>
>>>this means Hema is Rakhel" of Dharmendra and Isha Deol is his "Bastard
>>> child "
>>>
>>>However if u follow Islamic law . Hema malini is legal WIFE and Ish Deol
>>> is his
>>>legal daughter .
>>>
>>>Islam is giving status of WIFE to hema wheras Hindu law is giving her
>>> status of
>>>RAKHEL . now tell me which law is giving hema respect ?????
>>>
>>>Islam permits more than one wife to stop extra marital affairs . Extra
>>> marital
>>>affairs give status of RAKHEL to women . islam say . if you love her ,
>>> marry her
>>>and give full honour and status . Dont treat her like RAKHEL.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:12 AM, S.D. Sharma <anonsharma@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>You are talking like wazahat sahib. approach you are suggesting has not
>>> worked
>>>for over 60 yaers. India must pull out its troops to jammu, use neutron
>>> bomb and
>>>solve problem finally. Kashmiri youth are asking to be killed, why are
>>> they
>>>throwing stones and bombs. Rape is effective mean for army to control and
>>>dominate. Indian soldiers spend many months away from wive and family.
>>> since no
>>>local brothels and too many rti queries then raping local girls is best
>>> low cost
>>>solution Also it is scientific fact that 1 muslim man cannot satisfy 4
>>> wives so
>>>where is harm if Indian army helps local poplation.
>>>>
>>>>S D Sharma
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Abhimanyu <who.will.file.rti@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>The easiest way to solve kashmir problem is to WIN OVER the hearts and
>>>> minds of
>>>>the kashmiris ..
>>>>>
>>>>>this cannot be done through raping kashmiri gilrs and killing kashmiri
>>>>> youth.The
>>>>>history is evident that we failed to win kashmir through raping and
>>>>> killing .
>>>>>
>>>>>now lets try to win over kashmir through attemps made to win over hearts
>>>>> and
>>>>>minds of kashmiris.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 10:28 AM, S.D. Sharma <anonsharma@yahoo.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>Dear Mr
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You are 110% correct that there is diference of opinion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>ms Rundhati Roy is 110% correct that Kashmir is not integral part of
>>>>>> India and
>>>>>>this is historical fact. Kashmir enjoys special status under India's
>>>>>> Constition
>>>>>>under the accession of Maharaja to India. India is a federation of
>>>>>> states, each
>>>>>>state negotiates its union with India. kashmir negotiated its accession
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>India. Unilaterally the agreement cannot be changed by one side unless
>>>>>> through
>>>>>>the force of arms. If India has Imperialist ambistions then the proper
>>>>>> thing to
>>>>>>do is it use our neutron bomb and peacefully eliminate all Muslims in
>>>>>> Kashmri
>>>>>>since there are only about 4.000. pandits left in Kashmir who would
>>>>>> gladly
>>>>>>become martyrs to final solution of kashmir problem
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>S D Sharma
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:46 AM, Amitabh Thakur <amitabhth@yahoo.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Friends,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>My Article in today's Pioneer presenting my views on the case related
>>>>>>> with Ms
>>>>>>>Arundhati Roy, Mr Geelani etc.
>>>>>>>There would certainly be difference on opinion on this but I
>>>>>>> personally stick to
>>>>>>>the opinion presented by me here.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>http://epaper.dailypioneer.com/THEPIONEER/PIONEER/2010/11/04/ArticleHtmls/04_11_2010_009_030.shtml?Mode=1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>As an alternative link-
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>http://epaper.dailypioneer.com/Thepioneer/Pioneer/2010/11/04/index.shtml
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Amitabh Thakur
>>>>>>>IPS,
>>>>>>>Currently at IIM Lucknow
>>>>>>># 94155-34526
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>

Re: [HumJanenge] EU pushes for "right to be forgotten" on social media

I do not know from where u all included my email id for all this nonsense!!
 
Click Me!Click Me!Click Me!Click Me!
 
 
Please unsuscribe me from here!! I beg of u--excuse me
Just not interested in this
 
DO not want these nuisnace value mails pouring in every 15 min into my inbox
 
Regards
Kala Suresh
 
 
 
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: 06-11-2010 21:00:23
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] EU pushes for "right to be forgotten" on social media
 
DEAR HON MEMBERS,

WAT IS THIS NON SENSE .....GOING ON HERE
DON'T MAKE THIS PLATFORM LIKE OUR PARLIMENT OR ASSEMBLY HOUSE...
I HOPE MEMBERS WILL MAINTAIN SOME DECORUM OF THIS SITE

BYE

On 6 November 2010 15:54, M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
Vijay ji, I earnestly urge u not to stoop to the level of imposters and maintain your language which is our biggest assets.  We cannot eradicate an evil by resorting to another evil. 


From: VijayBahadur Singh <vijaybahadur@gmail.com>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sat, 6 November, 2010 5:00:29 PM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] EU pushes for "right to be forgotten" on social media

You are son of bitch and not Vishal. If you have courahe then post this message in the group.

On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 4:45 PM, vishalkudchadkar <humjanenge.owner@gmail.com> wrote:
http://www.gmanews.tv/story/205340/eu-pushes-for-right-to-be-forgotten-on-social-media

The European Union (EU) is pushing to legalize peoples' individual
right to delete all information about themselves online, the UK's The
Daily Telegraph said on Saturday.

"Internet users must have effective control of what they put online
and be able to correct, withdraw or delete it at will. What happens if
you want to permanently delete your profile on a social networking
site? Can this be done easily? The right to be forgotten is essential
in today's digital world," EU rights commissioner Viviane Reding told
the newspaper.

Although various online services and social networking sites allow you
to delete your profile, there is as yet no simple way to remove
personal information that has spread through the Internet.

This move by the EU sets a precedent for online companies, many of
which —including Facebook and Google— are already embattled in privacy
and anti-trust issues.

It remains to be seen if other countries will follow suit.

The move by the EU sets an interesting precedent for countries like
the Philippines, where social media are utilized heavily by the public
as well as the private sector.





--
With regards,
SARJA SATYODAYA
+974 66947942
Doha-Qatar


 
FREE Animations for your email - by IncrediMail! Click Here!

Re: [HumJanenge] Re: [rti_india] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in today's Pioneer

Mr. SD Sharma is an active member of a group, owner / moderators of which are claiming to be " RTI Experts" and frequently abuse others who do not tow to their style. His message in this group clear the cloud regarding "the real owner / moderators" of this fake group who is / are adding the Ids of all and sundry without consent.     


--- On Sat, 6/11/10, M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> wrote:

From: M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in>
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: [rti_india] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in today's Pioneer
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Date: Saturday, 6 November, 2010, 7:16 PM

No body should try to create difference between the followers of two religions for the sake of peace and development.  I doubt the credentials of Mr. S D Sharma.  His id runs anonsharma.  Whether this anon stand for anonymous and in the past, no mail by him has ever been posted.  I fully sympathise with Kashmiri Pandits and others but for it is wrong to blame all for this.  There are good and bad persons in every society, caste and religion.       


From: Urvi Sukul Singh <usukulsingh@hotmail.com>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sat, 6 November, 2010 6:31:25 PM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: [rti_india] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in today's Pioneer

 Dear Irfanji,
I have read this person Sharma's comments which are rude and highly provocative. I am shocked. Muslims do not have 4 wives.You should not bother to react.
Regards
Urvi

From: irfan khan
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: [rti_india] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in today's Pioneer


Urvashi ji .
supreme court is justifying live-in-relationships ( women living with men without marriage )and supreme court is justifying same sex marriage .
 
if supreme court is justifying such illegal and criminal relationships then why supreme courts cant justify a duely married women as WIFE . ( Hema's case )
 
urvashiji
 
basically i was replying to Mr sharma who said raping kashmiri girls is justified. He went on to say muslims cant satisfy 4 wives so it is justified that army MUST rape kashmiri women .
 
we all must condem sharma for his uncivilised comments on kashmiri girls.
 
urvashi do u condem?????

On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Urvi Sukul Singh <usukulsingh@hotmail.com> wrote:
I agree with Khemani sahab.In fact,my mailbox is flooded with these mails.I am on the rti4empowerment@yahoogroups.com and am happy with that.Incidentally,Mr Khan,the law applicable in Dharmendra's case is the Hindu law and it is uneqivocal in its position.There is a Supreme Court judgement on this,as I understand it.
PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE ME FROM ALL GROUPS OTHER THAN rti4empowerment@yahoogroups.com  I fail to understand why there s no unity though.It probably requires the cause being put above individual egos.
Regards,
Urvi

Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: [rti_india] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in today's Pioneer

 
I WOULD REQUEST THE MODERATOR OF THIS GROUP TO STOP SUCH ABUSIVE ARTICLES AND LETTERS

BIMAL KUMAR KHEMANI,
TRAP group of RTI activists
 ALIGARH (U.P.)
 Mob:09359724625
******************************************
Officially Certified A Grade by DoPT
*****************************************


On 6 November 2010 12:09, irfan khan <rtirti.khan@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear sharma .
 
this shows how uneducated and un civilised you are .
 
I pray to Allah that he may send indian army to your area and let the army rape your wife and daughters . I am praying this because you do not have any objection to this .
 
 
as far as 4 wifes of muslims is concerned .Just read following.
 
 
Hema malini is second wife of Dharmendra . If you follow Hindu marriage act Hema cannot be "Wife " since Hindu marriage act do not allow second wife .
 
this means Hema is Rakhel" of Dharmendra and Isha Deol is his "Bastard child "
 
However if u follow Islamic law . Hema malini is legal WIFE and Ish Deol is his legal daughter .
 
Islam is giving status of WIFE to hema wheras Hindu law is giving her status of RAKHEL . now tell me which law is giving hema respect ?????
 
Islam permits more than one wife to stop extra marital affairs . Extra marital affairs give status of RAKHEL to women . islam say . if you love her , marry her and give full honour and status . Dont treat her like RAKHEL.
 


 
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:12 AM, S.D. Sharma <anonsharma@yahoo.com> wrote:
You are talking like wazahat sahib. approach you are suggesting has not worked for over 60 yaers. India must pull out its troops to jammu, use neutron bomb and solve problem finally. Kashmiri youth are asking to be killed, why are they throwing stones and bombs. Rape is effective mean for army to control and dominate. Indian soldiers spend many months away from wive and family. since no local brothels and too many rti queries then raping local girls is best low cost solution Also it is scientific fact that 1 muslim man cannot satisfy 4 wives so where is harm if Indian army helps local poplation.

S D Sharma


On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Abhimanyu <who.will.file.rti@gmail.com> wrote:
The easiest way to solve kashmir problem is to WIN OVER the hearts and minds of the kashmiris ..
 
this cannot be done through raping kashmiri gilrs and killing kashmiri youth.The history is evident that we failed to win kashmir through raping and killing .
 
now lets try to win over kashmir through attemps made to win over hearts and minds of kashmiris.
 
 
 


 
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 10:28 AM, S.D. Sharma <anonsharma@yahoo.com> wrote:
Dear Mr

You are 110% correct that there is diference of opinion.

ms Rundhati Roy is 110% correct that Kashmir is not integral part of India and this is historical fact. Kashmir enjoys special status under India's Constition under the accession of Maharaja to India. India is a federation of states, each state negotiates its union with India. kashmir negotiated its accession to India. Unilaterally the agreement cannot be changed by one side unless through the force of arms. If India has Imperialist ambistions then the proper thing to do is it use our neutron bomb and peacefully eliminate all Muslims in Kashmri since there are only about 4.000. pandits left in Kashmir who would gladly become martyrs to final solution of kashmir problem

S D Sharma


On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:46 AM, Amitabh Thakur <amitabhth@yahoo.com> wrote:
 
Friends,

My Article in today's Pioneer presenting my views on the case related with Ms Arundhati Roy, Mr Geelani etc.
There would certainly be difference on opinion on this but I personally stick to the opinion presented by me here.

http://epaper.dailypioneer.com/THEPIONEER/PIONEER/2010/11/04/ArticleHtmls/04_11_2010_009_030.shtml?Mode=1

As an alternative link-

http://epaper.dailypioneer.com/Thepioneer/Pioneer/2010/11/04/index.shtml

Amitabh Thakur
IPS,
Currently at IIM Lucknow
# 94155-34526








Re: [HumJanenge] Re: [rti_india] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in today's Pioneer

No body should try to create difference between the followers of two religions for the sake of peace and development.  I doubt the credentials of Mr. S D Sharma.  His id runs anonsharma.  Whether this anon stand for anonymous and in the past, no mail by him has ever been posted.  I fully sympathise with Kashmiri Pandits and others but for it is wrong to blame all for this.  There are good and bad persons in every society, caste and religion.       


From: Urvi Sukul Singh <usukulsingh@hotmail.com>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sat, 6 November, 2010 6:31:25 PM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: [rti_india] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in today's Pioneer

 Dear Irfanji,
I have read this person Sharma's comments which are rude and highly provocative. I am shocked. Muslims do not have 4 wives.You should not bother to react.
Regards
Urvi

From: irfan khan
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: [rti_india] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in today's Pioneer


Urvashi ji .
supreme court is justifying live-in-relationships ( women living with men without marriage )and supreme court is justifying same sex marriage .
 
if supreme court is justifying such illegal and criminal relationships then why supreme courts cant justify a duely married women as WIFE . ( Hema's case )
 
urvashiji
 
basically i was replying to Mr sharma who said raping kashmiri girls is justified. He went on to say muslims cant satisfy 4 wives so it is justified that army MUST rape kashmiri women .
 
we all must condem sharma for his uncivilised comments on kashmiri girls.
 
urvashi do u condem?????

On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Urvi Sukul Singh <usukulsingh@hotmail.com> wrote:
I agree with Khemani sahab.In fact,my mailbox is flooded with these mails.I am on the rti4empowerment@yahoogroups.com and am happy with that.Incidentally,Mr Khan,the law applicable in Dharmendra's case is the Hindu law and it is uneqivocal in its position.There is a Supreme Court judgement on this,as I understand it.
PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE ME FROM ALL GROUPS OTHER THAN rti4empowerment@yahoogroups.com  I fail to understand why there s no unity though.It probably requires the cause being put above individual egos.
Regards,
Urvi

Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: [rti_india] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in today's Pioneer

 
I WOULD REQUEST THE MODERATOR OF THIS GROUP TO STOP SUCH ABUSIVE ARTICLES AND LETTERS

BIMAL KUMAR KHEMANI,
TRAP group of RTI activists
 ALIGARH (U.P.)
 Mob:09359724625
******************************************
Officially Certified A Grade by DoPT
*****************************************


On 6 November 2010 12:09, irfan khan <rtirti.khan@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear sharma .
 
this shows how uneducated and un civilised you are .
 
I pray to Allah that he may send indian army to your area and let the army rape your wife and daughters . I am praying this because you do not have any objection to this .
 
 
as far as 4 wifes of muslims is concerned .Just read following.
 
 
Hema malini is second wife of Dharmendra . If you follow Hindu marriage act Hema cannot be "Wife " since Hindu marriage act do not allow second wife .
 
this means Hema is Rakhel" of Dharmendra and Isha Deol is his "Bastard child "
 
However if u follow Islamic law . Hema malini is legal WIFE and Ish Deol is his legal daughter .
 
Islam is giving status of WIFE to hema wheras Hindu law is giving her status of RAKHEL . now tell me which law is giving hema respect ?????
 
Islam permits more than one wife to stop extra marital affairs . Extra marital affairs give status of RAKHEL to women . islam say . if you love her , marry her and give full honour and status . Dont treat her like RAKHEL.
 


 
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:12 AM, S.D. Sharma <anonsharma@yahoo.com> wrote:
You are talking like wazahat sahib. approach you are suggesting has not worked for over 60 yaers. India must pull out its troops to jammu, use neutron bomb and solve problem finally. Kashmiri youth are asking to be killed, why are they throwing stones and bombs. Rape is effective mean for army to control and dominate. Indian soldiers spend many months away from wive and family. since no local brothels and too many rti queries then raping local girls is best low cost solution Also it is scientific fact that 1 muslim man cannot satisfy 4 wives so where is harm if Indian army helps local poplation.

S D Sharma


On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Abhimanyu <who.will.file.rti@gmail.com> wrote:
The easiest way to solve kashmir problem is to WIN OVER the hearts and minds of the kashmiris ..
 
this cannot be done through raping kashmiri gilrs and killing kashmiri youth.The history is evident that we failed to win kashmir through raping and killing .
 
now lets try to win over kashmir through attemps made to win over hearts and minds of kashmiris.
 
 
 


 
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 10:28 AM, S.D. Sharma <anonsharma@yahoo.com> wrote:
Dear Mr

You are 110% correct that there is diference of opinion.

ms Rundhati Roy is 110% correct that Kashmir is not integral part of India and this is historical fact. Kashmir enjoys special status under India's Constition under the accession of Maharaja to India. India is a federation of states, each state negotiates its union with India. kashmir negotiated its accession to India. Unilaterally the agreement cannot be changed by one side unless through the force of arms. If India has Imperialist ambistions then the proper thing to do is it use our neutron bomb and peacefully eliminate all Muslims in Kashmri since there are only about 4.000. pandits left in Kashmir who would gladly become martyrs to final solution of kashmir problem

S D Sharma


On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:46 AM, Amitabh Thakur <amitabhth@yahoo.com> wrote:
 

Friends,

My Article in today's Pioneer presenting my views on the case related with Ms Arundhati Roy, Mr Geelani etc.
There would certainly be difference on opinion on this but I personally stick to the opinion presented by me here.

http://epaper.dailypioneer.com/THEPIONEER/PIONEER/2010/11/04/ArticleHtmls/04_11_2010_009_030.shtml?Mode=1

As an alternative link-

http://epaper.dailypioneer.com/Thepioneer/Pioneer/2010/11/04/index.shtml

Amitabh Thakur
IPS,
Currently at IIM Lucknow
# 94155-34526







Re: [HumJanenge] EU pushes for "right to be forgotten" on social media

DEAR HON MEMBERS,

WAT IS THIS NON SENSE .....GOING ON HERE
DON'T MAKE THIS PLATFORM LIKE OUR PARLIMENT OR ASSEMBLY HOUSE...
I HOPE MEMBERS WILL MAINTAIN SOME DECORUM OF THIS SITE

BYE

On 6 November 2010 15:54, M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
Vijay ji, I earnestly urge u not to stoop to the level of imposters and maintain your language which is our biggest assets.  We cannot eradicate an evil by resorting to another evil. 


From: VijayBahadur Singh <vijaybahadur@gmail.com>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sat, 6 November, 2010 5:00:29 PM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] EU pushes for "right to be forgotten" on social media

You are son of bitch and not Vishal. If you have courahe then post this message in the group.

On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 4:45 PM, vishalkudchadkar <humjanenge.owner@gmail.com> wrote:
http://www.gmanews.tv/story/205340/eu-pushes-for-right-to-be-forgotten-on-social-media

The European Union (EU) is pushing to legalize peoples' individual
right to delete all information about themselves online, the UK's The
Daily Telegraph said on Saturday.

"Internet users must have effective control of what they put online
and be able to correct, withdraw or delete it at will. What happens if
you want to permanently delete your profile on a social networking
site? Can this be done easily? The right to be forgotten is essential
in today's digital world," EU rights commissioner Viviane Reding told
the newspaper.

Although various online services and social networking sites allow you
to delete your profile, there is as yet no simple way to remove
personal information that has spread through the Internet.

This move by the EU sets a precedent for online companies, many of
which —including Facebook and Google— are already embattled in privacy
and anti-trust issues.

It remains to be seen if other countries will follow suit.

The move by the EU sets an interesting precedent for countries like
the Philippines, where social media are utilized heavily by the public
as well as the private sector.





--
With regards,
SARJA SATYODAYA
+974 66947942
Doha-Qatar


Re: [HumJanenge] Re: [rti_india] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in today's Pioneer

 Dear Irfanji,
I have read this person Sharma's comments which are rude and highly provocative. I am shocked. Muslims do not have 4 wives.You should not bother to react.
Regards
Urvi

From: irfan khan
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: [rti_india] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in today's Pioneer


Urvashi ji .
supreme court is justifying live-in-relationships ( women living with men without marriage )and supreme court is justifying same sex marriage .
 
if supreme court is justifying such illegal and criminal relationships then why supreme courts cant justify a duely married women as WIFE . ( Hema's case )
 
urvashiji
 
basically i was replying to Mr sharma who said raping kashmiri girls is justified. He went on to say muslims cant satisfy 4 wives so it is justified that army MUST rape kashmiri women .
 
we all must condem sharma for his uncivilised comments on kashmiri girls.
 
urvashi do u condem?????

On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Urvi Sukul Singh <usukulsingh@hotmail.com> wrote:
I agree with Khemani sahab.In fact,my mailbox is flooded with these mails.I am on the rti4empowerment@yahoogroups.com and am happy with that.Incidentally,Mr Khan,the law applicable in Dharmendra's case is the Hindu law and it is uneqivocal in its position.There is a Supreme Court judgement on this,as I understand it.
PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE ME FROM ALL GROUPS OTHER THAN rti4empowerment@yahoogroups.com  I fail to understand why there s no unity though.It probably requires the cause being put above individual egos.
Regards,
Urvi

Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: [rti_india] My Article on Ms Arundhati Roy in today's Pioneer

 
I WOULD REQUEST THE MODERATOR OF THIS GROUP TO STOP SUCH ABUSIVE ARTICLES AND LETTERS

BIMAL KUMAR KHEMANI,
TRAP group of RTI activists
 ALIGARH (U.P.)
 Mob:09359724625
******************************************
Officially Certified A Grade by DoPT
*****************************************


On 6 November 2010 12:09, irfan khan <rtirti.khan@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear sharma .
 
this shows how uneducated and un civilised you are .
 
I pray to Allah that he may send indian army to your area and let the army rape your wife and daughters . I am praying this because you do not have any objection to this .
 
 
as far as 4 wifes of muslims is concerned .Just read following.
 
 
Hema malini is second wife of Dharmendra . If you follow Hindu marriage act Hema cannot be "Wife " since Hindu marriage act do not allow second wife .
 
this means Hema is Rakhel" of Dharmendra and Isha Deol is his "Bastard child "
 
However if u follow Islamic law . Hema malini is legal WIFE and Ish Deol is his legal daughter .
 
Islam is giving status of WIFE to hema wheras Hindu law is giving her status of RAKHEL . now tell me which law is giving hema respect ?????
 
Islam permits more than one wife to stop extra marital affairs . Extra marital affairs give status of RAKHEL to women . islam say . if you love her , marry her and give full honour and status . Dont treat her like RAKHEL.
 


 
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:12 AM, S.D. Sharma <anonsharma@yahoo.com> wrote:
You are talking like wazahat sahib. approach you are suggesting has not worked for over 60 yaers. India must pull out its troops to jammu, use neutron bomb and solve problem finally. Kashmiri youth are asking to be killed, why are they throwing stones and bombs. Rape is effective mean for army to control and dominate. Indian soldiers spend many months away from wive and family. since no local brothels and too many rti queries then raping local girls is best low cost solution Also it is scientific fact that 1 muslim man cannot satisfy 4 wives so where is harm if Indian army helps local poplation.

S D Sharma


On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Abhimanyu <who.will.file.rti@gmail.com> wrote:
The easiest way to solve kashmir problem is to WIN OVER the hearts and minds of the kashmiris ..
 
this cannot be done through raping kashmiri gilrs and killing kashmiri youth.The history is evident that we failed to win kashmir through raping and killing .
 
now lets try to win over kashmir through attemps made to win over hearts and minds of kashmiris.
 
 
 


 
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 10:28 AM, S.D. Sharma <anonsharma@yahoo.com> wrote:
Dear Mr

You are 110% correct that there is diference of opinion.

ms Rundhati Roy is 110% correct that Kashmir is not integral part of India and this is historical fact. Kashmir enjoys special status under India's Constition under the accession of Maharaja to India. India is a federation of states, each state negotiates its union with India. kashmir negotiated its accession to India. Unilaterally the agreement cannot be changed by one side unless through the force of arms. If India has Imperialist ambistions then the proper thing to do is it use our neutron bomb and peacefully eliminate all Muslims in Kashmri since there are only about 4.000. pandits left in Kashmir who would gladly become martyrs to final solution of kashmir problem

S D Sharma


On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:46 AM, Amitabh Thakur <amitabhth@yahoo.com> wrote:
 

Friends,

My Article in today's Pioneer presenting my views on the case related with Ms Arundhati Roy, Mr Geelani etc.
There would certainly be difference on opinion on this but I personally stick to the opinion presented by me here.

http://epaper.dailypioneer.com/THEPIONEER/PIONEER/2010/11/04/ArticleHtmls/04_11_2010_009_030.shtml?Mode=1

As an alternative link-

http://epaper.dailypioneer.com/Thepioneer/Pioneer/2010/11/04/index.shtml

Amitabh Thakur
IPS,
Currently at IIM Lucknow
# 94155-34526