Dear Pranab da
I expect that you are referring to our usage of the terms "corrupt"
and "antics" to describe Shri Anna Hazare's recent behaviour for the
benefit of the India Against Corruption mailing list subscribers.
Let me set the record straight
CORRUPTION:
1) Shri Anna Hazare was a person with a proven record of corruption
who Arvind (through his PCRF Trust member Kiran Bedi) took along with
him for filing a so-called FIR in name of "People's War Against
Corruption" at Parliament Street Police Station on 14.Nov.2010. This
is a matter of record in the Justice Sawant enquiry commission report.
2) The said enquiry report (Justice Sawant is a retired and respected
Supreme Court Judge from Maharashtra whose Commission was appointed
under the Commission of Enquiry Act, and Shri Anna Hazare had every
opportunity to present his case before him) severly indicts Shri
Hazare of corruption.
3) Not only did Justice Sawant find acts of financial misappropriation
of his trust funds committed by Shri Hazare, but Hazare was strongly
castigated by Justice Swant for the mode and manner in which he
systematically sets about tarnishing peoples reputations by hurling
false corruption charges at his victims at strategic moments in their
life and careers so that the blackmailers in particular take advantage
of such situation.
4) So whenever India Against Corruption receives definite information
that Shri Hazare is breaching his publicly given assurances to India
Against Corruption not to conduct any of his so-called anti-corruption
camapigns under IAC's names and banner we are definitely going to warn
and caution our members regularly (and as many times as necessary)
about Mr. Hazare's past track record of associating with all kinds of
exploitative persons.
5) Since you have asked for evidence, we are soon activating an
information website exclusively for fully informing members of INDIA
AGAINST CORRUPTION. This is at
http://www.indiaagainstcorruption.info
We shall be uploading all the information, starting with Justice
Sawant Commission's report, very soon so that our members can
appreciate for themselves the self-admitted mechanics of Mr. Hazare's
so-called anti-corruption andolan which Justice Sawant exposed in
graphic detail.
6) If required, and since Mr. Hazare believes he still has some
association with IAC, we may also issue a charge sheet to Shri Anna
Hazare, to account for his recent actions and associations with
dubious persons who are/were members of Aam Aadmi Party and a
breakaway faction of AAM known as AVAM (AAP Volunteers Manch) who
indulged in forgery and photo-shopping to defame certain AAP
candidates at time of their election.
7) Equally, we ourselves have all the rights and evidences to lodge
criminal cases for cheating, fraud, cyber crime and other deceits /
impersonations etc. against Shri Hazare.
For eg. I would certainly like to know the mechanics of the so-called
Anna phone SIM card scheme which Arvind and/or Anna engineered to dupe
gullible persons of their monies and
who benefitted from it. I am sure that Shri Hazare would be knowing
all the persons behind that fraud committed in his name by using his
photo/s and done with his full knowledge and blessings and which is
still tarnishing IAC's name in Delhi through an onging complaint the
victims have filed.
Lastly, IAC is and shall remain, a non-political peoples movement. We
shall firmly intervene to ensure that IAC's name and banner is not
misued for political activity or black-mailing any where in India.
Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor
On 9/16/16, Pranab Kumar Chakravarty <pranabkumar.chakravarty@gmail.com> wrote:
> Editors : you are requested to ensure that you are in possession of
> documents which can stand scrutiny in a court of law before character
> assassination of any guy ! Expression of freedom does not gurantee us to
> defame any Tom, Harry and Dick who has the right to lodge defamation suit
> worth crores of INR
> On 16-Sep-2016 12:37 AM, "Sarbajit Roy" <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear Vidyut
>>
>> The answer in 1 line :
>>
>> Jantantra Morcha dumps Anna [1 <http://jantantramorcha.org/>] + AAP
>> dumps Sunil Lal [2
>> <http://jagrukbharat.com/3620/explosive-interview-of-sunil-lal-who-wants-to-take-his-aap-logo-back>]
>> (boss of Neil Terrance Haslam)[3
>> <http://www.newsgram.com/kejriwal-is-the-centurys-biggest-deceiver-of-trust-sunil-lal/>}
>> = Return of all the frustrated opportunists (with many more to come on
>> Oct.2) who love-hate Kejriwal.
>>
>> Every time there is some state election somewhere or turmoil in AAP we
>> have to put up with this political shit from a fresh crop of Anna bhakts.
>>
>> They should simply peddle their politcal crap somewhere else and let us
>> at
>> India Against Corruption get on with our divine task [pgportal
>> <http://pgportal.gov.in> (* MINHA/E/2016/03082*)] of saving our "Hindu"
>> cows from being delivered up for slaughter in Bangladesh through Modi
>> sarkar goons in Assam / West Bengal.
>>
>> Sarbajit
Friday, September 16, 2016
Thursday, September 15, 2016
Re: [IAC#RG] IAC PUBLIC NOTICE: The corrupt antics of Shri Anna Hazare
Editors : you are requested to ensure that you are in possession of documents which can stand scrutiny in a court of law before character assassination of any guy ! Expression of freedom does not gurantee us to defame any Tom, Harry and Dick who has the right to lodge defamation suit worth crores of INR
On 16-Sep-2016 12:37 AM, "Sarbajit Roy" <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
Every time there is some state election somewhere or turmoil in AAP we have to put up with this political shit from a fresh crop of Anna bhakts.Dear VidyutThe answer in 1 line :
Jantantra Morcha dumps Anna [1] + AAP dumps Sunil Lal [2] (boss of Neil Terrance Haslam)[3} = Return of all the frustrated opportunists (with many more to come on Oct.2) who love-hate Kejriwal.
They should simply peddle their politcal crap somewhere else and let us at India Against Corruption get on with our divine task [pgportal ( MINHA/E/2016/03082)] of saving our "Hindu" cows from being delivered up for slaughter in Bangladesh through Modi sarkar goons in Assam / West Bengal.SarbajitOn Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Vidyut <wide.aware@gmail.com> wrote:This is a fairly detailed and serious email. Is there any evidence available that we may scrutinize in order to reach an informed opinion on the matter?
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net "
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists "
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Re: [IAC#RG] IAC PUBLIC NOTICE: The corrupt antics of Shri Anna Hazare
Dear Vidyut
The answer in 1 line : Jantantra Morcha dumps Anna [1] + AAP dumps Sunil Lal [2] (boss of Neil Terrance Haslam)[3} = Return of all the frustrated opportunists (with many more to come on Oct.2) who love-hate Kejriwal.
They should simply peddle their politcal crap somewhere else and let us at India Against Corruption get on with our divine task [pgportal ( MINHA/E/2016/03082)] of saving our "Hindu" cows from being delivered up for slaughter in Bangladesh through Modi sarkar goons in Assam / West Bengal.
Sarbajit
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Vidyut <wide.aware@gmail.com> wrote:
This is a fairly detailed and serious email. Is there any evidence available that we may scrutinize in order to reach an informed opinion on the matter?
Re: [IAC#RG] IAC PUBLIC NOTICE: The corrupt antics of Shri Anna Hazare
Dear IAC members
There is an update / correction which IAC wishes to make concerning this subject.I have been informed that the offending video/s of Shri Anna Hazare were actually uploaded to a deceptively named Facebook page "indiancor" (recently opened on or about 6 August 2016) and not to the Facebook "indiacor" page managed by Shivendra Singh Chauhan (who later joined M/s Reliance Industries).
Accordingly, IAC expunges (with sincere regret to all concerned) the earlier statements (made afew hours ago) concerning involvement of Mr. Mukesh Ambani's corporates / RIL employees in the recent actions by Shri Anna Hazare. IAC was deceived and it was an honest error on our part.
Sarbajit Roy
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Vidyut <wide.aware@gmail.com> wrote:
This is a fairly detailed and serious email. Is there any evidence available that we may scrutinize in order to reach an informed opinion on the matter?On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Madhav Nalapat <mdnalapat@gmail.com> wrote:Noted Madhav Nalapat
Sent from my iPhonewww.indiaagainstcorrution.org.INDIA AGAINST CORRUPTION, jan andolanNational ConvenorSarbajit Roy7) In short, should Mr. Anna Hazare continue on the path he has set out on by misusing IAC's name, marks and goodwill for political purposes (directly or indirectly), he will also find that he (and also every friend of his) is automatically an enemy of India Against Corruption's HQ and they shall pick and choose the time they will extract their satisfaction and honour.5) This is not the first time we have had to caution Mr. Hazare but he is so incorrigible and easily influenced by the RSS fellow travellers in his 'durbar' who are sponging off him that Anna is now proving to be a public embarrassment to the anti-corruption movement which IAC spearheads.4) That Arvind also secretly teamed up with Baba Ramdev who actually engaged Shri Anna Hazare as an actor in the IAC campaign to register a so-called FIR on Commonwealth Games scams at the Parliament Street Police Station on 14.Nov.2010.3) That in 2010 Arvind had represented to us that PCRF was a trust comprising himself, Manish and a journalist Abhinandan Sekhri (who although not an IAC member we had no objection to). We later came to know that Mr. Prashant Bhushan and Ms. Kiran Bedi were also PCRF trust members, a fact which was suppressed to us, and which we strongly objected to later when these 2 persons brought in all sorts of undesirable persons (Sri Sri Ravishankar, Swami Agnivesh, Medha Patkar etc.) into IAC's CWG campaign and induced Arvind to conflate IAC's CWG campaign with a diversionary World Bank sponsored demand for Jan Lokpal Act.2) That in 2010 (when Arvind was essentially unemployed), India Against Corruption engaged (against payment) Mr. Kejriwal's trust PCRF (now amalgamated within Aam Aadmi Party) to carry out an IAC 'campaign' to expose/publicise CommonWealth Games scams (since we are ourselves selfless and silent anti-corruption workers who avoid media).1) The present India Against Corruption people's movement (jan andolan) was publicly founded on 26 February 2007 at New Delhi to expose Common Wealth Games scams. That whereas Mr. Arvind Kejriwal and Mr. Manish Sisodia were then very much also members of IAC but Mr. Anna Hazare was nowhere in the picture. Subsequently Arvind and Manish dropped out of active IAC work and the IAC andolan was taken forward by me, Veeresh and other leading RTI activists of India.It is thus necessary to reiterate some salient facts in the matter:-Accordingly, it seems that the cornered BJP (along with some of Mr. Mukesh Ambani's employees) have once again propped up Shri Anna Hazare to "reclaim" the name of "India Against Corruption" and every day paid news reports are now being planted to sayComrades, the IAC has been silently working, out of the media and TV glare, all across the country in the anti-corruption war. Our members, at considerable risk to themselves, have created tremendous pressure on the BJP government at the Centre to expose its corruption within the buereucracy, and we have silently frustrated many corrupt schemes of BJP Govt from going through.It is with deep regret that I am circulating this message to all members in IAC movement concerning Shri Anna Hazare's latest foolishness which is being circulating on various social media by certain vested interests.Dear Friends / Comrades,To:The entire India Against Corruption ("IAC") movement
IAC PUBLIC NOTICE: The corrupt antics of Shri Anna Hazare
a) that Anna Hazare founded India Against Corruption,
b) that Arvind Kejriwal was Anna's junior, Anna's student etc. etc.
NB: Although the PCRF audited books / balance sheets clearly record all these facts, Mr. Anna Hazare's contribution / role to the IAC campaign is not mentioned in PCRF statutory / audited filings.
a) That Shri Anna Hazare did not participate in the IAC CWG campaign out of any social obligations, but he was throughout a paid actor who was very well rewarded by cash payments and other kinds, initially through Mr. S.K.Tijarawala of Patanjali corporate group, and thereafter by persons closely associated with political / corporate formations - Shri Santosh Bhartiya, Shri Shivendra Chauhan (Corporate Vice-President Reliance Industries Ltd), General V.K.Singh (BJP MP), a Mr. Sunil Lal (former AAP founder member who we are infomed was embedded within AAP by a Reliance linked former Congress MP from Unnao whom Arvind had accused of HSBC havala in Nov. 2012), Ms. Kiran Bedi of the BJP, the Trehan family of Delhi, etc.b) That on 6 February 2011 Arvind and Manish privately agreed with us that IAC's name would not be used in connection with the simultaneous Jan Lokpal / Black money return campaigns for which Anna Hazare had been engaged by Baba Ramdev's Patanjali empire.
So far we have been very polite and tolerant towards Mr. Hazare considering his advanced years but there is a limit to our tolerance.
6) Accordingly, it is now and henceforth the official position of India Against Corruption that Shri Anna Hazare is an egoistic person of advanced years who is easily manipulated by the very forces of corruption which INDIA AGAINST CORRUPTION is exposing.As we shall not do proceed without consulting the larger IAC subscriber base, I request everyone to kindly share your views on this unpleasant situation which Mr. Hazare is creating.sincerelyin
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net "
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists "
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net "
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists "
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Wednesday, September 14, 2016
[IAC#RG] Will Sindhu Desh become a separate Nation (free from Pakistan)?
NewsGram Exclusive:
If Modi were born in place of Gandhi, India would not have been divided, says Mr. Shafi Muhammad Burfat. Mr. Burfat is Chairman of Jeay Sindh Muttahida Mahaz (JSMM) that has been demanding separate #Sindhudesh from Pakistan. JSMM has been declared a terrorist organization by Pakistan. Mr. Burfat lives in exile in Europe. Our correspondent Karishma Vanjani interviewed him.
Also,
There is no difference between Sindh and Hind, says Mr. Shafi Muhammad Burfat. he says Rigveda were created at the banks of Sindhu.
Our correspondent Karishma Vanjani interviewed Mr. Shafi Burfat. Please listen to this video: https://youtu.be/cr4DStuoDDI
Published from Chicago, USA, NewsGram is a media organization dedicated to Indian Diaspora, Indian culture, traditions, and history.
Editor-in-Chief: Dr. Munish Raizada
Please follow the following links:
Website: www.NewsGram.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/NewsGram2
Twitter: https://twitter.com/NewsGram1
Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1VXaiXIwaoIuv9_NK8zm0Q
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NewsGram" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to newsgram1+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to newsgram1@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/newsgram1.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/newsgram1/d76b3891-515b-4822-ad22-60a072b76205%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [IAC#RG] Why the 'Bhagoda' Kejriwal wants LG rule now ?
Dear M/s Abhiyan
Your attention is directed .to the IAC list rules which are athttp://www.indiaagainstcorruption.net.in/iac-s-rules
- India Against Corruption is an apolitical movement. Therefore members or adherents of any political party are requested to kindly unsubscribe themselves from this mailing list.
- India Against Corruption is an apolitical movement. Therefore members are requested to restrict their comments for or against any political party.
4. India Against Corruption is an anti-corruption movement. Therefore members are requested to kindly post messages directly relevant to corruption, means and strategies to combat/control corruption and corrupt persons,
Should Swaraj Abhiyan go political on 2 Oct 2016, we would expect you to either unsubscribe yourself, or request the special posting privileges we sometimes extend to people in IAC's timeline on a case-to-case basis.
sincerely
Sarbajit
A list moderator
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Swaraj Abhiyan <theswarajabhiyan@gmail.com> wrote:
Why the 'Bhagoda' Kejriwal wants LG rule now ?
A recent Delhi High Court order is proving to be a convenient alibi for Kejriwal and his aides to shrug off responsibility for administering the Capital while they are away fighting on the election battle front.
With Arvind Kejriwal wholly focused on winning upcoming assembly elections in Punjab, Goa and Gujarat, many are wondering who will run the Delhi government for the next one and a half years. Kejriwal himself has for all practical purposes shifted to Punjab. A party supporter has loaned him a huge bungalow on a half acre plot in Jalandhar where the Delhi chief minister will be based till the election is over sometime in Feb-March 2017. AAP sources said they don't expect Kejriwal to pay more than fleeting visits to Delhi over the next six months.
The number two man in the Delhi government, deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia, and the number three man, health minister Satyendra Jain, are in charge of the election in Goa, due at the same time as the one in Punjab. So they too will be otherwise pre-occupied even if they don't shift lock, stock and barrel the way Kejriwal has done.
The fourth senior man in the Delhi government, culture and tourism minister Kapil Misra, has been told to handle the Gujarat assembly election which is due at the end of 2017. This is the most crucial of all the assembly polls coming up next year as Gujarat is Narendra Modi's home state and a lot is at stake here. So Misra too will be very busy.
Ask AAP leaders who will govern Delhi and pat comes the answer: the Lt Governor. A recent Delhi High Court order is proving to be a convenient alibi for Kejriwal and his aides to shrug off responsibility for administering the Capital while they are away fighting on the election battle front. The order stated that Delhi continues to be a Union Territory despite having an assembly and a chief minister. It reinforced the Lt Governor's position as the ultimate authority. In other words, the LG is the boss and Kejriwal a mere flunky and chief minister only in name. While the ruling may be legally sound, such technicalities make a mockery of democracy. After all, Kejriwal and his AAP won a thumping mandate from the people of Delhi in 2015, bagging 67 of the Capital's 70 assembly seats. The confrontation between Kejriwal and the Modi government right from the start has left Delhi without an accountable administration.
Out in a jiffy
There's more than meets the eye to the controversy surrounding sacked AAP minister Sandeep Kumar. According to well-placed sources in the AAP camp, Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal has been annoyed with Sandeep Kumar for some time. Specifically, he has been annoyed with the former minister since a corruption allegation against him surfaced some months ago.
When the allegation was brought to Kejriwal's notice, he wanted to remove Sandeep Kumar immediately. But close aides of the Delhi chief minister prevailed on him not to do anything. Their reasoning was as follows. The allegation had not reached the public domain. It was an internal matter, known only to some members of the party. These aides also said that the allegation was at the level of an accusation that Sandeep Kumar had negotiated a money deal. No transaction had actually taken place and there was no money trail to Sandeep Kumar. Thirdly, the aides felt that sacking the minister would harm the AAP government's image since it would be the third sacking in a little over one year.
Since Kejriwal was already annoyed with Sandeep Kumar, when the sex video surfaced, it did not take him long to make up his mind to get rid of the minister. The decision was taken a meeting that lasted just 30 minutes, making it probably the fastest political sacking ever.
Read more at http://www.thestatesman.com/
news/opinion/why-lg-rule-now- suits-aap/164849.html# cwuGK41xuDJuwDPy.99
[IAC#RG] Commission of cognisable offences outside 261/18, Civil Lines, Gurgaon
To:
1) The DCP West (Gurgaon)http://www.hindustantimes.com/gurgaon/aap-s-cow-protest-backfires-haryana-minister-keeps-cow-left-at-his-doorstep/story-SHiFLXOWctvPSgsSyxDkRP.html
As a concerned citizen of India who is is deeply interested in Hindutva and animal protection, I am duty bound to report the commission of cognisable offences to you so that the offenders may be identified and prosecuted in the manner prescribed.
I would also appreciate that my information disclosing and relating to the commission of the described cognisable offences within your jurisdiction is properly recorded in the manner prescribed and a copy (ie. "FIR") is provided to me.
The copy of the news report is attached for your ready reference and evidence.
In case any FIR has already been registered in the matter, I would appreciate being provided the FIR number / date / thana to enable me to access it from NCRB or your website.
sincerely
Sarbajit Roy
B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024
Tel : +91-8010205897
[IAC#RG] Why the 'Bhagoda' Kejriwal wants LG rule now ?
Why the 'Bhagoda' Kejriwal wants LG rule now ?
A recent Delhi High Court order is proving to be a convenient alibi for Kejriwal and his aides to shrug off responsibility for administering the Capital while they are away fighting on the election battle front.
With Arvind Kejriwal wholly focused on winning upcoming assembly elections in Punjab, Goa and Gujarat, many are wondering who will run the Delhi government for the next one and a half years. Kejriwal himself has for all practical purposes shifted to Punjab. A party supporter has loaned him a huge bungalow on a half acre plot in Jalandhar where the Delhi chief minister will be based till the election is over sometime in Feb-March 2017. AAP sources said they don't expect Kejriwal to pay more than fleeting visits to Delhi over the next six months.
The number two man in the Delhi government, deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia, and the number three man, health minister Satyendra Jain, are in charge of the election in Goa, due at the same time as the one in Punjab. So they too will be otherwise pre-occupied even if they don't shift lock, stock and barrel the way Kejriwal has done.
The fourth senior man in the Delhi government, culture and tourism minister Kapil Misra, has been told to handle the Gujarat assembly election which is due at the end of 2017. This is the most crucial of all the assembly polls coming up next year as Gujarat is Narendra Modi's home state and a lot is at stake here. So Misra too will be very busy.
Ask AAP leaders who will govern Delhi and pat comes the answer: the Lt Governor. A recent Delhi High Court order is proving to be a convenient alibi for Kejriwal and his aides to shrug off responsibility for administering the Capital while they are away fighting on the election battle front. The order stated that Delhi continues to be a Union Territory despite having an assembly and a chief minister. It reinforced the Lt Governor's position as the ultimate authority. In other words, the LG is the boss and Kejriwal a mere flunky and chief minister only in name. While the ruling may be legally sound, such technicalities make a mockery of democracy. After all, Kejriwal and his AAP won a thumping mandate from the people of Delhi in 2015, bagging 67 of the Capital's 70 assembly seats. The confrontation between Kejriwal and the Modi government right from the start has left Delhi without an accountable administration.
Out in a jiffy
There's more than meets the eye to the controversy surrounding sacked AAP minister Sandeep Kumar. According to well-placed sources in the AAP camp, Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal has been annoyed with Sandeep Kumar for some time. Specifically, he has been annoyed with the former minister since a corruption allegation against him surfaced some months ago.
When the allegation was brought to Kejriwal's notice, he wanted to remove Sandeep Kumar immediately. But close aides of the Delhi chief minister prevailed on him not to do anything. Their reasoning was as follows. The allegation had not reached the public domain. It was an internal matter, known only to some members of the party. These aides also said that the allegation was at the level of an accusation that Sandeep Kumar had negotiated a money deal. No transaction had actually taken place and there was no money trail to Sandeep Kumar. Thirdly, the aides felt that sacking the minister would harm the AAP government's image since it would be the third sacking in a little over one year.
Since Kejriwal was already annoyed with Sandeep Kumar, when the sex video surfaced, it did not take him long to make up his mind to get rid of the minister. The decision was taken a meeting that lasted just 30 minutes, making it probably the fastest political sacking ever.
Read more at http://www.thestatesman.com/news/opinion/why-lg-rule-now-suits-aap/164849.html#cwuGK41xuDJuwDPy.99
Tuesday, September 13, 2016
Re: [IAC#RG] UPDATE: Impleadment in matter of Shri Ashutosh Gupta's outrageous blog on NDTV.com
Dear Ashok
You have got the wrong end of the stick. It seems that you don't read India Against Corruption websites or the mailing list as often as you should :-)Let me frankly say that we value all persons in the timeline of IAC even if they (wrongly) went into politics, while simultaneously reiterating what is published on IAC's website
IAC is exclusively dedicated to its ancient purpose of SWARAJ ie. expelling from Hindustan corrupting foreign colonial rulers, along with their agencies and Indian lackeys.
Foreign Rulers: Sonia "Gandhi" &Co.
Foreign Fixers: UIDAI, MNREGA, AID, Ford Foundation, George Soros
Indian Lackeys: Anna Hazare &Co, Narendra Modi &Co, Arvind Kejriwal &Co
Foreign Rulers: Sonia "Gandhi" &Co.
Foreign Fixers: UIDAI, MNREGA, AID, Ford Foundation, George Soros
Indian Lackeys: Anna Hazare &Co, Narendra Modi &Co, Arvind Kejriwal &Co
So you can see for yourself where "Arvind Kejriwal &Co" rank in our anti-corruption focus.
PS: As an AAP Swaraj member, would you like an account to post on the AAMAADMIPARTY.US website ?
Sarbajit
National Convenor
INDIA AGAINST CORRUPTION
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Ashok PS <psashokmenon@gmail.com> wrote:
Love your obsession towards AAP !!!Lage raho :)Speaks volume about your passion towards AAP ( ONLY) - Looks like "CON" gress & BJP are the cleanest and THE honest parties in India .
Monday, September 12, 2016
[IAC#RG] COMPLAINT: Corruption of Shri K.K.Sharma (Chief Secy/GNCTD) in matter of DMRC fare fixation
DELHI DIALOGUE COMMISSION (www.delhidialoguecommission.i
an initiative of "India Against Corruption"
To:
Shri Arvind Kejriwal,
Chief Minister of NCT Delhi
cc: OSD to Hon'ble LG of Delhi (for information)
BY EMAIL
Dear Chief Minister,
Sub: COMPLAINT: Corruption of Shri K.K.Sharma (Chief Secy/GNCTD) in matter of DMRC fare fixation
We are therefore constrained to inform you that after our complaint the DMRC had arranged / financed a 6 day international vacation (cloaked as "study tour") for Shri K.K. Sharma to the fleshpots of the Far East like Hong Kong, Taipei and Singapore for the specific purpose of corrupting and compromising the senior-most Delhi Govt. officer Shri K.K.Sharma.
As a result of your Chief Secretary's corruption by DMRC a HUGE increase in Delhi Metro Rail fares has been recommended by Shri K.K.Sharma on 8 Sept. 2016 . It is very strange and note-worthy that the 3 member fare fixation committee of which Shri K.K.Sharma is a member did not even conduct any public hearing before issuing its recommendations to raise the fares of Delhi Metro (unlike as was done in Mumbai last year for Ambani's metro rail there).
It is relevant to mention that the previous Fare fixation Committee of 2009 (on which the GNCTD was similarly represented) had allowed the Ambani owned/controlled DAEMPL to operate at fares of Rs. 200 till Sept. 2015 whereas the present fare is Rs. 54, ie a 300% SCAM.
Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor
for Delhi Dialogue Commission
for Delhi Dialogue Commission
(an initiative of "India Against Corruption")
B-59 Defence Colony,
New Delhi 110024
M: +91-8010205897
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:29 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
DELHI DIALOGUE COMMISSION (www.delhidialoguecommission.i
n )an initiative of "India Against Corruption"
To:
Shri Arvind Kejriwal,
Chief Minister of NCT Delhi
BY EMAIL
Dear Chief Minister,
Please find attached an email trail between myself and Indian Institute of Architects (with attachments) concerning Mr. Satyendar Jain (now Transport Minister/GNCTD)
I am gratified to observe that Mr. Satyendar Kr. Jain seems to be capable of swift action if requred. I therefore hope that the both of you will take prompt action on the following 3 urgent issues concerning the Transport Dept/GNCTD1) Immediately shift Millenium Bus Depot from Yamuna Bank, close it and return the land to the river. Please do so without wasting time at behest of various touts and vested interests concerning this emotive issue.2) Personally oversee that GNCTD's representative on DMRC's 4th fare fixation committee (Mr. K.K. Sharma/CS-Delhi) ensures that DMRC fares are reduced by at least 1/3rd in the same way as was done in case of Airport Express Line. I must convey that I doubt that Mr. Sharma is seriously interested in safeguarding the interests of voters of Delhi against DMRC fare hikes. Infact all the information reaching me is that Mr. Sharma has been "fixed" to ensure a huge (and unwarranted) hike in DMRC fares. Already there are murmurs that the Aam Aadmi Party (which hiked salaries of its MLAs by 4 times immediately on coming to power) is least caring if DMRC fares are "merely doubled".I am sure that you are very well aware of the open loot which Central Govt (Ministry of Urban Development) is doing in DMRC for decades. For instance I was in a DMRC Blue Line train today, stranded between Rajiv Chowk and Dwarka, for over 3 hours only because of the sheer corruption in DMRC where sub-standard parts, poor safety and shoddy construction are the norm. Since you mostly have mediocre people in your Govt. I doubt if you/GNCTD can project such issues in DMRC (in which Delhi is 50% JV partner but where the shots are called by MoUD/BJP) to safeguard Delhi's interests in DMRC. I recall that Mr.K.K. Sharma was in the Ministry of Urban Development between 1991-1996 so also I doubt if he can be objective or neutral when it comes to filling MoUD's coffers.
http://www.ndtv.com/delhi-news/delhi-metro-services-on-blue- line-disrupted-due-to-snag- 1424039
It is very strange that DMRC's proposal for a 230% fare hike is not in public domain, that GNCTD has not shared it (say on Twitter) and that you / AAP cadres are silent on DMRC fare hike.3) Ensure that the Enforcement staff of Transport Dept take very strong action against transport vehicles, especially private buses, grameen sewa and e-rickshaws etc. which drive, park and obstruct in No-Entry roads or notified bus lanes. I again remind you that Delhi Traffic Police is unable to prosecute such offenders only because a) GNCTD's PWD is strangely avoiding putting permanent mandatory traffic signs on the notified "no-entry" road and streets, b) Your local MLAs and Councillors are giving "protection" to these habitual offenders.sincerely
Sarbajit RoyNational Convenor
for Delhi Dialogue Commission(an initiative of "India Against Corruption")
B-59 Defence Colony,
New Delhi 110024M: +91-8010205897---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:15 AM
Subject: Re: Verification of your student/examinee
To: "IIA Voice of Indian Architects." <iiapublication@gmail.com>, indiaresists <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net> Sarbajit RoyTo:Shri N.S. KeshkamatThe Indian Institute of Architects.By EMAILSir,Many thanks for your email of today below concerning architectural qualification of your associate member Shri Satyendar Kr. Jain no. A-08990. Please find my response below:1) That the IIA evaded replying to my email dt. 11.May.2016 on this question until I circulated the issue of qualification of Mr. Jain to Chief Minister of Delhi and also membership of India Against Corruption vide my email dated 20 June 2016.
2) That a letter from CoA to IIA dated 27.April 2016 CA/5/Academic-IIA (PDF copy attached) implies that only Associate Members of IIA who passed AMIIA exams after 2002 are eligible to register as architects with CoA. Mr. Jain (as per his diverse electoral affidavits) apprently passed your AMIIA exams in either 1991 or 1992 (date unclear)3) That only architects registered with CoA are allowed to practice architecture. Between 1 Jan 2014 and 20 June 2016 Mr.Jain was shown as a "defaulter" on rolls of CoA. The current status is that he has thereafter very recently somehow regularised his enrollment with CoA, quite obviously subsequent to my complaint to Mr. Arvind Kejriwal (CM Delhi) dt. 20.June.2016. I carefully note that IIA has only replied to me (describing Mr. Jain as "Ar.") after Mr. Jain re-entered the CoA rolls.
NB : Screenshots from CoA website dt. 20-June-2016 and 27-June-2016 are attached for your reference.4) Given this background, I specifically seek to know from IIA the variations in associate membership status, if any, and exact dates of passing AMIIA exams for Mr. Satyendar Kr. Jain. Also, if Mr. Jain has ever been irregular or a defaulter (as he was with CoA) in his associate membership of IIA, the citizens/voters of Delhi are entitled to know each and every thing about it.I hope that you will reply to me very promptly and truthfully and without evasion since the equivalence of the AMIIA examination with those of, say, the regular B.Arch courses is subject to certain conditions as you well know.sincerelyNational Convenor
India Against Corruption, jan andolan
B-59 Defence Colony,
New Delhi 110024M: +91-8010205897On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 2:27 AM, IIA Voice of Indian Architects. <iiapublication@gmail.com> wrote:We write with reference to your email on the above mentioned subject. In this regard, we would like to inform you that as per our record Ar. Satyendar Kumar Jainis our Valid Associate Member bearing membership no. A-08990.RegardsN S Keshkamat--The Indian Institute of Architects.5th Floor, Prospect Chambers Annexe,
Dr. D. N. Road, Fort, Mumbai - 400 001.
Tel Nos : 91 - 22 - 22046972/22818491/22884805.
Fax No. 91 - 22 22832516
Email : iiapublication@gmail.com
website : indianinstituteofarchitects.com
Sunday, September 11, 2016
Re: [IAC#RG] UPDATE: Impleadment in matter of Shri Ashutosh Gupta's outrageous blog on NDTV.com
Love your obsession towards AAP !!!
Lage raho :)
Speaks volume about your passion towards AAP ( ONLY) - Looks like "CON" gress & BJP are the cleanest
and THE honest parties in India .
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Madam Chairperson,National Commission for WomenTo:Ms. Lalita Kumaramangalam,
Hon'ble Chairperson,BY EMAILSub: Case / File no : 8/C160014050/2016/NCW/RS/NEEI am grateful for the kind audience the Hon'ble Commission, by its Chairperson, granted me on 8.Sept.2016 concerning the above-cited matter after Shri Ashutosh had left.
It is most unfortunate that Shri Ashutosh, who was in a highly agitated state, chose to convert the Commission's serious business into a political farce, and even went to the extent of refusing his counsel's presence during proceedings requiring his counsel Shri Somnath Bharti Adv. to cool his heels in the reception area along with me.I briefly summarise my additional oral pleadings in my cause so as to assist the Hon'ble Commission in arriving at its decision.FACTS:
1) That one Shri Sandeep Kumar, an advocate and Cabinet Minister for Women and Child Development in the Govt of NCT Delhi appears to have recorded (ie. 'captured') a sex video of depicting criminal acts of disgusting and unnatural (ie. oral and anal sex, termed as fellatio, sodomy, buggery punishable u/s 377 IPC) sexual intercourse between himself and a woman.2) That when the sex video with its recordings of unnatural sexual acts reached Shri Arvind Kejriwal (Chief Minister of Delhi), he promptly attested to its veracity and the identity therein of his hand-picked Cabinet Minister colleague Shri Sandeep Kumar as a participant therein, by immediately dismissing the offender from his Cabinet. By Shri Kejriwal's action I therefore have good cause to believe that it is indeed Shri Sandeep Kumar depicted in the video being thereafter circulated via internet and social media and portions of which were also broadcast on TV news channels.3) That Shri Arvind Kejriwal, a public servant, did not report or forward the sex video (evidence) of the criminal acts committed by his corrupt Cabinet Minister in his possession to the Police Officer or nearest Magistrate as he is duty bound to do. Instead Shri Kejriwal first privately circulated the highly obscene sex video to his Aam Aadmi Party spokespersons for damage control and perception management.4) Accordingly Shri Ashutosh (National Spokesperson AAM AADMI PARTY) on accessing a copy of the sex video from Shri Arvind Kejriwal proceeded to publish the impugned highly scandalous, irresponsible and misogynistic article on the news website NDTV.COM which is grossly demeaning and derogatory to Indian women in general and against my family specifically. I say that this NDTV.COM article which has offended a great many people was written and published solely for the purpose of aiding and abbeting and preventing the Delhi Police and other law enforcement agencies from promptly arresting Mr. Ashutosh's party's Minister and to obstruct the criminal investigation.5) That the sexual acts recorded in the said video perpetrated against the woman in the sex video captured by Shri Sandeep Kumar are so filthy and disgusting that the poor woman was repeatedly caused to wipe off the penile fluid discharged by Shri Sandeep Kumar into her unprotected mouth in an attempt to mitigate his possible sexually transmitted infections. It is pertinent to mention that the video shows Shri Sandeep Kumar then induced the woman to place a condom on his male member before the woman was made to perform further certain unnatural sexual acts atop him.6) In these circumstances, any reasonable person would denounce the actions of Shri Ashutosh and NDTV.COM for persistently publishing information which they know to be false, for the purpose of causing obstruction, insult, injury, criminal intimidation, enmity, hatred, or ill will, by making use of computer resource/s or communication device/s, They are both in criminal collusion to commit cyber offences with Shri Sandeep Kumar who is already charged / arrested for cyber crimes concerning the videography and circulation of his sex video.7) That on 8 Sept 2016 Shri Ashutosh and NTDV.COm has published another article titled as "I Am Setting The Record Straight On My NCW Meeting" accessible at URL : http://www.ndtv.com/opinion/what-i-argued-about-with-ncw- making certain allegations against this Hon'ble Commission. Accordingly also, I am complaining that Shri Ashutosh and NDTV.COM are persistently publishing information, which they know to be false, for the purpose of causing annoyance, obstruction, insult, injury, criminal intimidation, enmity, hatred, or ill will, by making use of their computer resource/s or communication device/s.chief-1456352 8) That I personally witnessed Shri Ashutosh (immediately after leaving the NCW premises on 8.Sept.2016) and his party members and MLAs also created public disorder and attempted to incite a mob against the NCW outside the NCW premises.
9) That the Delhi Police is already seized of some aspects of the matter, since a woman representing herself to be the victim in the sex video has approached the police and the ex-Minister was arrested based on her information.In these circumstances, I am regretfully constrained to make additional prayers as follows to this Hon'ble TRIBUNAL:-PRAYERS:A) That Shri Ashutosh, Shri Arvind Kejriwal (Chief Minister Delhi), and M/s NDTV.COM be issued notice by the Hon'ble Commission to reply to my complaint and this additional communication,B) That in the alternative, that my complaint be directly forwarded to the Commissioner of Police / Delhi Police to initiate action against all the persons specified in my prayer "A" above for their several offences and conspiracies (as the conspirators of Shri Sandeep Kumar) punishable under Information Technology Act and (Indian Penal Code) IPC as cognisable offences.C) That the Central Govt may be kindly directed to immediately block the website of NDTV.COM u/s 69A of Information Technology Act for maintaining public order and for preventing further commisison of the cognisable offence/s such as I have described above.sincerelyEr. Sarbajit RoyNATIONAL CONVENORIndia Against Corruption, jan andolanB-59 Defence ColonyNew Delhi 110024Tel : +91-8010205897On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:2) My grievance is that Ashutosh and NDTV.com has published offensive, inaccurate, misleading, abusive, pedophilic, hateful, ethically objectionable, disparaging, or otherwise inappropriate material in the article accessible at1) I would be obliged if you would kindly also include / implead me in the subject matter as a complainant against Shri Ashutosh Gupta (alias Ashutosh). I also pray that M/s NDTV.com be impleaded as an offender.Dear Madam Chairperson,BY EMAILNational Commission for WomenTo:Hon'ble Chairperson
"http://www.ndtv.com/opinion/the-sex-was-consensual-private- "act-why-aap-punished-its-man-1 453374
where Ashutosh has written inter-alia"Indian history is full of examples of our leaders and heroes who had lived with their desires beyond social boundaries. Pandit Jawahar Lal Nehru's reported affairs with many female colleagues were juicy gossip but it didn't spoil his political career. His relationship with Edwina Mountbatten is widely discussed. The entire world knew about it. Their affections continued till Pt. Nehru's last breath. Was it a sin? History is also witness to the fact that top leaders of the Congress in 1910s were worried about Gandhiji's relationship with Sarla Chaudhary, who was distantly related to Rabindra Nath Tagore. Gandhi Ji had confessed that Sarla was his spiritual wife. Kasturba Gandhi was very disturbed. C Rajagopalchari and other senior leaders of the party had to intervene. They persuaded, pressured, cajoled Gandhi-ji to leave Sarla. Gandhiji in his later days slept naked with his two nieces to experiment with celibacy. Pandit Nehru had told him not to do so as the country would rise against him but Gandhi-ji did not budge."
3) That although there was no such person as "Sarla Chaudhary" as described (which is probably a patently deliberate device devised by Ashutosh to claim she is a fictional character) it is obvious he is alluding to my deceased great-grand-aunt Sarala Debi Chaudhurani (who unfortunately has left behind no direct descendants to counter Ashutosh's calumny) using the despicable device of innuendo employed by gutter columnists.
4) I and my family are upset that NDTV.com website has published Ashutosh's distortions linking Mohandas Gandhi's sexual (masturbatory) fantasies to my deceased family members names to besmirch their iconic places in history. It is relevant to mention that Smt. Sarala Debi Chaudhurani is the pre-eminent feminist icon of India, prominent in nationalist and Congress circles and had written the musical score for both India's National Antem (ie. Jana Gana Mana) as well as the National song (ie. Bande Mataram). In fact these nation binding anthems were greatly popularised in Upper India by Smt. Sarala Debi of the highly nationalistic Adi Brahmo Samaj (a religious minority) of which I am an 'acharya' and an attack on Smt. Sarala Debi or Gurudev Rabindra Nath Tagore simply to defend a misogynistic sex-crazed rapist Minister is also an attack on our minority religion.
5) For your Eminence's information, Gandhi was never in India in 1910 (or even 1911, 1912, 1913....) whereas Pulitzer-Prize winning reporter Joseph Lelyveld writes that Gandhi was then (ie. since 1908) in a homo-erotic relationship with Hermann Kaltenbach in South Africa. Please see the ABC TC (US) url
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/gandhi-book-claims-indian-leade r-bisexual-racist/story?id=132 55847
Accordingly, I say that if at all the Congress Party or Ms. Kasturba Gandhi ('Ba') was very disturbed with Mr. Gandhi in 1910s, it was because of Mr. Gandhi's homo-erotic activities and homosexual / pedophilic proclivities rather than any alleged relationship (sexual or otherwise) with Smt. Sarala Debi Chaudhurani.6) Accordingly, I sincerely hope that Hon'ble Commission impleads me as a complainant and strongly indicts Shri Ashutosh Gupta and NDTV.com. I also seek permission to submit my evidence during proceedings as and when directed by your honor.PS : I am a non-political person and am filing this in my personal capacity as a relative of Smt. Sarala Debi Chaudhurani (deceased) to defend her honour.Sincerely,Sarbajit Roy
B-59 Defence ColonyNew Delhi 110024
Tel : 8010205897
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net "
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists "
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
[IAC#RG] UPDATE: Impleadment in matter of Shri Ashutosh Gupta's outrageous blog on NDTV.com
To:
Ms. Lalita Kumaramangalam,Hon'ble Chairperson,
BY EMAIL
Sub: Case / File no : 8/C160014050/2016/NCW/RS/NEE
It is most unfortunate that Shri Ashutosh, who was in a highly agitated state, chose to convert the Commission's serious business into a political farce, and even went to the extent of refusing his counsel's presence during proceedings requiring his counsel Shri Somnath Bharti Adv. to cool his heels in the reception area along with me.
I briefly summarise my additional oral pleadings in my cause so as to assist the Hon'ble Commission in arriving at its decision.
FACTS:
1) That one Shri Sandeep Kumar, an advocate and Cabinet Minister for Women and Child Development in the Govt of NCT Delhi appears to have recorded (ie. 'captured') a sex video of depicting criminal acts of disgusting and unnatural (ie. oral and anal sex, termed as fellatio, sodomy, buggery punishable u/s 377 IPC) sexual intercourse between himself and a woman.
1) That one Shri Sandeep Kumar, an advocate and Cabinet Minister for Women and Child Development in the Govt of NCT Delhi appears to have recorded (ie. 'captured') a sex video of depicting criminal acts of disgusting and unnatural (ie. oral and anal sex, termed as fellatio, sodomy, buggery punishable u/s 377 IPC) sexual intercourse between himself and a woman.
2) That when the sex video with its recordings of unnatural sexual acts reached Shri Arvind Kejriwal (Chief Minister of Delhi), he promptly attested to its veracity and the identity therein of his hand-picked Cabinet Minister colleague Shri Sandeep Kumar as a participant therein, by immediately dismissing the offender from his Cabinet. By Shri Kejriwal's action I therefore have good cause to believe that it is indeed Shri Sandeep Kumar depicted in the video being thereafter circulated via internet and social media and portions of which were also broadcast on TV news channels.
3) That Shri Arvind Kejriwal, a public servant, did not report or forward the sex video (evidence) of the criminal acts committed by his corrupt Cabinet Minister in his possession to the Police Officer or nearest Magistrate as he is duty bound to do. Instead Shri Kejriwal first privately circulated the highly obscene sex video to his Aam Aadmi Party spokespersons for damage control and perception management.
4) Accordingly Shri Ashutosh (National Spokesperson AAM AADMI PARTY) on accessing a copy of the sex video from Shri Arvind Kejriwal proceeded to publish the impugned highly scandalous, irresponsible and misogynistic article on the news website NDTV.COM which is grossly demeaning and derogatory to Indian women in general and against my family specifically. I say that this NDTV.COM article which has offended a great many people was written and published solely for the purpose of aiding and abbeting and preventing the Delhi Police and other law enforcement agencies from promptly arresting Mr. Ashutosh's party's Minister and to obstruct the criminal investigation.
5) That the sexual acts recorded in the said video perpetrated against the woman in the sex video captured by Shri Sandeep Kumar are so filthy and disgusting that the poor woman was repeatedly caused to wipe off the penile fluid discharged by Shri Sandeep Kumar into her unprotected mouth in an attempt to mitigate his possible sexually transmitted infections. It is pertinent to mention that the video shows Shri Sandeep Kumar then induced the woman to place a condom on his male member before the woman was made to perform further certain unnatural sexual acts atop him.
6) In these circumstances, any reasonable person would denounce the actions of Shri Ashutosh and NDTV.COM for persistently publishing information which they know to be false, for the purpose of causing obstruction, insult, injury, criminal intimidation, enmity, hatred, or ill will, by making use of computer resource/s or communication device/s, They are both in criminal collusion to commit cyber offences with Shri Sandeep Kumar who is already charged / arrested for cyber crimes concerning the videography and circulation of his sex video.
7) That on 8 Sept 2016 Shri Ashutosh and NTDV.COm has published another article titled as "I Am Setting The Record Straight On My NCW Meeting" accessible at URL : http://www.ndtv.com/opinion/what-i-argued-about-with-ncw-chief-1456352 making certain allegations against this Hon'ble Commission. Accordingly also, I am complaining that Shri Ashutosh and NDTV.COM are persistently publishing information, which they know to be false, for the purpose of causing annoyance, obstruction, insult, injury, criminal intimidation, enmity, hatred, or ill will, by making use of their computer resource/s or communication device/s.
8) That I personally witnessed Shri Ashutosh (immediately after leaving the NCW premises on 8.Sept.2016) and his party members and MLAs also created public disorder and attempted to incite a mob against the NCW outside the NCW premises.
9) That the Delhi Police is already seized of some aspects of the matter, since a woman representing herself to be the victim in the sex video has approached the police and the ex-Minister was arrested based on her information.
In these circumstances, I am regretfully constrained to make additional prayers as follows to this Hon'ble TRIBUNAL:-
PRAYERS:
A) That Shri Ashutosh, Shri Arvind Kejriwal (Chief Minister Delhi), and M/s NDTV.COM be issued notice by the Hon'ble Commission to reply to my complaint and this additional communication,
B) That in the alternative, that my complaint be directly forwarded to the Commissioner of Police / Delhi Police to initiate action against all the persons specified in my prayer "A" above for their several offences and conspiracies (as the conspirators of Shri Sandeep Kumar) punishable under Information Technology Act and (Indian Penal Code) IPC as cognisable offences.
C) That the Central Govt may be kindly directed to immediately block the website of NDTV.COM u/s 69A of Information Technology Act for maintaining public order and for preventing further commisison of the cognisable offence/s such as I have described above.
sincerely
Er. Sarbajit Roy
NATIONAL CONVENOR
India Against Corruption, jan andolan
B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024
Tel : +91-8010205897
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
2) My grievance is that Ashutosh and NDTV.com has published offensive, inaccurate, misleading, abusive, pedophilic, hateful, ethically objectionable, disparaging, or otherwise inappropriate material in the article accessible at1) I would be obliged if you would kindly also include / implead me in the subject matter as a complainant against Shri Ashutosh Gupta (alias Ashutosh). I also pray that M/s NDTV.com be impleaded as an offender.Dear Madam Chairperson,BY EMAILNational Commission for WomenTo:Hon'ble Chairperson
"http://www.ndtv.com/opinion/the-sex-was-consensual-private- "act-why-aap-punished-its-man- 1453374
where Ashutosh has written inter-alia"Indian history is full of examples of our leaders and heroes who had lived with their desires beyond social boundaries. Pandit Jawahar Lal Nehru's reported affairs with many female colleagues were juicy gossip but it didn't spoil his political career. His relationship with Edwina Mountbatten is widely discussed. The entire world knew about it. Their affections continued till Pt. Nehru's last breath. Was it a sin? History is also witness to the fact that top leaders of the Congress in 1910s were worried about Gandhiji's relationship with Sarla Chaudhary, who was distantly related to Rabindra Nath Tagore. Gandhi Ji had confessed that Sarla was his spiritual wife. Kasturba Gandhi was very disturbed. C Rajagopalchari and other senior leaders of the party had to intervene. They persuaded, pressured, cajoled Gandhi-ji to leave Sarla. Gandhiji in his later days slept naked with his two nieces to experiment with celibacy. Pandit Nehru had told him not to do so as the country would rise against him but Gandhi-ji did not budge."
3) That although there was no such person as "Sarla Chaudhary" as described (which is probably a patently deliberate device devised by Ashutosh to claim she is a fictional character) it is obvious he is alluding to my deceased great-grand-aunt Sarala Debi Chaudhurani (who unfortunately has left behind no direct descendants to counter Ashutosh's calumny) using the despicable device of innuendo employed by gutter columnists.
4) I and my family are upset that NDTV.com website has published Ashutosh's distortions linking Mohandas Gandhi's sexual (masturbatory) fantasies to my deceased family members names to besmirch their iconic places in history. It is relevant to mention that Smt. Sarala Debi Chaudhurani is the pre-eminent feminist icon of India, prominent in nationalist and Congress circles and had written the musical score for both India's National Antem (ie. Jana Gana Mana) as well as the National song (ie. Bande Mataram). In fact these nation binding anthems were greatly popularised in Upper India by Smt. Sarala Debi of the highly nationalistic Adi Brahmo Samaj (a religious minority) of which I am an 'acharya' and an attack on Smt. Sarala Debi or Gurudev Rabindra Nath Tagore simply to defend a misogynistic sex-crazed rapist Minister is also an attack on our minority religion.
5) For your Eminence's information, Gandhi was never in India in 1910 (or even 1911, 1912, 1913....) whereas Pulitzer-Prize winning reporter Joseph Lelyveld writes that Gandhi was then (ie. since 1908) in a homo-erotic relationship with Hermann Kaltenbach in South Africa. Please see the ABC TC (US) url
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/gandhi-book-claims-indian-leade r-bisexual-racist/story?id= 13255847
Accordingly, I say that if at all the Congress Party or Ms. Kasturba Gandhi ('Ba') was very disturbed with Mr. Gandhi in 1910s, it was because of Mr. Gandhi's homo-erotic activities and homosexual / pedophilic proclivities rather than any alleged relationship (sexual or otherwise) with Smt. Sarala Debi Chaudhurani.6) Accordingly, I sincerely hope that Hon'ble Commission impleads me as a complainant and strongly indicts Shri Ashutosh Gupta and NDTV.com. I also seek permission to submit my evidence during proceedings as and when directed by your honor.PS : I am a non-political person and am filing this in my personal capacity as a relative of Smt. Sarala Debi Chaudhurani (deceased) to defend her honour.Sincerely,Sarbajit Roy
B-59 Defence ColonyNew Delhi 110024
Tel : 8010205897
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)