Re: [HumJanenge] Re: URGENT: Use the HJ website/forum

Dear Vikram

DoPT: Manual of Office Procedure : May 2003
"Office Memorandum - This form is generally used for corresponding
with other departments or in calling for information from or conveying
information to its employees. It may also be used in corresponding
with attached and subordinate offices. It is written in the third
person and bears no salutation or supersession except the name and
designation of the officer signing it."

Either a formal public notice is issued, or a press note / communique
such as this:
http://www.pib.nic.in/release/release.asp?relid=62825

Senior officers in DoPT have informed me that this has been done to
facilitate NAC to file their objections and take the fake "credit".

The gang of NCPRI haramis (you are tagged with them because of the
"RTI awards" RAC)
are hand in glove with Govt to screw the RTI Act.

Sarbajit

On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Vikram Simha <vikramsimha54@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> I Have Come Across And Read that in the Manual of Secrtarial Practice The Matter of Soliciting Comments from Other departments/Ministries is Known by an Nomenxclature as "Unofficial Notes" in Some public Undertakings , This is also Known as Inter office Correspondence , As Such i feel An OM is Issued for the Notice of All persons
> N vikramsimha ,Trustee RTI study Center & KRIA Katte , #12 Sumeru Sir M N Krishna Rao Road , Basvangudi < Bangalore 560004.
>
>
> --- On Fri, 17/12/10, Baby Varkey <babyjohn.varkey@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Baby Varkey <babyjohn.varkey@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: URGENT: Use the HJ website/forum
>> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
>> Date: Friday, 17 December, 2010, 4:20 PM
>> Dear Mr Sarbajit
>>
>> Your objection is very well taken.
>>
>> Since 1875, the legal principle from Taylor versus Taylor
>> "that where
>> a thing is required to be done in a particular manner, it
>> must be done
>> in that manner or not at all and that other methods of
>> performance are
>> necessarily forbidden." is now firmly established, by the
>> Privy
>> Council in Nazir Ahmad Vs. Emperor AIR 1936 PC 253. and
>> also AIR 1975
>> SC 915 Ram Chandra Keshav Adke (dead) Vs. Govind Joti
>> Chavare and Ors.
>>
>> If even about 10 persons from this list make the proper
>> representations (even by email considering the short time
>> available),
>> the Govt can be prevailed upon in my view to either
>> withdraw their
>> Office Memorandum or publish a public notice or clarify
>> that it is a
>> departmental memo soliciting comments only from other
>> departments /
>> ministries / organizations.
>>
>> Baby Varkey, Adv.
>>
>> On 12/17/10, sroy 1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > 2 threads have been started on the website
>> >
>> > "Amendment to RTI Rules"
>> > http://humjanenge.org.in/forum/index.php/topic,15.0.html
>> > ( I have set the ball rolling on this, members can add
>> their own
>> > comments/objs/suggns)
>> >
>> > "IPC 498A public notice for comments to Rajya Sabha "
>> > http://humjanenge.org.in/forum/index.php/topic,14.0.html
>> >
>> > Sarbajit
>> >
>>
>
>
>