Saturday, June 22, 2013

Re: [HumJanenge] SPIO REPLY

send english translation

N vikramsimha , KRIA Katte , #12 Sumeru Sir M N Krishna Rao Road , Basvangudi < Bangalore 560004.

From: hitendar parihar <hitendarrti@gmail.com>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, 13 June 2013 8:30 PM
Subject: [HumJanenge] SPIO REPLY

PL SEE ATTACH FILE AND ADVISHE

HITENDAR PARIHAR

NAGAUR RAJASTHAN

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "HumJanenge Forum People's Right to Information, RTI Act 2005" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HumJanenge+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Wednesday, June 19, 2013

[HumJanenge] obtaining original approved building plans from the Mumbai municipal corporation

I am looking for help in obtaining the original approved plans of a building at Borivali way back in 1961. So far I have only managed to obtain only the proposed plans from the Water Supply department. They gave me the file for inspection and I could find only the proposed plans.

Since the matter is under litigation, my lawyer has advised me to obtain the original approved building plans along with the BMC's approval note from the Building Proposals department located at 90-feet road Kandivli.

I filed an RTI application to inspect the file on May 28, but haven't heard from the BP department yet.

The builder who is harassing has a good clout with the officials there. His representatives are always parked there and I am afraid I may not get the original plans. Since all the residents of the building have full time jobs, it becomes difficult for us to chase officials to obtain documents.

I am therefore looking for someone who can do this work for me. Someone like an agent who will obtain the necessary copies duly certified. We are prepared to pay the person's charges.

Can anyone help?

Shiv Kumar

Tuesday, June 18, 2013

Re: [IAC#RG] Request for suo-moto Information under RTI Act

To:

Shri Dhiraj Srivastava

PS to CP and Central Public Information Officer

National Advisory Council,

2, Motilal Nehru Place,

New Delhi

18-June-2013

Dear Mr Shrivastava

Many thanks for your reply.

1) I had requested for the information to be provided suo-moto under the Life or Liberty proviso to section 7(1) of RTI Act 2005 , whereas the CIC decision you have relied on is "per incuram" referring to some Life and Liberty matter,

2) For your information, Mr. Vidya Charan Shukla has passed away in the meantime.It is really shocking that such a venerable UPA leader was compelled at age 83 years to attend a meeting without adequate security in a Naxal dominated region on the motivated advice of the NAC member, who subsequently resigned.

3) It is really shocking that the NAC has been infested with so many Maoists and Naxalites for so many years since 2006.

4) It is really shocking that ever since the NAC was formed the number of LWE controlled districts in India has gone up from 53 to 287.

5) It is really shocking that another former NAC member Mr. Harsh Mander was sheltering the wife of a known LWE leader for over 2 years, and had to resign over this issue when it came out.

In the circumstances it would be eminently fit if the NAC declares ON ITS OWN the qualifications and procedures for appointment of its members, including its Chairperson, so that the nation knows how why so many innocent lives INCLUDING OF PARA-MILITARY & SECURITY FORCES are being lost on a daily basis through leakage of confidential government information by secret and unexplained placement of private LWE persons in councils like the NAC, Planning Commission etc. which advise the Prime Minister of India.

For your information, a double Bench of the Central Information Commission in my own case by order dt. 01.06.2009 in CIC/LS/C/2009/00322 has reiterated that section 4 disclosure is to be provided immediately, free of cost and without any request being made for it.

"(i) Since a reasonable time has now passed from the time of promulgation of the Act in 2005, the Public Authorities should now take urgent steps to have their records converted to electronic form, catalogued, indexed and
computerized for easy accessibility through the network all over the country, as mandated in section 4 (1) (a) of the Act. The computerization, dissemination and updating of record is an ongoing and continuous process and all Public Authorities should put a proper system in place to make such sharing of records an automatic, routine and continuous process, so that access to such records is facilitated.

(ii) The Public Authorities are required to take immediate steps to publish detailed, complete and unambiguous information under the 16 categories, as on 31.3.2009 (if already not done or partially done) and thereafter update the information as and when necessary, but definitely every year, as mandated under section 4 (1) (b) of the
Act.

(iii) While formulating important policies or announcing the decisions affecting the public, the Public Authorities are required to publish all relevant facts about such policies
and decisions for the information of public at large, as mandated under section 4 (1) (c) of the Act.

(iv) The information disclosed by the Public Authorities under section 4 (1) (b) & (c ) of the Act is required to be disseminated through multiple means as provided under sub sections 2, 3 and 4 of Section 4 of the Act and as also suggested in Para 17.1 of the template prepared by the Tata Consultancy Service Ltd (Reference Para 14 above)/ or as per the practice adopted by the Government of Andhra Pradesh and the Andhra Pradesh State Information Commission (reference Para 13 above).

(v) Needless to say, the information disclosed by the Public Authorities under section 4 (1) (b) & (c) of the Act is a proactive disclosure and the Public Authorities are required to provide immediate access to this material as and when so requested, without the requirement of filing of any written request and the charging of any fee."

With best wishes

Er. Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor
Indian Against Corruption, jan andolan

B-59 Defence Colony, 2nd floor
New Delhi 110024
Tel: 011-24334262

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Dhiraj Srivastava <dhiraj.s@nac.nic.in> wrote:

Subject: Application under Right to Information Act, 2005

Dear Shri Roy,

Please refer to your E Mail on the subject mentioned above. You are requested to kindly intimate the substantive evidence in support of your claim of filing application under section 7(1) related to life & liberty of the RTI Act, 2005. Otherwise the application shall be processed as per normal provisions.

An order of the CIC in this context is enclosed for your reference in this context. In addition to above, you are also requested to remit Rs.10.00 as application fee by way of Postal Order / Demand Draft / Cheque in favour of Section Officer, Prime Minister's Office, New Delhi. The application shall be processed on receipt of the desired information.

Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

(Dhiraj Srivastava)

PS to CP and Central Public Information Officer

National Advisory Council,

2, Motilal Nehru Place,

New Delhi

On 06/10/13 01:07 PM, Sarbajit Roy wrote:

By EMAIL

To:
a) Central Public Information Officer
National Advisory Council
New Delhi

b) Secretary,
National Advisory Council
New Delhi

Date: 10-June-2013

Dear Sir/Madam,

URGENT

Sirs,

Sub: RTI request under section 4 of RTI Act 2005 to be complied immediately.

I am constrained to remind you that I have not received the suo-moto information sought by India Against Corruption's members vide my email dated 29-May-2013 (appended below).

The said email was sent under "Life or Liberty" clause of RTI Act on behalf of IAC (a strictly apolitical and secular people's movement) considering the deaths of so many persons in 25 May 2103 massacre who were "compelled" to go into areas well known to be LWE infested.

The reasons I am again requesting the information be published is summarised below:-

1) Because Ms Aruna Roy (former member NAC) is said to be a well known LWE. By way of example you may refer to the book "NGOs, Subversive Activists and Foreign Funds : the anti-nation industry 2nd edn." co-authored by her IAS batchmate Dr. Krishen Kak. Copies of the book are in the Library of Parliament. For your ready reference I am setting out a few directly relevant paragraphs therein

"'A careful look at the money trail of AID illustrates the functioning of the organisation, and throws light on other organisations that are used to funnel money collected by AID. These organisations co-ordinate their fund-raising activities and shadow their proceeds by passing through multiple accounts all controlled by like minded groups. One such organisation that has been funded by AID is called Tamil Nadu Science Forum (TNSF). TNSF works actively with DYFI. TNSF listed Balaji Sampath, who is also a founder of AID. Thus while Balaji Sampath's AID collects money in America, BALAJI SAMPATH (in his Indian incarnation!) receives money in India, ostensibly on behalf of TNSF.'

I understand that TNSF 'as a policy' would always impose a pre-condition on the libraries in Tamilnadu which they were financially supporting to the effect that the concerned libraries would only support DYFI and no other student body before receiving any funds. AID is a secretive organisation which enjoys the full political support of the UPA Government in New Delhi. It was AID which extended generous financial support to Sandeep Pandey, founder of ASHA and a known Naxalite sympathizer, to undertake a political trip to Pakistan some years ago.

Those who work with AID and its allies also seem to be experts in organizing international prizes and awards to themselves as part of a civil and cultural conspiracy. One Sanjit 'Bunker' Roy was given a prize by the Aga Khan foundation for having developed rainwater harvesting structures. Later investigations by The Week clearly revealed that he had hired a professional architect called Neehar Raina to get the job done. Upon this exposure, Aga Khan Foundation changed its citation to fit in with the known facts! A secularly shameless non-communal Roy, ended up by returning his prize. Bunker Roy's wife Aruna Roy, is a Maoist and has worked closely with AID. Like many who have worked closely with AID in its undeclared mission of national subversion, she too has been awarded a prize by the Ramon Magsaysay Foundation.

I can only conclude that NGO's like AID, ASHA, CAIR, FeTNA are all committed to their supreme objective of De-Hinduising the Indian State which means rendering the Hindu identity to any aspect of our national life illegitimate and irrelevant in public life and public discourse"

2) That apparently post the May 25 2013 Chattisgarh massacre, specific intelligence was available to the Govt of India concerning the involvement of private member(s) of the NAC to "De-Hindu"-ise (?) the Congress Party's leadership in the presently BJP ruled States of Madhya Pradesh and Chattisgarh which go to polls very shortly .

3) That it is well known to MHA that front NGOs (such as Social Work Reserch Centre, Tilonia [Rajasthan]) of Mr. Sanjit 'Bunker' Roy (who is said to be Ms. Aruna Roy's husband) regularly receive many crores of rupees under FCRA from foreign sources routed via countries such as Tibet and Sierra Leone.

4) That it is very well known to Govt. of India and the MHA that large amounts of foreign exchange are flowing in to India for conversion of animist tribals to Christianity, especially in states such as Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and Chattisgarh, and that radical Christian "priests" are actively inciting India's tribals to take up arms against the State, ie. LWEism also known as Naxalism, Maoism etc.

5) That Ms. Aruna Roy's husband actively runs massively foreign funded programs to train so-called "barefoot" doctors and "barefoot engineers". These illiterate unqualified depressed people are systematically brain-washed as agitators / technicians who go about fomenting disaffection against the Indian State and its institutions.

6) That Ms. Aruna Roy corruptly misused her status as a private (ie. "without salary to evade application of the Prevention of Corruption Act") NAC member to ensure that Ministries of Govt of India give huge funding to her husband's NGOs for the training of "barefoot" LWEs. Ms. Aruna Roy and her husband (who are only "humanities" graduates) have systematically ensured (through their proximity to Chairperson NAC and lobbying access thereby to critical Ministries) that the "Engineers Act/Bill" to regulate the qualifications and supervisory bodies to regulate the profession of Engineering is never passed. Thereby enabling this enterprising duo to carry on their hugely profitable private business of training "barefoot engineers" aka LWEs for some foreign natrions who openly finance them. It is also an open secret that Ms. Aruna Roy and her aforesaid husband were part of the move to tamper with the autonomy of the IITs, and also caused the arrest on 28.11.2011 of many IAC volunteers for raising slogans like "Desh ke yuvak yahaan hain, Rahul Gandhi kahaan hain ?" close to NAC office that day.

7) That when the concerned Intelligence / Investigative agencies communicated their inability to investigate the May 25 Chattisgarh massacre in the face of such High Profile persons being close to Hon''ble Chairperson NAC and being in a position to impede their free and unfettered investigations, Ms. Aruna Roy got convinced to "resign" from the NAC.

8) That Ms. Aruna Roy was replaced at the NAC by another Christian tribal's agitator in a tearing hurry and without any public procedure and/or public scrutiny being available or followed (as the IAC had requested vide my email dt. 29.05.2013 which was also addressed to the Cabinet Secretary by name).

9) That IAC apprehends the said hurried appointment of Ms Aruna Roy's replacement is to continue an unfinished agenda to de-Hinduise the Congress Party leadership in specific BJP ruled states. Hence IAC's request for urgent suo-moto disclosure.

In the circumstances, we repeat our request that all available information pertaining to procedure and terms for selection of members of the NAC is put into the public domain within 48 hours on Life or Liberty basis, as IAC is seriously interested in knowing how alleged/purported LWEs came to be appointed to NAC-I and NAC-II and if this was in any way responsible for deaths of so many citizens of India (with perhaps more to come).

With best wishes

yours sincerely

Er. Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor
Indian Against Corruption, jan andolan

B-59 Defence Colony, 2nd floor
New Delhi 110024
Tel: 011-24334262

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:08 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

By EMAIL

To:
1) Central Public Information Officer
National Advisory Council
New Delhi

2) Cabinet Secretary to Govt of India

Date: 29-May-2013

Kind Attn:
a) Mr Dhiraj Shrivastava (PS to Chairperson/NAC),

b) Mr Ajit Kumar Seth (Cabinet Secretary/GoI)

URGENT

Sirs,

Sub: RTI request under section 4 of RTI Act 2005 to be complied immediately.

Kindly treat this as a "Life or Liberty" application

I have come to know from the below mentioned NDTV link that there are now some vacancies for post of "Member" in the National Advisory Council and which post(s) I would like to formally apply to be considered for.

I am given to understand that the published qualification for the post is "professionals with diverse experience"
which I abundantly fulfill.

I would therefore be obliged to be urgently informed the procedure and application format (if any) to be considered.

I would also like to be urgently informed about the present prescribed salary and perquisites for the post, as I know for a fact that some corrupt members of NAC-I were misusing their posts (which was then an unpaid one) to lobby for foreign interests.

With best wishes

yours sincerely

Er. Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor
Indian Against Corruption, jan andolan

B-59 Defence Colony, 2nd floor
New Delhi 110024
Tel: 011-24334262

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Joshi NM <naishadhjoshi@gmail.com> wrote:

Sub: Re: Aruna Roy bidding goodbye to NAC

http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/social-activist-aruna-roy-resigns-from-sonia-gandhi-led-national-advisory-council-372756

Social activist Aruna Roy resigns from Sonia Gandhi-led National Advisory Council

Social activist Aruna Roy has decided not to continue in the National Advisory Council, led by UPA chairman Sonia Gandhi, after her term expires on Friday.

Ms Roy has written a letter to Mrs Gandhi requesting that she should not be considered for another term of NAC that sets the social agenda for the government and the UPA Chairperson has accepted the request.

On her way out, Ms Roy criticised the government for not taking up recommendations of the council on minimum wages to workers under Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).

Monday, June 17, 2013

Re: [IAC#RG] Online RTI facility extended to President Secretariat and MEA

Dear Murali,How do we find out whether Home Minister of India after his official meeting with US Homeland ministry-22 to 25May ,was attending social getto gether at Baltimore ,though he told press he had an appointment with Eye specialist Hence he did not rush back despite Maos had killed 27 personnel including ex cabinet Minister-who susequently died in hospital.

He only returned to India on 29th May

Will appreciate your inputs

With Best wishes

RAMESH PATIL

MRCI

From: Murali Krishnan <rti4citizens@gmail.com>
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Sent: Tuesday, 18 June 2013 12:00 AM
Subject: [IAC#RG] Online RTI facility extended to President Secretariat and MEA

Sarbajit and other RTI gurus,

Online RTI facility extended to President Secretariat and MEA

"However, the department has asked people not to file information related to state governments.

"Please do not file RTI applications through this portal for the public authorities under the state governments, including Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi. If filed, the application would be returned, without refund of amount,"

Doesn't this seem wrong ? Why no transfer under 6(3) ?

Murali

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in/

[IAC#RG] Online RTI facility extended to President Secretariat and MEA

Sarbajit and other RTI gurus,

Online RTI facility extended to President Secretariat and MEA

"However, the department has asked people not to file information related to state governments.

"Please do not file RTI applications through this portal for the public authorities under the state governments, including Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi. If filed, the application would be returned, without refund of amount,"

Doesn't this seem wrong ? Why no transfer under 6(3) ?

Murali

Re: [IAC#RG] Another patriot gone

i was there on deputation in 1970-71 just for 9 months in one of the wings

i feel like neta jee disappearance which is hidden by govt. and what not by congress, big bosses get benefits to hide facts n get promotions

false becomes facts n facts reversed and hidden untrue

On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

Bahukutumbi Raman passed away in Chennai on Sunday evening after a prolonged fight with cancer. He was 77.
Described as an asset by the Indian intelligence community, "B. Raman" was a former additional secretary with the Cabinet secretariat. He was also the director of the Institute for Topical Studies, Chennai and one of India's foremost security experts and one of the founders of India's external intelligence wing -- the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW)
He had also written a memoir titled "Kaoboys of Research and Analysis Wing: Down Memory Lane".
I had filed an RTI based on this book (and also another by Maloy Dhar) to the CabSec a few years back. A JointSec of Cabsec called me back and requested me not to pursue it further in National Interest. I replied that the fact of my queries were in public domain was enough.

some samples
b) Decision / policy, if any, to bifurcate IB to create R&AW on 21.Sep.1968 or thereabouts

c) Decision(s) / policy, if any, to constitute or deploy covert action units of R&AW after 1968,

d) Decision(s) / policy, if any, to constitute or deploy covert action units of Directorate-General of Security (DGS) after 1968,

e) A copy of the noting(s) by B.N.Mullick (former Director IB) constituting the "Burma Branch" presently with R&AW Archives,

f) Copy of the note issued by Indian Ambassador to Burma, and later supplied to R&AW in 1968-69, stating that Govt of India I had no objection to Chinese assistance to Burma (now Myanmar) for aerial photography of Indian territory,

g) Decision to destroy / weed out from R&AW records the transcripts of records of negotiations for settlement by Mr Rajiv Gandhi, Mr R.N. Kao and others recorded by Mr B Raman before Army was sent into Golden Temple Amritsar in June 1984, along with record(s) of factum of destruction. NB: Mr. B Raman former Addl Secy of R&AW has published that that these valuable historical records were
entrusted by him to R&AW archives around 31,August 1994 in the hope they are made available to future historians

h) Decision to destroy / weed out from R&AW records, communications from American Baptist missionaries in Burma (Kachin State) to R&AW after October 1968, along with records of factum of destruction.

i) Decision to destroy / weed out the Indian Army's minute of dissent to Joint Intelligence Committee concerning over-assessment of Naga hostiles sent to China for training in 1968-69, along with records of factum of destruction.

j) Decision to conduct an enquiry into suspicions that CIA was involved in assassination of Mrs Indira Gandhi. It is pertinent that Mr B Raman former Addl Secy R&AW, has alleged the enquiry "could not prove this suspicion".

k) Decision(s) / policy not to upgrade India's "weak" (per Mr B Raman) maritime intelligence capability concerning US and naval development in Indian Ocean region.
Entire document here [ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rti_india/message/4808 ]

Sarbajit

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

[IAC#RG] Another patriot gone

Bahukutumbi Raman passed away in Chennai on Sunday evening after a prolonged fight with cancer. He was 77.

Described as an asset by the Indian intelligence community, "B. Raman" was a former additional secretary with the Cabinet secretariat. He was also the director of the Institute for Topical Studies, Chennai and one of India's foremost security experts and one of the founders of India's external intelligence wing -- the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW)

He had also written a memoir titled "Kaoboys of Research and Analysis Wing: Down Memory Lane".

I had filed an RTI based on this book (and also another by Maloy Dhar) to the CabSec a few years back. A JointSec of Cabsec called me back and requested me not to pursue it further in National Interest. I replied that the fact of my queries were in public domain was enough.

some samples

b) Decision / policy, if any, to bifurcate IB to create R&AW on 21.Sep.1968 or thereabouts

c) Decision(s) / policy, if any, to constitute or deploy covert action units of R&AW after 1968,

d) Decision(s) / policy, if any, to constitute or deploy covert action units of Directorate-General of Security (DGS) after 1968,

e) A copy of the noting(s) by B.N.Mullick (former Director IB) constituting the "Burma Branch" presently with R&AW Archives,

f) Copy of the note issued by Indian Ambassador to Burma, and later supplied to R&AW in 1968-69, stating that Govt of India I had no objection to Chinese assistance to Burma (now Myanmar) for aerial photography of Indian territory,

g) Decision to destroy / weed out from R&AW records the transcripts of records of negotiations for settlement by Mr Rajiv Gandhi, Mr R.N. Kao and others recorded by Mr B Raman before Army was sent into Golden Temple Amritsar in June 1984, along with record(s) of factum of destruction. NB: Mr. B Raman former Addl Secy of R&AW has published that that these valuable historical records were
entrusted by him to R&AW archives around 31,August 1994 in the hope they are made available to future historians

h) Decision to destroy / weed out from R&AW records, communications from American Baptist missionaries in Burma (Kachin State) to R&AW after October 1968, along with records of factum of destruction.

i) Decision to destroy / weed out the Indian Army's minute of dissent to Joint Intelligence Committee concerning over-assessment of Naga hostiles sent to China for training in 1968-69, along with records of factum of destruction.

j) Decision to conduct an enquiry into suspicions that CIA was involved in assassination of Mrs Indira Gandhi. It is pertinent that Mr B Raman former Addl Secy R&AW, has alleged the enquiry "could not prove this suspicion".

k) Decision(s) / policy not to upgrade India's "weak" (per Mr B Raman) maritime intelligence capability concerning US and naval development in Indian Ocean region.

Entire document here [ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rti_india/message/4808 ]

Sarbajit

Re: [IAC#RG] PRESS RELEASE: publication by India Against Corruption

Pleas, Sarbajit, do not compare this idiot with Galileo Galilei or any of the stalwarts of the European or Indian renaissance. They were rational scientists, or social scientists ( if you will) who were trying to get the world to see sense. This guy wants to put the clock back in the most reactionary way.

On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Anamika R <anamikaiac@gmail.com> wrote:

I don't think there was any dissidence reflected in the piece. Nor was the release so simple.

It reflected a stance which can't be viewed as objective at all. It certainly was not discussing any rocket science.

As regards the three women, NDTV is yet to get to us!

By the way, Wikipedia has 2 dissidents reflected now sans Nehru.

Sent from my iPad

On 15-Jun-2013, at 13:36, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

"EXTREMIST" ???

So you want only normal / bland / safe / conventional views to exist. In your cloistered world the term "dissident" ought not to exist ?

Let us all collectively forget that Galileo held extremist views. So did Martin Luther, Jai Prakash Narain and Adolf Hitler.

In the warped "controlled" world of Wikipedia Jawaharlal Nehru (?) is one of only 4 "dissidents" India had.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_dissidents

I suppose we should let only Arundhati Roy or Madhu Kishwar or Ranjana Kumari speak on behalf of Indian women - because these are the only faces we see jabbering away on NDTV.

SIFF's theme is simple - Gender specific laws like Domestic Violence Act and IPC 498A are being abused and should either be repealed or made gender neutral.

This is now substantially also IAC's position (arrived at after much internal debate and discussion) as IAC conveyed to the Justice Verma Committee. A copy of IAC's submission can be accessed at IAC's website.

Sarbajit

On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Anamika R <anamikaiac@gmail.com> wrote:

I had similar opinion as Vidyut on the piece from Mr Sarkar. I am not getting into details of what he has put forth, as Vidyut has already done so.

To even think of putting the problems women face with those of men is audacious, to say the least.

We must not encourage extremist views, even if we propagate freedom of press.

Sent from my iPad

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Sunday, June 16, 2013

Re: [IAC#RG] Congress last ditch effort in Rank Pay case

WE ARE WITH YOU MR. SARBAJIT ROY. YOUR NAME ITSELF MEANS TOTAL VICTORY. WARN THE AG GHOLAM VAHANAVATI AND EXPOSE HIM TO THE MEDIA. ELECTION IS THEIR STARING IN THEIR FACE. EVERY VOTE COUNTS. THEY CANNOT AND WOULD NOT WANT TO MISS OUT ON A SOLID CHUNK OF VATARANS VOTE, TOGETHER WITH THEIR FAMILY AND SUPPORTERS.
PLEASE HAMMER THE IRON, ITS RED HOT !!!
JOY P. CHHETRY
PHOENIX, AZ., USA.

From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
To: indiaresists <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Sent: Monday, 17 June 2013 11:26 AM
Subject: [IAC#RG] Congress last ditch effort in Rank Pay case

India Against Corruption is concerned that crafty Congress Party is again out to shaft our IESMs and servicemen in the Major Dhanapalan / Rank Pay case by referring the matter to Attorney-General Ghoolam Vahanavati - their ultimate lying knave - who even got CBI taken out of RTI with a biased and unprofessional opinion (180 degrees opposed to what SG Gopal Subramaniam) had written which IAC G.Sec Karira and I inspected at DoPT.

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/ministry-of-defence-ak-antony-rank-pay-matter-attorney-general/1/280281.html

IESMs 'loha garam hain hathoda maro' but you chaps are bungling about and being misled up the garden path by political forces. Get united on this and meet all parties - especially the ruling party - in full force..