The responses of the Political parties are even more interesting :-)
Sarbajit
On 6/11/11, Amit Kumar <in4tunio@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looking at the responses of the Chief Ministers, a few things are clear:
>
> 1. The states governed by Congress need not be consulted as they do not
> provide any feedback, only stating they will follow the high command. Among
> these, only the chief minister of Delhi seems to have something to say.
> 2. States ruled by BJP all have the same reply.
>
> Only the Delhi and Manipur Chief Ministers actually answered the questions
> asked by the Center.
>
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> http://persmin.nic.in/Lokpal_Index.asp
>>
>> <smile>
>>
>
Saturday, June 11, 2011
Re: [HumJanenge] Overwhelming response against Lokpal Bill clauses
Re: [HumJanenge] Overwhelming response against Lokpal Bill clauses
Sarbajit
On 6/11/11, Amit Kumar <in4tunio@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looking at the responses of the Chief Ministers, a few things are clear:
>
> 1. The states governed by Congress need not be consulted as they do not
> provide any feedback, only stating they will follow the high command. Among
> these, only the chief minister of Delhi seems to have something to say.
> 2. States ruled by BJP all have the same reply.
>
> Only the Delhi and Manipur Chief Ministers actually answered the questions
> asked by the Center.
>
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> http://persmin.nic.in/Lokpal_Index.asp
>>
>> <smile>
>>
>
Re: [HumJanenge] Overwhelming response against Lokpal Bill clauses
From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
To: humjanenge <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Sat, 11 June, 2011 7:52:06 AM
Subject: [HumJanenge] Overwhelming response against Lokpal Bill clauses
http://persmin.nic.in/Lokpal_Index.asp
<smile>
[HumJanenge] incompetence and lackey-ism among the politicians cause of corrution too
----- Original Message -----From: Amit KumarSent: Saturday, June 11, 2011 11:50 AMSubject: 04 - Re: [HumJanenge] Overwhelming response against Lokpal Bill clauses
Looking at the responses of the Chief Ministers, a few things are clear:1. The states governed by Congress need not be consulted as they do not provide any feedback, only stating they will follow the high command. Among these, only the chief minister of Delhi seems to have something to say.2. States ruled by BJP all have the same reply.Only the Delhi and Manipur Chief Ministers actually answered the questions asked by the Center.
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
http://persmin.nic.in/Lokpal_Index.asp
<smile>
[HumJanenge] My fresh Public Grievance pertaining to Lok Pal Bill
The Secretary,
Department of Personnel & Training
By EMAIL
Dear Madam
I am reluctantly caused to complain to you concerning the quality and bonafides of private persons nominated for the Joint Drafting Committee for Lok Pal Bill (which is under your purview), specifically Mr Prashanth Bhushan (Advocate).
I am appending an email forwarded to me by one Justice (Retd) Kamleshwar Nath alongwith comments of Mr Prashanth Bhushan asking for wide publication / circulation of a scandalous email (attached) defaming his co Committee member and Union Home Minister Mr P.C.Chidambaram.
As your department's CPIO has still not informed me why Mr Bhushan was appointed to the Joint Drafting Committee instead of myself, I further complain to you that in view of Mr Bhushan's comments I insist (as guaranteed u/a 19) to be provided a formal opportunity of submitting my comments / objections / suggestions via a public consultation process on the draft LokPal Bill as and when it is finalised or placed before Parliament as is the usual practice.
Kindly also place this email and its annexure on the official record of the Joint Drafting Committee or forward it to the Convenor / Secretary thereof to be placed on record.
With best Wishes
Sarbajit Roy
B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024
Tel : 09311448069
From: Justice Kamleshwar Nath <justicekn@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:17 PM
Subject: FW: chidambaram
To: Activist Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>, "Activist N. S. Venkataraman" <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com>, Afzal Ansari <patrakarsadan@gmail.com>, Anti-corruption Lucknow 1 <iaclucknow@gmail.com>, Anti-corruption Lucnow 2 <upbeulko@gmail.com>, Anup Kumar Malhotra <anupmalhotra37@yahoo.com>, Anupam Gupta Rourkela <anupam7366@rediffmail.com>, Anupama Jha TII <anupama@transparencyindia.org>, Anurag Gupta <anuragupta7@rediffmail.com>, gupta_av@hotmail.com, Arun Gupta <neerjarun@satyam.net.in>, Arvind Gupta <arvindjgupta@gmail.com>, Ashok Haranahalli <ashokharanahalli@gmail.com>, Anil Bairwal <abairwal@gmail.com>, Avinash Kumar <avinashkr@yahoo.com>, B R Lal TII <br_lall@yahoo.com>, "B. K. Verma TII" <birendra_verma78@yahoo.com>, Balashankar <editor@organiserweekly.com>, Bharat Vikas Parishad <bvp@bvpindia.com>, "Bhavana V. K. Shukla" <vk_shukla@hotmail.com>, Brijendra Parashar HT <bkparasharlko@rediffmail.com>, Chandrika Prasad <chandrika_prasad@yahoo.com>, Chetna Kumar <chetna19@yahoo.co.uk>, "Chief Election Commissioner S. Y. Quraishi" <syquraishi@eci.gov.in>, DC Verma <dcverma06@gmail.com>, Deepali Gupta <deepali.gupta@gmail.com>, Dhananjay Gupta <dhan_jay_g@yahoo.com>, "Dharmadhikary K. R." <krdharma@yahoo.co.in>, Dhiraj K Gupta <dhirajkg@gmail.com>, Dhruv Kumar <groovy.dhruvy@gmail.com>, Dinkar Gupta <dinkarg@gmail.com>, Diwakar Gupta <diwakargupta@gmail.com>, "Dr. Rashmi Gupta" <rashmi1949@hotmail.com>, admiralrht@hotmail.com, ashok@aroraz.com, icdwivedi@gmail.com, karankharb@gmail.com, mgd@airtelmail.in, p_s_bawa@yahoo.co.in, nac.pankaj@gmail.com, ramkhandelwal29@gmail.com, rsrinivasan32@gmail.com, gpf18@gmail.com, Gandhian Satyagraha Brigade <gandhiansb@gmail.com>, ypanandindia@yahoo.co.in, Hardeo Singh GPWO <hardeosingh@rediffmail.com>, Hindustan T Sunita Aron <saron@hindustantimes.com>, "I. B. Singh" <ibsingh@hotmail.com.>, "IAS(retd) Ravindra Gupta" <rgupta@doe.ernet.in>, Jagdish Gandhi <jgandhi@cmseducation.org>, "Judges Assn Justice R. C. Lahoti" <lahotirc@gmail.com>, Ashok kumar Srivastava <justiceaks@yahoo.com.sg>, Justice Devi Pd Singh <dprasadsingh@allahabadhighcourt.in>, Justice I S Mathur <ismathur@satyam.net.in>, Justice Pradeep Kant <pradeepkant@hotmail.com>, Justice S Sodhi <savibonny@yahoo.com>, "Justice S. C. Sharma HOD CAT Alld" <diva.dev9@gmail.com>, Justice Salahuddin Mirza <ashshan@cyber.net.pk>, Lokayukta UP <lokayukta@hotmail.com>, Mahendra Lalka <mahendra_lalka@yahoo.com>, Manisha Agarwal <manisha.law@gmail.com>, Media Rakesh Upadhyay Zee <rakesh.upadhyay@zeenetwork.com>, "Media S. S. Tripathi" <aisna.world@gmail.com>, Media Sandeep <news@dailyaag.com>, Neerja Arun <drneerjaarun@gmail.com>, Murli Manohar Joshi <murli@sansad.nic.in>, Narendra Deo <deonarendra740@gmail.com>, Narendra Kumar Gupta <nkgupta@am.iitd.ernet.in>, Neerja Arun <aayusharun@yahoo.co.in>, NGO Exnora Innovations <chaturvediramakant@yahoo.co.in>, Niranjan Pandey <npandey1@in.ibm.com>, Omkar Razdan TII <niyamshanti@yahoo.com>, ORGANISER Sachin Garg <sachin.garg32@gmail.com>, "P. K. Singh Mankapur" <singhpks123@gmail.com>, "Piyush Gupta (Prem ji)" <piyush_distributors@yahoo.co.in>, Prabhakar Gupta <guptaprabhakar@yahoo.com>, Prakash Singh DG <prakash1959@gmail.com>, R N Srivastava TII <rnath123@hotmail.com>, "R.K. Ohri" <rkohri@airtelmail.in>, Raj Kumar <waykm@rediffmail.com>, RAJEEV AGARWAL <rajeevagarwal.lko@gmail.com>, Ram Autar Agarwal <devesh24@sancharnet.in>, Ram Dutt Tripathi BBC <ramdutt.tripathi@gmail.com>, Ravi Shankar Prasad <ravis@sansad.nic.in>, "S. K. Agarwal TII" <snehsantosh@gmail.com>, "S. N. Shukla" <shukla.sn@gmail.com>, Sandeep Pandey <ashaashram@yahoo.com>, Santosh P Gupta <gupta.santosh@mahindra.co.in>, "Gupta,Sapan" <Sapan.Gupta@standardchartered.com>, Satish Gupta <gupta_sc@hotmail.com>, Sharat Pradhan <sharatpradhan@rediffmail.com>, Speaker LS Meira Kumar <speakerloksabha@sansad.nic.in>, Subramanian Swamy 1 <swamy39@gmail.com>, Sudarshan Padmanabhan <padmanab@gmail.com>, Surendra Prakash Goel USA <goelusa@hotmail.com>, Umashanker Pandey <usplko@yahoo.co.in>, urvashi sharma <rtimahilamanchup@gmail.com>, Vikas Agarwal <vikas_ee@hotmail.com>, yogendra Narain <yognarain@gmail.com>
Cc: Arvind Gupta <arvind_gupta_lko@yahoo.co.in>, "B. K. Verma TII 2" <lprince33@gmail.com>, Chetna Kumar <chetna19@gmail.com>, "IAS(retd) Ravindra Gupta" <ravindra_gupta2005@yahoo.com>, Media Rakesh Upadyaya II <rakesh.varanasi@gmail.com>, "R. K. Ohri Pers" <rkohri@patriotsforum.org>, Ram Autar Agarwal <rag@del2.vsnl.net.in>
Dear All,
Forwarding herewith an eye opener on P. Chidambaram Minister who presided over violence on peaceful fasting Satyagrahis at Ramlila Grounds New Delhi at midnight of 4th/5th June 2011.
Knowledge is strength; let People know.
Regards,
KN
From the Desk of :
Justice Kamleshwar Nath
Retd. | : | Up-Lokayukta ( Karnataka ), Vice Chairman – C.A.T ( Allahabad ), Judge – High Court ( Lucknow & Allahabad ) |
Address | : | `Gunjan', C - 105, Niralanagar, Lucknow : 226 020. Uttar Pradesh, India |
Phone(s) | : | +91-522-2789033 & +91-522-4016459. Mobile : +91-9415010746 |
From: Janhit Manch [mailto:janhitmanch@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2011 10:32 AM
To: aastha.atray@gmail.com; Abhay Mokashi; Abhijeet Bhilavadikar; Abid dhule; admiralrht@hotmail.com; Adolf D'Souza; Adv Kotimbere; "Adv. J. P. Dhanda"; advanilk@sansad.nic.in; advocate girija varma; advocate indira unninayar; advocate mayank misra; advocate venkatesh rao; Afsar usmani; Ahmad M.Abdi; ajaitley@sansad.nic.in; Ajay Marathe; Ajit Bhattacharjea; Ajit Ranade; Alka Dhupkar (Correspondent); Anand Castellino; Anand Desai; anant trivedi 1; Anees; aneeshphadnis@gmail.com; Mr.Anil Mehta; Anil Singh; anil_desai@ml.com; anil.ksingh@timesgroup.com; aniljoseph2073@hotmail.com; anjiebose@hotmail.com; anwar bagwan pune; "Aruna CNN-IBN"; "Aruna CNN-IBN2"; Asha Gopal Nair; Asha Patil; ashariff@ncaer.org; Ashish Kothari; Ashish Mehta; Ashish Pendse"" <ashish.pendse@expressindia.com>, "Ashok Chawan" <ashokchavanmind@rediffmail.com>, "Ashok Pandit" <ashok_pandit17@rediffmail.com>, "Ashok R.Jukar" <juksons@yahoo.com>, "Ashutosh Shukla"; Ashwin Karia; Ashwin Shah; asim.human@gmail.com; aspee@aspee.net; ateeq84@gmail.com; Azim Jalna; b_rakesh@dnaindia.net; B.N. Srikrishna; B.S.Vasa; babu.mathew@actionaid.org; Babubhai Desai; bakerandcompany@yahoo.com; bala_wg@yahoo.co.in; bapudeedwania@gmail.com; bb_sharan2003@yahoo.co.in; Bhanuprasad parikh; bharatkadam35@gmail.com; Bhaskar Prabhu; Bhaskar Prabhu; "bhavika jain"; bhedakanti@rediffmail.com; Bhupen Patel; Bhupendra Singh Thakur; bihar - bibek anand 1; bimal.khemani@rediffmail.com; bmahesh@dnaindia.net; bobby.nagi@gmail.com; brlall@gmail.com; brlall@yahoo.co.in; broadband@relianceada.com; bunch_raja@yahoo.co.in; cabinetsy@nic.in; cbmassociates@gmail.com; cgraiyani@yahoo.com; champakdalal@yahoo.com; champanerkar@gmail.com; chandrashekharp@hotmail.com; chauhanyashvantsinh@yahoo.co.in; cheryl d'souza; Chetan S.Batavia; chetankothari53@yahoo.com; chiefminister@maharashtra.gov.in; Chitrangada; chitrangada.choudhury@hindustantimes.com; choufer@rediffmail.com; chpatelck@gmail.com; CHRI; citispace; Clara Lewis; Colin Gonsalves; colrama@hotmail.com; Common Cause; Communist Party Of India; contact@janhitmanch.org; coregroup@ppi.net.in; cse@cseindia.org; cvcmumbai@gmail.com; D. R. Poddar; Mr.Damji V.Savla; Dankesh Oza; debigoenka@gmail.com; Deborah Grey; deepa_tkadam@yahoo.com; Deepak Doshi; deepakmehta@gmail.com; Delhi Forum; "desai geeta"; Dhananjay Sompura; dhananjay tingal; Dhanya Indian Express; Dhiren Bhuta; dhruvraja@hotmail.com; Dr.Dilip Galal; Dilip J Mehendale; Dinesh D.Shah; Dinesh S.Shah; Dinesh Thite; dipalimshah@gmail.com; Dipti Deshmukh; divan@vsnl.com; Divyakant Mehta; "DNA"; "DNA speakup"; Dolphy D'Souza; dostitrust@yahoo.co.in; drjaypandya@hotmail.com; dte@cseindia.org; editorial@mm.co.in; editors@indiatogether.org; elan.consultants@gmail.com; dr Eshaan ambernath; etvnews@hathway.com; fahim bhiwandi; faiyaz pune; Dr.Fatema I.Jetpurwala; fightingterror@hindustantimes.com; Flavia Agnes; Forum for Fast Justice; Forum for Free Enterprise; frcf_b22@hotmail.com; G P shaikh Ahmed nrg; G. M. Jain; G.R.Vora; gandhim@sansad.nic.in; gandhipeacefoundation18@yahoo.co.in; GandhiServe Foundation; gaurjk@hotmail.com; Mr.Gautam; Gene Campaign; Gerson; Gerson Dacunha; Ghar Bachao Ghar Banao Andolan; Dr.Girish Sanghavi; Gopal R.Hegde; Gopalkrishnan iyer; Gordon D'Souza; gpf18@rediffmail.com; gr8sammy4u@gmail.com; guna raj; GURUNATH AV; gvtdwarka@yahoo.com; H.S.D'LIMA; Hansel Dsouza; hansrajb@sansad.nic.in; Harakhchand V.Gala; hari agrawal; Haria Exports Ltd.-Kavita; Harsukh Mehta; Hasmukh M.Shah; Mr.Hasmukh Parsana; Hema Sampat RTI; Hemang Tannaa; "hemant morparia"; Her Excellency President of India Smt. Pratibha Devisingh Patil; himanshu joshi; "Hindustan Times"; "Hindustan Times"; Hiren Shantilal Batavia; Hiten Anandpara; Hon'ble Prime Miister of India Dr. Man Mohan Singh; Hon'ble Chief Justice of India Mr K G Balakrishanan; hrvakhariy; "HT Sayli Udas Mankikar"; Hussain Akola; hvgandhi84@gmail.com; Ibrahim Akola; IC Dwivedi; ideamumbai@yahoo.com; "India Today"; "Indian Express"; Indra Sawhney; indraneel@dspdesign.co.in; Indur Chhugani; info@cmsindia.org; info@mkgandhi.org; J.M.Mehta; Jagdeep DESAI; Jagdeep S.Chhokar; jaiex2001@yahoo.com; Jain Jayant; jainravikiran@yahoo.co.in; Jairaj Phatak Commr MCGM; James John; Janak D.Dwarkadas; Janhit Manch; janhitmanch@vsnl.net; jaswant@sansad.nic.in; jaygraphics_pln@yahoo.co.in; jitenmody2005@hotmail.com; jitu11in@yahoo.com; joshi.krishna@indiatimes.com; jp@loksattaparty.com; Judicial Reforms .; Jugal S. Rathi; jui_gangan@yahoo.com; justicekn@gmail.com; kailashrr@rediffmail.com; Kajal Iyer; Kamal Jaswal; kamsri2005@yahoo.com; Kanubhai suchak; kanubhai@hotmail.com; kanunayak@gmail.com; karmayog@yahoogroups.com; Kaushik Suchak; kbthakker2007@yahoo.co.in; kcsekhar@ias.nic.in; kdsarkari@yahoo.com; kedar diwan; kerpl@vsnl.net; ketaki@kgoswami.com; Ketan H.Mehta; Khinvasarachavan; kidsedutainment@hotmail.com; Kirit J. Shah; kishoreshahdadpuri@yahoo.com; Kotimbere sholapur; Dr.Kranti Kumar Sharma
Subject: Fwd: chidambaram
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Prashant Bhushan <prashantbhush@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:28 PM
Subject: Fwd: chidambaram
To:
Dears All,
read this outstanding article by Arun Agarwal on why chidambaram fears the Lokpal and put it on as many websites and magazines as you can. Disseminate it as widely as you can.
Warmly,
Prashant
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: arun agrawal <angrywal@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:41 AM
Subject: chidambaram
To: Prashant Bhushan <prashantbhush@gmail.com>, Shanti Bhushan <shantibhush@gmail.com>, arvind kejariwal <parivartanindia@gmail.com>, Parivartan <parivartan_india@rediffmail.com>
Please go through the attached file on Chidambaram.
BR
Arun
--
use ubuntu.com instead of microsoft windows and remain FREE from viruses and trojans
www.openoffice.org
http://www.janhitmanch.org/judicialdelayssolutions.pdf Reforms for the Indian justice system
Re: [HumJanenge] Where India heading?
|
Re: [HumJanenge] An Open Letter for the Flag Bearers of Anti-Corruption Movement
From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, 10 June 2011 6:03 PM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] An Open Letter for the Flag Bearers of Anti-Corruption Movement
As you know the original texts of our ancient scriptures are not available to anyone. Nor are there any authentic or universally acceptable copies. I am relying upon the versions used by Rammohun Roy (and later with modifications by Ramakrishna Paramhans, Swami Vivekananda etc) - these are quite different from the versions generally used by persons outside Bengal so I do not want to be in any controversy on this score.
You may refer to your own versions and extract what I have said.
Sarbajit
Dear Sarbajit Roy,Thanks for quoting in name of Bhagvad Gita and upanishads. Please give cross ref vis-a-vis your ref & quotations in holy scriptures.Regards,Mukund parikh
Friday, June 10, 2011
Re: [HumJanenge] An Open Letter for the Flag Bearers of Anti-Corruption Movement
LOL Sarbajit, you sound better than a highly trained PIO who wishes to deny information without quoting Section 8 ;-) @Mukund, please re-read the Mahabharata, especially the concluding chapters where serpent king Takshak bribes the Kashyap brahmin on his way to save Parakshit with his knowledge of Sanjeevani. Manoj --- On Fri, 6/10/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
|
Re: [HumJanenge] Overwhelming response against Lokpal Bill clauses
http://persmin.nic.in/Lokpal_Index.asp
<smile>
Re: 2nd Freedom Struggle Re: [HumJanenge] WE all have failed the nation
Devendra Tripathi
Cell: +1(408)416-1848
From: Mukund Apte <mdapte@gmail.com>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Cc: Devendra Tripathi <tripathidk@yahoo.com>; HG PANDYA <hgpandya@gmail.com>; Parvez Jamasji <parvez1942@yahoo.com>; Col (Retd) Satish C Dewan <coldewan@gmail.com>; Prof 'Padma Bhushan' N S Ramaswamy <nsramaswamy@hotmail.com>; Prof R K Gupta India <cityju@rediffmail.com>
Sent: Fri, June 10, 2011 5:30:02 AM
Subject: Re: 2nd Freedom Struggle Re: [HumJanenge] WE all have failed the nation
Dear Sir,
Do you really feel Democracy that we are practicing is good and effective to make all Bhaarateey people happy & comfortable with it? Please note that this system is really 'foreign' to us and was imposed by British and then continued by our Government even after 1947. Since ancient times this Democracy was never in vogue in Bhaarat and Bhaarat was known to outsiders as 'Suvarnbhoomee' and even foreign travellers have written that there was no beggar anywhere therein. There was no Democracy there then.
Since last 60 years Bhaarat is using Democracy and Janataa is electing its representatives to rule over self. The people or voters rarely if at all elected parties but the persons whom they feel were their true leaders. In Democracy such people have no place and to do anything they have to join a political party. If that becomes ruling, then these 'leaders' have to obey the party diktats on everything and vote for those resolutions agreed by the party. Once become ruling, that party does not give any value or importance to the election manifesto that they might have declared for getting votes. They carry out their activities and resolutions as per their predetermined agenda. They do not accept any interference of Janataa in its functioning, nor they give any value or importance to the opposition parties in the Parliament. In spite of these 'obstacles' they carry out their programmes. During all the period between elections, they are busy in collecting money for themselves and their party and also trying to keep their vote banks happy, so that they can get elected in next election also.They have no time to worry for the Nation or the people therein. Just imagine with 45 lakh crore rupees GDP of Bhaarat, there are around 60% of its population does not have adequate food to eat for survival. Of all people farmers are committing suicides. It is surely not expected from a responsible Government? But this is Democracy.
Government is merrily following Western culture abandoning our own. Do not think that the Democracy being followed by West in something superior odr different. Are you aware that just 5 years before the Democratic Party of USA had established Environmental Pollution Control Commission to ensure Industry mantains the Enviromment pollution free. They made some rules for indudtry to follow for this. Just last year the Republicans (who have majority in Senate now) warned the EPC Commissionesr not to make Industry expend more with environmental pollution aspect. Since they say that there is no proof that the pollytion is because of industrial activities. So USA also is nor concerned with Earth (leave aside USA). Whatever one party (when was in majority) had done, the other just dismantles the same when their chance comes. Is it the way the States are functioning?
Just see any country having Democracy. You will find there are minimum two divisions among people and are continupously fighting for power (for themselves), isn't it? How can Democracy really give any comfort or happiness to people or any prestige to the country? In Democracy the Government always becones arrogant and cannot consider all people as their own. That is the problem.
Actually, as Dr Ferguson, a historian in Harvard Institutes states in his book "Civilization: The West and The Rest" that the West has patented six applications (of Statecraft) since last 600 years and have offered them to the Rest. The Rest have started accepting them since last 100 years starting with Japan. USA as we see currently is in its downhill journey and none can expect it to come up in near future. Japan has also (apparently due to Natural disasters) going the same way. Please note that the author gives the applications an adjective 'killer'. One of them is 'Competition'. Don't you think Democracy is only Political image of Competition?
Democracy is a systen of Government unsuitable to any country in the world. Since others have not seen any except Dictatorship & Democracy, they do consider Democracy better. But Bhaarat has known others from ancient times functioning very well. It is its responsibility to practice some effective one from our earlier times and guide others to it, It is our responsibility also as Jagadguru. Shaantiparv in Mahaabhaarat gives in detail as to what are the duties of Government and how they are to be conducted.
With regards to all,
------Mukund Apte
Whereas I also share the frustration at the present government, after huge scandals and what happened at Ramlila Maidan, we must not make it a simple party issue. Janata party of late 70s did not do any better (thank God, they were out quickly). Likewise Pt Jawahar Lal did do good by focussing on education. Rajiv Gandhi did do good by focussing on technology (rather than getting bogged down by we-need-drinking-water-and-not-computer syndrom), PV Narsimha Rao did have foresight to open the economy (rather than getting bogged down by multinationals-will-slave-us-again syndrom).Today India is largest democracy in world. Please do not understimate this fact.Having said, that, enough of this Govt. Its sins have overflowed and it MUST go at earliest.Regards,
Devendra Tripathi
Cell: +1(408)416-1848
From: HG PANDYA <hgpandya@gmail.com>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wed, June 8, 2011 10:02:23 PM
Subject: Re: 2nd Freedom Struggle Re: [HumJanenge] WE all have failed the nation
Hi Mr. Parvez, I do agree with u and our stratagy is silent and not attacking enimy. our politicians are also like that. They don't commit for any thing for the country. And now our own nonsense people, hungry for money, corrupt by birth, currency eating paste are downsizing the country. Our learned PM uttering nothing...and silent, inactive......helpless we are.
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Parvez Jamasji <parvez1942@yahoo.com> wrote:
--
With regards to all,
------Mukund Apte>>
Re: [HumJanenge] An Open Letter for the Flag Bearers of Anti-Corruption Movement
In that sense, it is good that we have people like Mr Sahil Afroz who go "beyond headlines" and ue their enemy's own weapon (s) against them.
Sarbajit
Mr Sarbajit,Is this some kind of Sec 4 disclosure from you ?It seems you are being seriously affected by the Sec 4 Task Force !RTIwantedSent: Friday, June 10, 2011 10:20 AM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] An Open Letter for the Flag Bearers of Anti-Corruption Movement
1) We should accept that corruption is a reality which cannot be eradicated.
2) We should strive to be pure, devout and honest ourselves.
3) We should question everyone and everything.
4) We should strive to be so perfect that every lower Truthseeker must learn from us. Similarly we should l;earn from more advanced/evolved Truthseekers.
What I am saying above is not my own views, but from the Bhagvad Gita and the Oopanishads,
Sarbajit
Re: [HumJanenge] THOMAS WAS APPOINTED AS CVC DESPITE KNOWLEDGE OF VIGILANCE CASE
Dear Mr Apte,
There are two issues - Letter & Spirit.
Action may be correct in letter BUT NOT IN SPIRIT since CVC is a watchdog on corruption & the gentleman considered was already under investigation and
therefore bad in spirit & consequently bad in law due " mens rea "
As per conditions or empaneling contenders , being under inquiry he was ineligible & thus appointment of o ineligible person must be illegal.
False propaganda against Baba Amte needs to be dispelled. He is NOT usurping legislative powers of parliament but only trying to bring to their notice the desire
of the nation for an effective, purposeful mechanism with integrity to control corruption by state machinery.
Other citizen groups have not been debarred. They should also join in to lend weight in right spirits - need NOT agree to all points.
Citizen
On 6/21/2011 5:15 AM, Mukund Apte wrote:
Dear Sir,
The appointment of Shri Thomas as CVC was done as laid down in our Constitution by the Government as per norms of Democracy with majority vote 2:1 in the selection Committee. Our Constitution lays down that a committee of 3 with a rep of Opposition should select one nominee from the panel presented by the Government to the Committee for the post. One member from opposition (in the Committee) opposed Shri Thomas. The Committee however with 2:1 did select Shri Thomas. Was not it done by Democracy? Yes it was. But it was proved to be embarrassing for the Nation.
The problem is with Democracy. Once Committee is formed it is quite natural that the members from Government will be in majority (in the Committee). By observing majority principle of Democracy at any time Government can select any person (from the panel) that it wants. Actually what Constitution intends is that that person from the panel will be selected who has Least objection from all members of the Committee. That means the selection must be by unanimity in the Committee. Government surely may find this 'inconvenient'. And hence Democratic principle is found very useful for the Government. This is the condition in all such selections.
Such Committee selections therefore must be by Unanimity to avoid such embarrassment to the Nation.
With regards to all,
-----Mukund Apte
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Dwarakanath <dwarakanathdm@gmail.com> wrote:
Friends, this blaming game or pleading ignorance or innocence is a clear case of either favouritism or irresponsibilit. All concerned in this decision making, beingg people in a position to get whatever information they wanted, before making a decision are found to be wanting in their assigned responsibilities. If it were officials from any Ministries, ACTION UNDER their service rules must be initiated and whatever punishment or holding back increment or entry in service record MUST BE MADE. If it was a MP who was found wanting to apply their full mind, they have the prerogative and power to take up the case that the vital information was not provided to them before making a decision and hence a breach of privilege and must initiate action thereon on the person responsible. We cannot keep mum in this country unless we are a silent partners in the corruption and nepotism happening all around us. If people in position and responsibility were to come clean they must take up their issue seriously, without resorting back to party politics compromising national interest. The people have voted to them, as a delegation of their power and it is not that the elected people had the power suo moto. If they cannot respond to the demands of the citizens under the guise of a certain volume of demand is needed for a certain initiation of decision, let them go for national referndum wherever it is needed.
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:18 PM, M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
PJ Thomas was not cleared to serve on central deputation'
Economic Times, 13.6.2011.
NEW DELHI: After denying any communique from the Kerala government on the pending vigilance case against former CVC P J Thomas , the Centre has now made public a letter from the state which says he was not cleared to serve on central deputation.
The Central Public Information Officer of the Department of Personnel and Training in an RTI response had earlier said no such letter was with them. But during the first appeal, Deputy Secretary R K Mittal overturned the previous reply.
"After going through the relevant papers and official records, it appears that the CPIO was not able to link up the letter with the file concerned. Accordingly, CPIO is directed to refer to file...and provide the relevant information," Mittal said in his order.
After the decision, the letter dated March 11, 2008 from the chief secretary of Kerala objecting to Thomas' deputation to the Centre was provided to activist S C Agrawal.
The communique has punctured the claims of DoPT that it was unaware about the ongoing vigilance case against Thomas while short-listing his name for the post of anti-corruption watchdog Central Vigilance Commissioner.
"P J Thomas, IAS, Chief Secretary to Government (Kerala), had applied for Central Deputation in 1988, but was not selected for appointment. Subsequently after 1992, he had expressed his willingness for central deputation, but was not considered because of ongoing vigilance enquiry/case. Because of this he was not considered so far.
"The case has not been finalised yet. I may inform tha Thomas could not work at the Centre as he was not recommended for the same by the state government ," the letter from the chief secretary said.
60-year-old Thomas, a 1973-batch IAS officer of the Kerala cadre, was appointed chief secretary of the state in 2007 before moving to the Centre in 2009 as secretary, parliamentary affairs, telecom secretary and finally central vigilance commissioner.
The government had appointed Thomas as CVC despite dissension by Leader of Opposition Sushma Swaraj, who was one of the three-members in the selection committee comprising Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Home Minister P Chidambaram.
The apex court had later quashed the appointment of Thomas as CVC holding that the recommendation made by the panel, headed by the Prime Minister, did not consider the relevant material and, therefore, its advice "does not exist in law".
The court had scrapped his appointment as CVC on a PIL by Center for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL) and retired bureaucrats and police officials, including former Chief Election Commissioner J M Lyngdoh , challenging his appointment in view of a criminal case pending against him.
Later, the prime minister had said he was unaware of the pending case against Thomas and virtually blamed Chavan, who was MoS (Personnel) at that time, for the fiasco, contending that the key information was not provided.
Reacting to it, Chavan said vigilance clearance was the responsibility of the state government. He had also said the central deputation of Thomas was on the basis of documents provided by the Kerala government.
This argument was termed "baseless" by the then Chief Minister of Kerala V S Achuthanandan who said the Centre was duly informed about pending vigilance case against Thomas in 2008.
-- AK Acharjee Mgr -Circulation email dte@cseindia.org website www.downtoearth.org.in