Re: Reply: [rti4empowerment] Re: Poll results for rti4empowerment

Lets not fight within. Lets fight the errand IAS .COM and their chosen loyal political masters namely Gandhi gharana , Manuwadi Manhoos gharana , Thakre gharana and such rascals who are real roadblocks in our path to accountability in all govt , private activities that influence our lives. Haridas, 1955 --- On Tue, 14/12/10, DSouza Wilberious Evanglist <wilevades@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: From: DSouza Wilberious Evanglist <wilevades@yahoo.co.uk> Subject: Re: Reply: [rti4empowerment] Re: Poll results for rti4empowerment To: rti4empowerment@googlegroups.com, "sarbajit roy" <sroy.mb@gmail.com>, "sroy1947" <sroy1947@gmail.com>, usukulsingh@hotmail.com, dr.jagnarainsharma@gmail.com, bimal.khemani@gmail.com, majorravi@gmail.com, "M.K. Gupta" <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in>, "Mahendra Kumar Gupta" <mkgupta1952@gmail.com>, "leslie almeida" <leslie_almeida@rediffmail.com> Date: Tuesday, 14 December, 2010, 4:40 AM Dear Sarabjit Roy,   Please re-read.  With the erudition you claim to have, you know  why I did so & I have conviction in what I did.   I have been doing so ever since I began using RTI Act 2005 for my survival since 2006 where I seek certain classified information & I am certain who possesses the information I seek.   Even PM Manmohan Singh has replied, albeit via PIO of PMO on former CJI KGB's letter to PM to include Judges in section 8 of RTI Act 2005. I have obtained copies of KGB's letter to PM, PM's letter to LM Veerappa Moily but only Veerappa Moily denied information on course of action on PM's letter to him.   In another case of under valuation of land I addressed similar applications to CMN CBDT, CVC, PM & FM Pranab Mukherji. Only the last one did not reply. I have been able to set the process in motion.   Is sroy1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com> also your e-mail ID? If that is the case & if my assupmtion is correct you must have been born in the year 1947.   Regards, WEDS From: sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> To: INDIA RTI for empowerment <rti4empowerment@googlegroups.com> Sent: Mon, 13 December, 2010 22:33:59 Subject: Re: Reply: [rti4empowerment] Re: Poll results for rti4empowerment Dear Mr WEDS 1) On what basis did you apply directly in RTI to Mr Veerappa Moily ?. 2) On what basis did you file a FA to PM ? It is people like you who don't even possess a copy of RTI Act (5.4/5.5) or have the brains to understand it to apply it who are screwing up the scene for genuine citizen applicants. Contaminants like you should be removed from responsible RTI groups as soon as possible. List owner kindly take action under RUP. Sarbajit DSouza Wilberious Evanglist wrote: > Dear Dr Sharma, > > About the dilution of RTI, you will soon come to know. > > If you have specific information do let me know. If it was about former CJI KG > Balakrishnan's recommendations to include judges in section 8 of RTI, I obtained > copies of those letters & wrote to PM that KGB' s decision is repugnant to the > Constitution of india & Judges cannot be preferentially treated as they are > Public Servants. Independence of Judiciary  does not connote immunity to judges. > It only connotes that the process of adjudication does not become influenced. > > However, my RTI application addressed to Veerappa Moily (Section 5(4&5)) did not > elicit any reply. Appealed PM as FAA - no disposal. PM did not reply in another > issue- appealed to Prez- no reply. > > I did not have time to pursue further as approach to Central Information > Commission or any other Information Commission is futile. > > Regards, > WEDS