Re: [HumJanenge] RTI Unification advisory

DEAR SARABJIT & RAVI
No need to argue on Judicial Reform here in ourselves as
above discussed and let us join on the seminar being held at Mumbai on
22 & 23 Jan.
From the mail of Sarabjit, I understand that he may not like
to join the seminar on Judicial reform at Mumbai.
O.K. never mind those who are interested, may join it.
I propose to join it on 22-1-11 and 23-1-11.
You may be aware that politicians are getting relief from
SC, that is why Moily sahab wants amendment in RTI Act and soon may
bring a Bill, in which he wants that Judges would be taken out of the
ambit of RTI.
Serious part of the bill is that those who will use/misuse
the assets details of HC SC Judges will be sent behind jail for three
years.
It is necessary that we should share our views in the
seminar on Judicial Reform.
Regards
Dr JN Sharma
ADVOCATE / RTI / HUMANRIGHTS ACTIVIST

On 12/12/10, Ravindran P M <pmravindran@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Sarabjit
>
> You are very much right and I share you apprehensions and views. But our war
> on injustice shall continue whether on rti front, judicial reforms front or
> any other front. Incidently there is a convention on judicial reforms at
> Mumbai on 22/23 jan.
>
> regards n bw
>
> ravi
>
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear Ravindran
>>
>> These groups (googlegroups) have a different philosophy from the other RTI
>> groups you are used to, and as will be apparent over time.
>>
>> The DoPT has released the draft rules at this time because they know that
>> RTI camp is divided and that appointment oif next CIC/ICs is very close.
>> They have already made their deals about appointment of next ICs/CIC with
>> the RTI haramis.
>>
>> Whatever you are reading in the media and other groups about the draft RTI
>> rules is all fake and manipulated by RTI haramis. It is the old magicians
>> trick to distract the audience by waving a red handkerchief in left hand
>> and
>> doing harimapan (buggery) with your right hand with your planted people in
>> the audience organising the clapping. It is all prearranged who will take
>> credit for getting what is in any case legally untenable rules deleted and
>> who will be appointed as an IC for his treachery.
>>
>> RTI Unity project is not fooled by this. We shall kick them in the balls
>> as
>> many times as required.
>>
>> Sarbajit
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Ravindran P M
>> <pmravindran@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Whats this?
>>>
>>> Why no discussion on draft RTI rules?
>>>
>>> And what is this issue abt digvijay? Unless it is rti related this can
>>> certainly be barred.
>>>
>>> ravi
>>> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 12:25 AM, RTI UNITY <rti.unity@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> [*DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE*]
>>>>
>>>> ADVISORY 2010/12/002
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To all members / moderators
>>>> 1. [rti_india]
>>>> 2. [humjanenge]
>>>> 3. [rti4empowerment]
>>>>
>>>> Circulating emails over the afore mentioned RTI google mailing lists on
>>>> the following *topical* subjects shall result in instant revocation of
>>>> group membership.
>>>>
>>>> a. DoPT's draft RTI Rules
>>>> b. Digvijay Singh
>>>>
>>>> This advisory is issued on behalf of, and in the interest of, all group
>>>> members / cityzens as a short term measure to limit volume of group
>>>> message
>>>> posts.
>>>>
>>>> *RU project coordinator*
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>