Re: [HumJanenge] UNITY and Unification in RTI movement

Dear Rajeswar I requested to share the list with me. If it is true that why you do not want to share it Bimal Khemani RTI activist ALIGARH-202001 INDIA Mob:935-972-4625 --- On Sun, 12/12/10, Ravindran P M <pmravindran@gmail.com> wrote: From: Ravindran P M <pmravindran@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] UNITY and Unification in RTI movement To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com Date: Sunday, 12 December, 2010, 10:06 PM Many on this or other forums have sought this info. Please post it to these groups or to me on my personal id.   regards n bw   ravi On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:48 PM, young cyber indians <cyberyouth@tightmail.com> wrote: Dear Friends Many of National RTI Forum working committee members are on list of suspected maoist / terrorist affiliated RTI activists whose phone and internet were tapped which was obtained by AID under RTI. If any member wants the list of such persons they can send me email. K Rajeshwar Rao. On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Mr. Varkey > > Your answer is quite evidently contained within your question. So who > am I to disagree with the view of any Hon'ble Court? > > On a larger note, there are many unanswered questions about the bonafides > of these 2 Thakurs and the self-serving NGOs they have set up. for instance > the so-called nationl RTI forum is set up as a trust with only themselves as > Trustees. The office-bearers are packed with persons belonging to certain > communities etc etc.. There are many unanswered questions about > Dr Nutan Thakur circulated on other RTI groups which she had failed to > answer comprehensively. > > Sarbajit > > On 12/9/10, Baby Varkey <babyjohn.varkey@gmail.com> wrote: >> Dear Mr Sarbajit Roy >> >> On another RTI group an IPS officer (Amitav Thakur) and his wife from >> National RTI forum have  written that Lucknow High Court has dismissed their >> writ petition seeking an enquiry into corrupt judges of UP which Hon'ble >> Supreme Court had commented adversely upon. It appears that >> Hon'ble Lucknow bench characterised the petitioner Nutan Thakur as cheap >> publicity seekers. >> >> Your valued comments please >> >> B. Varkey (Adv.) >> > ------------------------------------------------- This message sent via VFEmail.net http://www.vfemail.net $14.95 Lifetime accounts!  15GB disk!  No bandwidth quotas!