Re: [IAC#RG] Sandhiv Pragya Singh Thakur

The law has cited very well - Sadhvi Pragya Singh is a habitual liar when it comes to her bail applications..

High Court
http://indiankanoon.org/doc/641767/

Supreme Court
http://www.swamilawyer.com/2011/09/sadhwi-pragyna-singh-thakur-v-state-of.html


On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:13 AM, raja bunch <bunch_raja@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> We are humans first. Rest what the law cites. My view.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Vidyut Kale <wide.aware@gmail.com>
> To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
> Sent: Tuesday, 12 March 2013 1:21 PM
>
> Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Sandhiv Pragya Singh Thakur
>
> I think there is a fundamental disconnect here.
>
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Anamika R <anamikaiac@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Even if they are facilitators, which law stops them from medical treatment
>
>
> She has a right to medical treatment.
>
> according to their choice and a fast track court on humanitarian grounds?
>
>
> I am not aware if prisoners have a right to choose medical treatment.
> Method, perhaps. Facility or location? I don't think so.
>
> Also, fast track courts are injustice. Why should some cases have special
> consideration? Are others lesser humans?
>
>
> After all, she is a young lady and can't have an endangered existence.
>
>
> She is hardly the only female prisoner in India. This keeps coming up. WHY
> must she have special consideration - particularly needs to be answered if
> we are challenging the course of things in court.
>
>
> Do we speak only of Nirbhaya and not of Sadhvi?
>
>
> Unless you believe Nirbhaya facilitated her own rape, you clearly make no
> distinction between a person who is victim of a horrendous crime - made
> possible by huge lapses in how the state functions and a person who stands
> accused of facilitating an attack on innocents.
>
> Most of the arguments in support of Sadhvi Pragya are ones opposed with
> massive vitriol by her supporters if religions get reversed.
>
> I refuse to turn citizens my country into "allowed targets" of some religion
> or the other. No matter which religion. Whoever thinks Hindu crazies and
> Muslim crazies are not the same thing, simply because they believe their
> favorite religion has a halo is living in delusion. An attack on the state
> is an attack on the state. An attack on citizens is an attack on citizens.
> All bleed red and regardless of religion, it is the defenseless being
> killed. If you cannot recognize that, and facilitators of attacks from one
> religion must get special consideration over facilitators of attacks from
> another religion, you are attacking my country.
>
> This is unworthy for an anti-corruption movement to be spending time over.
>
> Vidyut
>
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>
>
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in