Re: [IAC#RG] Sandhiv Pragya Singh Thakur

But even habitual liars and traitors are given bails.   V.S.Sardesai --- On Tue, 12/3/13, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote: From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Sandhiv Pragya Singh Thakur To: "indiaresists" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net> Date: Tuesday, 12 March, 2013, 12:09 PM The law has cited very well - Sadhvi Pragya Singh is a habitual liar when it comes to her bail applications.. High Court http://indiankanoon.org/doc/641767/ Supreme Court http://www.swamilawyer.com/2011/09/sadhwi-pragyna-singh-thakur-v-state-of.html On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:13 AM, raja bunch <bunch_raja@yahoo.co.in> wrote: > We are humans first. Rest what the law cites. My view. > > ________________________________ > From: Vidyut Kale <wide.aware@gmail.com> > To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net > Sent: Tuesday, 12 March 2013 1:21 PM > > Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Sandhiv Pragya Singh Thakur > > I think there is a fundamental disconnect here. > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Anamika R <anamikaiac@gmail.com> wrote: > > Even if they are facilitators, which law stops them from medical treatment > > > She has a right to medical treatment. > > according to their choice and a fast track court on humanitarian grounds? > > > I am not aware if prisoners have a right to choose medical treatment. > Method, perhaps. Facility or location? I don't think so. > > Also, fast track courts are injustice. Why should some cases have special > consideration? Are others lesser humans? > > > After all, she is a young lady and can't have an endangered existence. > > > She is hardly the only female prisoner in India. This keeps coming up. WHY > must she have special consideration - particularly needs to be answered if > we are challenging the course of things in court. > > > Do we speak only of Nirbhaya and not of Sadhvi? > > > Unless you believe Nirbhaya facilitated her own rape, you clearly make no > distinction between a person who is victim of a horrendous crime - made > possible by huge lapses in how the state functions and a person who stands > accused of facilitating an attack on innocents. > > Most of the arguments in support of Sadhvi Pragya are ones opposed with > massive vitriol by her supporters if religions get reversed. > > I refuse to turn citizens my country into "allowed targets" of some religion > or the other. No matter which religion. Whoever thinks Hindu crazies and > Muslim crazies are not the same thing, simply because they believe their > favorite religion has a halo is living in delusion. An attack on the state > is an attack on the state. An attack on citizens is an attack on citizens. > All bleed red and regardless of religion, it is the defenseless being > killed. If you cannot recognize that, and facilitators of attacks from one > religion must get special consideration over facilitators of attacks from > another religion, you are attacking my country. > > This is unworthy for an anti-corruption movement to be spending time over. > > Vidyut > > Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" > Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" > Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" > Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user > WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in > > > Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" > Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" > Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" > Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user > WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in -----Inline Attachment Follows----- Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in