Re: [IAC#RG] Sandhiv Pragya Singh Thakur

Ours is a strange country.
 Two murderers were allowed to proceed on X-Mas vacation from Indian Prison and now they have been given permission to proceed to exercise their right to vote, and of course never to return. Have we ever heard of any Indian prisoner being sent on parole for Diwali. Id. X-Mas etc? and despite being a highly acclaimed democracy never for  exercising ones voting right!
 
After 26/11 terrorist attack in Mumbay with more than sufficient proofs, our ministers and politicians of repute called it an attack by RSS and MOSAD and released a book to this effect.

After Heathrow Air port terrorist attack, a doctor who had been sharing most things with the dead terrorist, moved to Australia obviously arousing suspicion and was therefor arrested. The mysterious part is that on that fateful day Indian P.M. could not sleep. Though no politician leave alone P.M. ever lost his or her sleep for 100s of innocent Muslim youth and lacs of innocent persons lingering in prisons for many years.

A criminal with terrorist connections was deported from Portugal to India after lots of efforts and at  great cost to the nation, he however enjoys all the comforts at the cost of the state.

An intl terrorist Headley now punished by U.S. disclosed that samjhota Express , Ajmer and Mecca Masjid blasts were planned by them. Not only this He disclosed that they had been working ceaselessly to highlight Hindu terrorism and for this they even tied thread around the wrist of the terrorists. and yet sadhwi Pragnya continues to suffer.
 
Mera Bharat mahan
Harendra Singh
 

---

From: vasant sardesai <vasant_sardesai@yahoo.co.in>
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 8:25 PM
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Sandhiv Pragya Singh Thakur

But even habitual liars and traitors are given bails.   V.S.Sardesai --- On Tue, 12/3/13, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote: From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Sandhiv Pragya Singh Thakur To: "indiaresists" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net> Date: Tuesday, 12 March, 2013, 12:09 PM The law has cited very well - Sadhvi Pragya Singh is a habitual liar when it comes to her bail applications.. High Court http://indiankanoon.org/doc/641767/ Supreme Court http://www.swamilawyer.com/2011/09/sadhwi-pragyna-singh-thakur-v-state-of.html On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:13 AM, raja bunch <bunch_raja@yahoo.co.in> wrote: > We are humans first. Rest what the law cites. My view. > > ________________________________ > From: Vidyut Kale <wide.aware@gmail.com> > To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net > Sent: Tuesday, 12 March 2013 1:21 PM > > Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Sandhiv Pragya Singh Thakur > > I think there is a fundamental disconnect here. > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Anamika R <anamikaiac@gmail.com> wrote: > > Even if they are facilitators, which law stops them from medical treatment > > > She has a right to medical treatment. > > according to their choice and a fast track court on humanitarian grounds? > > > I am not aware if prisoners have a right to choose medical treatment. > Method, perhaps. Facility or location? I don't think so. > > Also, fast track courts are injustice. Why should some cases have special > consideration? Are others lesser humans? > > > After all, she is a young lady and can't have an endangered existence. > > > She is hardly the only female prisoner in India. This keeps coming up. WHY > must she have special consideration - particularly needs to be answered if > we are challenging the course of things in court. > > > Do we speak only of Nirbhaya and not of Sadhvi? > > > Unless you believe Nirbhaya facilitated her own rape, you clearly make no > distinction between a person who is victim of a horrendous crime - made > possible by huge lapses in how the state functions and a person who stands > accused of facilitating an attack on innocents. > > Most of the arguments in support of Sadhvi Pragya are ones opposed with > massive vitriol by her supporters if religions get reversed. > > I refuse to turn citizens my country into "allowed targets" of some religion > or the other. No matter which religion. Whoever thinks Hindu crazies and > Muslim crazies are not the same thing, simply because they believe their > favorite religion has a halo is living in delusion. An attack on the state > is an attack on the state. An attack on citizens is an attack on citizens. > All bleed red and regardless of religion, it is the defenseless being > killed. If you cannot recognize that, and facilitators of attacks from one > religion must get special consideration over facilitators of attacks from > another religion, you are attacking my country. > > This is unworthy for an anti-corruption movement to be spending time over. > > Vidyut > > Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" > Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" > Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" > Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user > WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in > > > Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" > Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" > Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" > Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user > WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in -----Inline Attachment Follows----- Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in