Re: [HumJanenge] UNITY and Unification in RTI movement

Many on this or other forums have sought this info. Please post it to these groups or to me on my personal id.

 

regards n bw

 

ravi

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:48 PM, young cyber indians <cyberyouth@tightmail.com> wrote:

Dear Friends

Many of National RTI Forum working committee members are on list of
suspected maoist / terrorist affiliated RTI activists whose phone and
internet were tapped which was obtained by AID under RTI. If any
member wants the list of such persons they can send me email.

K Rajeshwar Rao.

On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Mr. Varkey
>
> Your answer is quite evidently contained within your question. So who
> am I to disagree with the view of any Hon'ble Court?
>
> On a larger note, there are many unanswered questions about the bonafides
> of these 2 Thakurs and the self-serving NGOs they have set up. for instance
> the so-called nationl RTI forum is set up as a trust with only themselves as
> Trustees. The office-bearers are packed with persons belonging to certain
> communities etc etc.. There are many unanswered questions about
> Dr Nutan Thakur circulated on other RTI groups which she had failed to
> answer comprehensively.
>
> Sarbajit
>
> On 12/9/10, Baby Varkey <babyjohn.varkey@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dear Mr Sarbajit Roy
>>
>> On another RTI group an IPS officer (Amitav Thakur) and his wife from
>> National RTI forum have  written that Lucknow High Court has dismissed their
>> writ petition seeking an enquiry into corrupt judges of UP which Hon'ble
>> Supreme Court had commented adversely upon. It appears that
>> Hon'ble Lucknow bench characterised the petitioner Nutan Thakur as cheap
>> publicity seekers.
>>
>> Your valued comments please
>>
>> B. Varkey (Adv.)
>>
>

-------------------------------------------------
This message sent via VFEmail.net
http://www.vfemail.net
$14.95 Lifetime accounts!  15GB disk!  No bandwidth quotas!