Re: [IAC#RG] IAC brings CBI back under RTI (for now)

I agree with you. One wastes two years without getting any reply from CIC on the non compliance of its order.

Dr N C Jain

9-3-13

From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Sent: Friday, March 8, 2013 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] IAC brings CBI back under RTI (for now)

Dear Manoj,I expect that PIO will discover exemptions in the RTI Act to deny information, as he was being coached / tutored by CIC(SM) during the course of the hearing. I expect 8(1)(h) "impede the process of investigation or apprehension or prosecution of offenders;" to be used now. We all know the rackets which are going on in the CIC. This is an old one - waste 1 year waiting for 2nd Appeal, send it back to PIO/FAA, get bakwaas or no info and waste 1 year more and so on. I  have just discovered a magic bullet against this today, and am waiting for another of Dr. Sandeep's Gupta's decisions (heard today) to come out.Sarbajit

On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Manoj Pai <manojpai@yahoo.com> wrote:

How do you expect CBI counter "it is still bound to disclose information pertaining to allegations of corruption and human rights violation." in High Court? Manoj

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-userWWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in/