Re: [IAC++] What the public reads in Newspapers & hears on TV

Dear Kishore

We are all are saying the same things in different words.

1) IAC does not care especially about the "public".
2) IAC does not care about the media or public perception.
3) IAC (unlike the public) cares about the movement
4) That is also why IAC now hardly cares about Anna Hazare.
or Team Arvind who had done tremendous harm to the movement.

All IAC is doing is offering an umbrella and limited support tools for
local movements to network to fight corruption in their own way. We
are in no hurry and will build slowly but surely.

We will take over the simple things which TeamArvind promised but
could never deliver on. For instance

a) mutual representation in RTI related appeal hearing matter
throughout India.
b) Representation at CIC Delhi for parties who cannot attend
c) Arranging lawyers at Delhi High Court when favourable RTI
orders of CIC get stayed.

A lot of this is already available on affiliated organisations like
rtiindia.org etc.

Sarbajit

On 12/13/12, Kishore Jagtiani <kishorejagtiani@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Sarabjit,
>
> I am talking about the movement & the Aam Aadmi of India.
>
> What the public reads in Newspapers & hears on TV, & the public perception.
>
> The public will not look at what you have stated, BUT will look at his
> perception & the movement.
>
> I personally believe great harm is done to the movement, & I for one am
> terribly disillusioned.
>
> However much we would like this movement to succeed, but now I will only
> watch from the sidelines & switch off from Anna Hazare, as I cannot digest
> this
>
> Kishore Jagtiani.
>
> Concept Creation
>
> "Citizens Centres - Governance at Doorstep".
>