Re: [IAC++] curruption aginst FIR

Dear Anirudh

I can't speak for Shivendra, as I don't track what he says/does.

Today we have a system of laws which have evolved to regulate the criminal justice delivery system.

I am the first to acknowledge that the criminal justice delivery system is not working either a) smoothly or b) fast or c) fairly.

But, in Kasab's case it worked just fine.

So its not the the laws which are bad or that that system is inadequate, its the people involved.

What AK/Anna is talking about/proposing is anarchy, where eventually there are no laws - everything is discretionary and corruption will be multiplied by 10 and the citizens terrorised by 20 times.

IAC now is also the first to talk about genuine legal reform. Starting with the judiciary and not with the laws.

Sarbajit

On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Anirudh <anirudh.n2008@yahoo.com> wrote:

Dear Mr. Sarbajit/ Shivendra Chauhan,

You are all not talking about changes in system, changes in antiquated colonial laws which is suppressive, oppressive and of course non-governance and time consuming nature. In the age of information technology and rat race who will spend lots of time just to get FIR registered.  

Most of the suggestion Sarbajit making is to abide the rotten system of governance. Crime committed within second, while justice delivered after decades. What a democracy is this? Your IAC not talking about justice system make easy access and affordable to common citizen.

People don't bother to support anybody who take practical decision and beneficial to all. We don't bother hundreds of AK, Anna and other rise up and replicate IAC movement. But our fundamental right should be protected, our service delivery should be improved, price rise and other day to day issues should be properly addressed esp. local issues  where we are more connected with.