Dear Friends
There is certainly a deep sense of frustration amongst the informed
citizenry of this country.
There is also a deep desire on the part of concerned citizens to
contribute their mite to improving the state of governance in the
country.
HOWEVER
Ignorant and poorly conceived / planned actions on the part of
misguided / egoistic / publicity seeking individuals is doing
tremendous harm to the system / other citizens. It will also be be
found that these so-called PILs are often actually being filed by
benamis on behalf of the culprits.
THEREFORE
I, am prepared to train any highly motivated corruption fighter (who
has not been corrupted by the nonsense NGOs use to stuff peoples
brains with) in simple techniques to get the govt to listen and take
action. If there is even 1 such person in this group, they may email
me OFFLIST
Sarbajit
On 3/20/11, vishweshwar raste <
vmraste@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> this pil needs to be in the supreme court - all gov s - central, state and
> local r miserably failing on their legal duty under sec 4 of the rti :|.
>
>
>
> To:
humjanenge@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] PIL Case on Section-4 of RTI Act
> From:
ranjitmaiti@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 03:52:28 +0000
>
>
> These are glaring example how an Act meant for setting a regime of
> transparency and accountability but due to utter apathy of the state govt
> depts and lukeworm approach by the retired IAS or IPS at the helm of affairs
> having least interest is nullyfying the efforts.
> Unless an officer with proven reputation is posted as SPIO ; appellate
> authority and Information commissioner the situation will not improve.
> At the same time people must be educated to file appeals at proper level and
> activist NGOs should pursue vigorously.
>
> R K Maiti
> Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
>
>
> From: "SHASHI KUMAR.A.R." <
rudreshtechnology@gmail.com>
> Sender:
humjanenge@googlegroups.com> Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 20:03:45 +0530
> To: <
humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
> ReplyTo:
humjanenge@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] PIL Case on Section-4 of RTI Act
>
> Our group has filed seeking information under section 4(1) a and 4(1) b of
> the act , But many of the departments done incomplete 4(1) b of the act ,
> with reference to 4(1) a of the act cataloging and indexing of records ,
> None of the departments are taking any interest even after lapse of 5 years
> , We filed complaint with state information commission , But State
> information commission not interested to implement section 4 of the act ,
> Both Government departments and state information commissioners are working
> together to burry the act , State information commission became pensioners
> paradise , They came to commission to enjoy government car and facilities ,
> Always they are not working neutral , they try to close the case without
> providing information
>
>
> ARS KUMAR. BE. LLB. MA JOURNALISM
> SOCIAL ACTIVIST & JOURNALIST
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Sarbajit Roy <
sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This is a poorly drafted and confused petition. Still it may work - or it
> may not.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Pradip Pradhan <
pradippradhan63@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> Dear friends
> As desired by many RTI Activists of different states, I am sending herewith
> a copy of PIL Case filed in Orissa High Court seeking direction of the
> Hon'ble Court for effective operationalisation of section 4 (1b) of RTI Act
> on 15.11.2010. The case has been filed by Mr. Sanjeeeb Satapathy , RTI
> Activist working in an NGO called Antodaya, Kalahandi district of Orissa.
> The petition has prayed the Court to direct Orissa Information Commission
> to hear complaint cases relating to violation of section 4 by the Public
> Authorities.
>
>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.