1) ICs and CICs have a different standard for measuring intemperate
language / behaviour (as you doubtless recall from your little run in
with Mr Tiwari).
2) Although the SC declined to stay the judgment of Delhi High Court
striking down Management Regulations, the SC has given a very limited
relief to CIC insofar as constitution of benches are concerned
pende-lite.
Sarbajit
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:35 AM, umapathy subramanyam
<umapathi.s.rti@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Roy Sir,
>
> Thanks for your detailed clarification. However, there is no
> point/Clarification on your part to to show that the Shri. Gandhi used
> intemperate language. At the most , it may be an error of law and legal
> technicality which can be challenged in court of law at the will of the
> aggrieved party. so, the basic issue remains that you are making unnecessary
> allegations against shri. Gandhi and your grievance petitions is an attempt
> to gain publicity. Further your allegations of corruption is not attracted ,
> at the most the order of the Mr. Gandhi may be illegal. An illegal order
> based on error of law is not a corrupt order.
>
> However, I notice a contrary/oppostie views in your own post. first in the
> grievance petitions you request the Chief CIC to constitute a bench to
> review the decision of the Gandhi's orders and not to allow him to sit in a
> single Bench. On the other hand, it is clear from the Court Judgment that
> CIC has no power to constitute benches( please see your clarification at no
> 3) . so, why are you asking for the same to Chief CIC ? Is not contrary ?
> you also know that CIC has no power to review its own decisions, yet in your
> grievance petitions you are asking for the review of the orders of Gandhi
> before it is pronounced. so, it does not make any sense . Is it ?
>
> so, you are unnecessarily making the things complicated and confusing your
> self and others over the issue.
>
> Thanks and regards.
>
> umapathi.s
>
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.