I don't have words.
Your contention that Mamcine had diplomaic immunity and therefore can give silemn undertaking without meaning is hard to digest.
Mr AMBASSADOR speaks as a constituted attorney of his country. It has to be honoured by the country he represents. The Italian government'a advocate is equally responsible as the officer of the court in aiding and aberting. He has washed hos hands.
Mr Mancini has lost his immunity as his words are not honoured thus he has been deemed az sacked.
SC HAS EVERY RIGHT TO RESTRAIN HIM.
SONIA IF INVOLVED IN THE CONSPIRACY AS A DUAL CITIZEN IS IN DEEP TROUBLE IN BOTH THE COUNTRIES AND CANT ABDICATE.
US is a spectator. MMS can't. UPA boat is rocking and one more salvo and it will sink for sure.
we are forgetting our proverbs that one is enough than many in bushes
our courts never given freedom to our own peoples but given to other countrymen
that shows that some consipiracy was preplanned before hand
like always big persons as well as big post people help big bosses only but no one helps down trodden, low post persons
JAY HIND JAY BHARATOn Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:Adv S.K.Jain ji
may kindly give his opinion on anonymous commens like this posted on Indian Express website which appear after moderation.
http://www.indianexpress.com/comments/ambassador-breaks-vow-to-supreme-court-on-italian-marines-case-drives-row/1086806/
"DUMB and DUMBER Indian Govt., Supreme Court
By: Hopeless Indian | Tuesday , 12 Mar '13 12:35:33 PM
When was the last time a court in India allowed a murder accused go out of jail freely for voting and celebrating their festivals? Either this was a pre-planned conspiracy by the Indian Govt. and the court (probably under pressure from Sonia Gandhi) or they are sheer dumb. They release murders on the affidavit of someone who has diplomatic immunity. India is indeed a banana republic."On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Mani Ram Sharma <maniramsharma@gmail.com> wrote:
SC has said - Bonafide criticism of any system or institution is aimed at inducing the administrators of that system or institution to look inwards and improve its public image. Courts do not like to assume the posture that their functioning needs no improvement. (M.R. Parashar & ORS... Vs. Dr. Farooq Abdullah & ORS..., 1984 Cr.L.R. (SC) 113 : 1984 SCC (Cri.) 254 : 1984 Cri.App.R. (SC) 259). You are humbly requested to please short out and advise comments amounting to derogatory , far from truth and contempt of court. the internet media has sufficient material now. I would like to advise you that a website named INDIANCORRUPTJUDGES ( http://indiancorruptjudges.com/ ) is being also conducted exposing the judicial scams. Kindly peruse it and advise whether it contains any contemptuous material or any contempt proceedings have been launched & succeeded against it.You may also prefer visiting http://judicialreforms.organd http://judicialreform.in I shall be awaiting your good advice in the matter.
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Adv. S. K. Jain <adv.skjain@yahoo.com> wrote:Dear Sir,
Most humbly I would like to submit that your comments are derogatory and amount to "Contempt Of Court" in strict
sense of the term. So beware while making the comments in future.
Adv. S.K. Jain.
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.