Saturday, March 23, 2013

Re: [IAC#RG] Definition of "Hindu"

Dear Dr Arun

Firstly Agamas are only some sayings passed done in oral tradition. They exist only from the time they were first confirmed independently. Anyone can fabricate an Agama or a Tantra to support his argument. Have you got any ancient document to support that this ancient Brihaspati Agama exists ?

If you ask the Jews and the Christians they will be able to show you some documents like Dead Sea Scrolls, Hinduism has hardly anything permanent to show for her great culture except abandoned temples all over India which foreign tourists like you come to see and photograph.

The most famous discovery of India is the ZERO. Your Chinese friend Mr. S Kumar got a big ZERO when we asked him to prove his statements on Macaulay.  He got another ZERO when we asked him directly if he was a HINDU or not and if so the name of his God. If you morons can't answer such simple questions, run away and play somewhere else.

BTW please send me the email of the great scholar who discovered this theory and reference. AFAIK, Guruji (Golwalkar) passed away in 1970s, and his guruji died even before that.

On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Kumar Arun <kumar2786@hotmail.com> wrote:

Dear fellow Bharatiya,

Please find some explanations on the the very subject "Definition of Hindu" we are discussing.
This is not mine but coming from a great scholar on this subject. If necessary I will pass on his
e-mail address after obtaining his permission. Meanwhile, since you consider yourself a scholar,
please go ahead and look into the scriptures for the reference and return with your answer.

Respectfully,

Dr. Kumar Arun




No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.