[HumJanenge] Why Employer Notice to Arvind Kejriwal NOT in Public Domain?

Dear Sir, Why Employer Notice to Arvind Kejriwal is NOT put in Public Domain? What has he to hide? Regards, --  (Babubhai Vaghela) C 202, Shrinandnagar V, Makarba Road Vejalpur, Ahmedabad - 380051 M -  94276 08632 http://twitter.com/BabubhaiVaghela About me in Annexure at - http://bit.ly/9xsHFj http://www.youtube.com/user/vaghelabd (Administrator - Google Group - Right to Information Act 2005) http://groups.google.com/group/Right-to-Information-Act-2005/about?hl=en --- On Mon, 9/5/11, Rakshpal Abrol <rakshpal.abrol@yahoo.co.in> wrote: From: Rakshpal Abrol <rakshpal.abrol@yahoo.co.in> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Employer Notice to Arvind Kejriwal & NOT I-Tax Notice. To: vaghelabd@yahoo.com Date: Monday, September 5, 2011, 9:21 PM Who is croook? What is the need of puting on Public domain. Find attached our letter to Editor     Warm regards,   Rakshpal Abrol Consumer Activist 9820203154 rakshpal.abrol@yahoo.co.in From: Vaghela B D <vaghelabd@yahoo.com> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com Sent: Sun, 4 September, 2011 3:53:12 PM Subject: [HumJanenge] Employer Notice to Arvind Kejriwal & NOT I-Tax Notice. What Kejriwal said to have received is a Notice from an Employer to Employee. It is not Income Tax Department Notice to Citizen to pay dues. Crook will not put that Notice in Public Domain. On Sat, 03 Sep 2011 22:16 IST Subhash Shanbhag wrote: >http://www.scribd.com/doc/63800112/Arvind-Kejriwal-s-Reply >This explanation is very clear >subhash > > > > >>________________________________ >>From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> >>To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com >>Sent: Saturday, 3 September 2011 5:45 PM >>Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Arvind Kejriwal - IT Notice >> >> >>Dear Col Khera >> >>I am truly shocked by your email. >> >>1)  With all this black money problem in the country, are you condoning that IRS officers should go on leave for extended periods and thereby block their replacements. >> >>2) Arvind Kejriwal is a foreign financed intelligence operative with huge amounts of money at his disposal and gives lakhs of rupees as prizes. Why should we contribute to pay his IT demands ? >> >>3) What exactly has Arvind done for the RTI cause which is so extraordinary ? >> >>PS: Kindly stop using RSS code words on this group - we are apolitical here >> >>Sarbajit >> >> >>On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Mahesh Khera <mkkhera@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>Dear Friends, >>> >>> >>>In another Group, a mail is in circulation that we should contribute to generate money so that Arvind Kejriwal can pay up the money to the IT dept. >>> >>> >>>My view is that let Prashant Bhushan legally fight the case as his entitlements for his two years of leave of absence without pay should be counted towards the pay back in lieu of his resignation after three years of study leave.  >>> >>> >>>In the mean while, if Supreme Court accepts the plea, it is a victory for all those who might be affected by the vague Govt orders. If, however, Supreme Court rejects then lets all contribute as is being suggested by Santosh MS and enable him to pay to the Govt as every law abiding citizen must follow the rules and regulations.  >>> >>> >>>Arvind Kejriwal has contributed immensely to RTI and now for a strong Lok Pal. Most of India supports him in his tireless and selfless efforts. The contribution is not to help him monetarily but would only be a rebut to the Govt if indeed the state is victimizing him just because he has been digging his heals against them for anti corruption laws. Such a move has a potential for babus to show spine to the political leaders and not accept any wrong orders. This move alone would have a huge impact on the self reforms in babudom much more than all the Lok Pals.By this, I do not mean that Jan Lok Pal would not be necessary.  >>> >>> >>>This is a food for thought. >>> >>> >>>Jai Hind and Vande Matram. >>>  >>>With warm regards, >>> >>>Col Mahesh Khera >>> >>> >> >> >>