Re: [HumJanenge] 2nd appeal - decision

First of all, the SA Order is not reasoned(i.e. it  does not specify which info. should be provided) and does not impose a penalty for delay after giving the PIO a hearing. But to enforce such provisions u ve to file writ petition. That's a problem for most.

---

From: Madhukar Mazire <madhukar_m@hotmail.com>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2011 1:22 PM
Subject: [HumJanenge] 2nd appeal - decision

Hello Group,
 
I had filed a RTI application to pune municipal corporation about the " varios donation paid to organisations by PMC in last 3 yrs)
in which i didnt received any info in 2 months, then it went to 1st appeal, the 1st app officer gave their inputs saying please provide the requestd information to the appellent, nothing happend.
 
then went to 2nd appeal in front of maharashtra information officer, pune bench, in the same day i got the requested information from PMC which was not sufficient, the same thing i put infront of the commissioner,
 
now when i received the order, it says the dept does,t gave the information in time because the person was on election duty, so its took time, it will not happen again, nothing else,,,,
 
so many cases witht the same result, whats the use of RTI then,,,,,,,,,,,,,,no penalty no punishment.............
 
please advice,,,,now 
 

 

---

From: bala1hm@hotmail.com
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [HumJanenge] New Posting
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:09:53 +0530

 

 You guys need a laugh  . . . . . .

..this would be appropriate for India !

Advice from Curtis & Leroy: Limit all US politicians to two terms..  One in office  One in prison ...... Illinois already does this, and it seems to be working for them.

 

---