Dear Friends,
The debate on " who to blame for lack of vigilance" is not understood. We, the ESM know very well that it is not possible to provide surveillance at each and every point of a city, nor is it possible to screen each and every man entering/leaving or roaming in a city/inhabitation. We must learn from Israel and strike deep in to the territory of the country providing shelter to our enemies. And this alone is the answer.
Col MMP Kala.
From: Manoj Kamra <manojkamra@gmail.com>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wed, 7 September, 2011 11:15:16 PM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Blast at Delhi High Court
The debate on " who to blame for lack of vigilance" is not understood. We, the ESM know very well that it is not possible to provide surveillance at each and every point of a city, nor is it possible to screen each and every man entering/leaving or roaming in a city/inhabitation. We must learn from Israel and strike deep in to the territory of the country providing shelter to our enemies. And this alone is the answer.
Col MMP Kala.
From: Manoj Kamra <manojkamra@gmail.com>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wed, 7 September, 2011 11:15:16 PM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Blast at Delhi High Court
Dear Sarbajit Roy ji,
In my humble opinioeen, CCTV recording inside and outside of courts ,hospitals, important public bldgs should be started-----no need of entirely useless/irrelevent sketches of terrorists.
In US, since 1961 , recording of court proceeding is in vogue. In our parliament , every word is transcripted. So it should be right time to initiate movement for installing CCTV outside&inside of courts (if judiciary agrees which is most unlikely).
With regards
manoj k.kamra
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
Instead of filing a knee-jerk PIL, I suggest a "5 year plan" of emailing our "public grievance" to CJ/DHC, making constructive suggestions against Delhi Police <wink>, filing RTIs and then making them all dance in CIC before filing a Writ Petition in SC.
Sarbajit
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Rakesh Agarwal <rakesh@nyayabhoomi.org> wrote:
I fully endorse Sarabjeet's views and submissions. I myself escaped death by
a whisker because I was within a few centimetres of the spot just 4 minutes
before the blast.
On 25th July, I had sent a letter to the chief justice highlighting how the
process of issuing passes is a threat to the security and is meaningless. No
reply was ever received. Perhaps I and Sarabjeet could join in a PIL on this
issue which should be filed tomorrow if not today. Let us ensure that this
gets heard on Friday rather than wait for the next Wednesday.
Rakesh
-----Original Message-----
From: humjanenge@googlegroups.com [mailto:humjanenge@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of sarbajit roy
Sent: 07 September 2011 14:30
To: HumJanenge Forum People's Right to Information, RTI Act 2005
Subject: [HumJanenge] Blast at Delhi High Court
Dear Friends
I was within the Delhi High Court at 10:14 AM when powerful blast
shook the building, resulting in hundreds of people being affected. In
fact I was standing at the very spot where the blast took place at
about 9:45 AM.
The blame for this incident lies squarely at the door of the Chief
Justice of Delhi High Court. I had filed RTIs recently to the Court
highlighting the problems litigants like me faced to enter the court
and make passes strongly emphasising the "threat to life and limb" of
litigants by the encroachment on the pavements by the advocates and
court . Recent security measures introduced by the Registrar/DHC like
insisting on photo-ID and making applicants for gate passes sign in
their presence have increased the queques. Only 3 functioning counters
to issue passes, senior advocates parking their BMWs on the footpath
where the passes are issued. In the SC the pass section is inside the
controlled area and they have about 15 functioning counters. And so
on.
Sarbajit
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.