Dear Sarabjit,
Greetings.
Thanks for your views. your views are intellectually appealing and, therefore, I agree with you on some of the points.
The moot point in public administration in Gujarat is: Except Godhra incidence, Curfew was never required in Gujarat.
Congress lost public favour in Gujarat elections because of its policy of sponsored killings in Gujarat. It has never gained electoral favor in ascending to power till date.
Local politics like Keshubhai Patel factor etc. contributed in reducing vote share of BJP in Gujarat.
In general, Gujarat public administration had a fresh outlook giving fair living to people of all community in the state since 2003. Everyone has prospered. Education, women empowering, rural development, roads/infrastructure, electricity-water is improving noticeably.
Congress adopted minority appeasing KHAM theory during Madhavsinh Solanki rule. [KHAM=Kshatriy, Harijan, pAtel, Muslim] http://www.jagran.com/news/national-kham-theory-of-congress-for-gujarat-9283908.html
Agricultural Tenancy Act was ruthlessly and unfairly enforced in Gujarat. ULC Act was also thrust down on peoplen most corrupt manner. That's why people in Gujarat do not pupularly favour congress.
At the national level, Congress is enslaved by SG. Minus SG, what is left of Congress? Shall we reply on Digvijays? or Congress Leader & Spokesperson, Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi?
What is the alternative for National Politics, apart from state level leaders?
Best Regards,
Joshi NM
On 6 April 2013 17:07, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Naishadh
The problem with data is that it can be interpreted in different ways.This proves that NaMO is either a SOFT leader or that he actively encouraged the massacre of Muslims in 2002.
"Modi Govt. never imposed curfew in his rule. Difference is clear like Day-Nite."
Why did the Gujarat riots go on for 2+ months ? Even the 1984 Sikh riots were over in under a week. In Delhi it was over in 4 days the moment they imposed curfew (despite not having a PM) and calling in the Army
In the 1983 Nellie (Assam) massacres where you did your comparison, it was over in 6 hours, so what could the Congis have done in a remote district in a State which has always been under the paramilitary forces like Assam Rifles and where the Hindu-Muslim ratio is far different from Gujarat being 50:50 or worse.
The fact of the matter is that Modi may be very good at allowing Gujaratis to make money, but when it comes to INDIA he has no track record of performance (where the only like person he scores over on this account is Raul Vinci who is a big ZERO).
Also, I hope you notice that BJP's vote share in Gujarat has been continually slipping since 2002 and Congress is picking up more and more Muslim votes there.
Sarbajit
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Joshi NM <naishadhjoshi@gmail.com> wrote:Maj. Gen. (Retd) Deepak Malhotra has made valuable data available. I thank him for a very useful tabulated data compilation.
Analysis and conclusion is apparent and obvious.Compilation was focused on the ability of state to prevent riots and perform RAJDHARM. Focus was on ruler not on ruled.Sarabjit is way off the mark this time in his comments in reply to Dear Maj. Gen. (Retd) Deepak Malhotra.About Gujarat riots in congress rule, you may have to keep in mind state actors renting-sponsoring random killings on both sides by contract killers. Public in general would be rioting against state-police; reeling under month-long curfews. Abdul Latif-Rasul Party etc. were the examples during Madhavsinh Solanki - Chiman Patel etc. rule.Modi Govt. never imposed curfew in his rule. Difference is clear like Day-Nite.Best regards,--On 6 April 2013 14:20, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:Dear Maj. Gen. (Retd) Deepak Malhotra,
1) Out if the 21 state level incidents you have listed,4 have
taken place in Gujarat. (ie. about 25%)
2) This is surely very high and arouses concern that Gujaratis
are a homicidal race of people and/or easily instigated.
3) Why are there no riots in the neighbouring state of Rajasthan
which equally shares the same borders including with Pakistan?
4) In each and every riot in Gujarat the aggressors were
overwhelmingly the Hindus and the victims the Muslims.
5) So what happened in Gujarat's riots are clear evidence that
Gujaratis in power/politics are damaging to the national fabric.
Mohandas Gandhi being one such and Narendra Modi another.
The entire Partition riots 5 million persons dead or injured was
caused by 1 Gujarati (Gandhi).
6) Can India allow another Gujarati (NaMo) to control India's
destiny ? Your own facts and figures say NO !!.
SarbajitOn Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Deepak Malhotra <deepakmalho11@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
Forget Gujarat: Look at the Congress RecordLet us set the record straight once and for all. Those Secularists who call Narendra Modi a murderer can judge for themselves from the Table below.
- Nowhere in the world has one party (Indian National Congress) presided over the murder of so many citizens.
- No Congress Minister / Politician has ever been booked. Only promoted.
- Do you want to hand over this Country to them again?
- Please think ?
List of MAJOR Riots / Incidents since 1947(More than 50 dead)
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Best Regards,
-Joshi NM
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Best Regards,
-Joshi NM
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.