Sunday, October 2, 2011

Re: [HumJanenge] Fwd: Third party right under RTI Act upheld

By mentioning "CONFIDENTIAL, AND NOT TO BE DISCLOSED WITHOUT CONSENT"., will you not be playing straight in the hands of the Babus, who actually are interested in keeping their Governmental Jagir as "confidential & Non-transperant"?


On 2 October 2011 22:42, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
In view of the Delhi High Court decision on 3rd rights, I advise all my fellow list members to always clearly mention in BOLD type at the start of any correspondence which is submitted to public authorities "CONFIDENTIAL, AND NOT TO BE DISCLOSED WITHOUT CONSENT".


On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Trap Rti <rtitrap@gmail.com> wrote:
NGO haramis

On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Sidharth Misra <sidharthbbsr@gmail.com> wrote:
Friends,

Here's an important decision of DHC.

Arvind Kejriwal's challenge fails to convince Delhi High Court on
third party rights.

http://goo.gl/84JHg   (Judgment)

http://goo.gl/NA54n   (News Clip)

Sidharth Misra



No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.