Sunday, April 3, 2011

Re: [HumJanenge] karnataka state consumner commission

Dear Shashi,

I thank you for your time to read and respond.

This is not my case. I was trying to help the fellows who were suffering. A Judgement was pronounced against the builder for a customer in one case within 6 months. After the said judgement 4 cases came up referring to the old judgement- but judgment has not come for over 18 months.

Thanks
Abhinav

One more thing that I mentioned that Builder is not turning up to the court.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:16 AM, SHASHI KUMAR.A.R. <rudreshtechnology@gmail.com> wrote:
Mr. Sihma you are an rti expert and you are suggesting to qurery the judiciary , I think you have forgotten in rti act you cant ask any questions , you can take order sheet and other papers but there is no provisions to speed up the case using rti , you can obtain only information , there is will be lot of complaints to be heard by the commission , hence they may adjourn the case , if  both the parties are present in all hearings , the case will be decided on merits ,  I think you dont know there are thousands of cases pending in civil courts more than 20 years , I think mr. Abhinav is not having pateince for his case , The peoples in this forum without knowing the procedures of court shuld not suggest any redmideis and make coments on judiciary , Indian judiciary is best in the world , It is my opinion 
It is duty of the petitioner to see that notice must be served to builder  as per Civil procedure code ,

ARS KUMAR. BE. LLB , MA JOURNALISM 
SOCIAL ACTIVIST & JOURNALIST 

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Vikram Simha <vikramsimha54@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
Make an RTI Request , ask them the order sheets for All adjornments , Query why they are Adjorning Continously , donot they have Process of SEnding RPAD/ Serveing through Process Server ?Paper notification  and Finally Ex=parte , What does the Jurisprudence Speak

N vikramsimha , KRIA Katte , #12 Sumeru Sir M N Krishna Rao Road , Basvangudi < Bangalore 560004.

--- On Sun, 3/4/11, Abhinav <a.h.agarwal@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Abhinav <a.h.agarwal@gmail.com>
Subject: [HumJanenge] karnataka state consumner commission
To: "Humjanenge" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
Date: Sunday, 3 April, 2011, 10:56 PM


Those who are connected to juducial system in India.
For one of the case against the builder in Karnataka State Consumer commission. I got to know that builder is not coming to the court. Still there is no Ex parte decision

Court Hall Proceedings
Posted For Posted on Action Taken Order Passed if any
Admission 14/08/2009 Adjourned
Admission 28/08/2009 notice
Notice 29/10/2009 Adjourned
Notice 27/11/2009 Adjourned
Notice 22/12/2009 Adjourned
Affidavit 27/01/2010 Affidavit filed
Arguments 30/03/2010 Judgement Reserved
Judgements 07/04/2010 Adjourned
Arguments 17/06/2010 Adjourned
Arguments 01/07/2010 Adjourned
Version 15/07/2010 Adjourned
Version 22/07/2010 Adjourned
Affidavit 20/08/2010 Adjourned
Arguments 16/09/2010 Adjourned
Arguments 02/11/2010 Adjourned
Orders 23/11/2010 Adjourned
Orders 06/01/2011 Adjourned
Version 03/02/2011 Adjourned
Version 07/02/2011 Version Filed
Version 17/02/2011 Adjourned
Affidavit 11/03/2011 Adjourned
Affidavit 12/04/2011


--
Any idea why is it taking so long ?
Thanks
Abhinav
 
"
Have a heart that never hardens, a temper that never tires, and a touch that never hurts...
"





--
Thanks
Abhinav
 
"
Have a heart that never hardens, a temper that never tires, and a touch that never hurts...
"

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.