Dear Shri Goyal
This is my second post on the issue.
I work with Prashant Bhushan for judicial reforms and have seen his conduct and functioning from close quarters. Given his busy schedule, aside from the 3-4 cases that he took up for me, I have referred a few other cases to other “commercial” lawyers. He never asked me why and I didn’t feel the need to explain. There is unstated understanding that only important cases that deserve his attention will be taken up by him.
Prashant charges professional fee in cases which he feels are not of wider public interest but in which he can help deliver justice.
Regards
Rakesh
From: humjanenge@googlegroups.com [mailto:humjanenge@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Hari Goyal
Sent: 12 April 2011 12:48
To: Vishal Kudchadkar
Subject: RE: [HumJanenge] Corrupt Rich India versus Poor Real India
Dear Shri Diwan Singh Ji,
Thanks for your message. I am a civil servant retired about more than 16 Years ago from Central Govt. Service. You may be right to say Mr. Prashant Bhushan
does take cases of the poor. But so far my experience goes, I wanted to meet him for giving a case against the Registrar of Cooperative Societies, NCT of Delhi
since RCS has delegated his powers to a builder in the show cases issued by One Mr. Satya Gopal former RCS against five persons who own immovable property
against in posh colonies of South Delhi. Mr. Satya Gopal's successor, in hearings asked for files from the President of the Society (the builder) but he refused to submit
them After finding the truth of wrong aned false affidavits of these five persons, he allowed them to keep the membership and Society flats on the basis of non-speaking
orders. Mentioning according to the President of the Society the complaint about false and wrong affidavits is wrong, so I allow them to keep the Society flats with
them.
This case I wanted to give to Mr. Prashant Bhushan. But he told me on phone that before taking up any case, for giving opinion only, his charges are Rs. Thirty
Three Thousand and feed for drafting, whole case fee and per appearance fee would be separate and does not include Rs. 33,000/- I was told that case fee is about
Rs. 1.50 Lakh. Per appearance is from Rs. 21,000/- to 51,000/-. If he is a changed person and fightinh against corruption, then I can contact him again. This is a case
of rampant corruption in the office of RCS, NCT of Delhi.
Once again thanks for sparing time for reply.
Hari Goyal
Indeian Economic Service (1968 Batch)
former Professor of Economics. LBS National
Academy of Adminstration, Mussoorie
rtidwarka@yahoo.co.in
From: haridgoyal@hotmail.com
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Subject: [HumJanenge] Corrupt Rich India versus Poor Real India
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 07:32:16 -0600
From: haridgoyal@hotmail.com
To: rtitimes@freelists.org; humjanenge@googlegroups.com; rti4empowerment@googlegroups.com; rtidwarka@yahoo.co.in; rti4ngo@googlegroups.com; parivartan_india@rediffmail.com
Subject: RE: [rtitimes] Appeal to Swami Ramdevji
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 07:24:04 -0600
Mr. Milap Choraria,
RTI activists should not indulge in raising appeals. Any whre dynastic decisions particulalry in politics have ruined this country and you are voting for it.
Mr. Prashant Bhushan is billionnaire. He takes the cases of only rich people (corrupt rich India and not of common man - the Real India). Baba Ram Dev
has raised an important question. A person who does not know how much injustice is done to poor people, how can he represent their aspirations? Do you
know his fee for a CASE? On my personal experience, I can say that Baba Ram Dev,s opposition is well justified. Gight against corruption is long perhAPS
a few generations will have to fight. In the beginning itself, Anna Hazare Ji should not have accepted this without having got litmus test like Congress CM
of Delhi refusing to take action against a corrupt minister on the recommendation of Delhi Lok Ayukta who earned powers on the basis of Dellhi Lokayukta Act
of 1998. Rathwer she is challenging his authority. This may happen when Jan Lok Pal Bill chairman makes any recommendation against a minister or bureacrat
and a corrupt P.M. may not take any action. Real India will have to remain a mute spectator.
UPA Govt. in the Centre particularly Congress and DMK wanted to buy time to reduce negative effects of this agitation
AND SIBAL HAS BEEN SUCCESSFUL.
Hari Goyal
rtidwarka@yahoo.co.in
10.04.2011
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 00:00:25 -0700
From: milap_choraria@yahoo.com
Subject: [rtitimes] Appeal to Swami Ramdevji to forward his full support to Committee’s Penal Members from Civil Society including Shri Shanti Bhusanji and Shri Prashant Bhusanji
To: rtitimes@freelists.org
Swami Ramdevji expressed his concerned claiming that appointment of Shri Shanti Bhusanji and Shri Prashant Bhusan is also a dynastic appointment in Drafting Committee for Lokpal Bill. Shri Shanti Bhusanji is just not a former Law Minister, rather he was known fighter against political corruption, since he fought Famous Election Petition in Allahabad High Court on behalf of Shri Raj Narayan against Smt. Indira Gandhi. He is one of the important legal luminaries of India. Shri Prashant Bhusanji, no doubt is son of Shri Shanti Bhusanji, but he himself proved as very competent Supreme Court Lawyer, without taking any advantage of the name and fame of his father. He filed several petitions, concerned to Larger Public Interests and also against corruption related matter. He was dare to face contempt Petition initiated against him in the Supreme Court, because he raised a very important issue, of ethnic values. Both Shri Shanti Bhusanji and Shri Prashant Bhusanji involved in drafting of Jan Lokpal Bill. I think we could not have able to suggest any better name for Co-Chairman than Shanti Bhusanji. If we opposing the name of Shri Prashant Bhusanji, we are trying to damage the efficacy which may contain in the Lokpal Bill, if its drafted by the present Drafting Committee, having with its members including Shri Shanti Bhusanji and Shri Prashant Bhusanji. Therefore, this is my appeal to Swami Ramdevji, kindly withdraw his opposition against appointment of Shri Shanti Bhusanji and Shri Prashant Bhusanji by Shri Anna Hazare, and should forward his full support to Committee’s Penal Members from Civil Society. TRUTH SHALL ALWAYS PREVAIL |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.