[HumJanenge] Re: Corrupt Rich India versus Poor Real India

It is a prime responsibility of an advocate not to ditch his client
halfway through the case. Even if he has to drop the case due to any
(non-monetary) reason he should make alternative arrangements.

Sarbajit does not file RTIs on behalf of anyone. I am not a taxi. In
my (bachelor) days as Secy of an informal public interest litigating
group I have drafted and assisted over 300 PILs in SC in my spare time
- I did not lose even a single one.

What Sarbajit does do, is try and assist members of this group 100%
FREE OF COST within his time constraints. I don't have the luxury of a
father who was a politician and Minister like Mr Bhushan. Neither do I
pretend to be a Robin Hood.

Very occasionally now, I assist a few 100% genuine people during RTI
appeals where there is some public question which can facilitated by
an interpretation of RTI law by CIC.

Sarbajit

On Apr 12, 2:56 pm, Abhimanyu <who.will.file....@gmail.com> wrote:
> let us not defame Prashant Bhushan on case to case basis .
> he may be very busy to take up small cases . he may be avoiding small cases
> to concentrate on big cases.
>
> similary may i ask how many RTI cases sarbajit has taken up and followed
> till second appeal on behalf of some other persons ???
>
> once I requested sarbajit to take up my RTI case from his address , he
> plainly refused.( if he agrees even today i have one RTI matter for sarbajit
> to take up )
>
> so whats wrong if prashant bhushan is not taking up some cases .
>
> >>>http://milapchoraria.tripod.com/msp*