[HumJanenge] Re: Why every "active" member of this group is a moron

Hi Abhijit

My email was not meant for you. Obviously we dont want our
non-"activist" members to respond to chainmail. The recent spate of
chainmail to this group circulated by motivated activists and the
subsequent discussion being a good example.

Sarbajit

On Apr 11, 7:35 am, Abhijit Mehta <abhi...@abhijitmehta.com> wrote:
> Really !!!
> Now respond to chain emails?
> P.S: If i am going to be without by not forwarding the chain email.I must have done something right.
> Regards
>
> Abhijit Mehta
> The Best Is Yet To Come
> God Bless
>
> On 11-Apr-2011, at 7:59 AM, Sarbajit Roy wrote:
>
> > Dear Members
>
> > Precisely 24 hours ago, our very learned member Mr. Utpal Sen sent the email below.
> > As desired by him many member have forwarded the email, we have tracked at least 7 members who forwarded this email from our group's website - and there must be many more who did the same from their email package.
>
> > Personally I feel amazed that our hardcore RTI activists members (the brainiest species on the face of this planet) did not immediately disabuse Mr Sen or call him a lunatic or inform him that he should stop listening to his Chinese brainwashers and use instead our glorious Shastric calendars where the same "phenomena" occurs about once in 7 years - the next phenomena taking place in July 2016.
>
> > Sarbajit
>
> > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 8:10 AM, utpal sen <tap...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Dear All.
>
> > July 2011 Calendar
>
> > Don't want to mess up my feng shui!
>
> > This year, July has 5 Fridays, 5 Saturdays and 5 Sundays. This happens
> > once every 823 years. This is called money bags. So, forward this to
> > your friends and money will arrive within 4 days. Based on Chinese
> > Feng Shui the one who does not forward 20 People..... will be without
> > money. Not taking any chance !!!
>
> > July 2011
>
> > Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
> > 1 2
> > 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
> > 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
> > 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
> > 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
> > 31
>
> > On 4/9/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Dear Mathre
>
> > > From the facts before you, the best you could conclude was that I have
> > > removed AT LEAST ONE MInister.
>
> > > (I have actually got rid of 2). I got rid of both of them in under 2
> > > months.
>
> > > On your point about the 42 year delay in Parliament, ask yourself
> > > simply 1 question.
>
> > > In 1972 A Congress party Law Minister Shanti Bhushan piloted the
> > > Lokpal Bill and failed.
> > > Today 42 years later the same corrupt Congress through their 73 year
> > > old brain dead ventriloquist dummy expects the pubic to believe that
> > > the same Shanti Bhsuihan is the one to draft the Bill.? This is all
> > > stage managed and it is a sad reflection on the brainwashed citizenry
> > > of this country who will swallow any garbage given to them as
> > > tranquilisers to keep them quiet.
>
> > > Sarbajit
>
> > > On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Mathre Rangarajan <ranga...@yahoo.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >> Dear Sarbjit Roy,
>
> > >> I fully agree and command you that you have been able to get rid of ONE
> > >> currupt minister - What about others? It is known every minister including
> > >> Chief Mister is currupt (especially so in Karnataka). We need a law to get
> > >> rid of all currupt with out needing to wage a war in each and every case.
> > >> Unfortunately there is absolutely no deterrent what so ever - the currupt
> > >> boldly say you may go ahead and prosecute (if you can), it takes a decade
> > >> or
> > >> more to punish the guilty that too with a paltry fine of few rupees or a
> > >> small sentence and all the ill gotton wealth is safely with them to enjoy
> > >> pepetually.
>
> > >> Secondly you said that Sri Anna Hazary's movement is illigal and
> > >> unconstitutionnal and he is blackmailing - Parliament is there to make law
> > >> -
> > >> So why is it taking that your Parleament to even consider the law for 42
> > >> years (it is refusing to consider as every parlimentarian is against it),
> > >> and if this movement were not there it would take another 42 years or more
> > >> to consider such a law.
>
> > >> God help India.
>
> > >> mathre rangarajan