[HumJanenge] Re: DEMAND for Information u/s 4(4) of RTI Act 2005

Dear Santji

I have already been conveyed the "first information".
DoPT knows nothing of this :"officially". The entire matter
was handled by the PMO dealing with the Law Min
(Legislative Dept). The gazette of the Resolution is on
the website of Law Min. The Law Min knows nothing of it
either they were simply handed a text to notify.

My procedure is 100% correct. I have to do nothing
additional.

Sarbajit

On Apr 11, 12:12 pm, Sant Mathur <santmat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> By changing the deadline more suitably pl send request by post also, along
> with sufficient monetary consideration(for abundant precaution).
> spm
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Date: Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:23 AM
> > Subject: Re: DEMAND for Information u/s 4(4) of RTI Act 2005
>
> > To:
> > Joint-Secretary / ATA/ DoPT (and public grievance officer) for necessary
> > action
>
> > Sir,
>
> > I refer to the rejection (truncated) email below.
>
> > I am now aggrieved that the duly designated/notified CPIO under you is
> > refusing to accept / rejecting my RTI related email as below. I have
> > obtained (by faithfully copy-pasting) the email ID of the CPIO from the
> > persmin website today.
>
> > Please ensure that I receive the demanded information immediately so as to
> > resolve my grievance as I am concerned that this is a systemic failure and
> > not individual one.
>
> > NB: Apparently cc's of the said bounced email have been received by Dir/RTI
> > and Dir/Admin of DoPT without bouncing back..
>
> > Yours faithfully
>
> > Sarbajit Roy
> > B-59 Defence Colony
> > New Delhi 110024
> > TeL ; 09311448069
>
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-dae...@googlemail.com>
> > Date: Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:09 AM
> > Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
> > To: sroy...@gmail.com
>
> > Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>
> > usa...@nic.in
>
> > Technical details of permanent failure:
> > Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient
> > domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further
> > information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server
> > returned was: 550 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected usa...@nic.in (state 17).
>
> > ----- Original message -----
>
> > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > Received: by 10.204.127.29 with SMTP id e29mr3887919bks.52.1302460741212;
> > Sun,
> > 10 Apr 2011 11:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
> > Received: by 10.204.37.195 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 11:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
> > Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 00:09:01 +0530
> > Message-ID: <BANLkTinpqMsPCRenZeMDFzoti0zwkT1...@mail.gmail.com>
> > Subject: DEMAND for Information u/s 4(4) of RTI Act 2005
> > From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy...@gmail.com>
> > To: usa...@nic.in, dirrti-d...@nic.in, dira...@nic.in
> > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dab507d05afd04a094c583
>
> > To:
> > Shri Amarjit Singh (AVD-4)/DoPT,
> > Central Public Information Officer/RTI Act
>
> > 10-April-2010
>
> > BY EMAIL
>
> > Sir
>
> > I refer to recent media reports concerning the purported setting up of
> > Committee(s) for Central Lok Pal legislation referring *inter-alia* to the
> > unprecedented step of including various members of public / civil society
> > in
> > it. I also refer to questions answered in Lok Sabha during the past 1 year
> > by the Hon'ble MoS/DoPT on the status of Central Lok Pal legislation. In
> > the
> > interest of brevity I am not specifying these reports/questions since these
> > are matters of record.
>
> > Accordingly, I am caused to *DEMAND* the following information be *
> > DISSEMINATED* suitably to me free of cost in the electronic form *
> > IMMEDIATELY* to safeguard my Fundamental Rights listed in the Constitution
> > of India. I am given to understand from the Persmin website today that you
> > are the dealing CPIO for "Central Lok Pal legislation".
>
> > NB: As this is a DEMAND for information dissemination u/s 4(4) r/w
> > sub-sections 4(1)(b), 4(1)(c), 4(1)(d) and 4(3) of RTI Act 2005, I am not
> > required to pay the Rs.10 application fee prescribed for "requests" for
> > information made u/s 6(1) of RTI Act.
>
> > Information required
>
> > 1) Copy of all notifications or orders or circulars or any other official
> > communication constituting committee(s) / council(s) / board(s) by whatever
> > noun or description etc in connection with
> > a) the formulation (incl. drafting) of Central Lok Pal legislation, or
> > b) advising on the formulation of Central Lok Pal legislation,
> > as the case may be.
>
> > 2) All relevant facts concerning the formulation of the Central Lok Pal
> > legislation.
>
> > 3) Provide reasons why I was not appointed / nominated to the said
> > committee(s) / council(s) / boards(s) etc.. I say that I am an affected
> > person for this limited purpose. In the alternative the reasons why a few
> > other members of the public / civil society (if any) were appointed /
> > nominated may be disseminated to me.