On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:46 PM, M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
The exemption is from the disclosure of purpose for asking about the information and not personal name and address which must be given. RTI is only for the Indian citizens. It is wrong to presume that the requester is not required to give his name and contact details.
From: Abhimanyu <who.will.file.rti@gmail.com>
To: rti4empowerment@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wed, 9 March, 2011 10:33:48 PM
Subject: Re: [rti4empowerment] Hope SC givesi judgement to save identity of RTI applicant
sir if i provide u insider information about corruption in bsnl pune can you take up RTI from ur place ?
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:35 PM, false <jitu11in@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hope some day in some case the Supreme court gives this judgement also, that since RTI allows any document that is a public document which should otherwise be publish on respective government website and any citizen that demand information of such document under his right to information, when demanding such information, it should .not be necessary for citizen to reveal his personal identity. Personal identity of applicant may otherwise be used or leaked by those in authority to victimise the applicant, and all such information the applicant should have right to receive even by email without his personal appearance or giving his postal address.rgds,Jitendra Gupta
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.