Reply: [rti4empowerment] Re: [HumJanenge] Re: "Judge Uncle Syndrome" in the High Courts

Dear Ms. Singh,

 

Elders have said & rightly so, CIVILITY & MANNERISM ARE A FRUIT OF GREAT CULTIVATION; ONE DOES NOT FIND IT AMONG GROSS PEOPLE!

 

ON ONE END OUR COUNTRY IS ADDRESSED AS BHARAT MAATAA & ON THE OTHER END  INSULT & AND INSINUATIONS ARE HEAPED ON WOMEN!

 

ONE CANNOT HELP IF ONE IS INCURABLY ADDICTED TO THE PERVERSION OF ROBBING LITERARY GARBAGE CANS ON THEIR WAY TO THE DUMPS!

 

ONE SHOULD REALISE BOTH MEN & WOMEN ARE BORN FROM WOMEN'S WOMB! ORDINARILY HUMAN BODY DOES NOT ACCEPT ANY FOREIGN MATTER BUT, IT IS BAFFLING THAT WOMAN HAS THE CAPABILITY TO NUTURE AN EMBRYO INTO A BOY OR GIRL CHILD FOR 9 MONTHS BEFORE IT IS DELIVERED INTO THIS WORLD!

 

SCIENTIFICALLY IT IS ESTABLISHED WOMEN ARE A STRONGER HUMAN BEINGS THAN MEN DESPITE BRUTE PHYSICAL PROWESS OF MAN. WOMEN GENERALLY HAVE 20% LONGER SPAN OF LIFE THAN MEN; IN CASE OF MORTAL DISEASE WOMEN HAVE BETTER  CHANCE OF SURVIVAL THAN MEN FOR XX CHROMOSOME WHICH CONTRIBUTES TO THE BIRTH OF A GIRL CHILD OF WHICH X CHROMOSOME IS 20 TIMES AS LARGE AS Y CHROMOSOME IN XY COMBINATION RESULTING IN A BOY CHILD.

 

ELDERS HAVE ALSO SAID IF A WOMEN BECOMES EDUCATED ENTIRE FAMILY IS EDUCATED WHEREAS, IF MAN BECOMES EDUCATED AN INDIVIDUAL IS EDUCATED!

 

REGARDLESS OF THE FACT THAT TIME & MINDS NEVER AGREE; LET US LEARN TO RESPECT OTHERS VIEWS, HOWEVER, POIGNANT THEY ARE! FOR, DISSENT IS THE SIGN OF PROGRESS!

 

ONE SHOULD ALWAYS REALISE THAT AT TIMES IT IS ADVISABLE TO FUNCTION ON ONES OWN DICTATES OF INTUITION.  REMEMBER THE PARABLE OF FATHER, SON & DONKEY CROSSING A BRIDGE?

 

 

 WE ARE IN A CIVILISED SOCIETY; ALTHOUGH IMNSTANCES MAY REMIND US OTHERWISE AT TIMES, LET US PROVE IT WRONG.

 

BEST WISHES

 

WEDS

---

From: Urvi Sukul Singh <usukulsingh@hotmail.com>
To: HumJanenge RTI India Right to Information Act 2005 <HumJanenge@googlegroups.com>; humjanenge@googlegroups.com; humjanenge@yahoogroups.co.in; rti4empowerment@googlegroups.com; rti4emp yahoo <rti4empowerment@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thu, 2 December, 2010 15:24:00
Subject: [rti4empowerment] Re: [HumJanenge] Re: "Judge Uncle Syndrome" in the High Courts


Mr Roy,
If you are considered a  high-end RTI activist,then I will gladly bid goodbye to the RTI groups.BTW,before you pass judgement,I would suggest you ask the people who are on the Group (and VERY REAL people,believe me,L because I have met or spoken telephonically to many of them) as to whether I contribute positively or not.
Hardcore doesn't imply licence to kill(with rude words) it implies a deep commitment ,and I think we will have to put to the vote whether your commitment is deeper than that of the  the next man/woman.
I have witnessed your personal attacks on this Group on people,with specific reference to Mr Rejimon.For a long period in the middle ,I did not come across your posts.You have,however,returned,and you are spewing venom most of the time,
I request the moderators of the Groups on which Mr Roy is a member,to take me off those Groups if I also figure in those lists.All except rti4empowerment@yahoogroups.com The rest of you,please carry on with your Group of high-enders!
Best of luck.
Urvi Sukul Singh
--------------------------------------------------
From: "sroy1947" <sroy1947@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 2:59 PM
To: "HumJanenge RTI India Right to Information Act 2005" <HumJanenge@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: "Judge Uncle Syndrome" in the High Courts

> Dear Ms Singh
>
> This is a group for hard=core RTI activists. Quite obviously ladies
> with weak constitutions are not up to digesting alot of what is posted
> to this group and most of which is quite frankly nausea inducing
> concerning the rampant corruption in the Info Commissions and the
> judiciary..
>
> I concur that a group like rti4empowerment@yahoogroups is the only
> group which will suit your delicate temperament. The moderator there
> is really scraping the bottom of the barrel if he permits posts from
> you and RSingh631 etc to his members (somebody else has already shown
> that half the member list over there is fake).
>
> PS: If you read the first post in this thread, you will find that it
> was not I who raised this issue/attack but the Law Commission of
> India.
>
> Sarbajit
>
> Urvi Sukul Singh wrote:
>> Mr Roy,
>> You suggest action against people making suggestions yet  your language and
>> the tenor of you mails is absolutely unbearable at times.Time someone took
>> action against you.Most of what one has read over the last few weeks is a
>> load of rubbish,with you a regular participant.
>> I have requested being taken off all groups other than
>> rti4empowerment@yahoogroups.Kindly comply.Otherwise,till I get the mails,if
>> I feel the need I will reply.
>> Urvi Sukul Singh
>> PS I find this attack on the judiciary very unseemly.
>