Re: [HumJanenge] CIC Habibullah's corrupt decision on Narmada Dam

i see you guys are having fun playing 20 questions with obnoxious sexist remarks. Play on dearies.

----- Original Message -----

From: Raminder Singh

To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com

Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 11:26 PM

Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] CIC Habibullah's corrupt decision on Narmada Dam

Dear Sarbjit

This is one pudding I'd like to eat
http://www.getsurrey.co.uk/news/s/2045333_postmistress_faces_74000_theft_charge"

"AN award-winning postmistress has appeared before magistrates accused of stealing more than £74,000 from the post office.
Seema Misra is charged with four counts of false accounting and one of theft by employee."

No wonder she  doesnt want to reveal who "she" (?) is,

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Seema Misra <seemamisra08@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Mr Chief Patron ,

The proof of the pudding is in the eating . None of your brilliant legal brains have shown their brillance . Only prejudice emerges.

We can play 20 questions on my identity . I am under no legal or moral obligation to inform you of whom I am.

Pertinent to note , that you obviously think the language used in the email was permissible.

Thanks for the suggestion on whateveryoumaycall talk . So far your website is much more entertaining.

S.Misra


----- Original Message ----- From: "sroy 1947" <sroy1947@gmail.com>
To: <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 8:55 PM

Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] CIC Habibullah's corrupt decision on Narmada Dam


Dear Ms Misra

As there are apparently quite a few "Seema Misra"'s in the RTI / NGO
space could you provide me some clues to better place you. (SNS ?,
Righttofood, Assoc4Advocacy ....)

In the phrase "condom of the NCPRI" due you take objection to my usage
of "condom", or "NCPRI" or both :-)

We have many ladies present, who alternate between reading me on
weekdays and visiting  the fiction section of www.astatalk.com on
weekends (try it - its much better than stardust - honestly).

I can solemnly assure you that we have some of the finest legal brains
of India on
this board (I am one of them), and before making sweeping
generalizations on hatred and human rights concerning them, please try
to be more specific.

Sarbajit
Chief Patron and Software Architect to this forum.

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Seema Misra <seemamisra08@gmail.com> wrote:

I am absolutely horrified with the language used in this email  network. - "
condom of the NCPRI" .

I was very happy that I began receiving email from this network ( though
unsolicitied )  , thinking i will get a wide variety of information on the
types of problems a cross section of people face related to RTI.

Obviously this network caters to a large section of disgruntled  men , with
minimal information on  law , and extreme hatred for anyone who raises of
human rights issues other than their human rights.

I will now treat this like I do stardust- at least they are honest .

Seema Misra


e-----

From: Anil Agrawal
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] CIC Habibullah's corrupt decision on Narmada Dam
Why are you agitated? Corruption is a way of life. Get up in the morning and
read a new scam. Who are involved? Right from Ministers to babus. They are
looting us. Adarsh scam, papers have been destroyed. What do you make of it?
Netas and babus are not only saving their skin they want to continue to
cling on to ill gotten flats in Adarsh. NOTHING WILL HAPPEN EITHER IN CWG,
2-G SCAM, ADARSH OR ANYTHING ELSE.
Anil

On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 3:53 PM, sroy 1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com> wrote:

http://humjanenge.org.in/forum/index.php/topic,7.0.html

Appeal No CIC/WB/C/2006/00066
Dated: 19/4/'06
Right to Information Act – Section 7(1)
Name of Applicant: Shri Shekhar Singh, Smt Aruna Roy & others
Name of Public Authority: Prime Minister's Office

Corrupt Chief Information Commission gives hearing within 48 hours to
email complaint of NCPRI big guns. Aruna Roy and Shekhar Singh had
filed a "life or liberty" RTI request to secure copy of a 3 ministers
report on SSP. They were already in possession of informal copies, but
Medha Patkar's advocate (another NCPRI big cheese) needed an "official
copy" to file in Supreme Court immediately.

On coming to know about this life or liberty request,  Prakash
Kardaley contacts me (being in Delhi) to immediately oppose disclosure
of this information to his NCPRI compatriots. I promptly email a "3rd
party" request to PMO, which is acknowledged and is transferred along
with NCPRI's request to Ministry of Water Resources. Along with NCPRI
I also receive a 3rd party notice for the CIC hearing. As per RTI Act
the CPIO cannot release information without intimating the 3rd party
and giving him opportunity to file appeals.

I and Veeresh Malik (another Hum Janenge moderator) reach the CIC
venue well in time. We find that neither Aruna Roy nor Shekhar Singh
are present, instead they have sent Arvind Kejriwal. The moment the
hearing commences, the CPIO of MoWR informs the CIC that as per
instructions of his Minister (Saifuddin Soz) he has just handed copies
of the controversial report (clearly marked as Confidential
/Top-Secret etc) to Ms Aruna Roy outside the hearing chamber so that
Prashant Bhushan can file the same in court the next day. I strongly
protest at this mockery of RTI Act / abuse of RTI process/ denial of
my 3rd party rights etc, but Habibullah and Ansari have been bought
off. The completely biased and corrupt order he delivers leaves no
doubt that he is a puppet.

The order has been deleted from the CIC website by Habibullah. Now
here is that order, attached so that the public of India can remember
what a corrupt person Mr Habibullah is, and how he used the CIC like a
condom for the NCPRI.