Friday, December 3, 2010

[HumJanenge] Re: Disappearing decisions on CIC website

Dear Gupta sahab

As Wajahat Sahab has specified on many occasion to this groups, this
world
is but a stage and we are all merely jesters on it.

Jesters, often being close to the subject, serve a vital 2 way
purpose, to
communicate unpalatable truths in a foolish way to a despot who would
otherwise lop one head off.

As head of the CIC, Mr Habibullah is ultimately responsible for all
purchases.
The real question is, what will the "first rate" inverter turn out to
be ?

If anyone thinks that I / this group shall leave Mr Habibullah's
successors
when they demit office for their sins they are sadly mistaken.

The topic of next ICs / CIC deserves a fresh thread.

Sarbajit

On Dec 3, 8:15 pm, "M.K. Gupta" <mkgupta...@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> Should v be so blunt to call an elderly gentleman by his bare name without
> prefixing some respectable word like Shri. I have many times listen Wajahat ji
> who is very courteous, cool and have patience with thecourtesy of Lucknowwalas
> like "Pahle Aap. This is really not our culture to tarnish the image of anybody
> without giving any proof of purported corruption. Can we call our father or
> other elder family members like this.
>
> I think Veeresh will not be elder than Shri Habibullah who has retired at the
> age of 65 after serving on responsible senior posts. R some person testing his
> patience before he send some defamation notice for the derogratory, contemptuous
> and defamatory remarks without even prima facie proof?
>
> WE ARE NOT REALLY SERVING THE CAUSE OF RTI BUT R INDLUGING IN THE GAME OF MUD
> SLINGING ON SOME PRE-DETERMINED TARGETS BUT AND SOME BODY IS BEHIND THIS GAME TO
> FURTHER HIS VESTED INTEREST OR TO SETTLE PAST SCORE. WHO IS GIVING FEED-BACK TO
> MR. SARABJIT ABOUT THE PAST HAPPENING AT THE CIC. WHETHER SOMEBODY FROM THE
> REGISTRY OF CIC HAVE EVER COMPLAINT OF INFERIOR INVERTORS AND WHETHER MR
> HABIBULLAH WAS PURCHASE OFFICER OR ORDERED FOR THE PURCHASE IF THE CHARGES ARE
> RELLAY TRUE.
> PL. REFRAIN FROM THIS GAIN AS LOT IS REQUIRED 2 B DONE IN THE FIELD OF RTI.
> WHISTLE BLOWER BILL, FRESH APPTT. OF ICs R PENDING. FRESH ICs SHOULD BE
> OF IMPEACABLE RECORD AND NOT LIKE THE PRESENT CHIEF OF CVC WHO IS ALREADY IN THE
> DOCK IN PALM OIL AND 2G SPRECTRUM CASES.
>
> ________________________________
> From: veeresh kumar <v4veer...@yahoo.com>
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Fri, 3 December, 2010 12:03:05 AM
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Disappearing decisions on CIC website
>
> Habibullah: "Certainly there are no orders to delete any decision from
> the website"
>
> Inspector Gregory (Scotland Yard detective): "Is there any other point
> to which you would wish to draw my attention?"
> Holmes: "To the curious incident of the dog in the night-time."
> Gregory: "The dog did nothing in the night-time."
> Holmes: "That was the curious incident."
>
> from "Silver Blaze (The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes)", by Arthur Conan Doyle
>

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.