I have my own experience with CIC. i attend UPSC civils mains examination in 2004. Results were out. But my name was not there in qualified list and not also in non-qualified list. I have written many letters to UPSC but no reply.During 2006 I asked reply from UPSC under RTI act. Initially they refused to give any reply. I appealed then they given reply saying that i was disqualified in general English paper and refused to give my marks and qualifying marks.I appealed to CIC. CIC not registered my case and sent back saying that'' you have to send it in proper format'' . Again i have sent in proper format as they suggested.But no response for 4 months. I have sent reminder letter. This time they(CIC) asked duplicate copy of my first request letter to UPSC.That I did not have .But I sent PIO reply letter and appealing authority letter .Still they have not registered my case. Once again I requested UPSC under RTI act to give duplicate copy of my initial request letter.I got reply that '' your letter was weeded out not available in this office'' There ends my story. I totally disillusioned I stopped preparing civil services.Later came to know that during initial days there was nexus between CIC and UPSC in suppressing the information and not registering any complaints against UPSC.Of course now things might have changed litter better. --- On Thu, 2/12/10, sroy 1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com> wrote:
|
Saturday, December 4, 2010
Re: [HumJanenge] The rot in CIC registry: Enquiry report scandals - Part 1
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.