Saturday, December 4, 2010

Re: [HumJanenge] The rot in CIC registry: Enquiry report scandals - Part 1

ek hi mail bar bar bhej na band karin

NISAR AHMAD KHAN
Azad Shiksha Kendra
Mohalla Sipah P.O. Sadar
Distt Jaunpur Uttar Pardes
INDIA 222001

--- On Sat, 4/12/10, yarap rao <yrprao@yahoo.co.in> wrote:

From: yarap rao <yrprao@yahoo.co.in>
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] The rot in CIC registry: Enquiry report scandals - Part 1
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Date: Saturday, 4 December, 2010, 10:55 AM

 
 
I have my own experience with CIC. i attend UPSC civils mains examination in 2004.
Results were out. But my name was not there in qualified list and not also in non-qualified list. I have written many letters to UPSC but no reply.During 2006 I asked reply from UPSC under RTI act. Initially they refused to give any reply. I appealed then they given reply saying that i was disqualified in general English paper and refused to give my marks and qualifying marks.I appealed to CIC.
 
                        CIC not registered my case and sent back saying that'' you have to send it in proper format'' . Again i have sent in proper format as they suggested.But no response for 4 months. I have sent reminder letter.
 
                              This time they(CIC) asked duplicate copy of my first request letter to UPSC.That I did not have .But I sent PIO reply letter and appealing authority letter .Still they have  not registered  my case.
 
                              Once again I requested UPSC under RTI act to give duplicate copy of my initial request letter.I got reply that '' your letter was weeded out not available in this office''
There ends my story.
 
       I totally disillusioned I stopped preparing civil services.Later  came to know that during initial days there was nexus between CIC and UPSC in suppressing the information and not  registering any complaints against UPSC.Of course now things might have changed litter better.
               
 
                
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


--- On Thu, 2/12/10, sroy 1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com> wrote:

From: sroy 1947 <sroy1947@gmail.com>
Subject: [HumJanenge] The rot in CIC registry: Enquiry report scandals - Part 1
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Date: Thursday, 2 December, 2010, 12:16 PM

As many of you know, the CIC has had to file an SLP in the SC
after Mr Habibullah took that corrupt decision to set up an enquiry
committee to go into all aspects of RTI servicing in the DDA.

To make sure that he got his cut, he even appointed his private
bagman to the Committee to ensure that the kickbacks
would reach him,

To expose how Mr Habibullah's little registry scam works, here
(attached) is an enquiry report conducted by Mr Tarun Kumar.

It clearly exposes how Delhi Police suppressed and destroyed
papers which had been sought for in RTI and had been ordered
to be given to the applicant. Since, this enquiry report has never
seen the light of day.I shall leave it to you gentle readers to
estimate how much money was received and by whom to
suppress it.

Perhaps Mr Habibullah can explain why enquiry reports like this
were never published on CIC website, or should we also ask
Tiwariji ?

Sarbajit


No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.