On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 12:20 PM, pavan nair <pavannair1@gmail.com> wrote:
It would be incorrect to directly convert the currency at market exchange rates. You need to use purchasing power parity or PPP rates which for India /US is done by a factor of 3. In other words the cost of the item is actually about Rs 80 which includes shipping which does not seem excessive.
It doesn't exactly include shipping. If you read the link, it is an add on item on purchases over $25 and gets added to the delivery for free - after you buy it.
Who needs a banana cutter anyway.
A matter of opinion. Have a toddler in the house, and banana slices (and the cutter) can be an interesting way to tempt the kid into eating a banana. God knows having a child means buying a lot of things regardless of "necessity". Also, for a family that eats a lot of fruit plates/salads/recipes... it can be a useful kitchen gadget. Technically you don't need to own more than one knife or pen. How many do you actually own?
The same mistake is made by most people while assessing the poverty line. The UNDP poverty line is $1.25 per capita per day. Most people assume that this is about Rs 60 per day which is incorrect. It is actually Rs 20 per day. So the planning Commission figure of Rs 26 per day in rural areas is actually an improvement on the UNDP poverty line.
This calculation does not compute. You are taking the UNDP poverty line and applying it to the US dollar parity. Well the US does not have a poverty line comparable with anything recognizable in your post. To my knowledge, the last known poverty line at $23,021 for a family of four, computes to about $15.7 a day. Which would be a brilliant idea for India even with parity factored in. Or wait, even half of that would be a brilliant idea
Col Pavan Nair
I have observed that starting with agreeing with a government stand and picking reasoning and figures to suit usually leads to logical fallacies, because the government is illogical. Our poverty line is unsustainable. People living at twice our poverty line are just as likely to die of hunger. It is simply a game to decrease visible numbers and the culpability of misgovernance.
Just saying.
V
--
Vidyut Kale
Vidyut Kale
Twitter: @Vidyut
Diaspora: vidyut@ilikefreedom.org
Facebook: http://facenook.com/theVidyut
Phone: Allergic
Telephone: Forget it.
Mobile phone: Forgot
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.