Wednesday, December 19, 2012

[IAC++] Judicial Accountability towards We the People is the desperate need of the hour for Common Man to get justice that has been denied..

Dear All,

"8 of 16 CJIs Corrupt" case undecided by Supreme Court for years together reflect Judicial Corruption.

Rather, I call it a judicial barbarism or even judicial goondaism.

Judicial Accountability towards We the People is the desperate need of the hour for Common Man to get justice that is denied..

We the People must have our say in the selection, appointment, transfers, promotions and removal of the Judges, including those at HCs & SC, for the democracy to flourish which has remained so far on paper. 

Rather, it is the Mobocracy that is dominating now. 

Regards,

-- 
(Babubhai Vaghela)
C 202, Shrinandnagar V, Makarba Road Vejalpur, 
(Administrator - Google Group - Right to Information Act 2005)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Babubhai Vaghela <vaghelabd@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 1:09 PM
Subject: FORMER JUDGES SHOULD NOT ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE COURTS BY THEIR TILTED LEGAL OPINIONS - They will get discouraged once "8 of 16 CJIs Corrupt" case decided..
To: right-to-information-act-2005 <Right-to-Information-Act-2005@googlegroups.com>
Cc: feedback2chairman@iocl.co.in, info@ictj.org, kenyainfo@ictj.org, geneva@ictj.org, capetown@ictj.org, brussels@ictj.org, Bar Council of India <info@barcouncilofindia.org>, allindiabarassociation@gmail.com, ica@ficci.com, Prashant Bhushan <prashantbhush@gmail.com>, Chief Secretary to GoG Gandhinagar <csguj@gujarat.gov.in>, "Shri Alok Rawat Secretary (Coord & PG) PG PMO" <secypg@nic.in>, Cabinet Secretary to Government of India <cabinetsy@nic.in>, Chairperson NHRC <chairnhrc@nic.in>, riseindiarise@googlegroups.com, Vaghela B D <vaghelabd@yahoo.com>, Rahul Gandhi INC <office@rahulgandhi.in>, dch@nic.in, fm@finance.nic.in, hm@nic.in, hrm@sb.nic.in, ritasharma.secy@nac.nic.in, dhiraj.s@nac.nic.in, office.nac@nac.nic.in, k.raju@nac.nic.in, ms.swaminathan@nac.nic.in, swami.ms@sansad.nic.in, narendra.jadhav@nac.nic.in, pramod.tandon@nac.nic.in, jean.dreze@nac.nic.in, aruna.roy@nac.nic.in, madhav.gadgil@gmail.com, deep.joshi@nac.nic.in, anu.aga@nac.nic.in, farah.n@nac.nic.in, mirai.c@nac.nic.in, anandsharma@sansad.nic.in, tipu_in@yahoo.com, vmoily@kar.nic.in, office@tharoor.in, bjpco@bjp.org, CVC <cvc@nic.in>, Director CBI <dcbi@cbi.gov.in>, Delhi High Court <delhihighcourt@nic.in>, Help Gujarat High Court <rg-hc-guj@nic.in>, Registrar General Bombay High Court <rg-bhc@nic.in>, High Court Jaipur <hcjaipur-rj@nic.in>, High Court Jodhpur <hc-rj@nic.in>, Registrar General Madras High Court <hcourt@tn.nic.in>, official liquidator <hc-asm@nic.in>, highcourt.or@nic.in, High Court of Karnataka <shhcourt@kar.nic.in>, highcourt@hry.nic.in, Help Supreme Court <supremecourt@nic.in>, Meira Kumar Speaker Lok Sabha Parliament <speakerloksabha@sansad.nic.in>, Hon'ble Vice President of India <vpindia@sansad.nic.in>, Smt Pratibha Patil President of India <presidentofindia@rb.nic.in>


Sir,

In my openion, They will get discouraged from this type of activity as also working as Mouthpieces of vested interest once the inordinately delayed "8 of 16 former CJIs Corrupt" case is decided with the names of ex CJIs (reportedly lying with Supreme Court) are made public.

References : 

8 of 16 former Chief Justice of India corrupt: Former Law minister



Mr Prashant Bhushan approached SC for investigation for other former CJI that is reportedly not included in the list of those 8 former CJIs.

Plea filed in SC against former CJI K G Balakrishnan

 

Regards,

-- 
(Babubhai Vaghela)
C 202, Shrinandnagar V, Makarba Road Vejalpur, Ahmedabad - 380051
M -  94276 08632
http://twitter.com/BabubhaiVaghela
About me in Annexure at - http://bit.ly/9xsHFj
http://www.youtube.com/user/vaghelabd
(Administrator - Google Group - Right to Information Act 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/Right-to-Information-Act-2005/about?hl=en


FORMER JUDGES SHOULD NOT ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE  COURTS  BY THEIR TILTED LEGAL OPINIONS

 

Chief Justice of India SH Kapadia rightly spurned the written legal opinions of former Supreme Court Chief Justices that were submitted along with at petition filed. The tendency of these retired judges in trying to influence the merits of a case by their legal opinion needs to be strongly deprecated. Such opinions obtained obviously at a price cannot be used to influence courts. These retired judges should maintain the decorum and sanctity of the positions they held.  

 

In Goa we recently had the case where two former Supreme Court judges Justice B.N.Srikrishna and Justice S.N.Variava gave their legal opinion in defence of an advocate who is accused of having cheated the State exchequer to the tune of five lakhs by fraudulently billing for hearings he never appeared in Court. In that much skewed opinion these two retired Supreme Court judges opined that "per appearance" did not have to necessarily mean appearance in Court and could be appearance anywhere in Goa. One of these judges even tried to make direct contact with the Law department to hush up the cheating case against that Advocate who is a Mumbai based Senior Counsel and also appears before the Supreme Court. The Judiciary seems to be sinking to a very new low.   

 
Aires Rodrigues
T1 - B30, Ribandar Retreat
Ribandar - Goa - 403006
Mobile: 9822684372

Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)