Re: [HumJanenge] Re: BOMBAY BLASTS !!!

Ya, like the government which decides what information is to be given and what not (based on the good internal interest). Or like having a GOVT. BABU attitude, "take this or leave, but I wont think about your problem/view a bit"

Also instead of insisting that I leave the group, why can't people like you understand that there are other people who also have to communicate their views to people like me who are not the lawyers or highly intelligent circus ring masters.

As far as I know, my view was published though late, after exercising my "(notional) rights to free speech on this group" 

Also may I know who decides what is madness of the crowd or the wisdom of the crowd? As this if decided by a person, has individual view and has a biased outcome.

My simple request is/was/will be only that please when you are allowing the views of a typical view, then allow all the different type of views of the same topic to be discussed. Do not block other or radically different views.

I have been moderating some other groups, I also understand the problem, but I never have interfered with those views which are opposite to mine. (Though I block the spam.)

  As these different views are the real essence of the crowd's knowledge. which people may decide for wisdom or madness.  

I would like to stop this thread as you are a lawyer and you will continue the replying with sentences more words and less meanings and a custom made " If you disagree with even a single one of these points you are free to
leave this facility. ."

Regards,

Mr. Hemant Kshirsagar

On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 9:51 AM, sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Hemant

1) People are on this group to get benefit of collective wisdom (ie.
"wisdom of crowds" aka "madness of crowds").

2) The moderators are only ringmasters in this circus, occasionally
cracking their whip (censorship) and exerting their moral authority
for the BENEFIT of the group as a whole.

3) If all 4,000 members insisted on simultaneously exercising their
(notional) rights to free speech on this group (like you have) there
would be chaos.

4) The PRIME FOCUS at this group is a balanced flow of emails to
further the RIGHT TO INFORMATION (RTI) of our members as RESPONSIBLE
CITIZENS. The rules / guidelines for this group are very well known
and publicised.

If you disagree with even a single one of these points you are free to
leave this facility.

Sarbajit.

On Jul 16, 7:48 am, "Mr. Hemant Kshirsagar"

<hemantkshirsaga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Your communication is same as dictatorship "with your absolute right"and you
> are becoming the same as what you/we/group are fighting against.
>
> Regards,
> Hemant Kshirsagar
>