Thursday, July 14, 2011

Re: [HumJanenge] delay in courts

Dear Major,
 
                    You may like to read my article on eliminating corruption. See attachment.
  How about working towards implementing this idea?
 
                                                            Israel Jayakraan, Colonel (Retd), signals, Chennai.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 7:23 AM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] delay in courts

Gentlemen,
The problem in India is the corruption at all levels. Judges are not bothered for "aam aadmi" or the country? Judges are busy either pleasing their political boses or putting all efforts for cases involving rich and famous or planning their own/family's concerns.

What we need to do is talk less and act more. Plan an organization of like minded people at grass root level in all cities/villages with an agenda to improve/safeguard democracy, use RTI act to help "aam aadmi", create awareness through media if any thing wrong happens to aam aadmi, make local authorities/MLA/MP accountable to public, review every quarter the progress of the local area vs promises made by the politicians etc etc.
A major movement is required on the lines of satya grah of Gandhi times. We need to have another freedom struggle from these rascals.

Good luck,
Major Gurjeet
From: capt beniwal <trident142@yahoo.co.in>
Sender: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 07:11:27 +0530 (IST)
To: <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
ReplyTo: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] delay in courts

Even supreme court judges do what you have said. Many of them are Law to themselves and DO NOT  give any reason as to under whic law the case is decided. 

--- On Fri, 15/7/11, Vijay Kapoor <vijay99kapoor@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Vijay Kapoor <vijay99kapoor@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] delay in courts
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Date: Friday, 15 July, 2011, 5:14 AM

There are still other (Shocking) reasons for delays in courts.  Yes, it is the "honble" "judges" themselves.
I have limited but sad direct experience of courts and "judges."  Most of the "judges" themselseves go against the law.  For instance, the Consumer Protection Act suggests that a non-complicated case should be disposed off in about 5 months, and that ordinarily no adjournment should be allowed, and if any is allowed, the reasons should be recorded in writing and costs of at least Rs. 500 should be awarded. However, most cases drag on for years, because the "judges" allow multiple adjournments on the flimsiest of grounds, without recording reasons in writing, and without allowing costs contrary to law. 
 
Again, the "judges" are completely into endless proccedure as opposed to substance.  For instance, every applications gets a new date.  Why?
Why cannot, for instance, a judge order that in the event the application is allowed, there will be a commission at 12.30 pm on the next date, but if the application is not allowed, the matter is set for final arguements on the next date.  Such thinking would reduce a number of unnecessary "dates."
 
Yet again, it is settled law that orders must be reasoned orders and lower courts cannot supersede those of SC, but "judges" routinely flount such common sense.  As a matter of fact, I find, as a general rule, that the higher the courts, the more arrogant are the "judges."
 
Finally, it is high time the "judges" wake up to reality and stop the insulting practice of awarding paltry costs of Rs. 500 or 1000 in matters that took several years and probably cost 50,000 or even a few lacs.  Why should the errant be rewarded and the complainant punished with costs of only 1000?  And why do the courts not give adequate compensation and or exemplary damages where the matter was dragged on for years and where the losing party wilfully broke laws of the land? 
 
I think if the courts were more prompt and gave out proper costs and damages, the errant would shape up for fear of large damages.
 
Therefore, the "judges" first need to be properly trained in order to make for quicker and better justice.  But to be fair to them, the number of judeges need to be increased several-fold as opined by Law Commission several decades ago (!) so that no judge at the lower level has more than 10 matters and at the higher level has more than 5 matters listed before him on any day.  And of course, the courts need proper infrastructure so the the judes work in an envoirnment conducive to such work. 
 
Victor


--- On Thu, 7/14/11, bail gk <bailgk@gmail.com> wrote:

From: bail gk <bailgk@gmail.com>
Subject: [HumJanenge] delay in courts
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Date: Thursday, July 14, 2011, 2:48 AM

Hello friends
I am impressed by the contributions now being recieved by you, where
causes for delays have been pointed out. I would like to add a couple
more.
a. All laws in India need immediate revision to create proper
environment for speedy justice. We know that many are more than a
hundred years old
b' Why are the courts closed in summer? Was this practice not
introduced so that white skinned honourable judges who couldnot bear
the heat of colonial India and could rush to hills - all at tax payers
money. . This is still continued to cool the heads of our desi judges
after giving umteen adjournments causing delay in deciding cases.
c. Are not the MPs responsible for drafting and ensuring passing of
revised laws.Why doesnot the civil society gherao all MPs who walk out
almost every day on flimsiest reasons. We" intelligencia' should make
effective noices to drive some sense to our elected representatives
particularly in the last forty years. Let us  keep the issue burning
till we get good justice with out delays Brig Bail
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)