Re: [HumJanenge] CVC to resign and be appointed as CIC

Dear Gupta

What you perhaps don't know is that all those people who were ORGANISING
the screaming and shouting about transparent appointments have already
made their deals concerning CIC/IC appointments.

These jackals are like the so-called third front, completely hollow inside,
and just dependent on fixing, blackmail and patronage to survive. You can
be assured that the next Central Commission is going to be a completely
corrupt and biased one (although it will seem very good from the outside).

As list moderators we use many methods to identify and control both the
quantity and quality of emails posted to the members. In the present case
it was amusing to see how many gullible people there are on the group
who post messages for no rhyme or reason.

Sarbajit

On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 1:23 PM, M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
>
> Dear Sarab,
>
> Why r u feeling the punch? The persons who were screaming loudly about
> transparency in appointments are very much here and what is wrong in their
> screaming for that? Don't u agree that the appointments to
> Commissions should be transparent with competent and independent
> incumbents?
> To inendify the so called disruptive elements by trick, such doubtful /
> baseless questions should not be put on the blog as they confuse the members
> and send wrong message.
> ________________________________
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Sun, 5 December, 2010 12:14:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] CVC to resign and be appointed as CIC
>
> Dear Abhimanyu and list
>
> 1) I do not divulge my sources
>
> 2) Sometimes group owners/moderators have to identify disruptive
> elements by trick questions such as these.
>
> 3) Have you ever wondered why the RTI activist scene is so quiet now
> about appointment on next CCIC and ICs. Think about it. Where are all
> those people who were screaming loudly about transparency in
> appointments ?
>
> Sarbajit