Dear Sarabjit,
Greetings.
Like you, I am not politically affiliated to any party and do support persons or parties based on issues or merits, from time to time.
While attempting never to forget judicial activism and media hype in case of NaMo for post Godhra Rajdharm, I feel obliged, without any political bias and purely advocating Rajdharm of Governments in power in state or center, the following is the worst ever example of forgotten Rajdharm by Government and duty by media:
Date: 22 May 1987.
State Chief Minister: Vir Bahadur Singh, INC
Prime Minister: Rajiv Gandhi, INC
Killed: 42 persons allegedly by PAC-state.
Inquiry Commissions: *Sachar & IK Gujarat -Report dated: 23/06/1987.
State Inquiry: In 1988, (After 1 Year) the Government of In 1988, the Government of Uttar Pradesh ordered an inquiry by the Crime Branch Central Investigation Department (CBCID) of Uttar Pradesh Police. The three-member official investigation team headed by former auditor general Gian Prakash submitted its report in 1994,[13] though it wasn't made public till 1995, when victims moved the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court.
Judicial Result: After the inquiry, chargesheet was filed with the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM), Ghaziabad in 1996 under Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), who subsequently issued warrants to the accused policemen to appear before the court. Bailable warrants were issued 23 times against them between 1994 and 2000, yet none of them appeared in court. This was followed by non-bailable warrants which were issued 17 times between April 1998 and April 2000, to no avail. Eventually, under public pressure, 16 of the accused surrendered before the Ghaziabad court in 2000, and were subsequently released on bail and were back in service.
Short Narration:
Hashimpura massacre took place on 22 May 1987, during the Hindu-Muslim riots in Meerut city in Uttar Pradesh state, India, when 19 personnel of the Provincial Armed Constabulary (PAC) allegedly rounded up 42 Muslim youth from the Hashimpura mohalla (locality) of the city, took them in truck to the outskirts, near Murad Nagar, in Ghaziabad district, where they were shot and their bodies were dumped in water canals. A few days later dead bodies were found floating in the canals. In May 2000, 16 of the 19 accused surrendered, and were later released on bail, while 3 were already dead. The trial of the case was transferred by the Supreme Court of India in 2002 from Ghaziabad to a Sessions Court at the Tis Hazari complex in Delhi,[1][2] where it is the oldest pending case.[3]
On 24 May 2007, twenty years after the incident, two survivors and members of 36 victim families visited Lucknow and filed 615 applications under The Right to Information Act 2005(RTI), at the office of Director General of Police seeking information about the case.[4] The inquiry revealed in September that all accused remained in service, and none had any mention of the incident in their Annual Confidential Report (ACR)s.[5] Five men who were shot and survived, later became witness for the prosecution case in 2007. These include Muzib-ur-Rehman, Mohamad Usman, Zulfiqar Nasir, and Naeem Arif.[6]
Gujarat performed much better but Indian Intelligentsia is always criminally bias in concealing misdid (Lapse in Rajdharma) of one particular party while hammering and subjecting citizens with continuous bombardment against vicarious (Not Real or Legal) liability of opponent Party.
Hope I have made my example very clear with the aforesaid citation.
best regards,
-Joshi NM
On 6 April 2013 17:07, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Naishadh
The problem with data is that it can be interpreted in different ways.This proves that NaMO is either a SOFT leader or that he actively encouraged the massacre of Muslims in 2002.
"Modi Govt. never imposed curfew in his rule. Difference is clear like Day-Nite."
Why did the Gujarat riots go on for 2+ months ? Even the 1984 Sikh riots were over in under a week. In Delhi it was over in 4 days the moment they imposed curfew (despite not having a PM) and calling in the Army
In the 1983 Nellie (Assam) massacres where you did your comparison, it was over in 6 hours, so what could the Congis have done in a remote district in a State which has always been under the paramilitary forces like Assam Rifles and where the Hindu-Muslim ratio is far different from Gujarat being 50:50 or worse.
The fact of the matter is that Modi may be very good at allowing Gujaratis to make money, but when it comes to INDIA he has no track record of performance (where the only like person he scores over on this account is Raul Vinci who is a big ZERO).
Also, I hope you notice that BJP's vote share in Gujarat has been continually slipping since 2002 and Congress is picking up more and more Muslim votes there.
Sarbajit
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Joshi NM <naishadhjoshi@gmail.com> wrote:Maj. Gen. (Retd) Deepak Malhotra has made valuable data available. I thank him for a very useful tabulated data compilation.
Analysis and conclusion is apparent and obvious.Compilation was focused on the ability of state to prevent riots and perform RAJDHARM. Focus was on ruler not on ruled.Sarabjit is way off the mark this time in his comments in reply to Dear Maj. Gen. (Retd) Deepak Malhotra.About Gujarat riots in congress rule, you may have to keep in mind state actors renting-sponsoring random killings on both sides by contract killers. Public in general would be rioting against state-police; reeling under month-long curfews. Abdul Latif-Rasul Party etc. were the examples during Madhavsinh Solanki - Chiman Patel etc. rule.Modi Govt. never imposed curfew in his rule. Difference is clear like Day-Nite.Best regards,--On 6 April 2013 14:20, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:Dear Maj. Gen. (Retd) Deepak Malhotra,
1) Out if the 21 state level incidents you have listed,4 have
taken place in Gujarat. (ie. about 25%)
2) This is surely very high and arouses concern that Gujaratis
are a homicidal race of people and/or easily instigated.
3) Why are there no riots in the neighbouring state of Rajasthan
which equally shares the same borders including with Pakistan?
4) In each and every riot in Gujarat the aggressors were
overwhelmingly the Hindus and the victims the Muslims.
5) So what happened in Gujarat's riots are clear evidence that
Gujaratis in power/politics are damaging to the national fabric.
Mohandas Gandhi being one such and Narendra Modi another.
The entire Partition riots 5 million persons dead or injured was
caused by 1 Gujarati (Gandhi).
6) Can India allow another Gujarati (NaMo) to control India's
destiny ? Your own facts and figures say NO !!.
SarbajitOn Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Deepak Malhotra <deepakmalho11@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
Forget Gujarat: Look at the Congress RecordLet us set the record straight once and for all. Those Secularists who call Narendra Modi a murderer can judge for themselves from the Table below.
- Nowhere in the world has one party (Indian National Congress) presided over the murder of so many citizens.
- No Congress Minister / Politician has ever been booked. Only promoted.
- Do you want to hand over this Country to them again?
- Please think ?
List of MAJOR Riots / Incidents since 1947(More than 50 dead)
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Best Regards,
-Joshi NM
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Best Regards,
-Joshi NM
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.